Yahoo Groups archive

QTR-Quadtone RIP

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:12 UTC

Thread

I've only just found QTR

I've only just found QTR

2013-12-10 by <beefyzee@...>

Hi Everyone,


I've never heard of qtr before, and have became a little excited now that I have.

My need is just one thing, to print solid opaque black on transparent inkjet film. I won't be dealing with halftones or anything, just solid black to block UV light.

I this what QTR can be used for with the printers it works with.

Just in case you are wondering what I'm getting up to, I'm learning to make circuit boards. I've already had success but used a double layer of transparencies to get the opacity, so I'm wanting to get away from that and achieve enough black ink density to use one single sheet.

Cheers,

Keith.

Re: [QuadtoneRIP] I've only just found QTR

2013-12-10 by Mike Finley

I'd be doubtful that QTR would get a significantly more solid black, but 
that may not be what you need!
Have you tried other colours to see if they are better at blocking the 
ultraviolet?
You might also try the PDNPrint group for advice/ideas - they're not 
trying to print cicuit boards, but trying to create negatives for old 
photographic processes, many of which are primarily ultraviolet sensitive.


On 10/12/2013 10:00, beefyzee@... wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
>
> I've never heard of qtr before, and have became a little excited now 
> that I have.
>
> My need is just one thing, to print solid opaque black on transparent 
> inkjet film. I won't be dealing with halftones or anything, just solid 
> black to block UV light.
>
> I this what QTR can be used for with the printers it works with.
> ...
>
> 

-- 
mike finley photography
http://www.mikefinley.co.uk
http://words.mikefinley.co.uk

Re: [QuadtoneRIP] I've only just found QTR

2013-12-10 by Paul Roark

QTR might be very useful for this purpose. It can put much more ink on the film than can the Epson driver. However, beware that the film coating may not be able to absorb all the ink, so you'll get dot gain or spreading of the ink that could make the lines less sharp. You'll have to experiment with different ink limits to see what works best. For photographic purposes we usually print a calibration mode print at 100 and see which black patch is the darkest, setting the black ink limit there.

Paul
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 2:00 AM, <beefyzee@...> wrote:

Hi Everyone,


I've never heard of qtr before, and have became a little excited now that I have.

My need is just one thing, to print solid opaque black on transparent inkjet film. I won't be dealing with halftones or anything, just solid black to block UV light.

I this what QTR can be used for with the printers it works with.

Just in case you are wondering what I'm getting up to, I'm learning to make circuit boards. I've already had success but used a double layer of transparencies to get the opacity, so I'm wanting to get away from that and achieve enough black ink density to use one single sheet.

Cheers,

Keith.


Re: I've only just found QTR

2013-12-11 by piezobw

Mike,

We manufacture a very dense opaque black ink that was originally designed for the Piezography backlit process in which the black needed to block out light. This ink, because it is very dense is useful now to Piezographers as a dual matte black/photo black. We sell most of this ink to silkscreen printers who wish to use the Epson driver to make opaque film. It can also be used with QTR. The ink we now call Piezography Warm Neutral Shade 1 opaque photo black and you can find it here:

http://shopping.netsuite.com/s.nl/c.362672/it.A/id.6109/.f?sc=15&category=39578

With the Piezography process we use this ink only sparingly in our shadows preferring to use four ink shades in total to define shadow detail. For your process, you could use only this one ink in order to achieve a OD of 3.0 or higher.

Not that it matters, but it is also exceedingly light fast because it is pure carbon. The density comes from an experimental grind in which particles are much finer than would normally be required for jetting. The end result is a greater amount of opacity.

regards,

Jon Cone
Piezography

--- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, Mike Finley <mike.finley@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> I'd be doubtful that QTR would get a significantly more solid black, but 
> that may not be what you need!
> Have you tried other colours to see if they are better at blocking the 
> ultraviolet?
> You might also try the PDNPrint group for advice/ideas - they're not 
> trying to print cicuit boards, but trying to create negatives for old 
> photographic processes, many of which are primarily ultraviolet sensitive.
> 
> 
> On 10/12/2013 10:00, beefyzee@... wrote:
> >
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> >
> > I've never heard of qtr before, and have became a little excited now 
> > that I have.
> >
> > My need is just one thing, to print solid opaque black on transparent 
> > inkjet film. I won't be dealing with halftones or anything, just solid 
> > black to block UV light.
> >
> > I this what QTR can be used for with the printers it works with.
> > ...
> >
> > 
> 
> -- 
> mike finley photography
> http://www.mikefinley.co.uk
> http://words.mikefinley.co.uk
>

Re: I've only just found QTR

2013-12-16 by AlienRelics

I found out about this software from Keith's post on the DipTrace forum. I'm also the moderator on Homebrew_PCBs (about making printed circuit boards from many different processes) and Inkjet_PCB_Construction (about using inkjet printers to print resist patterns directly onto blank PCBs).

As far as UV blocking goes, from what I've seen from numerous discussions, it depends on the specific inkset you are using. But often, the color inks block UV better. Possibly because they are more light sensitive than black inks, and maybe the manufacturer added UV blockers?

Steve Greenfield AE7HD

--- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, Mike Finley <mike.finley@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> I'd be doubtful that QTR would get a significantly more solid black, but 
> that may not be what you need!
> Have you tried other colours to see if they are better at blocking the 
> ultraviolet?
> You might also try the PDNPrint group for advice/ideas - they're not 
> trying to print cicuit boards, but trying to create negatives for old 
> photographic processes, many of which are primarily ultraviolet sensitive.
> 
> 
> On 10/12/2013 10:00, beefyzee@... wrote:
> >
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> >
> > I've never heard of qtr before, and have became a little excited now 
> > that I have.
> >
> > My need is just one thing, to print solid opaque black on transparent 
> > inkjet film. I won't be dealing with halftones or anything, just solid 
> > black to block UV light.
> >
> > I this what QTR can be used for with the printers it works with.
> > ...
> >
> > 
> 
> -- 
> mike finley photography
> http://www.mikefinley.co.uk
> http://words.mikefinley.co.uk
>

Re: [QuadtoneRIP] Re: I've only just found QTR

2013-12-16 by Paul Roark

I would recommend the circuit and technical group look at the Epson 1430 and dyes. QTR supports the approach. I think there may be sharpness advantages not only from the smaller 1.4 picoliter droplet but also from the fact that the dyes are inside the coating and not sitting on top. I suspect dot gain or other issues may be better controlled.


Paul



Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 9:35 AM, AlienRelics <alienrelics@...> wrote:

I found out about this software from Keith's post on the DipTrace forum. I'm also the moderator on Homebrew_PCBs (about making printed circuit boards from many different processes) and Inkjet_PCB_Construction (about using inkjet printers to print resist patterns directly onto blank PCBs).

As far as UV blocking goes, from what I've seen from numerous discussions, it depends on the specific inkset you are using. But often, the color inks block UV better. Possibly because they are more light sensitive than black inks, and maybe the manufacturer added UV blockers?

Steve Greenfield AE7HD

--- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, Mike Finley wrote:
>
> I'd be doubtful that QTR would get a significantly more solid black, but
> that may not be what you need!
> Have you tried other colours to see if they are better at blocking the
> ultraviolet?
> You might also try the PDNPrint group for advice/ideas - they're not
> trying to print cicuit boards, but trying to create negatives for old
> photographic processes, many of which are primarily ultraviolet sensitive.
>
>
> On 10/12/2013 10:00, beefyzee@... wrote:
> >
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> >
> > I've never heard of qtr before, and have became a little excited now
> > that I have.
> >
> > My need is just one thing, to print solid opaque black on transparent
> > inkjet film. I won't be dealing with halftones or anything, just solid
> > black to block UV light.
> >
> >; I this what QTR can be used for with the printers it works with.
> > ...
> >
> >
>
> --
> mike finley photography
> http://www.mikefinley.co.uk
> http://words.mikefinley.co.uk
>


RE: I've only just found QTR

2013-12-17 by <sanking@...>

Steve,

I have been making digital negatives for UV sensitive alternative printing processes for the past 12-15 years and have tested many inksets. I don't believe it is generally correct that the color inks block UV better. In fact, with all of the current large carriage Epson printers that use the K3 inkset MK is by far the biggest blocker of UV light. PK blocks about the same as Y and C. G in the *900 series printers also blocks a lot of UV, about like C+Y.

You can test this by printing the ink calibration page in QTR, using calibration mode, and then either reading the densities with a UV densitometer, or by printing the page with a UV sensitive process. What you will find is that UV blocking is in this order:
1. MK
2. PK
3. Y
4. C
5. LLK
6. LC
7. LLK
8. LM

G in the *900 series also blocks a lot of UV, not sure where it falls compared to the other inks as I have not actually tested it.

I don't know what UV blocking one needs for printing circuit boards but at 100% the blockage of the MK in the Epson K3 inkset is about log 4.5, and Shade 1 in the Cone K7 set blocks as much or more. That much density gives what we might call a bullet proof negative.

Sandy

RE: I've only just found QTR

2013-12-17 by G. McCurdy

Fwiw, when I was making circuit boards I used a laser jet. Not much luck with inkjets as many I tried used a dye ink and they passed light and messed up the photoboards exposure and contrast needed. The laser jet had a much darker toner, thicker, and I could print it on clear film, or burn a contact sheet on orthographic high contrast film. Then put a photo clad circuit board under a sunlight, developed it, and did the etch with the ferricyanide.

I could do double-sided boards down to the tiny surface-mount IC circuits and components that way. Used a small drill to align the film images on the boards. I believe I used Kepro boards back then (Now bought out by camconchemical.com).

RE: I've only just found QTR

2013-12-17 by <beefyzee@...>

Sandy,


thanks for that input, great info. I've done a lot of Googling on this matter and this has led me to quite a few screenprinting forums. It always seems to be the same story: as far as non-dedicated inks go, the guys get the most opaque prints using genuine Epson black. However I don't recall any of them differentiating between M & P. After that the main inks used are the dedicated screen printing inks like Black Max and others, which are supposed to be very fast drying and absolutely loaded with UV blocking pigment.


G McCurdy,

when I first started on this PCB venture a couple of months ago, I bought a mono laser printer and it was useless. Lots and lots of Googling and I realised only a few were getting good enough results with a laser. It seems very brand/model dependant.


I came to learn that all the screenprinters were using inkjet with either genuine epson black ink (or dedicated screenprinting ink) + rip software which made the printer lay down much more ink. The other important factor was the inkjet transparency used. Any inkjet transparency just won't cut it. The guys seem to get greatly improved results using the transparencies dedicated to making film positives. They all seem to say one thing though, inkjet is the only way to get very opaque prints (providing the recipe is right).


I tried my Epson TX810FW and the first attempt was terrible. Back to mind numbing Googling and learning about print driver settings and I eventually ended up was a much darker/denser and uniform laydown of ink, but I still had to use 2 stacked films. That led me to the path I'm on now. The hardest part I'm finding is getting hold of the 2nd hand printers QTR supports.


Keith.

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.