Yahoo Groups archive

QTR-Quadtone RIP

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:12 UTC

Message

RE: [QuadtoneRIP] why use QTR?

2007-05-30 by Eric Neilsen

Daniel, You'll get used to the "normal" speed of unidirectional printing. It
is the ONLY type that I have used; quality over speed for both my 7000 and
4800. Hi speed or bi directional is good for quick draft quality, but unless
you have a 3800 just relax. 

 

Eric Neilsen Photography

4101 Commerce Street

Suite 9

Dallas, TX 75226

http://e.neilsen.home.att.net

http://ericneilsenphotography.com

Skype ejprinter

  _____  

From: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com [mailto:QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Daniel Jackson
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2007 12:06 AM
To: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [QuadtoneRIP] why use QTR?

 

I've been using MIS UT7 inks on an Epson 2200 with Paul Roark's
curves and the Epson driver for a few years, and have been
mostly very happy with the results. 

But I'm giving QTR a try again, as I decided to get more serious
about linearizing and getting a good monitor/print match. 

I get very fine banding with QTR (which I see several people
have complained about) that goes away if I switch to
unidirectional printing. 

So here's my question: should I stick with QTR and just accept
this reduction in printing speed? I get the impression that it will
be easier to linearize and to make curves for new papers with
QTR, and that QTR allows much finer control. But I'm concerned
about the drop in speed and the QTR prints don't look better
than the ones produced by my old method.

--Daniel

 

.

 
<http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=14834347/grpspId=1705019182/msgI
d=4589/stime=1180353392/nc1=4543830/nc2=3848616/nc3=4299909> 
 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.