Marcos Maniacs group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Marcos Maniacs

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:07 UTC

Thread

modern engines for 1600/1800GT

modern engines for 1600/1800GT

2010-06-01 by chinojuan2

Read some old Wiki articles saying certain engines made the 1600/1800GT a bit nose heavy (perhaps iron block engine). As later Marcos had Rover 8 cylinder, did this make it evebn worse---or were Rover 8 cylinder cars not the same as 1600/1800?
 I bring up these questions because I wondered if anyone had a experience or thoughts on placing a Ford or Chevy V-8 into a 1600/1800GT (something like a 289/302 Ford or a 305/350 Chevy).  Would these engines make the car too nose heavy and ruin the handling? 

I was dreaming about a way to make the 1600/1800 GT more powerful, sound great, have a modern engine anyone can work on....but not at the expense of handling.....

Figured some MArcos had Ford as well as GM engines, so thsi idea shouldn't be too blasphamous  :)

RE: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT

2010-06-01 by Red Hot


The Rover V8 was based on a Buick engine with alloy block and was particularly light in weight for a V8. I seem to recall that when fitted to the MGB it was no heavier than the 1800 MGB engine. The V8 engines you mention would be much heavier units and while anything is possible I would think that there are plenty of modern 2 litre engines around that would be far more suitable if you want it as a reliable car to use. If you look at other cars when they get old and collectible, the value is always in the ones that have original motors so you might want to think about that too. There are plenty of ways to make either the 1600 crossflow Ford or the 1800 Volvo engine more powerful.

Best of luck!

Roger Andreason

ex Marcos racer


To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com
From: chinojuan2@...
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 13:11:02 +0000
Subject: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT

Read some old Wiki articles saying certain engines made the 1600/1800GT a bit nose heavy (perhaps iron block engine). As later Marcos had Rover 8 cylinder, did this make it evebn worse---or were Rover 8 cylinder cars not the same as 1600/1800?
I bring up these questions because I wondered if anyone had a experience or thoughts on placing a Ford or Chevy V-8 into a 1600/1800GT (something like a 289/302 Ford or a 305/350 Chevy). Would these engines make the car too nose heavy and ruin the handling?

I was dreaming about a way to make the 1600/1800 GT more powerful, sound great, have a modern engine anyone can work on....but not at the expense of handling.....

Figured some MArcos had Ford as well as GM engines, so thsi idea shouldn't be too blasphamous :)



Get a free e-mail account with Hotmail. Sign-up now.

Re: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT

2010-06-01 by Chino Juan

thanks for the insight. I have inherited a 1600, but it hasn't run since 1979. THe engine is said to be "good", but it has been sitting since then, so who knows what it will take to get it back up. 

I was actually considering getting the engine running, but wanted something with more "omph" (it has Ford 4). I do not know what to do to give it more power without ruining value and ease of maintainence. I really can't do a lot of work myself, and want to make servicing it simple, and have it be as reliable as possible....

The car "looks" fast to me, but it would also be nice if it sounded and went as fast as it looks! I guess I do not want to be blwon away by 4 cylinder Accords and V-6 Camerys.......




________________________________
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Red Hot <firstredhot1@...>
To: marcosmaniacs@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, June 1, 2010 11:15:20 AM
Subject: RE: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT

  


The Rover V8 was based on a Buick engine with alloy block and was particularly light in weight for a V8. I seem to recall that when fitted to the MGB it was no heavier than the 1800 MGB engine.  The V8 engines you mention would be much heavier units and while anything is possible I would think that there are plenty of modern 2 litre engines around that would be far more suitable if you want it as a reliable car to use. If you look at other cars when they get old and collectible, the value is always in the ones that have original  motors so you might want to think about that too.  There are plenty of ways to make either the 1600 crossflow Ford or the 1800 Volvo engine more powerful.
Best of luck!
Roger Andreason
ex Marcos racer
________________________________
To: MarcosManiacs@ yahoogroups. com
From: chinojuan2@yahoo. com
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 13:11:02 +0000
Subject: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT

  
Read some old Wiki articles saying certain engines made the 1600/1800GT a bit nose heavy (perhaps iron block engine). As later Marcos had Rover 8 cylinder, did this make it evebn worse---or were Rover 8 cylinder cars not the same as 1600/1800?
I bring up these questions because I wondered if anyone had a experience or thoughts on placing a Ford or Chevy V-8 into a 1600/1800GT (something like a 289/302 Ford or a 305/350 Chevy). Would these engines make the car too nose heavy and ruin the handling? 

I was dreaming about a way to make the 1600/1800 GT more powerful, sound great, have a modern engine anyone can work on....but not at the expense of handling.... .

Figured some MArcos had Ford as well as GM engines, so thsi idea shouldn't be too blasphamous :)



________________________________
Get a free e-mail account with Hotmail. Sign-up now.

RE: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT

2010-06-01 by Red Hot

The engine in your car was straight from a Mk2 Cortina saloon and is essentially the same as the engine used for many years in Formula Ford race cars. Try taking the plugs out, squirt a little lubricant into the plug holes and try to see if it will turn over. If it does chances are it will be possible to get it running. Make sure you get let the lubricant disperse before putting the plugs back in or you will get a hydraulic lock.

If you go here http://www.burtonpower.com/technical_1/kent_crossflow.aspx you can see much information about tuning this engine. ; Any tuning you do to the original engine will not reduce the value of the car and may well enhance it.

A lot of the later Ford 4 cylinder engines had the same mounting holes on the back of the block so using one of these is a simple task compared to fitting a V8 or other make of engine. The Marcos should have come with either a Lotus Twin Cam or the Ford Cosworth BDA but of course they cost more and were less suitable for everyday use.

You could even fit a Ford RS500 turbo motor but that would be more difficult due to needing to locate all the ancillaries - but another option would be to look for a Cosworth YBM which was used here for Midget racing for some time and is popular with Vintage racers. It is the Cosworth turbo motor modified to be normally aspirated with a pair of Weber carbs.

I hope that gives you a few ideas. I used to race a 1500 and also a 1600 in the UK when they were new cars.

Regards

Roger

To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: chinojuan2@...
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 10:34:28 -0700
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT


thanks for the insight. I have inherited a 1600, but it hasn't run since 1979. THe engine is said to be "good", but it has been sitting since then, so who knows what it will take to get it back up.
I was actually considering getting the engine running, but wanted something with more "omph" (it has Ford 4). I do not know what to do to give it more power without ruining value and ease of maintainence. I really can't do a lot of work myself, and want to make servicing it simple, and have it be as reliable as possible....
The car "looks" fast to me, but it would also be nice if it sounded and went as fast as it looks! I guess I do not want to be blwon away by 4 cylinder Accords and V-6 Camerys.......

From: Red Hot hotmail.com>
To: marcosmaniacs@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, June 1, 2010 11:15:20 AM
Subject: RE: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT



The Rover V8 was based on a Buick engine with alloy block and was particularly light in weight for a V8. I seem to recall that when fitted to the MGB it was no heavier than the 1800 MGB engine. The V8 engines you mention would be much heavier units and while anything is possible I would think that there are plenty of modern 2 litre engines around that would be far more suitable if you want it as a reliable car to use. If you look at other cars when they get old and collectible, the value is always in the ones that have original motors so you might want to think about that too. There are plenty of ways to make either the 1600 crossflow Ford or the 1800 Volvo engine more powerful.

Best of luck!

Roger Andreason

ex Marcos racer


To: MarcosManiacs@ yahoogroups. com
From: chinojuan2@yahoo. com
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 13:11:02 +0000
Subject: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT

Read some old Wiki articles saying certain engines made the 1600/1800GT a bit nose heavy (perhaps iron block engine). As later Marcos had Rover 8 cylinder, did this make it evebn worse---or were Rover 8 cylinder cars not the same as 1600/1800?
I bring up these questions because I wondered if anyone had a experience or thoughts on placing a Ford or Chevy V-8 into a 1600/1800GT (something like a 289/302 Ford or a 305/350 Chevy). Would these engines make the car too nose heavy and ruin the handling?

I was dreaming about a way to make the 1600/1800 GT more powerful, sound great, have a modern engine anyone can work on....but not at the expense of handling.... .

Figured some MArcos had Ford as well as GM engines, so thsi idea shouldn't be too blasphamous :)



Get a free e-mail account with Hotmail. Sign-up now.



Get a free e-mail account with Hotmail. Sign-up now.

Re: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT

2010-06-01 by Robin Gilmour

Dear Marcos Group:

Have you ever considered a retired sprint car engine?

Esslinger builds very trick pinto based race engines for sprint cars and other classes.

I considered buying a retired race engine with alloy block, D port head, dry sump, mechanical FI, titanium rods and all kinds of other trick parts.

They have fallen out of favor with the sprint car crowd. Now most of these engines run alcholol but some were built for gas also.

They weigh about 225 lbs, rev to 10K and put out 250 hps.....

I have seen engines on such sites as" race junk" for $3000.00  The titanium rods cost almost $3000....

Just a thought....
 

Robin




________________________________
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Red Hot <firstredhot1@...>
To: marcosmaniacs@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, June 1, 2010 12:29:38 PM
Subject: RE: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT

  
The engine in your car was straight from a Mk2 Cortina saloon and is essentially the same as the engine used for many years in Formula Ford race cars. Try taking the plugs out, squirt a little lubricant into the plug holes and try to see if it will turn over. If it does chances are it will be possible to get it running.  Make sure you get let the lubricant disperse before putting the plugs back in or you will get a hydraulic lock.

If you go here http://www.burtonpo wer.com/technica l_1/kent_ crossflow. aspx you can see much information about tuning this engine.  Any tuning you do to the original engine will not reduce the value of the car and may well enhance it.

A lot of the later Ford 4 cylinder engines had the same mounting holes on the back of the block so using one of these is a simple task compared to fitting  a V8 or other make of engine.  The Marcos should have come with either a Lotus Twin Cam or the Ford Cosworth BDA but of course they cost more and were less suitable for everyday use.  

You could even fit a Ford RS500 turbo motor but that would be more difficult due to needing to locate all the ancillaries - but another option would be to look for a Cosworth YBM which was used here for Midget racing for some time and is popular with Vintage racers. It is the Cosworth turbo motor modified to be normally aspirated with a pair of Weber carbs.

I hope that gives you a few ideas. I used to race a 1500 and also a 1600 in the UK when they were new cars.

Regards

Roger


________________________________
To: MarcosManiacs@ yahoogroups. com
From: chinojuan2@yahoo. com
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 10:34:28 -0700
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT

  


thanks for the insight. I have inherited a 1600, but it hasn't run since 1979. THe engine is said to be "good", but it has been sitting since then, so who knows what it will take to get it back up. 
 
I was actually considering getting the engine running, but wanted something with more "omph" (it has Ford 4). I do not know what to do to give it more power without ruining value and ease of maintainence. I really can't do a lot of work myself, and want to make servicing it simple, and have it be as reliable as possible....
 
The car "looks" fast to me, but it would also be nice if it sounded and went as fast as it looks! I guess I do not want to be blwon away by 4 cylinder Accords and V-6 Camerys..... ..




________________________________
 From: Red Hot <firstredhot1@ hotmail.com>
To: marcosmaniacs@ yahoogroups. com
Sent: Tue, June 1, 2010 11:15:20 AM
Subject: RE: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT

  



The Rover V8 was based on a Buick engine with alloy block and was particularly light in weight for a V8. I seem to recall that when fitted to the MGB it was no heavier than the 1800 MGB engine.  The V8 engines you mention would be much heavier units and while anything is possible I would think that there are plenty of modern 2 litre engines around that would be far more suitable if you want it as a reliable car to use. If you look at other cars when they get old and collectible, the value is always in the ones that have original  motors so you might want to think about that too.  There are plenty of ways to make either the 1600 crossflow Ford or the 1800 Volvo engine more powerful.
Best of luck!
Roger Andreason
ex Marcos racer
________________________________
 To: MarcosManiacs@ yahoogroups. com
From: chinojuan2@yahoo. com
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 13:11:02 +0000
Subject: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT

  
Read some old Wiki articles saying certain engines made the 1600/1800GT a bit nose heavy (perhaps iron block engine). As later Marcos had Rover 8 cylinder, did this make it evebn worse---or were Rover 8 cylinder cars not the same as 1600/1800?
I bring up these questions because I wondered if anyone had a experience or thoughts on placing a Ford or Chevy V-8 into a 1600/1800GT (something like a 289/302 Ford or a 305/350 Chevy). Would these engines make the car too nose heavy and ruin the handling? 

I was dreaming about a way to make the 1600/1800 GT more powerful, sound great, have a modern engine anyone can work on....but not at the expense of handling.... .

Figured some MArcos had Ford as well as GM engines, so thsi idea shouldn't be too blasphamous :)



________________________________
 Get a free e-mail account with Hotmail. Sign-up now. 


________________________________
Get a free e-mail account with Hotmail. Sign-up now.

Re: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT

2010-06-02 by Robin Gilmour

Dear Marcos Group:

I have a TVR 2500M with that great bid heavy and underpowered Triumph TR6 engine.  I have daydreamed about engine transplants for a while now:

My list includes:

Mustang / Merkur Turbo I4
Ford Zetec SVT 
Ford Duratec I4 DOHC and all aluminum. Came in 2001 and later Ford Rangers, some mazda's etc etc
Ford Duratec 2.5L V6 Contour SVT all aluminum block and heads, porsche designed cosworth reworked.....
VW VR6 
Audi 7a 2.3 L I5 DOHC, cast iron block, alum head.
Audi AAN 2.3L DOHC Turbo 227 hps show room stock hot to 500 without too much grief......
Nissan 20SRT 2.0L DOHV turbo
Toyota AE86 2.0L DOHC


Regards
Robin







________________________________
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Red Hot <firstredhot1@...>
To: marcosmaniacs@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, June 1, 2010 12:29:38 PM
Subject: RE: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT

  
The engine in your car was straight from a Mk2 Cortina saloon and is essentially the same as the engine used for many years in Formula Ford race cars. Try taking the plugs out, squirt a little lubricant into the plug holes and try to see if it will turn over. If it does chances are it will be possible to get it running.  Make sure you get let the lubricant disperse before putting the plugs back in or you will get a hydraulic lock.

If you go here http://www.burtonpo wer.com/technica l_1/kent_ crossflow. aspx you can see much information about tuning this engine.  Any tuning you do to the original engine will not reduce the value of the car and may well enhance it.

A lot of the later Ford 4 cylinder engines had the same mounting holes on the back of the block so using one of these is a simple task compared to fitting  a V8 or other make of engine.  The Marcos should have come with either a Lotus Twin Cam or the Ford Cosworth BDA but of course they cost more and were less suitable for everyday use.  

You could even fit a Ford RS500 turbo motor but that would be more difficult due to needing to locate all the ancillaries - but another option would be to look for a Cosworth YBM which was used here for Midget racing for some time and is popular with Vintage racers. It is the Cosworth turbo motor modified to be normally aspirated with a pair of Weber carbs.

I hope that gives you a few ideas. I used to race a 1500 and also a 1600 in the UK when they were new cars.

Regards

Roger


________________________________
To: MarcosManiacs@ yahoogroups. com
From: chinojuan2@yahoo. com
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 10:34:28 -0700
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT

  


thanks for the insight. I have inherited a 1600, but it hasn't run since 1979. THe engine is said to be "good", but it has been sitting since then, so who knows what it will take to get it back up. 
 
I was actually considering getting the engine running, but wanted something with more "omph" (it has Ford 4). I do not know what to do to give it more power without ruining value and ease of maintainence. I really can't do a lot of work myself, and want to make servicing it simple, and have it be as reliable as possible....
 
The car "looks" fast to me, but it would also be nice if it sounded and went as fast as it looks! I guess I do not want to be blwon away by 4 cylinder Accords and V-6 Camerys..... ..




________________________________
 From: Red Hot <firstredhot1@ hotmail.com>
To: marcosmaniacs@ yahoogroups. com
Sent: Tue, June 1, 2010 11:15:20 AM
Subject: RE: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT

  



The Rover V8 was based on a Buick engine with alloy block and was particularly light in weight for a V8. I seem to recall that when fitted to the MGB it was no heavier than the 1800 MGB engine.  The V8 engines you mention would be much heavier units and while anything is possible I would think that there are plenty of modern 2 litre engines around that would be far more suitable if you want it as a reliable car to use. If you look at other cars when they get old and collectible, the value is always in the ones that have original  motors so you might want to think about that too.  There are plenty of ways to make either the 1600 crossflow Ford or the 1800 Volvo engine more powerful.
Best of luck!
Roger Andreason
ex Marcos racer
________________________________
 To: MarcosManiacs@ yahoogroups. com
From: chinojuan2@yahoo. com
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 13:11:02 +0000
Subject: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT

  
Read some old Wiki articles saying certain engines made the 1600/1800GT a bit nose heavy (perhaps iron block engine). As later Marcos had Rover 8 cylinder, did this make it evebn worse---or were Rover 8 cylinder cars not the same as 1600/1800?
I bring up these questions because I wondered if anyone had a experience or thoughts on placing a Ford or Chevy V-8 into a 1600/1800GT (something like a 289/302 Ford or a 305/350 Chevy). Would these engines make the car too nose heavy and ruin the handling? 

I was dreaming about a way to make the 1600/1800 GT more powerful, sound great, have a modern engine anyone can work on....but not at the expense of handling.... .

Figured some MArcos had Ford as well as GM engines, so thsi idea shouldn't be too blasphamous :)



________________________________
 Get a free e-mail account with Hotmail. Sign-up now. 


________________________________
Get a free e-mail account with Hotmail. Sign-up now.

Re: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT

2010-06-02 by Donny Lang

In my opinion, the Rover alloy V8 is the best choice of V8s for the Marcos. As you mentioned, this is the engine that Marcos used starting in the mid-1980s. It is one of the lighter V8s out there at about 320 lbs and makes decent power, but is still relatively small displacement at 215 ci to 282 ci (3.5 liter to 4.6 liter). The engines are plentiful and cheap to purchase at U-Pull junkyards coming from mid 1990 Land Rover Discovery and Range Rovers. The bigger headache and expense comes in mating a suitable flywheel/bellhousing/transmission. Probably the best match is the Leyland LT77 out of the Triumph TR8 and Morgan+8. I think there are also T5 transmissions that can be mated with custom bellhousings.
I expect the heaviest engines used in the Marcos cars were the 3.0 V6 Ford and the 3.0 Volvo. My car came with a 2.0 V4 Ford that weighs at least 100lbs more than the Rover V8 I am replacing it with. ;I would consider the small block Fords and Chevys mentioned as too heavy unless you came across an all alloy version.
-Donny
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message -----
From: chinojuan2
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 9:11 AM
Subject: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT

Read some old Wiki articles saying certain engines made the 1600/1800GT a bit nose heavy (perhaps iron block engine). As later Marcos had Rover 8 cylinder, did this make it evebn worse---or were Rover 8 cylinder cars not the same as 1600/1800?
I bring up these questions because I wondered if anyone had a experience or thoughts on placing a Ford or Chevy V-8 into a 1600/1800GT (something like a 289/302 Ford or a 305/350 Chevy). Would these engines make the car too nose heavy and ruin the handling?

I was dreaming about a way to make the 1600/1800 GT more powerful, sound great, have a modern engine anyone can work on....but not at the expense of handling.....

Figured some MArcos had Ford as well as GM engines, so thsi idea shouldn't be too blasphamous :)

Re: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT

2010-06-02 by Richard Brengman

Is this a wood chassis car?

If it is a wood chassis it is not suitable for too much in the way of power increase.

I am putting a 2 liter Alfa into mine, (probably not "modern" enough for you) but I am also using hot cams that will limit low end torque a bit.
I will also avoid drag-race type starts.

Richard, Marcos 1600

On Jun 1, 2010, at 6:56 PM, Donny Lang wrote:


In my opinion, the Rover alloy V8 is the best choice of V8s for the Marcos. As you mentioned, this is the engine that Marcos used starting in the mid-1980s. It is one of the lighter V8s out there at about 320 lbs and makes decent power, but is still relatively small displacement at 215 ci to 282 ci (3.5 liter to 4.6 liter). The engines are plentiful and cheap to purchase at U-Pull junkyards coming from mid 1990 Land Rover Discovery and Range Rovers. The bigger headache and expense comes in mating a suitable flywheel/bellhousing/transmission. Probably the best match is the Leyland LT77 out of the Triumph TR8 and Morgan+8. I think there are also T5 transmissions that can be mated with custom bellhousings.
I expect the heaviest engines used in the Marcos cars were the 3.0 V6 Ford and the 3.0 Volvo. My car came with a 2.0 V4 Ford that weighs at least 100lbs more than the Rover V8 I am replacing it with. I would consider the small block Fords and Chevys mentioned as too heavy unless you came across an all alloy version.
-Donny
----- Original Message -----
From: chinojuan2
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 9:11 AM
Subject: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT

Read some old Wiki articles saying certain engines made the 1600/1800GT a bit nose heavy (perhaps iron block engine). As later Marcos had Rover 8 cylinder, did this make it evebn worse---or were Rover 8 cylinder cars not the same as 1600/1800?
I bring up these questions because I wondered if anyone had a experience or thoughts on placing a Ford or Chevy V-8 into a 1600/1800GT (something like a 289/302 Ford or a 305/350 Chevy). Would these engines make the car too nose heavy and ruin the handling?

I was dreaming about a way to make the 1600/1800 GT more powerful, sound great, have a modern engine anyone can work on....but not at the expense of handling.....

Figured some MArcos had Ford as well as GM engines, so thsi idea shouldn't be too blasphamous :)



Re: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT

2010-06-02 by pauldransfield@iname.com

I think you will find that the engine bay in the earlier Marcos 1600 is much smaller than the engine bay in the 3 litre cars. I have a 3 litre Volvo Marcos and my car is noticeably longer than the 1600 version. Also, in order to fit a Rover V8 in the later cars, there were substantial mods required to the chassis. I doubt that engine would fit the earlier cars. Just make sure the option you prefer will actually fit in the space available.

Regards,

Paul Dransfield
3 litre Volvo
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: Donny Lang <indigo@...>
To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, Jun 1, 2010 9:56 pm
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT


 


In my opinion, the Rover alloy V8 is the best choice of V8s for the Marcos. As you mentioned, this is the engine that Marcos used starting in the mid-1980s. It is one of the lighter V8s out there at about 320 lbs and makes decent power, but is still relatively small displacement at 215 ci to 282 ci (3.5 liter to 4.6 liter). The engines are plentiful and cheap to purchase at U-Pull junkyards coming from mid 1990 Land Rover Discovery and Range Rovers. The bigger headache and expense comes in mating a suitable flywheel/bellhousing/transmission. Probably the best match is the Leyland LT77 out of the Triumph TR8 and Morgan+8. I think there are also T5 transmissions that can be mated with custom bellhousings.
I expect the heaviest engines used in the Marcos cars were the 3.0 V6 Ford and the 3.0 Volvo. My car came with a 2.0 V4 Ford that weighs at least 100lbs more than the Rover V8 I am replacing it with. I would consider the small block Fords and Chevys mentioned as too heavy unless you came across an all alloy version.
-Donny

----- Original Message ----- 
From: chinojuan2 
To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 9:11 AM
Subject: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT


  
Read some old Wiki articles saying certain engines made the 1600/1800GT a bit nose heavy (perhaps iron block engine). As later Marcos had Rover 8 cylinder, did this make it evebn worse---or were Rover 8 cylinder cars not the same as 1600/1800?
I bring up these questions because I wondered if anyone had a experience or thoughts on placing a Ford or Chevy V-8 into a 1600/1800GT (something like a 289/302 Ford or a 305/350 Chevy). Would these engines make the car too nose heavy and ruin the handling? 

I was dreaming about a way to make the 1600/1800 GT more powerful, sound great, have a modern engine anyone can work on....but not at the expense of handling.....

Figured some MArcos had Ford as well as GM engines, so thsi idea shouldn't be too blasphamous :)

Re: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT

2010-06-02 by Chino Juan

the Duratec SVT's would be nice, even a 2.0 Zetec form Focus would be nice .......have a Focus with 160K  on it, the car has given me headaches, but engine/trans has been rock solid......




________________________________
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Robin Gilmour <quattroguy83@...>
To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, June 1, 2010 8:11:48 PM
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT

  
Dear Marcos Group:

I have a TVR 2500M with that great bid heavy and underpowered Triumph TR6 engine.  I have daydreamed about engine transplants for a while now:

My list includes:

Mustang / Merkur Turbo I4
Ford Zetec SVT 
Ford Duratec I4 DOHC and all aluminum. Came in 2001 and later Ford Rangers, some mazda's etc etc
Ford Duratec 2.5L V6 Contour SVT all aluminum block and heads, porsche designed cosworth reworked.... .
VW VR6 
Audi 7a 2.3 L I5 DOHC, cast iron block, alum head.
Audi AAN 2.3L DOHC Turbo 227 hps show room stock hot to 500 without too much grief......
Nissan 20SRT 2.0L DOHV turbo
Toyota AE86 2.0L DOHC


Regards
Robin







________________________________
From: Red Hot <firstredhot1@ hotmail.com>
To: marcosmaniacs@ yahoogroups. com
Sent: Tue, June 1, 2010 12:29:38 PM
Subject: RE: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT

  
The engine in your car was straight from a Mk2 Cortina saloon and is essentially the same as the engine used for many years in Formula Ford race cars. Try taking the plugs out, squirt a little lubricant into the plug holes and try to see if it will turn over. If it does chances are it will be possible to get it running.  Make sure you get let the lubricant disperse before putting the plugs back in or you will get a hydraulic lock.

If you go here http://www.burtonpo wer.com/technica l_1/kent_ crossflow. aspx you can see much information about tuning this engine.  Any tuning you do to the original engine will not reduce the value of the car and may well enhance it.

A lot of the later Ford 4 cylinder engines had the same mounting holes on the back of the block so using one of these is a simple task compared to fitting  a V8 or other make of engine.  The Marcos should have come with either a Lotus Twin Cam or the Ford Cosworth BDA but of course they cost more and were less suitable for everyday use.  

You could even fit a Ford RS500 turbo motor but that would be more difficult due to needing to locate all the ancillaries - but another option would be to look for a Cosworth YBM which was used here for Midget racing for some time and is popular with Vintage racers. It is the Cosworth turbo motor modified to be normally aspirated with a pair of Weber carbs.

I hope that gives you a few ideas. I used to race a 1500 and also a 1600 in the UK when they were new cars.

Regards

Roger


________________________________
To: MarcosManiacs@ yahoogroups. com
From: chinojuan2@yahoo. com
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 10:34:28 -0700
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT

  


thanks for the insight. I have inherited a 1600, but it hasn't run since 1979. THe engine is said to be "good", but it has been sitting since then, so who knows what it will take to get it back up. 

I was actually considering getting the engine running, but wanted something with more "omph" (it has Ford 4). I do not know what to do to give it more power without ruining value and ease of maintainence. I really can't do a lot of work myself, and want to make servicing it simple, and have it be as reliable as possible....

The car "looks" fast to me, but it would also be nice if it sounded and went as fast as it looks! I guess I do not want to be blwon away by 4 cylinder Accords and V-6 Camerys..... ..




________________________________
From: Red Hot <firstredhot1@ hotmail.com>
To: marcosmaniacs@ yahoogroups. com
Sent: Tue, June 1, 2010 11:15:20 AM
Subject: RE: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT

  



The Rover V8 was based on a Buick engine with alloy block and was particularly light in weight for a V8. I seem to recall that when fitted to the MGB it was no heavier than the 1800 MGB engine.  The V8 engines you mention would be much heavier units and while anything is possible I would think that there are plenty of modern 2 litre engines around that would be far more suitable if you want it as a reliable car to use. If you look at other cars when they get old and collectible, the value is always in the ones that have original  motors so you might want to think about that too.  There are plenty of ways to make either the 1600 crossflow Ford or the 1800 Volvo engine more powerful.
Best of luck!
Roger Andreason
ex Marcos racer
________________________________
To: MarcosManiacs@ yahoogroups. com
From: chinojuan2@yahoo. com
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 13:11:02 +0000
Subject: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT

  
Read some old Wiki articles saying certain engines made the 1600/1800GT a bit nose heavy (perhaps iron block engine). As later Marcos had Rover 8 cylinder, did this make it evebn worse---or were Rover 8 cylinder cars not the same as 1600/1800?
I bring up these questions because I wondered if anyone had a experience or thoughts on placing a Ford or Chevy V-8 into a 1600/1800GT (something like a 289/302 Ford or a 305/350 Chevy). Would these engines make the car too nose heavy and ruin the handling? 

I was dreaming about a way to make the 1600/1800 GT more powerful, sound great, have a modern engine anyone can work on....but not at the expense of handling.... .

Figured some MArcos had Ford as well as GM engines, so thsi idea shouldn't be too blasphamous :)



________________________________
Get a free e-mail account with Hotmail. Sign-up now. 


________________________________
Get a free e-mail account with Hotmail. Sign-up now.

Re: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT

2010-06-02 by Chino Juan

what about the 4.6 V-8 from later mustangs? is it alloy?




________________________________
From: Donny Lang <indigo@...>
To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, June 1, 2010 9:56:28 PM
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT

  
In my opinion, the Rover alloy V8 is the best choice of V8s for the Marcos. As you mentioned, this is the engine that Marcos used starting in the mid-1980s. It is one of the lighter V8s out there at about 320 lbs and makes decent power, but is still relatively small displacement at 215 ci to 282 ci (3.5 liter to 4.6 liter). The engines are plentiful and cheap to purchase at U-Pull junkyards coming from mid 1990 Land Rover Discovery and Range Rovers. The bigger headache and expense comes in mating a suitable flywheel/bellhousin g/transmission. Probably the best match is the Leyland LT77 out of the Triumph TR8 and Morgan+8. I think there are also T5 transmissions that can be mated with custom bellhousings.
I expect the heaviest engines used in the Marcos cars were the 3.0 V6 Ford and the 3.0 Volvo. My car came with a 2.0 V4 Ford that weighs at least 100lbs more than the Rover V8 I am replacing it with. I would consider the small block Fords and Chevys mentioned as too heavy unless you came across an all alloy version.
-Donny
----- Original Message ----- 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>From: chinojuan2 
>To: MarcosManiacs@ yahoogroups. com 
>Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 9:11 AM
>Subject: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT
>
>  
>Read some old Wiki articles saying certain engines made the 1600/1800GT a bit nose heavy (perhaps iron block engine). As later Marcos had Rover 8 cylinder, did this make it evebn worse---or were Rover 8 cylinder cars not the same as 1600/1800?
>I bring up these questions because I wondered if anyone had a experience or thoughts on placing a Ford or Chevy V-8 into a 1600/1800GT (something like a 289/302 Ford or a 305/350 Chevy). Would these engines make the car too nose heavy and ruin the handling? 
>
>I was dreaming about a way to make the 1600/1800 GT more powerful, sound great, have a modern engine anyone can work on....but not at the expense of handling.... .
>
>Figured some MArcos had Ford as well as GM engines, so thsi idea shouldn't be too blasphamous :)
>
>

Re: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT

2010-06-02 by Chino Juan

yes, I believe wooden frame




________________________________
From: Richard Brengman <SIA@...>
To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, June 1, 2010 10:17:38 PM
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT

  
Is this a wood chassis car? 

If it is a wood chassis it is not suitable for too much in the way of power increase.

I am putting a 2 liter Alfa into mine, (probably not "modern" enough for you) but I am also using hot cams that will limit low end torque a bit.
I will also avoid drag-race type starts.

Richard, Marcos 1600
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Jun 1, 2010, at 6:56 PM, Donny Lang wrote:

  
>
>
>In my opinion, the Rover alloy V8 is the best choice of V8s for the Marcos. As you mentioned, this is the engine that Marcos used starting in the mid-1980s. It is one of the lighter V8s out there at about 320 lbs and makes decent power, but is still relatively small displacement at 215 ci to 282 ci (3.5 liter to 4.6 liter). The engines are plentiful and cheap to purchase at U-Pull junkyards coming from mid 1990 Land Rover Discovery and Range Rovers. The bigger headache and expense comes in mating a suitable flywheel/bellhousin g/transmission. Probably the best match is the Leyland LT77 out of the Triumph TR8 and Morgan+8. I think there are also T5 transmissions that can be mated with custom bellhousings.
>I expect the heaviest engines used in the Marcos cars were the 3.0 V6 Ford and the 3.0 Volvo. My car came with a 2.0 V4 Ford that weighs at least 100lbs more than the Rover V8 I am replacing it with. I would consider the small block Fords and Chevys mentioned as too heavy unless you came across an all alloy version.
>-Donny
>----- Original Message ----- 
>>From: chinojuan2 
>>To: MarcosManiacs@ yahoogroups. com 
>>Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 9:11 AM
>>Subject: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT
>>
>>  
>>Read some old Wiki articles saying certain engines made the 1600/1800GT a bit nose heavy (perhaps iron block engine). As later Marcos had Rover 8 cylinder, did this make it evebn worse---or were Rover 8 cylinder cars not the same as 1600/1800?
>>I bring up these questions because I wondered if anyone had a experience or thoughts on placing a Ford or Chevy V-8 into a 1600/1800GT (something like a 289/302 Ford or a 305/350 Chevy). Would these engines make the car too nose heavy and ruin the handling? 
>>
>>I was dreaming about a way to make the 1600/1800 GT more powerful, sound great, have a modern engine anyone can work on....but not at the expense of handling.... .
>>
>>Figured some MArcos had Ford as well as GM engines, so thsi idea shouldn't be too blasphamous :)
>>
>>
>
>

Re: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT

2010-06-02 by tntsmith98@comcast.net

I'd go with the 4 cylinder duratec from a later focus/escape/fusion/ranger/mazda3/mazda6 etc rather than the zetec just based on weight (Al vs. iron block).  2.0 and 2.3 are easily available and have lots of aftermarket support. 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chino Juan" <chinojuan2@...> 
To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Wednesday, June 2, 2010 10:31:19 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT 

  






the Duratec SVT's would be nice, even a 2.0 Zetec form Focus would be nice .......have a Focus with 160K  on it, the car has given me headaches, but engine/trans has been rock solid...... 




From: Robin Gilmour <quattroguy83@...> 
To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tue, June 1, 2010 8:11:48 PM 
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT 

  



Dear Marcos Group: 

I have a TVR 2500M with that great bid heavy and underpowered Triumph TR6 engine.  I have daydreamed about engine transplants for a while now: 

My list includes: 

Mustang / Merkur Turbo I4 
Ford Zetec SVT 
Ford Duratec I4 DOHC and all aluminum. Came in 2001 and later Ford Rangers, some mazda's etc etc 
Ford Duratec 2.5L V6 Contour SVT all aluminum block and heads, porsche designed cosworth reworked.... . 
VW VR6 
Audi 7a 2.3 L I5 DOHC, cast iron block, alum head. 
Audi AAN 2.3L DOHC Turbo 227 hps show room stock hot to 500 without too much grief...... 
Nissan 20SRT 2.0L DOHV turbo 
Toyota AE86 2.0L DOHC 


Regards 
Robin 








From: Red Hot <firstredhot1@ hotmail.com > 
To: marcosmaniacs@ yahoogroups. com 
Sent: Tue, June 1, 2010 12:29:38 PM 
Subject: RE: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT 

  


The engine in your car was straight from a Mk2 Cortina saloon and is essentially the same as the engine used for many years in Formula Ford race cars. Try taking the plugs out, squirt a little lubricant into the plug holes and try to see if it will turn over. If it does chances are it will be possible to get it running.  Make sure you get let the lubricant disperse before putting the plugs back in or you will get a hydraulic lock. 

If you go here http://www.burtonpo wer.com/technica l_1/kent_ crossflow. aspx you can see much information about tuning this engine.  Any tuning you do to the original engine will not reduce the value of the car and may well enhance it. 

A lot of the later Ford 4 cylinder engines had the same mounting holes on the back of the block so using one of these is a simple task compared to fitting  a V8 or other make of engine.  The Marcos should have come with either a Lotus Twin Cam or the Ford Cosworth BDA but of course they cost more and were less suitable for everyday use.  

You could even fit a Ford RS500 turbo motor but that would be more difficult due to needing to locate all the ancillaries - but another option would be to look for a Cosworth YBM which was used here for Midget racing for some time and is popular with Vintage racers. It is the Cosworth turbo motor modified to be normally aspirated with a pair of Weber carbs. 

I hope that gives you a few ideas. I used to race a 1500 and also a 1600 in the UK when they were new cars. 

Regards 

Roger 


To: MarcosManiacs@ yahoogroups. com 
From: chinojuan2@yahoo. com 
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 10:34:28 -0700 
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT 

  





thanks for the insight. I have inherited a 1600, but it hasn't run since 1979. THe engine is said to be "good", but it has been sitting since then, so who knows what it will take to get it back up. 

I was actually considering getting the engine running, but wanted something with more "omph" (it has Ford 4). I do not know what to do to give it more power without ruining value and ease of maintainence. I really can't do a lot of work myself, and want to make servicing it simple, and have it be as reliable as possible.... 

The car "looks" fast to me, but it would also be nice if it sounded and went as fast as it looks! I guess I do not want to be blwon away by 4 cylinder Accords and V-6 Camerys..... .. 




From: Red Hot <firstredhot1@ hotmail.com > 
To: marcosmaniacs@ yahoogroups. com 
Sent: Tue, June 1, 2010 11:15:20 AM 
Subject: RE: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT 

  




The Rover V8 was based on a Buick engine with alloy block and was particularly light in weight for a V8. I seem to recall that when fitted to the MGB it was no heavier than the 1800 MGB engine.  The V8 engines you mention would be much heavier units and while anything is possible I would think that there are plenty of modern 2 litre engines around that would be far more suitable if you want it as a reliable car to use. If you look at other cars when they get old and collectible, the value is always in the ones that have original  motors so you might want to think about that too.  There are plenty of ways to make either the 1600 crossflow Ford or the 1800 Volvo engine more powerful. 

Best of luck! 

Roger Andreason 

ex Marcos racer 

To: MarcosManiacs@ yahoogroups. com 
From: chinojuan2@yahoo. com 
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 13:11:02 +0000 
Subject: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT 

  


Read some old Wiki articles saying certain engines made the 1600/1800GT a bit nose heavy (perhaps iron block engine). As later Marcos had Rover 8 cylinder, did this make it evebn worse---or were Rover 8 cylinder cars not the same as 1600/1800? 
I bring up these questions because I wondered if anyone had a experience or thoughts on placing a Ford or Chevy V-8 into a 1600/1800GT (something like a 289/302 Ford or a 305/350 Chevy). Would these engines make the car too nose heavy and ruin the handling? 

I was dreaming about a way to make the 1600/1800 GT more powerful, sound great, have a modern engine anyone can work on....but not at the expense of handling.... . 

Figured some MArcos had Ford as well as GM engines, so thsi idea shouldn't be too blasphamous :) 





Get a free e-mail account with Hotmail. Sign-up now. 




Get a free e-mail account with Hotmail. Sign-up now.

Re: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT

2010-06-02 by Richard Brengman

Zetec is a common conversion in the U.K., but the engine will be the cheap part.

On Jun 2, 2010, at 7:31 AM, Chino Juan wrote:


the Duratec SVT's would be nice, even a 2.0 Zetec form Focus would be nice .......have a Focus with 160K on it, the car has given me headaches, but engine/trans has been rock solid......

Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Robin Gilmour yahoo.com>
To: MarcosManiacs@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, June 1, 2010 8:11:48 PM
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT


Dear Marcos Group:

I have a TVR 2500M with that great bid heavy and underpowered Triumph TR6 engine. I have daydreamed about engine transplants for a while now:

My list includes:

Mustang / Merkur Turbo I4
Ford Zetec SVT
Ford Duratec I4 DOHC and all aluminum. Came in 2001 and later Ford Rangers, some mazda's etc etc
Ford Duratec 2.5L V6 Contour SVT all aluminum block and heads, porsche designed cosworth reworked.... .
VW VR6
Audi 7a 2.3 L I5 DOHC, cast iron block, alum head.
Audi AAN 2.3L DOHC Turbo 227 hps show room stock hot to 500 without too much grief......
Nissan 20SRT 2.0L DOHV turbo
Toyota AE86 2.0L DOHC


Regards
Robin




From: Red Hot hotmail.com>
To: marcosmaniacs@ yahoogroups. com
Sent: Tue, June 1, 2010 12:29:38 PM
Subject: RE: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT

The engine in your car was straight from a Mk2 Cortina saloon and is essentially the same as the engine used for many years in Formula Ford race cars. Try taking the plugs out, squirt a little lubricant into the plug holes and try to see if it will turn over. If it does chances are it will be possible to get it running. Make sure you get let the lubricant disperse before putting the plugs back in or you will get a hydraulic lock.

If you go here http://www.burtonpo wer.com/technica l_1/kent_ crossflow. aspx you can see much information about tuning this engine. Any tuning you do to the original engine will not reduce the value of the car and may well enhance it.

A lot of the later Ford 4 cylinder engines had the same mounting holes on the back of the block so using one of these is a simple task compared to fitting a V8 or other make of engine. The Marcos should have come with either a Lotus Twin Cam or the Ford Cosworth BDA but of course they cost more and were less suitable for everyday use.

You could even fit a Ford RS500 turbo motor but that would be more difficult due to needing to locate all the ancillaries - but another option would be to look for a Cosworth YBM which was used here for Midget racing for some time and is popular with Vintage racers. It is the Cosworth turbo motor modified to be normally aspirated with a pair of Weber carbs.

I hope that gives you a few ideas. I used to race a 1500 and also a 1600 in the UK when they were new cars.

Regards

Roger

To: MarcosManiacs@ yahoogroups. com
From: chinojuan2@yahoo. com
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 10:34:28 -0700
Subject: Re: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT


thanks for the insight. I have inherited a 1600, but it hasn't run since 1979. THe engine is said to be "good", but it has been sitting since then, so who knows what it will take to get it back up.
I was actually considering getting the engine running, but wanted something with more "omph" (it has Ford 4). I do not know what to do to give it more power without ruining value and ease of maintainence. I really can't do a lot of work myself, and want to make servicing it simple, and have it be as reliable as possible....
The car "looks" fast to me, but it would also be nice if it sounded and went as fast as it looks! I guess I do not want to be blwon away by 4 cylinder Accords and V-6 Camerys..... ..

From: Red Hot hotmail.com>
To: marcosmaniacs@ yahoogroups. com
Sent: Tue, June 1, 2010 11:15:20 AM
Subject: RE: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT



The Rover V8 was based on a Buick engine with alloy block and was particularly light in weight for a V8. I seem to recall that when fitted to the MGB it was no heavier than the 1800 MGB engine. The V8 engines you mention would be much heavier units and while anything is possible I would think that there are plenty of modern 2 litre engines around that would be far more suitable if you want it as a reliable car to use. If you look at other cars when they get old and collectible, the value is always in the ones that have original motors so you might want to think about that too. There are plenty of ways to make either the 1600 crossflow Ford or the 1800 Volvo engine more powerful.

Best of luck!

Roger Andreason

ex Marcos racer


To: MarcosManiacs@ yahoogroups. com
From: chinojuan2@yahoo. com
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 13:11:02 +0000
Subject: [MarcosManiacs] modern engines for 1600/1800GT

Read some old Wiki articles saying certain engines made the 1600/1800GT a bit nose heavy (perhaps iron block engine). As later Marcos had Rover 8 cylinder, did this make it evebn worse---or were Rover 8 cylinder cars not the same as 1600/1800?
I bring up these questions because I wondered if anyone had a experience or thoughts on placing a Ford or Chevy V-8 into a 1600/1800GT (something like a 289/302 Ford or a 305/350 Chevy). Would these engines make the car too nose heavy and ruin the handling?

I was dreaming about a way to make the 1600/1800 GT more powerful, sound great, have a modern engine anyone can work on....but not at the expense of handling.... .

Figured some MArcos had Ford as well as GM engines, so thsi idea shouldn't be too blasphamous :)



Get a free e-mail account with Hotmail. Sign-up now.



Get a free e-mail account with Hotmail. Sign-up now.




Re: modern engines for 1600/1800GT

2010-06-02 by geirooye

Hi there
The Buick/Rover V8 is not that much heavier than your original 1600 but it will be a tight fit in the engine bay.  I believe the length is fine but it's relatively wide and in the -bay of a wooden chassis car it will be a struggle.  And as has been said, the much higher torque of the V8 will put strains on the rest of the drive train and its anchoring points in the wooden chassis. I have a feeling you live in the US, so the "sensible" route here is the modern equivalent of your straight four; the Ford/Mazda Duratec four.  And since you have good access to the 2.3 litre version from the Ranger I'd go for that.  With a bit of outside work on it (ECU, throttle bodies and a good header) you will have an easy 200-220 HP in an engine weighing LESS than your old unit.

With a steel chassis Marcos (that came in 1969) it would be different. The 3 litre Volvo straight 6 or Ford V6 are heavy, and I know that a small block Ford V8 with alu heads and an alu B&W gearbox weighs in at LESS than the Volvo/Ford combos.  The Ford (Essex) V6 is almost 200 kg while the Duratec is around 100 kg.  And such a difference in mass is really noticeable in the front of a light weight car, even if it's situated far behind the front wheels.

I agree that Marcos used several different engines through the years, first Volvo B18, then Ford 1600/4, 2 litre V4 and 3 litre V6, Volvo 3 litre L6, Buick 215/Rover 3.5 litre V8, Ford Pinto 2 litre and later - when the width of the car increased came modern Ford 5 litre V8.  Tha last models with the new body shape had Corvette LS engines, but then the chassis was probably "rearranged"

But good luck with your project :-)

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.