I'd like to think I'm wrong, but I don't believe there's any shortcut to
curve creation. For example even if you only change the shadow density
on the grey tab, all of the ink curves alter, so unless you have access
to the algorithms which generate the curves you will be at a bit of a
loss in modeling how a printed step chart would react. The problem is
compounded by the fact that every change during curve creation also
alters the maximum print density, so the each new curve iteration has to
be compared against a new ideal density curve to see if it's close
enough to warrant final linearization. At least, that's my take on it.
I found that keeping careful notes and plotting measured densities
against ideal densities in Excel for each curve creation iteration was
the only reliable way (for me, anyway) to produce a final, linearized
curve. I also saved time by printing the step chart with several
combinations of variables in one curve-creation "session". This used up
more ink and paper since I was, in effect, creating multiple threads of
curve creation iterations, with only one being the best one. It took a
long time, but I'm hoping that my increasing experience will speed up
the curve creation process.
What I would like to know is: just how close does a measured-density
curve have to be to an ideal-density curve before it can be used in
linearization?
Cheers,
Terence Lowe.