In a message dated 7/21/02 12:10:26 PM Pacific Daylight Time, aidan@... writes: > I thought that the Mellotron 400 and Mark IV were identical. I seem to > remember Les Bradley telling me that they were one and the same. What's > the difference? I haven't seen the article, but isn't the review about the > new Mark VI instead? Aidan > There never was a Mk IV, they were all 300's. The Mark- designation always applied to 2-manual trons (e.g., MkI, MkII, MkV) until DK broke the tradition with the single manual MkVI (which should have been a 600). Frank Samagaio Mk IV #908 8-)~
Message
Re: [Mellotronists] Mark IV/400/VI
2002-07-21 by MAinPsych@aol.com
