Cray, Thanks for that, it's much appreciated. There have been some changes made recently to the Atrixsynth blog which will make for more interesting reading. Negative comments regarding manufacturers from anonymous posters will no longer be allowed and will be removed. You're still free to rant and rave, you just have to put your name to them. I'm glad this has happened as Matrix synth is by far the best analog synth blog going. Along those lines howeve,r let me dispell some of the rumors that popped up recently: 1) The Model 12's Mark II change was not done to fix a problem. It was a performance enhancement only. I'm always listening and tweeking...always. If I come across one I feel is significant, I incoporate it. Much like the sine shaper change in the Model 15 rev. 1.5 2) The Model 24 is not a Buchla 266 clone. It's a completely unique circuit. One look at the block diagram on the M24 page on the EAR site will make this point clear. Noone has done this in quite this way before. As far as it's functionality, I specifically asked Buchla and Associates if they would have a problem with this. Their answer "Not at all, everyone needs a wiggly voltage" 3) The Model 13 is close to a Lowpass Gate circuit. There are some significant improvements as far as using that circuit with Doepfer level signals as opposed to Buchla line level. There are components put in the Modle 13 that wil not be foind in any other Lowpass Gate replica - this includes the Cynthia Lowpass Gate, (which I designed) and the Wiard Borg Filter. I think thar's about it...for today, anyway. - P > > Hi Peter > > You are an amazing synth builder and I know you have way more fans > than haters so dont give up keep making great models for the people > who know :-) >
Message
Re: Peter puts up with a lot of BS
2006-10-23 by (i think you can figure that out)
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.