hi ken, if i remember correctly, the old style programmers had pulse
address inputs at the bottom to select a stage. if you remember a
month or so ago someone was selling those 2 sequencers panels , one
of them had a pulse sequencer which basically went from pulse output
1 to pulse out 8 or 10 by a clock source at its input. if you patch
the outputs sequentially to the programmer stage address inputs, they
would fire in order. i am not sure if this is correct, but it seems
to be the way it was intended. i wonder how the pulse input on the
pulse sequencer reacted to smooth voltages of any type? hope this
helps.
regards,
RM
address inputs at the bottom to select a stage. if you remember a
month or so ago someone was selling those 2 sequencers panels , one
of them had a pulse sequencer which basically went from pulse output
1 to pulse out 8 or 10 by a clock source at its input. if you patch
the outputs sequentially to the programmer stage address inputs, they
would fire in order. i am not sure if this is correct, but it seems
to be the way it was intended. i wonder how the pulse input on the
pulse sequencer reacted to smooth voltages of any type? hope this
helps.
regards,
RM
--- In SergeModular@y..., sasami@h... wrote:
>
> >Which manual did you find this in?
>
> >The only old one that I can find something that is similar to what
> >you're mentioning is using 2 programmers AND a sequencer. The
sequencer
> >is being clocked, and each stage in turn is selecting a stage of
the
> >programmer pair.
>
> That's the one. The problem with wiring two standard programmers
like this
> is that you will have two stages selected at any given time, unless
there is
> a way to join their internal reset bus, and by the looks of it,
their
> summing busses as well.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ken
>
______________________________________________________________________
_
> Ken Stone sasami@h...
> Modular Synth PCBs for sale <http://www.blaze.net.au/~sasami/synth/>
> Australian Miniature Horses & Ponies
<http://www.blaze.net.au/~sasami/>