I keep hearing the myth that mellotron sounds are always degraded in some way when using digital recording methods. It may have been always true 25 years ago. (using poor converters, low resolution filters, short word length and low sample rates). With modern, good quality digital recorders, you can still end up with a cold / harsh "digital sandpaper" recording. (degraded). OR you can get results that are pure and sweet. The initial recording at 24 bit / 96k sample rate will always sound great. The trouble is, engineers fuck with the recording over and over and over again....and the sound quality deteriorates ever so slightly each time it's processed. (There may be no generation loss when making digital copies, but there is generation loss when processing the signal). In addition, some of the processing that's intended to improve the sound, degrades it. EQ, gain adjustment, Downward compression, reverb, upward expansion, EQ, upward compression, downward expansion, more EQ, more gain adjustment, a pinch of Q sound, a dash Aphex Exciter....run it through the DA - AD converter just one more time and presto! Harsh digital sandpaper! No problem... We can always use an Analog tube (valve) emulator to fix it. Clay
Message
digital recording
2005-06-09 by ceccles_ca
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.
