Alan I had described the procedure for matte papers, but the photo paper is analagous. It seems that, buried deep in your lengthy reply, you are doing what I would do when printing with QTR, i.e. converting your image colour space using the ICC profile for your curve (in your case the generic profile QTR-Gray-Photo) before saving the TIFF for printing. The process works for me. I do see a small change on the screen sometimes when I do the conversion. I think that's natural when you consider that ink/paper would not have the dynamic range of a monitor. However, you should be able to get as good blacks with QTR as you have with Paul's curves and the Epson driver. If you're not (with the same ink/paper/printer), then something is wrong. Possibly the QTR curve you are using is the culprit. On another note, although I haven't used UT2, I have used UT7, which is a similar inkset design. I don't think the K is used when printing on photo paper. I can see that's true (by looking at the qidf) for QTR. I am almost certain that it's true for Paul's curves as well. Tom --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, "Alan Ansell" <aansell@...> wrote: > > > Hi Tom, thank you for your input. I was kindly referred to some earlier posts that covered some of this topic. I have gone back and read some of those also. That has helped to clarify a little more, but ... > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
Message
Re: Soft Proofing QTR in Photoshop
2007-04-20 by Tom Moore
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.