Yahoo Groups archive

QTR-Quadtone RIP

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:12 UTC

Message

Re: solved (I think) ...Re: regarding "no color management" in Print Tool

2015-04-16 by tyler@...

aside from whether or not there is something wrong with your profile.. the default intent sometimes built in shouldn't really be a problem. It's questionable whether or not many apps honor it, and the choice and decision what intent to use is always yours, using the apps most of us use here. Hope that makes sense. Additionally, there is often some visual discontinuities with relative vs perceptual in colors at the gamut boundry, since they may be chopped. I've seen other discontinuities with colormetric as well, depending on the profile, and image colors. Percpetual moves all that into gamut and smooths those transitions.


---In QuadtoneRIP@yahoogroups.com, <tracy@...> wrote :

Well, I believe I found the issue: the paid profiles native rendering intent is Relative instead of Perceptual.

The ColorMunki, and all the Epson and other third-party supplied profiles have a specified rendering intent of Perceptual, not Relative Colormetric.

When printing either as relative or perceptual from a native perceptual profile, the colors are correct and there is no sudden jump in gradation patterns. ("C" in the above case.)

When printing with the paid profile (which is native relative instead), using a perceptual intent works fine (no banding; smooth gradations; proper color) but when selecting relative colormetric during printing, the banding and off colors appear.

I'll admit to not completely understanding why relative/relative doesn't work, so if someone would care to explain, I'm eager to learn.

Meanwhile, I'll ask the supplier of the paid profiles to re-do them with a perceptual intent.

Thanks, folks.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.