SergeModular

Hi Peter,

It was not clear to me as some terms were used strangely, but it really
didn't matter to me; the reply (PWM etc) was solely intended to give
information...

I hope you didn't take my patch from Wednesday too seriously. It wasn't even
outlined completely (some parts are not required for simple waveforms, for
complex ones the path must be split into processing the initial simple wave
as described and using the OR gate to "hold" the final complex wave in the
SmoothFG). I just sometimes like thinking up the most cumbersome and
complicated patches with the least efficient build/ goal ratio -
"counterproductive", contemplative fun, getting lost in patchcord jungle ;->

Bla blupp

Sebastian Kuehnl

----- Original Message -----
From: <sonic@...>
To: <SergeModular@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 2:50 AM
Subject: [SergeModular] that supposed bitrate patch ??????????????


: --- In SergeModular@y..., sonic@s... wrote:
: > > Get your free @... address at http://mail.yahoo.com
:
: re: SUPPOSED BITRATE PATCH .
:
: I hope it was clear from my post , that this doesnt actually have
: anything to do with "digital" with a capital D , or "bitrate" with a
: capital or small B . It is , as I said an Analogue "simulation" of
: that effect often called "decimation on Digital stuff . I think this
: was clear ? appy olly loggys if not................
: P.K.
:




_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @... address at http://mail.yahoo.com