John I made a cool and a warm curve for UC and VFA. I decided to set the K limit to 75% and the Black boost to 95%, which is where the density really flattened out in the inkseparation. The net effect was that the K went to 95% for the deepest shadows. Using Black Boost causes the K to ramp up at the end of the curve more steeply than it would if I had simply set the K limit to 95%. That meant that the curve would be closer to the desired form prior to linearization. In general, I also use the shadow, highlight and gamma values to bring the curves closer to "ideal" prior to linearization. I was not happy with the curves and stopped working on them. In the end I decided that the 95% Black Boost is too high because I was getting ink spattering near the edges of the blacks. I started using the UT7 inks and never went back to fix the UC curves. Tom Moore > -----Original Message----- > From: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com [mailto:QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com] On > Behalf Of John Hollenberg > Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2005 12:38 AM > To: QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [QuadtoneRIP] Where to Set Ink Limit? > > I am making a profile for Epson Velvet Fine Art on Epson 2200. > Percent ink, L* values for black ink of the calibration target: > > 0,98.7 > 5,74 > 10,59.3 > 15,48.7 > 20,38.3 > 25,33.2 > 30,29.4 > 35,27.6 > 40,25.3 > 45,23.3 > 50,21.6 > 55,20.5 > 60,19.6 > 65,18.3 > 70,17.7 > 75,17.1 > 80,16.7 > 85,16.3 > 90,15.8 > 95,15.4 > 100,15.4 > > Question: where would you put the ink limit based on these data, and why? > > Thanks. > > --John > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > >
Message
RE: [QuadtoneRIP] Where to Set Ink Limit?
2005-10-22 by Tom Moore
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.