> >> From: <mailto:lsf5275%40aol.com>lsf5275@... >> Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 21:36:02 EST >> >> Jon, without a doubt, that is (some of) the lamest bullshit I >> have ever read on this list. > >No Frank, it's absolutely true. I agree here. > >> Jon, Don might have started this list, but it now transcends >> him. It isn't his. Yes it is, and that's the whole point. And I would suggest that he has to take the can when something goes wrong. On one synth group on the net (I needn't say which- oh all right then, a Roland site) it was hijacked by spammers as the owner moderator went awol, so the more serious/creative members left and started a proper group list, leaving the tossers to their fun. Any list owner has a moral obligation when dealing with any serious subject to keep an eye on things and make sure that it doesn't descend into anarchy -another example is the Off topic list on Sound on Sound's site, which was binned -for various reasons, one of which was the number of complaints SOS received from readers. There were other reasons as well, but the flame artists now have their own playground elsewhere on the net for general rudeness and flame wars. I hope this illustrates my point. > It is all of ours and we trust him to moderate >> it. But to do so, he must remain neutral and follow a fair set > > of rules. Being independent oand objective needs the patience of Job. Any takers? > >Third, you're advocating censorship. Indeed. Dave.
Message
Re: [Mellotronists] Re: question/observation
2007-11-18 by d.etheridge1@ntlworld.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.
