Yahoo Groups archive

PLAN B analog blog

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:10 UTC

Message

Re: Mixer question - tolling my peeps (you guys)

2007-08-20 by NoRMaN PHaY

I think the unity gain input is much more useful than an output level
pot, personally.  I'd definitely go for that.  I have a couple of
serge MIX2 modules which have this feature, and it's very useful to
have & adds versatility.

As the m12 filter has an input level pot, as long as the mixer isn't
going to overload internally when all of the ins are cranked up full,
I don't think the output pot would be missed at all in use.

A simple dual attenuator (passive) or dual reversing
attenuator(active) might be a useful future utility module.

--- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, "(i think you can figure
that out)" <peter@...> wrote:
>
> Got a question for the group, please give me input.  
> 
> One thing that's pestered me about most Eurorack line mixers is they
> have this overall output level pot which I feel is at best an option,
> at most a redundancy, if nothing else another pot you need to deal
> with along with the level pots - and they all omit something tey could
> slap in the same space as the output level pot that I feel would be
> much more useful:  a fifth buss input to stack mixers together so you
> don't have to take one of the input channels to do it? 
> 
> Do you guys see a need for a mixer that is stackable at the risk of
> removing the output level pot?
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.