SergeModular

Hello Jan-H

I tested your suggestion and it works, thanks.

I think I know why my first approach didn't work. I was triggering the sequencer and the
ASR from the same source. So, the ASR was sampling before the quantization was
complete (most of the time). So, I used a 2nd DTG with a little wider gate time for the ASR,
and it works just fine. By varying the gate time I can introduce fewer or more quantization
errors, which can be very interesting. (Serge+interesting=fun!)

So, now I can do either approach. One requires more QTKB channels, the other requires
another clock source.

Thanks again
John R.

--- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, "metafoetus2002" <jan-hinnerk.helms@...>
wrote:

>
> Hi John,
>
> from reading your post it looks like the voltage goes from the QTKB into the ASR. IMHO

it

> makes more sense to have the quantizer as the last link in the chain. This means to
> "sacrifice" more of the QTKB channels for quantizing the individual ASR outs, but it

should

> ensure "correct" notes.
>
> Best regards,
> Jan-Hinnerk
>
> --- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, "johnrichoux" <jrichoux@> wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks
> >
> > I've just begun using a QTKB and am getting interesting but unexpected results with

an

> ASR.
> > Does the ASR have trouble sampling quantized CV?
> >
> > A simple two note sequence seems to set a minimum and maximum and adds random
> notes
> > in-between. I have the attenuator fully on. Decreasing it reduces the max-freq.
> >
> > The TKB and ASR are both clocked by the same DTG. I've varied the rise & fall times
> thinking
> > that might be the problem, but still the same.
> >
> > If I bypass the quantizer, the ASR behaves as I would expect. CV's are sampled,

delayed

> and
> > reproduced as recorded.
> >
> > Any suggestions would be appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks
> > John R.
> >
>