Something struck me about the arrows.
I think I have it now. The arrow points in the direction which part
it corresponds with. So the left side works with the signal in left
pointed arrow and the right pointed arrow with the right part.
Or is it more complicated?
--- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, Bakis Sirros
<synth_freak_2000@...> wrote:
I think I have it now. The arrow points in the direction which part
it corresponds with. So the left side works with the signal in left
pointed arrow and the right pointed arrow with the right part.
Or is it more complicated?
--- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, Bakis Sirros
<synth_freak_2000@...> wrote:
>AR envelope that the TG 'normally' is.
> i forgot:
> black audio ins:
>
> also, input a gate there, to create an ASR envelope instead of an
>middle)
>
> Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist
>
> [Doepfer_a100] group owner
>
> www. parallel - worlds - music. com
>
> www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic
>
> www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic
>
> www. myspace. com/ memorygeist
>
> www. DiN. org. uk
>
> www. musicamaximamagnetica. com
>
> www. shimarecords. co. uk
>
> www. rubberrecords. gr
>
> Athens - Greece
>
> --- On Fri, 2/20/09, roelelec <r.steverink@...> wrote:
> From: roelelec <r.steverink@...>
> Subject: [SergeModular] Re: Soft Sync + Linear FM
> To: SergeModular@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Friday, February 20, 2009, 10:39 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> That's something I haven't tried yet.
>
> Thanks for the tip.
>
> I will try this, cause I'm also very curious how much it
>
> differs/matches the soft sync effect of the other osc's.
>
>
>
> The Timegen osc is still a puzzle to me.
>
> I don't remember how I patched it (I'm gonna note these findings
>
> carefully down from now on) but a couple of times turning the rise
>
> knob revealed only a small area of frequenties, just if the right
>
> part was transformed in a notch filter or something?
>
>
>
> I also haven't the faintest idea what the signal in's (in the
><kkonkkrete@ ...>
> can be used for?
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Roel
>
>
>
> --- In SergeModular@ yahoogroups. com, "kkonkkrete"
>style
> wrote:
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > If I remember correctly, you can get some (roughly) hard-sync
>slope /
> > effects using your timegen osc, or more generally any of the
>the
> > transient generator variants. Use the trigger switch to make the
>
> > right half self trigger (oscillate). Now patch the gate out of
>Mess
> > left half into the trig in of the right half. I think you should
>
> now
>
> > have the right oscillator re-triggered by the left oscillator.
>two
> > with frequency offsets. Instant razorblade cocktail. Just don't
>
> cut
>
> > yourself.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > --- In SergeModular@ yahoogroups. com, "roelelec" <r.steverink@ >
>
> wrote:
>
> > >
>
> > > Hi John,
>
> > >
>
> > > Yeah I know what sync is, that it eliminates the beating when
>getting
> > > osc's frequenties are locked in together. It's the way of
>sounds
> > > razor sharp sounds in stead of the more organic, floating
>wrote:
> like
>
> > > f.e. strings.
>
> > > But is soft syc then only the soft variant of hard sync? I'm no
>
> > > technician. I'm interested and very much like to know.
>
> > >
>
> > > Cause I reckon soft sync must have more uses that only
>
> eliminating
>
> > > the beating. Why otherwise did Serge include soft sync in his
>
> osc's
>
> > > and not the so favourable hard sync? Which are the secrets?
>
> > >
>
> > > Thanks for the info on the waveforms!
>
> > >
>
> > > Cheers,
>
> > >
>
> > > Roel
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > > --- In SergeModular@ yahoogroups. com, John P <johnp299792@ >
>well
> > > >
>
> > > > soft sync is used when you want two or more oscillators to
>
> track
>
> > > > together, in sync, *without* beating.
>
> > > > If you patch two oscillators from, say, your SSG Stepped Out
>
> into
>
> > > their
>
> > > > 1V/Oct inputs, they will track together, but no matter how
>
> you
>
> > > tune
>
> > > > them, there will be some beating, and the beating will change
>
> as
>
> > > the
>
> > > > pitch input changes. Patching the Sawtooth of one into the
>
> Sync of
>
> > > the
>
> > > > other one will eliminate this beating, if the Osc's are tuned
>
> > > closely to
>
> > > > begin with.
>
> > > >
>
> > > > roelelec wrote:
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > >
>
> > > > > My question is: what's the use of soft sync in general?
>
> > > > >
>
> > > >
>
> > >
>
> >
>