Yahoo Groups archive

SergeModular

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:13 UTC

Thread

greetings serge users/a request for opinions

greetings serge users/a request for opinions

2001-05-30 by kursk1@earthlink.net

hello
my name is Bill. This summer I'm gonna invest in a modular
system and I would very much appreciate your opinions on
choosing a system. The choices (I've narrowed them down to)
are MOTM, Wiard , and Serge. I'm on the ground floor as far as
modulars go but I still want to invest in a system that I hope to
appreciate and explore for many years. Otherwise I would
choose the Evenfall minimodular and grow from there. MOTM
has a reputation for high quality but seems a bit conservative in
design. Still it ranks as a good choice for building up a modular
foundation and would integrate well with my moogerfoogers
(1/4" plugs/all CV). Wiard seems fabulous but perhaps difficult to
bite into for a novice. Grant Richter, the system's designer,
explained that he usually sells his systems to people who
already own multiple systems and also have the expertise to
"understand" how the Wiard works. He doesn't say this to
discourage me from being interested in the Wiard but only to be
honest and to help me make better decisions. The Wiard system
and the MOTM (for a well-rounded small modular setup) cost
around $3500 give or take. My top choice currently is Serge and I
was considering the ANIMAL panel and the TKB to
control/sequence it. The ANIMAL looks powerful but I'm
wondering if the DTG will provide enough envelope
sophistication to make the music I do (ambient
landscape/space -- with a sonically strange and unsettling event
here and there). Also will the SSG(+noise) and the wave mult
modules provide the hoped for randomness and timbral
inspiration? Will the ANIMAL do it for me? ANIMAL+TKB =$4500.
Should I consider a funstation? My god the cost! ahh but the
possibilities sonically speaking (the Blue funstation --blue voice
panel+a control panel(which one?) + TKB = $7550ouch I mean
ahhhh).
enough questions. I look forward to your responses and
assistance
Thanks
Bill

Re: greetings serge users/a request for opinions

2001-05-30 by Matt Wilson

kursk1@... wrote:

hello
my name is Bill.
you're supposed to say "my name is bill and i'm a synthaholic" ;^)....welcome to the list!
This summer I'm gonna invest in a modular
system and I would very much appreciate your opinions on
choosing a system. The choices (I've narrowed them down to)
are MOTM, Wiard , and Serge. I'm on the ground floor as far as
modulars go but I still want to invest in a system that I hope to
appreciate and explore for many years. Otherwise I would
choose the Evenfall minimodular and grow from there. MOTM
has a reputation for high quality but seems a bit conservative in
design. Still it ranks as a good choice for building up a modular
foundation and would integrate well with my moogerfoogers
(1/4" plugs/all CV).
at the outset, let me say that i find plug size to be a minor attractions/detractions to a system's ergonomics,
*unless* we're talking about bananas, in which case i'd say that particular format is superior to all others and
therefore provides an incentive to purchase that particular system.
as most everyone on the list will agree, bananas eliminate, for the most part, the need for multiples, their
insertion count will far outlast any coax cable, their lifetime integrity is longer (partially due to the lack of any
soldering/welding because they are monoaxial), they come in cool colors, and are relatively cheap. also, adapters
are a fact of life with modulars so start soldering!
Wiard seems fabulous but perhaps difficult to
bite into for a novice. Grant Richter, the system's designer,
explained that he usually sells his systems to people who
already own multiple systems and also have the expertise to
"understand" how the Wiard works. He doesn't say this to
discourage me from being interested in the Wiard but only to be
honest and to help me make better decisions. The Wiard system
and the MOTM (for a well-rounded small modular setup) cost
around $3500 give or take. My top choice currently is Serge and I
was considering the ANIMAL panel and the TKB to
control/sequence it. The ANIMAL looks powerful but I'm
wondering if the DTG will provide enough envelope
sophistication to make the music I do (ambient
landscape/space -- with a sonically strange and unsettling event
here and there).
sounds cool. i own a seven panel system with only a single ADSR and need more; the DTG, or DSG for that
matter,defintely does not operate, for all intents and purposes, as a "standard" envelope, but for your purposes (drones,
etc) the DTG/DSG would work fine. i have in fact built the PAIA 9710 Env. for use with my system because, as you
know, you don't simply order a module from STS when ya need one.
Also will the SSG(+noise) and the wave mult
modules provide the hoped for randomness and timbral
inspiration?
absolutely.
Will the ANIMAL do it for me? ANIMAL+TKB =$4500.
Should I consider a funstation? My god the cost! ahh but the
possibilities sonically speaking (the Blue funstation --blue voice
panel+a control panel(which one?) + TKB = $7550ouch I mean
ahhhh).
enough questions. I look forward to your responses and
assistance
bill: i took the plunge and bought the red fun station several years ago. i've never looked back. i therefore
came into the game (after years on two ARP 2600s) with a well specified system and experience on the ARPs.
you seem to be in the same boat as listmember toby schultz was about a year or so back; perhaps he can share with
us the decision making process utilized in purchasing his first modular from serge (an animal) and whether he's
lining up more panels. toby?

and keep in mind: unless the shop panels are built and ready to go (in which case you're paying up front with imminet
delivery), you will be paying 50% upfront with a god-knows-how-long lead time of probably 2-3 months; in other words,
you've got a fair amount of time to put your affairs in order before owing rex the balance.

hope this helps. and obviously bill, when you're asking this type of list what modular they recommend, what do expect
to hear?!!! ; )

matt

--
MATT WILSON, ATTORNEY @ LAW
phone: 619 234-2200
fax: 619 234-2219
email: mbwlaw@...
website: http://www.mattwilsonlaw.com

Re: greetings serge users/a request for opinions.I.M.O

2001-05-30 by sonic@sonicboomuk.fsnet.co.uk

--- In SergeModular@y..., kursk1@e... wrote:

Bill
you seem pretty smart in your choices already !
see below



> hello
> my name is Bill. This summer I'm gonna invest in a modular
> system and I would very much appreciate your opinions on
> choosing a system. The choices (I've narrowed them down to)
> are MOTM, Wiard , and Serge. I'm on the ground floor as far as
> modulars go but I still want to invest in a system that I hope to
> appreciate and explore for many years. Otherwise I would
> choose the Evenfall minimodular and grow from there. MOTM
> has a reputation for high quality but seems a bit conservative in
> design. Still it ranks as a good choice for building up a modular
> foundation and would integrate well with my moogerfoogers
> (1/4" plugs/all CV). Wiard seems fabulous but perhaps difficult to
> bite into for a novice. Grant Richter, the system's designer,
> explained that he usually sells his systems to people who
> already own multiple systems and also have the expertise to
> "understand" how the Wiard works.



I dont think that is totally fair on himself or the Wiard .
certainly the serge & the wiard are flexible & endless in
possibilities (according to money & imagination) . Both systems are
complex , but I had no problem doing 2 shows , 1 with Tortoise , 1 as
EAR the day my Serge arrived . The catalogue , common sense & basics
of knowledge will have you in atleast at a cool level straight away .
Plus you'll only get more & more from these systems . One thing I'd
say for Serge is the massive range of modules . The Wiard is very
cool too , but Serge has the undeniable edge . I.M.O. , lots of the
Wiard ideas are very Buchla > Serge > lineage.




He doesn't say this to
> discourage me from being interested in the Wiard but only to be
> honest and to help me make better decisions. The Wiard system
> and the MOTM (for a well-rounded small modular setup) cost
> around $3500 give or take. My top choice currently is Serge and I
> was considering the ANIMAL panel and the TKB to
> control/sequence it. The ANIMAL looks powerful but I'm
> wondering if the DTG will provide enough envelope
> sophistication to make the music I do (ambient
> landscape/space -- with a sonically strange and unsettling event
> here and there).

You cant have too many modulation sources with the Serge .I would
think the 70 min. cycle available from the uni slope gens. would be
very usefull in soundscape /ambient work ?


Also will the SSG(+noise) and the wave mult
> modules provide the hoped for randomness and timbral
> inspiration?


you better believe it......I cannot think of a better system still
made for randomness & timbral flexibility.



Will the ANIMAL do it for me? ANIMAL+TKB =$4500.
> Should I consider a funstation? My god the cost! ahh but the
> possibilities sonically speaking (the Blue funstation --blue voice
> panel+a control panel(which one?) + TKB = $7550ouch I mean
> ahhhh).
> enough questions. I look forward to your responses and
> assistance


I must admit , I found a totally custom panel(s) layout the only
real option initially . (my opinion , just in case....).The
various "predone" panels will suit some aims better than others . I
see them as a great expander to a custom system /panels . I'm sure
though that they suit many folx to a tee .
You seem to know instinctively which are the better of these
systems . I envy you lucky soul buying & discovering these joys .
what ecstacy......
good luck p.k.
p.s. modcan do some Serge like stuff & other nice looking modules ,
not quite in Serges league as far as choice , and I dont know how it
is to use , but I guess it's an option ?

> Thanks
> Bill

Re: greetings serge users/a request for opinions

2001-05-31 by alt-mode

Hi Bill,

You certainly have done some good research. I'm probably going to get kicked off
this list for saying this, but I wouldn't recommend a Serge or Wiard as your first
modular. I would recommend MOTM for several reasons:

- The system can grow with you at a lower cost and in smaller chunks.
- While the functions are perhaps more basic, sometimes the restrictions can help
you learn more. You can find all sorts of wierd things with just a few oscillators
and EGs; add some filters and a ringmod and you've got lots to explore. The MOTM
stuff has a few surprises too, the suboctave mux can inspire some crazy stuff along
with the VC router. Don't overlook these seemingly simple modules!
- While the modulation possibilities of the Serge are far greater, I personally
think the MOTM filters sound better. I frequently patch my Serge into my MOTM
filters. It depends on what you are going after musically, is the filter more
important than the modulation wierdness? - a question of personal taste.

Any of the choices you have listed will give you a high quality system and will last
many years. As has been mentioned, the interfacing is an easily solved problem. If
space is a big issue, the Serge and Wiard systems are more compact than MOTM but
usually you manage to find room to house your stuff if your additiction is strong
enough.

I would start with MOTM and when your addiction is too great and your bank account
is capable, spring for some Serge panels to create a hybrid system. That's kinda
what happened to me ;)

Eric
Show quoted textHide quoted text

--- kursk1@... wrote:
> hello
> my name is Bill. This summer I'm gonna invest in a modular
> system and I would very much appreciate your opinions on
> choosing a system. The choices (I've narrowed them down to)
> are MOTM, Wiard , and Serge. I'm on the ground floor as far as
> modulars go but I still want to invest in a system that I hope to
> appreciate and explore for many years. Otherwise I would
> choose the Evenfall minimodular and grow from there. MOTM
> has a reputation for high quality but seems a bit conservative in
> design. Still it ranks as a good choice for building up a modular
> foundation and would integrate well with my moogerfoogers
> (1/4" plugs/all CV). Wiard seems fabulous but perhaps difficult to
> bite into for a novice. Grant Richter, the system's designer,
> explained that he usually sells his systems to people who
> already own multiple systems and also have the expertise to
> "understand" how the Wiard works. He doesn't say this to
> discourage me from being interested in the Wiard but only to be
> honest and to help me make better decisions. The Wiard system
> and the MOTM (for a well-rounded small modular setup) cost
> around $3500 give or take. My top choice currently is Serge and I
> was considering the ANIMAL panel and the TKB to
> control/sequence it. The ANIMAL looks powerful but I'm
> wondering if the DTG will provide enough envelope
> sophistication to make the music I do (ambient
> landscape/space -- with a sonically strange and unsettling event
> here and there). Also will the SSG(+noise) and the wave mult
> modules provide the hoped for randomness and timbral
> inspiration? Will the ANIMAL do it for me? ANIMAL+TKB =$4500.
> Should I consider a funstation? My god the cost! ahh but the
> possibilities sonically speaking (the Blue funstation --blue voice
> panel+a control panel(which one?) + TKB = $7550ouch I mean
> ahhhh).
> enough questions. I look forward to your responses and
> assistance
> Thanks
> Bill
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> SergeModular-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Keep on Patchin'!
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

Re: greetings serge users/a request for opinions

2001-05-31 by Microtonal

This summer I'm gonna invest in a modular
system and I would very much appreciate your opinions on
choosing a system. The choices (I've narrowed them down to)
are MOTM, Wiard , and Serge. I'm on the ground floor as far as
modulars go but I still want to invest in a system that I hope to
appreciate and explore for many years.
I believe you could be happy with any of these systems. The exciting thing about MOTM and Wiard is that these systems are still evolving and you can see what new modules are added to the lineups over time. The frustration is waiting to see what new modules are added! It may be some years before MOTM or Wiard have phasers, frequency shifters, variable slope filters, VC Dividers or boolean logic modules available. Serge, on the other hand, has the most complete line available NOW in my opinion. The line of modules has not changed too much since the early 1980s but certainly some useful functions such as the Pulse Divider and Boolean Logic module have been added by Rex.
Remember, you don't need to limit yourself to one system over time. There are many users with multiple vendors in their setup. I began with MOTM modules as a core, added Synthesizers.com sequencers since MOTM didn't offer them, then recently added (by some very good fortune, I might add) a Serge panel with DSGs and other useful functions that I couldn't find elsewhere. The conversion between jack formats makes things a little more difficult, but not impossible as all three offer banana to 1/4" jack converters.
MOTM has a reputation for high quality but seems a bit conservative in
design. Still it ranks as a good choice for building up a modular
foundation and would integrate well with my moogerfoogers
(1/4" plugs/all CV).
at the outset, let me say that i find plug size to be a minor attractions/detractions to a system's ergonomics,
*unless* we're talking about bananas, in which case i'd say that particular format is superior to all others and
therefore provides an incentive to purchase that particular system.
as most everyone on the list will agree, bananas eliminate, for the most part, the need for multiples, their
insertion count will far outlast any coax cable, their lifetime integrity is longer (partially due to the lack of any
soldering/welding because they are monoaxial), they come in cool colors, and are relatively cheap. also, adapters
are a fact of life with modulars so start soldering!
I have a love-hate relationship with bananas. I love the stacking capability, the density and the short, color coded cable lengths. The density can work against you however. I once had a patch on a university's 7-panel Serge with about 100 patch cords and literally could not reach some of the knobs due to the pile of cables in the way. Using the Serge provided cables can help in this regards. My problems with the patch were aggravated by having to buy 50 of the patch cords on short notice, so I did not have the length and color options that Rex provides.
I am also somewhat concerned with running long audio signals without shielding. Your mileage may vary there.
If you go with a 1/4" system, definitely budget for a mutiples panel or two. You will need it. You can buy color coded 1/4" cables up the 3 foot lengths (Hose patch bay cables), but the cable quality is a little suspect/light weight and I am concerned about a bit of voltage drop on longer cables for critical things such as VCO control voltages.
Wiard seems fabulous but perhaps difficult to
bite into for a novice. Grant Richter, the system's designer,
explained that he usually sells his systems to people who
already own multiple systems and also have the expertise to
"understand" how the Wiard works. He doesn't say this to
discourage me from being interested in the Wiard but only to be
honest and to help me make better decisions. The Wiard system
and the MOTM (for a well-rounded small modular setup) cost
around $3500 give or take.
I think a Wiard should not be much more difficult to use than a Serge. Don't let this discourage you!
My top choice currently is Serge and I
was considering the ANIMAL panel and the TKB to
control/sequence it. The ANIMAL looks powerful but I'm
wondering if the DTG will provide enough envelope
sophistication to make the music I do (ambient
landscape/space -- with a sonically strange and unsettling event
here and there).
sounds cool. i own a seven panel system with only a single ADSR and need more; the DTG, or DSG for that
matter,defintely does not operate, for all intents and purposes, as a "standard" envelope, but for your purposes (drones,
etc) the DTG/DSG would work fine. i have in fact built the PAIA 9710 Env. for use with my system because, as you
know, you don't simply order a module from STS when ya need one.
Will the ANIMAL do it for me? ANIMAL+TKB =$4500.
Should I consider a funstation? My god the cost! ahh but the
possibilities sonically speaking (the Blue funstation --blue voice
panel+a control panel(which one?) + TKB = $7550ouch I mean
ahhhh).
enough questions. I look forward to your responses and
assistance
The Animal+TKB combo looks like a good start assuming that two panels is your current budgetary limit, but you'll find yourself wanting more DTGs or DSGs. If you look at a conventional patch, the Animal gives any combination of 3 LFOs/AR envelopes using the two DTG stages and the Smooth Function Generator. That gives only one envelope per NTO, VCFQ and UAP, for instance. That doesn't even include a clock to run the TKB as a sequencer.
The Blue Funstation is an awesome system with lots of control voltage possibilities for chaotic/semi-random/non-repetitive patches. With 1 DTG, 2 DTGs, Random Source, Quadrature Oscillator and the SSG there are endless combinations of envelopes/LFOs/control signals available. By all means, max out your system as best you can afford!

and keep in mind: unless the shop panels are built and ready to go (in which case you're paying up front with imminet
delivery), you will be paying 50% upfront with a god-knows-how-long lead time of probably 2-3 months; in other words,
you've got a fair amount of time to put your affairs in order before owing rex the balance.

Patience is the name of the game when buying almost any modular. Seldom will a complete system ship from any provider in less than 2-3 months.

Bill, welcome aboard. I hope this information proves useful.

John Loffink

microtonal@...

Re: greetings serge users/a request for opinions

2001-05-31 by C. Whitten

Bill,
As Matt said, you might only expect one recommendation posting to this list,
however most of the members here have more than one system including myself.
All the same my favourite system would still be Serge. As mentioned by
someone else my only question would be the filter. The beauty of the
mini-jack or 1/4 inch systems being the enormous variety of filters
available. Having said that, there is absolutely nothing wrong with the
Serge filters.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>I still want to invest in a system that I hope to
>appreciate and explore for many years.
In my opinion, if you bought into another system first you would still
hanker after some Serge modules but you would be further from realising your
dream having spent money on another system. In other words I'd advise going
for the Serge straight off.
>(the Blue funstation --blue voice
>panel+a control panel(which one?) + TKB = $7550ouch I mean
>ahhhh).
Yeah, it's a killer and PK gives good advice IMO. If you have limited funds
go for a custom panel choosing exactly the combination of modules most
useful to you.
My first panel included no oscillators because I knew I would have hours of
fun processing audio through it. When I saved up for another panel I filled
in some of the gaps and later still I purchased a TKB (second hand).

Of course both MOTM and Wiard have fantastic modules available but (as a few
people have mentioned) I think Serge (is it still STS?) offer a complete
package including many unusual modules which in themselves offer a myriad of
functions. The most impressive modules I own being the NTO, Wave Multiplier,
Resonant EQ, DSG and the TKB is outrageously good.
CW

Re: greetings serge users/a request for opinions.I.M.O

2001-05-31 by dma1600@yahoo.com

How do you get a 70 min cycle with the slope generator? I clocked it
at something like 2 minutes and 40 seconds.

Dan
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> You cant have too many modulation sources with the Serge .I would
> think the 70 min. cycle available from the uni slope gens. would be
> very usefull in soundscape /ambient work ?
>

Re: greetings serge users/a request for opinions

2001-06-01 by particlemen@aol.com

--- In SergeModular@y..., kursk1@e... wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> hello
> my name is Bill. This summer I'm gonna invest in a modular
> system and I would very much appreciate your opinions on
> choosing a system.

Bill,

There is a tradeoff between ease of use and sophistication. A preset
synth requires no skill, but quickly becomes tiresome. A modular
synth (any patch cord type) is a bit more intimidating, but it will
take some time before you'll realize its full potential. The more
complexity, the more you'll have to work to fully explore a modular
system's potential. This leads to a deeper satisfaction. If you are
going to spend serious money for one, you may as well get one that
that offers a lot of exploration and potential i.e. the STS Serge
Modular.

Of course, anyone on this list is probably pro STS Serge.

So, I recommend you get a copy of the review of a Funstation found in
Keyboard Magazine - February 1998. The system covered appears to be a
Blue voice, a Red control, and a Sequencer panel (using the Egres
nomenclature.) A somewhat unbiased viwepoint. AND, read and re-read
the Egres site - especially the wizardy section. If patching up a
basic VCO,VFC,VCA sound (with modulation) is a mystery to you, do a
little reading on the web, beg some time on a system, etc. The only
way to learn is to dive in. Good Luck!!

Dr P

Re: greetings serge users/a request for opinions

2001-06-01 by matt wilson law office

particlemen@... wrote:

-

So, I recommend you get a copy of the review of a Funstation found in
Keyboard Magazine - February 1998.

i will be scanning and posting this article to the list this weekend.

matt

--
Matt Wilson, Attorney @ Law
mbwlaw@...
(619) 234-2200

Re: greetings serge users/a request for opinions

2001-06-01 by particlemen@aol.com

So, I recommend you get a copy of the review of a Funstation found in
Keyboard Magazine - February 1998.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> i will be scanning and posting this article to the list this
weekend.
>
> matt
>

Matt,

Please consider posting a color scan. The patch diagram in the
article is very informative, and its in color.

Thanks, Dr P

Re: greetings serge users/a request for opinions

2001-06-01 by Sebastian Kuehnl

Hi Bill, Eric,

----- Original Message -----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "alt-mode" <alt_mode@...>
To: <SergeModular@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 4:33 AM
Subject: Re: [SergeModular] greetings serge users/a request for opinions


: Hi Bill,
:
: You certainly have done some good research. I'm probably going to get
kicked off
: this list for saying this, but I wouldn't recommend a Serge or Wiard as
your first
: modular. I would recommend MOTM for several reasons:
:
: - The system can grow with you at a lower cost and in smaller chunks.
: - While the functions are perhaps more basic, sometimes the restrictions
can help
: you learn more. You can find all sorts of wierd things with just a few
oscillators
: and EGs; add some filters and a ringmod and you've got lots to explore.
The MOTM
: stuff has a few surprises too, the suboctave mux can inspire some crazy
stuff along
: with the VC router. Don't overlook these seemingly simple modules!
: - While the modulation possibilities of the Serge are far greater, I
personally
: think the MOTM filters sound better. I frequently patch my Serge into my
MOTM
: filters.

This is surprising to me...


: It depends on what you are going after musically, is the filter more
: important than the modulation wierdness? - a question of personal taste.

...so here I think it's interesting to ask: why have systems with complex
waveshaping never had filters of the popular "fat", warm type (before Wiard
maybe, but even statements about the Omni sound are funnily opposing)?

Don Buchla, designer of the first complex waveshaping modules, never thought
of his analog instruments to be primarily for subtractive synthesis (this is
how he could develop into the digital realm _smoothly_ - his ideas had quite
a universal background). This popular paradigm, actually a severe
restriction to the wide field of analog synthesis possibilities, was
established by Moog synthesizers - would never have been so successful with
a less spectacular sounding lowpass filter.

For essentially VCO-VCF-VCA-based patches, complex soundprocessing via
nonlinear transforms and steeply edged resonant filtering usually do not
combine well. Extremely careful coordination of the sweep of filter
frequency and sweep of wave processing is required in order to avoid thin,
hollow sounding (in the context perceived as "noisy") passages during
sweeps.
Complementing this, a well done complex shape for morphing (making up your
own transform functions from scratch is only available with the Wiard, and,
with similar possibilities, with some softsynths) frequently makes further
exciting filter action obsolete.
This is for example why certain presets of the PPG Waves sound infamously
boring, why these are somewhat hard to program from an analog-used view, and
why Palm wanted to proceed to entirely digital synthesis.
This is also why even the excellent, so popular Moog 904A to me ceases to be
desirable in the context of nonlinear wave processing - its characteristics
are too dominating in this context. As can be heard from the demos on the
Wiard Miniwave/ Joyrider webpages (waveshaping into Vactrol filters,
sounding BIG), other resonating filters may just be better suited, but note
that firstly Grant's great sounding trick here was to use two of them
serially in formant-like configurations, and that his is based on Don
Buchla's lowpass filter.
Buchla made instruments on which you were less likely to start with playing
sturdy sawtooth-based basses or strings rather than arbitrarily
syn-thesiz-ed timbres (before the complex VCOs, wild FM was the main
synthesis technique with the Buchlas). In these systems (200 to 700 series)
the main filter was capable of "frequency gating", simultaneous attenuation
and one-pole-filtering sharing the same control input (but responding
differently), whose main purpose was just to approach a natural amplitude/
overtone spectrum relation for artificial sounds, rather than to make filter
action itself interesting in the foreground.

On another note, note that you might find using pulse waves boring quickly,
as they won't gain as much from most transform functions as waves with more
than two states.

So to sum up, on the long run (if intense examination and usage is desired)
I think complex wave processing functions, as provided in the Serge lineup,
asks for different starting points than subtractive synthesis. Less so does
the Wiard as it's not limited to some preset transform functions (timbrally
it perhaps has the broadest palette of all systems). Don Buchla had a very
clear and definitive answer. The Serge system's tribute to this is in the
lack of pulse waves in the main VCO (in exchange, providing more pulse
derivation possibilites than any other system including the Buchlas, as
alternatives to the waveshaping modules) and probably in the gentle filters,
about which one frequently hears users being bored by their sound,
resonating or not. It sure does apply to the variable slope filter.

So, for example start putting a resonating filter output (read: many tiny
rounded waves :-) into the wavemultiplier. Or use the wavemult output only
as some modulation source - this might seem like wasted capability first,
but that's irrational. And mixing two identical but detuned wavemult outputs
(getting expensive ;-), maybe adding in a triangle for low end boost, and
then filtering, I often find resembling classic PPG sounds - no surprise.


Finally, I would like to mention that the Wiard VCOs' initial (unbiased)
range 20Hz - 20KHz to me seems a little odd regarding the Wavecity
possibilities. Naturally for quite a few complex shape experiments in middle
audio range, a much lower input wave is required.

Sebastian Kuehnl



: Any of the choices you have listed will give you a high quality system and
will last
: many years. As has been mentioned, the interfacing is an easily solved
problem. If
: space is a big issue, the Serge and Wiard systems are more compact than
MOTM but
: usually you manage to find room to house your stuff if your additiction is
strong
: enough.
:
: I would start with MOTM and when your addiction is too great and your bank
account
: is capable, spring for some Serge panels to create a hybrid system.
That's kinda
: what happened to me ;)
:
: Eric
:


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @... address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.