VC Quad panner as a stand alone sounds like a great idea, actually. Let me give that some serious thought. Again, if enough people say 'yeah', it's a win win for everybody. Thanks for this (good) idea. - P --- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, Robert Hoffman <robmix@e...> wrote: > Maybe there's two separate modules, the Balanced Stereo Output, which > I'm all for - sign me up, and a VC Quad panner. > > Rob > > > > On Monday, October 4, 2004, at 01:17 PM, Johan Boberg wrote: > > > About the proposed Balanced Stereo Output Processor, > > it looks really useful, i would really like to have one. > > > > But i would really love to have it somehow patchable as a > > Quad Output Processor if possible. It could still be used > > as a stereo out if this is preferred. I don't know exactly > > what it would take to convert your design into this without > > changing it too much though... > > > > /Johan > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ > > Johan Boberg http://www.eam.se > > > > > > > <image.tiff> > > > > > <image.tiff> > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > To visit your group on the web, go to: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PLAN_B_analog_blog/ > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > > PLAN_B_analog_blog-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. > >
Message
Re: [PLAN_B_analog_blog]
2004-10-04 by (i think you can figure that out)
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.