I think the unity gain input is much more useful than an output level pot, personally. I'd definitely go for that. I have a couple of serge MIX2 modules which have this feature, and it's very useful to have & adds versatility. As the m12 filter has an input level pot, as long as the mixer isn't going to overload internally when all of the ins are cranked up full, I don't think the output pot would be missed at all in use. A simple dual attenuator (passive) or dual reversing attenuator(active) might be a useful future utility module. --- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, "(i think you can figure that out)" <peter@...> wrote: > > Got a question for the group, please give me input. > > One thing that's pestered me about most Eurorack line mixers is they > have this overall output level pot which I feel is at best an option, > at most a redundancy, if nothing else another pot you need to deal > with along with the level pots - and they all omit something tey could > slap in the same space as the output level pot that I feel would be > much more useful: a fifth buss input to stack mixers together so you > don't have to take one of the input channels to do it? > > Do you guys see a need for a mixer that is stackable at the risk of > removing the output level pot? >
Message
Re: Mixer question - tolling my peeps (you guys)
2007-08-20 by NoRMaN PHaY
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.