PLAN B analog blog

OK, that makes sense.  You could use one of the processors as an audio mixer
onto itself and then still crossfade CV - from the 'B' input with the other
processor which could be adding CV's together.  Good idea.

Consider it done.  It shall be known as the Paradigm Shift input.

- P


paradigmshiftbeats wrote:

> This would give you all the convenience of your current design while
> also allowing you to use each sub-module separately, for example:
> 
> cv 1,2,3 into Mixer 1
> audio 1,2,3 into Mixer 2
> cv 4, 5 (or audio 4,5) into Xfade A,B
> 
> or perhaps:
> 
> cv 1,2,3 into Mixer 1
> Mixer 1 normalled to Xfade A input
> cv 2 to Xfade B input
> cv 4,5,Xfade out into Mixer 2
> 
> or even:
> 
> cv 1,2,3 into Mixer 1
> cv 4,5,6 into Mixer 2
> Mixer 1 Max out to Xfade A input
> Mixer 2 Min out to Xfade B input
> 
> You see what I mean?  :-)
> 
> 
> --- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, "(i think you can figure
> that out)" <peter@b...> wrote:
>> 
>> Thinking a little more about this i have a question:
>> 
>> What's the difference between the switchable second input of the
>> xfader and just using one of the processor inputs?  anything that
>> goes into the secondary input could go into one of the processor
>> inputs are well - so this switched in/ non normalized xfader input
>> would just limit three input per side (via the processor) to only
> 1 
>> input per side (via the secondary input).
>> 
>> Am i missing the boat on this?  let me know and thnaks,
>> 
>> - P
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>