It worked great
a Klopfgeist instrument in logic
routed to the serge's PNRV
PNRV's envelope follower output to Serge sequencer clock input
and also to DTG trig in for output vca
- perfect synch !
I'm gonna have so much fun with this :) :)
Kim
a Klopfgeist instrument in logic
routed to the serge's PNRV
PNRV's envelope follower output to Serge sequencer clock input
and also to DTG trig in for output vca
- perfect synch !
I'm gonna have so much fun with this :) :)
Kim
On Jun 1, 2007, at 11:25 PM, Yulian Pugachevsky wrote:
>
> I think your audio-clocking method is great, although I have not tried
> it, i do not see any reasons why it would not work. The only
> observation i'd make (and it's probably quite optional) is to run the
> audio click through a DTG to extract an exact pulse (this will also
> allow to play with the TKB's "groove" by adjusting the rise/fall
> times).
>
> y.
>
> On 1-Jun-07, at 3:20 PM, Kim Hansen wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> i've already got a serge sequencer panel, and my next wish is a TKB -
>> there will be endless fun synching these to
>> my various drummachines and synth w arpeggiators and suchlike.
>>
>> actually, this mail has given me an idea i'll go try out right away:
>>
>> I'll make a precise click track ( sound not midi ) in logic and try
>> routing that into the serge as a clock for the serge sequencer
>> panel...
>>
>> Has anyone here on the list got any experince/ideas in something like
>> this that they'd like to
>> share ?
>>
>> Kim
>>
>> On Jun 1, 2007, at 4:26 PM, Yulian Pugachevsky wrote:
>>
>>> Kim,
>>>
>>> I too use LogicPro on a MacBookPro (and have been using it since
>>> Apple acquired EMagic).. never noticed any MIDI latency issues (..
>>> and no, i dont make slow and sad muisic ;).. the only thing that
>>> comes to mind when speaking of latency in Logic are the buses, since
>>> (and go figure out why) there is no latency compensation. What I
>>> mean is that if you apply a plug-in as an insert to a track (which
>>> will play fine) vs. applying it as an insert to a bus and routing a
>>> given track to that bus (which will cause latency).
>>>
>>> Also, if you're controlling analogue gear via MIDI->CV, one should
>>> keep in mind the latency introduced by interface itself
>>>
>>> ... but if you are looking for a computer with REALLY tight MIDI
>>> timing, you may want to look into an old ATARI (520, 1040, Mega or
>>> Stacy).. these are really unbeatable and can rival any hardware MIDI
>>> seq... but MIDI-only ;)
>>>
>>> yulian.
>>>
>>> On 31-May-07, at 4:31 PM, Kim Hansen wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Ross
>>>>
>>>> As i read it you're not asking about midi to cv conversion,
>>>> but about what midi/computer setups we use ?
>>>>
>>>> - I use Logic Pro on a dual G4
>>>>
>>>> - it's ok for the slow stuff and sad songs but the midi timing
>>>> really isn't very
>>>> good. - if i wanted/needed fast, tight midi i'd get a hardware
>>>> sequencer instead/also
>>>>
>>>> all the best, - Kim
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On May 31, 2007, at 3:47 AM, amnesia wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>
>>>>> I have decided after a year of noodling that I would like to hear
>>>>> the
>>>>> Serge running under midi control using laptop PC- Cubase SX.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a CV converter ( I still need to make a lead from the CV
>>>>> box to
>>>>> ground serge) but wondered what people are using midi box
>>>>> wise....I
>>>>> havent used a computer for music since the Atari 1040ste back in
>>>>> the
>>>>> early 90s.
>>>>>
>>>>> ross
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>