FWIW, I mentioned a nonlinear slope to the unwanted portamento on the
QTKB--on second look it seems very close to a cap charge/discharge
curve. There's most likely a cap somewhere on the input circuitry of
the QTKB that is introducing this slew. If changing this cap value
doesn't affect the tracking/sampling inside the QTKB, this may be a
quick fix.
Peff
--- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, John Papiewski
<johnp299792@a...> wrote:
QTKB--on second look it seems very close to a cap charge/discharge
curve. There's most likely a cap somewhere on the input circuitry of
the QTKB that is introducing this slew. If changing this cap value
doesn't affect the tracking/sampling inside the QTKB, this may be a
quick fix.
Peff
--- In SergeModular@yahoogroups.com, John Papiewski
<johnp299792@a...> wrote:
> I wonder if there's something you can trim on the qtkb to fix thisdelay
> everybody's talking about? I've listened carefully to my unit &it
> seems fine. I don't have an asr though.side
>
> As for the gate pulse, if you patch the quantizer output into the +
> of a comparator and the input into the - side, play with thecomparator
> bias a little, you get very nice gates, one pulse per quantizerstaircase a
> transition. It's great for those times I use quantizer to
> triangle lfo or slow random voltage.
>
> John P.