http://home.att.net/~djaux/Image28.gif
That's the only picture I know of too.
I spent a lot of time looking at Zero Halliburton specs and talking to Rex at STS about
having my four-panel system mounted inside one of these cases.
My idea was to put two panels in each half (like on the six-panel picture, which has three
panels per half), but very few, if any, of these cases have halves (shells) of equal depth.
My requirements were to fit the four panels in a case no larger than the IATA standards for
airplane carry-on baggage. I expect to travel with my system regularly, and there's no way
I'm checking it in. We couldn't find a case to fit four panels without being unnecessarily
large though.
I'd be curious to see what your friend comes up with. I still find these Zero Halliburton
cases a very elegant solution.
Thomas
That's the only picture I know of too.
I spent a lot of time looking at Zero Halliburton specs and talking to Rex at STS about
having my four-panel system mounted inside one of these cases.
My idea was to put two panels in each half (like on the six-panel picture, which has three
panels per half), but very few, if any, of these cases have halves (shells) of equal depth.
My requirements were to fit the four panels in a case no larger than the IATA standards for
airplane carry-on baggage. I expect to travel with my system regularly, and there's no way
I'm checking it in. We couldn't find a case to fit four panels without being unnecessarily
large though.
I'd be curious to see what your friend comes up with. I still find these Zero Halliburton
cases a very elegant solution.
Thomas
--- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, JB <ringmodulator@...> wrote:
>
> Is this what you're after?
> http://home.att.net/~djaux/Image28.gif
>
> 2007/1/25, Rick <echo7even@...>:
> > trying to help a friend figure this out.
> >
> > any pics would be helpful
> >
> > thanks
> > -r
> >
> >
> >
> > Keep on Patchin'!
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>