SergeModular

"Steve Ridley" wrote:

> Message-Id: <001801c29cb4$2f89c6c0$19f4883e@default>
> List-Unsubscribe:

<mailto:SergeModular-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>

> From: "Steve Ridley" <spr@...>
> X-Priority: 3
> Reply-To: SergeModular@yahoogroups.com
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
> X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE

V5.00.2314.1300

> Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 23:14:27 -0000
> Mailing-List: list SergeModular@yahoogroups.com;

contact SergeModular-owner@yahoogroups.com

> Received: (cpmta 13590 invoked from network); 5 Dec

2002 15:13:00 -0800

> Received: from 66.218.66.73 (HELO

n18.grp.scd.yahoo.com)

> by smtp.c014.snv.cp.net (209.228.35.68) with SMTP; 5

Dec 2002 15:13:00 -0800

> Received: from [66.218.67.192] by

n18.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Dec 2002 23:13:00
-0000

> Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 5 Dec 2002 23:13:00

-0000

> Received: (qmail 31524 invoked from network); 5 Dec

2002 23:12:59 -0000

> Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
> by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 5 Dec 2002

23:12:59 -0000

> Received: from unknown (HELO cmailg2.svr.pol.co.uk)

(195.92.195.172)

> by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 Dec 2002

23:12:59 -0000

> Received: from

modem-25.bursa-trigger.dialup.pol.co.uk
([62.136.244.25] helo=default)

> by cmailg2.svr.pol.co.uk with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
> id 18K5Aw-0004eB-00
> for SergeModular@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 05 Dec 2002

23:12:58 +0000

> X-Egroups-Return:

sentto-2947859-1727-1039129980-theanalogcottage=cswebmail.com@...

> X-Msmail-Priority: Normal
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> X-Apparently-To: SergeModular@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [SergeModular] Filter comparisons
> X-Received: 5 Dec 2002 23:13:00 GMT
> References: <asln6d+cr5l@...>

<002901c29bef$3feeaa50$0201a8c0@carbon111>

> Precedence: bulk
> Delivered-To:

cswebmail.com%theanalogcottage@...

> Delivered-To: mailing list

SergeModular@yahoogroups.com

> Return-Path:

<sentto-2947859-1727-1039129980-theanalogcottage=cswebmail.com@...>

> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> To: <SergeModular@yahoogroups.com>
> X-Sender: spr@...
>
> > The VCFS also has an -18db / Oct slope for sounds
> with more bite
> > than the -12db filters.
>
> Is that really true? All the VCFSs I've seen have

only

> two
> stages, giving a final slope of -12dB/octave. I was
> under
> the impression that the "real" slope could only be
> varied
> between -6B/oct and -12dB/.oct and that higher

"slopes"

> were achieved by internally raising the resonance.

The

> catalogue seems to indicate this too. Anyone know the
> truth?
>
>
> SPR
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> SergeModular-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Keep on Patchin'!
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> <a

href="http://mail.cswebmail.com/jump/http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms</a>/

Hi Steve,

The VCFS has a VC slope better than -18dB! This filter
is more unique than the VCFQ...

Regards,

Andre'

___________________________________________________
The ALL NEW CS2000 from CompuServe
Better! Faster! More Powerful!
250 FREE hours! Sign-on Now!
http://www.compuserve.com/trycsrv/cs2000/webmail/