-----Original Message----- From: Mike Peake [mailto:peake@...] Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2000 2:43 AM To: Gabe G Cc: analogue@... Subject: Re: [AH] MKS-80, Jupiter8, Virus: Are they apples and oranges? At 11:26 PM -0000 3/31/00, Gabe G wrote: >> -The Virus sounds digital. > >I think the above statement should read, "The Virus can sound digital if >it wants to, as it has digital waveforms available if you want to use >them, but it can also sound amazingly analogue." (Can of worms =open=) No, I stand by my statement. You say "can sound amazingly analog". Depends upon what. All of the digitals I've heard, all of them, lack the obvious depth of the large analogs (modular Moog, Buchla, etc.) The digitals sound less full tonally and have less dynamic range in their beating than the real thing. They have less 'whoomf' in their filters in the bass region. Ever used filter feedback on a Mini or a Moog modular? No digital can come close at all to what that does in the bass region (Michael Caloroso has an excellent patch he might be convinced to post to the list.) I'm talking about sounds that can mask a kick drum, not 'oh this single-oscillator CEM synth is sooo phat'. I guess my reference and aesthetic are anachronistic nowaday. The Virus is a great-sounding synth, but it's not going to replace the progenitors, or even come close to these aspects of their character. ...I'm turning into the new Mr. 808. Mike Peake, Your Psychic Friend ___________________ Specifications: "It's the way gone that matters, as much, or more, than the destination." -Ian McDonald- Terminal Cafe
Message
FW: [AH] MKS-80, Jupiter8, Virus: Are they apples and oranges?
2000-04-03 by Verschut, Ricardo
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.