Yahoo Groups archive

QTR-Quadtone RIP

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:12 UTC

Message

Re: New poll for QuadtoneRIP

2007-04-14 by Mark McCarvill

Good point. I see how #2 could have been chosen for UT7. I wonder how
many others were confused by the categories, or weren't confused but
mistakenly chose the "wrong" category anyway.

I use UT7 in my 7600 for landscape photographs and I'm very happy with
the inks. I especially like the refillable carts, which saves me $$$.
Haven't noticed the lack of tonal smoothness you mention. I find QTR
gives smoother results than the Epson driver. 

Mark  


--- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, James Haney <jhaney@...> wrote:
>
> When I set it up I was thinking that fit "B&W inks with Color Inks as  
> toners"
> 
> I guess those are really "Color Inks" so much as "toned Grey inks"
> 
> I used UT7 for a while in 2005. Good results, but I thought there  
> weren't enough grey inks in the partition to create smooth enough  
> tones in the portraits I do.
> 
> James
> 
> 
> 
> On Apr 12, 2007, at 9:57 AM, Mark McCarvill wrote:
> 
> > Which category for MIS UT7 inks - #4?
> >
> > --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the
> > > QuadtoneRIP group:
> > >
> > > What B&W Printing method do you Primarily use with QTR?
> > >
> > > o OEM color inks
> > > o B&W inks with Color Inks as toners
> > > o Multi-tone B&W inks (i.e. Black + 3 color carbon set)
> > > o Multi Tint K with no toned inks (Cone K7, Septone)
> > > o Funky Home-mixed ink combos
> > >
> > >
> > > To vote, please visit the following web page:
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/QuadtoneRIP/surveys?id=2481225
> > >
> > > Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are
> > > not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups
> > > web site listed above.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> >
> >
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.