you are correct. sorry, i forgot to mention the sequential switch in
that same panel. you basically put both of the programmer final
outputs or mix outputs to the switch inputs and used the last step
pulse out of each programmer to cycle between each of them or you
use the pulse sequencer individual pulse outputs to cycle the switch.
RM
that same panel. you basically put both of the programmer final
outputs or mix outputs to the switch inputs and used the last step
pulse out of each programmer to cycle between each of them or you
use the pulse sequencer individual pulse outputs to cycle the switch.
RM
--- In SergeModular@y..., <spr@s...> wrote:
>
> > of them had a pulse sequencer which basically went from pulse
output
> > 1 to pulse out 8 or 10 by a clock source at its input. if you
patch
> > the outputs sequentially to the programmer stage address inputs,
they
> > would fire in order. i am not sure if this is correct, but it
seems
> > to be the way it was intended. i wonder how the pulse input on
the
> > pulse sequencer reacted to smooth voltages of any type? hope
this
> > helps.
>
> The problem is, this set up is shown in one of the old serge
> manuals, but it doesn't work with more than one standard
> programmers. Using the standard 4 stage programmers, the first
> four steps come out of programmer #1 and the next four come out
> of programmer #2. Also, because programmer #2 does not reset
> programmer #1, when step 5 (step 1 of programmer #2) is selected,
> step 4 (step 4 of programmer #1) stays on.
>
> It's not difficult to bodge it to work (join the reset buses
> and combine the outputs in some way), but it would be very
> interesting to see the proper Serge way of doing it...
>
>
> SPR
>
>
>
>
>
_____________________________________________________________________
__
> Freeserve AnyTime, only £13.99 per month with one month's FREE
trial!
> For more information visit http://www.freeserve.com/time/ or call
free on 0800 970 8890