> Seq - I would agree with the dropping of the ASR. I have like three of themASR are rather like barberploe generators - good at doing exactly one thing.
>on my system and frankly I haven't found them that useful.
Youc could emulate an ASR using the second channel of the sequencer, but the
reverse is not true.
>I missed this in my last post. If you are only going to have one, I'd say goThe multiplier is a lot more versatile than the shaper, and you get three
>with the Wave multiplier. I have both but always end up in the multiplier
>instead of the shaper...
different effects, as distinct from three of the same. I've heard the shaper
discribed as "voltage controlled fuzz box" before. The same does not apply
to the multiplier.
>- a Random Source is almost double the price of the Noise Source. If =I believe a random source to be a noise board and a SSG board hard patched
>Yannis gets the SSG is there anything the Random Source can do that a Noise
>Source+SSG comb cannot do?
and mounted behind a common panel - as such, the two as separate modules
should be able to the same things.
My 2c
Ken
_______________________________________________________________________
Ken Stone sasami@... or ken@...
Modular Synth PCBs for sale <http://www.blaze.net.au/~sasami/synth/>
Australian Miniature Horses & Ponies <http://www.blaze.net.au/~sasami/>