Thanks Ed for your additional thoughts. I use a solux lamp to view prints plus sometimes a tungsten lamp (since most of my prints will be displayed under tungsten lighting). I position the prints a distance from the light that is appropriate for the light intensity. Also, I print at 1440 dpi. As far as the process, I used the linearise procedure outlined on the NorthLight Images website for using the PrintFix Pro. I hadn't look at the eye-one-readme.pdf since it appeared to be oriented to using the the GretabMacbeth Eye-One hardware. But I'll look it over and see if there is anything that may apply. Best wishes, Ken --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, "edrudolpho" <erudolph@...> wrote: > > Ken, let's see if anyone else has any thoughts on your method and your > problem. > > A couple of things occur to me. One is your viewing environment. Is > the light illuminating the print of the right brightness? After all, > the monitor is emitting light. > > Another is the dpi. I believe virtually all the QTR profiles are made > at 1440 dpi, but some folks like to print at 2880. This would result > in a lot more ink being laid down. So, if you are using a 1440 curve > and want to print at 2880, you want to decrease your ink limit in the > QTR driver to about -35% (I think). > > The third thing is, did you read the Eye-One read me in the Curve > Design folder that comes in the QTR 2.4.1 download. It describes two > parts to the process. Linearizing a curve for your printer, and > building an ICC profile for printing and soft-proofing. > > Ed > > --- In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, "prof_mgt551" <prof_mgt551@> wrote: > > > > Hi Ed, > > > > The procedure I used was outlined in an article on the NorthLight > > Images website for using PrintFix Pro to linearise the QTR output. > > Here are the steps that I used: > > > > 1. Converted the Step-21-gray file (contained in the eye-one folder) > > to the QTR-Gray-Photo Paper space, saved as a tiff and printed the > > file using QTR and the Ilford Smooth Pearl curves provided on this > > website. > > 2. Read the L values of the printed 21 step scale and entered these > > into a tab delimited text file. > > 3. Used QTR-Create-ICC program to convert the tab delimited text file > > into an icc file. > > 4. Converted the original Step-21-gray file into the new icc space > > created in step 3, saved this file and printed again in QTR > > 5. A reading of this new print showed that the scale was linearised. > > However when compared to the screen view of the image in Photoshop on > > a calibrated display, the printed version is slightly darker or heavier. > > > > So the process did linearise the gray scale, but the new icc profile > > does not create a close softproof match. The print doesn't look bad at > > all. It looks good when viewed by itself, but when compared to the > > display verion, then some difference can be seen. The difference is > > not dramatic, but enough that it is not possible to accurately adjust > > a gray scale image in Photoshop based entirely on what is viewed on > > the display. > > > > There is something not quite right and I am not sure exactly what > > might be causing the problem. I prefer not using the gamma adjustment > > slider in QTR to correct the discrepency between the printed and > > display version, since I assume this would cause the output to no > > longer be linear, thus in some respect degrading the image quality. > > > > Thanks for input on this. > > > > Best wishes, > > > > Ken > > >
Message
Re: Roy's working space blocks up shadow detail? Why use it?
2006-06-05 by prof_mgt551
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.