Hi John, I've read through your posts and I think you've got some different issues going on. For below where 740mm prints as 738mm -- this is a very small difference so I'd tend to think it's a mechanical feed variation. Canvas may feed slightly differently than paper. For the epson driver I assume you are selecting Canvas as the media type and possibly the epson driver compensates for it. In your other post printing through qimage I think you are talking about a very much larger variation in size. I think you had a 16mm shorter print than you expected. The first question I'd have is whether it's a truncation of the image -- ie are you missing the bottom of the image or is it a shrinkage of the image -- i.e. all there but smaller. You mentioned looking at the tiff file after formatting in qimage with a 1mm margin. Did you just check size or also the image -- ie truncation vs shrinkage question? The 7800 by default has a 14mm bottom margin. This is the only thing I can think of that maybe has to do with your problem. I'm not very familiar with qimage so I don't know how it deals with margins. But if the 14mm bottom margin accounts for most of the shortness then you may be back as the mechanical feed to account for the rest of it. Roy On 6/20/07, wharfwalker <jswhite@...> wrote: > I have done some further tests printing a specific size through qtr and > found that there is a difference. > When I print a 740mm long print from photoshop it prints 740mm long. > When I print from qtr it is 738mm. > My first tests were with 10x8s and I could not be sure I was seeing any > difference but there definately is at these longer print sizes. > I have everything switched off in qtr, no centering, no fit to page. > Is there anything else I could be doing wrong. > Regards > John White >
Message
Re: [QuadtoneRIP] image size accuracy
2007-06-20 by Roy Harrington
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.