-----Original Message-----
From: Cyndustries [mailto:cynthia.webster@gte.net]
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 11:54 AM
To: The_Cyndustries_List@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [The_Cyndustries_List] MOTM-style Sawtooth Animator
Howdy!
Yes, that is supposed to say VC Fat, I
just took a pencil to the ?G? and turned
it into a ?C?, And yes those naughty
silkscreen people printed them all a little
too high, well, at least they got the
mounting holes too narrow, yikes, These
are the very same ?professionals? doing
the Motm panels, (good Luck Paul!)
Cynthia
From: The_Cyndustries_List@yahoogroups.com [mailto:The_Cyndustries_List@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Tkacs, Ken
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 7:56 AM
To: The_Cyndustries_List@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [The_Cyndustries_List] MOTM-style Sawtooth AnimatorSorry if this had been asked before? I just received my MOTM-style Sawtooth Animator (thanks!). The first thing I noticed was the name of the second knob -- "VG FAT." Is that a typo? Is that supposed to be "VC FAT," or am I misunderstanding something??
It also looks like the silk-screening on the panel is about 3/16" too "high," with the word "FAT" at the top very nearly going off the top edge of the module, and all the jack labels being much closer to the jacks above them rather than to the ones they apply to, underneath.
Message
Re: [The_Cyndustries_List] MOTM-style Sawtooth Animator
2008-05-19 by gjames@kddlab.com
My 2 have the same issues. For $300 a pop, this is unacceptable. The panel supplier should make good on their work or not get paid. I would certainly hope that Paul will not let this kind of sloppyness out the door.
Another observation: there's an awful lot of point-to-point re-work on my boards. Nicely done, but nevertheless begs the question of how thoroughly the PCB was prototyped.
The SAs are in complete contrast to the ZOs, which I consider Cadillacs.