Yahoo Groups archive

Homebrew_PCBs

Archive for Homebrew_PCBs.

Index last updated: 2026-03-30 01:05 UTC

Thread

Experimental method

Experimental method

2005-07-23 by hjf2k2

Hi all, i've been testing a way to make photo etching cheap'n easy. I
went to a Screen-print shop and bought photosensitive emulsion, the
cheapest type. I mixed the components and painted the emulsion on the
copper. Then I let it dry overnight in a (pitch) dark place.
On a transparency I printed the negative of my circuit and placed the
transparency, toner side to the emulsion and placed it under a
fluorescent lamp for 7 minutes or so. I removed the board and nothing
seemed to change, until I ran some water over the board, and with a
hair brush for babies (the softer-than-hair type) i helped the water.
The exposed areas dried up but the rest washed with water. GREAT
precision, SMD quality. Then I let the board again now in the sun to
totally burn the emulsion and it was ready for etching, warm (hot)
ferric chloride.

Hope that helps.
Some day I'll try the AZO-based emulsion, but that one needs UV curing.

RE : [Homebrew_PCBs] Experimental method

2005-07-23 by Robert Hedan

Can you posts pics please? I'm really curious as to how it came out. I'm
trying out the Pulsar technique right now and I like it. I had some
messing-up around the edge 'cause my PCB was VERY corroded; I cleaned it for
as long as my arms could handle. But I have another brand of PCB and it is
obvious that the first one was VERY old.

I'm also switching to 1/32" thick PCB. The GBC H300 laminator does NOT
digest 1/16" boards very well; it burped and farted the whole time, having
to force-feed it by hand with another blank board.

Robert
:)


-----Message d'origine-----
De : Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com] De
la part de hjf2k2
Envoyé : juillet 23 2005 13:19
À : Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Objet : [Homebrew_PCBs] Experimental method


Hi all, i've been testing a way to make photo etching cheap'n easy. I went
to a Screen-print shop and bought photosensitive emulsion, the cheapest
type. I mixed the components and painted the emulsion on the copper. Then I
let it dry overnight in a (pitch) dark place. On a transparency I printed
the negative of my circuit and placed the transparency, toner side to the
emulsion and placed it under a fluorescent lamp for 7 minutes or so. I
removed the board and nothing seemed to change, until I ran some water over
the board, and with a hair brush for babies (the softer-than-hair type) i
helped the water. The exposed areas dried up but the rest washed with water.
GREAT precision, SMD quality. Then I let the board again now in the sun to
totally burn the emulsion and it was ready for etching, warm (hot) ferric
chloride.

Hope that helps.
Some day I'll try the AZO-based emulsion, but that one needs UV curing.







Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and Photos:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs

If Files or Photos are running short of space, post them here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs_Archives/
Yahoo! Groups Links

Re: Experimental method

2005-07-23 by lcdpublishing

Is there a way to get the "Cured" emulsion off of the traces after
etching?






--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "hjf2k2" <drgenio@h...> wrote:
> Hi all, i've been testing a way to make photo etching cheap'n easy. I
> went to a Screen-print shop and bought photosensitive emulsion, the
> cheapest type. I mixed the components and painted the emulsion on the
> copper. Then I let it dry overnight in a (pitch) dark place.
> On a transparency I printed the negative of my circuit and placed the
> transparency, toner side to the emulsion and placed it under a
> fluorescent lamp for 7 minutes or so. I removed the board and nothing
> seemed to change, until I ran some water over the board, and with a
> hair brush for babies (the softer-than-hair type) i helped the
water.
> The exposed areas dried up but the rest washed with water. GREAT
> precision, SMD quality. Then I let the board again now in the sun to
> totally burn the emulsion and it was ready for etching, warm (hot)
> ferric chloride.
>
> Hope that helps.
> Some day I'll try the AZO-based emulsion, but that one needs UV
curing.

Re: Experimental method

2005-07-23 by Bob_xyz

Screen cleaner should strip it off easily. When a silk screen is done
with a job, it can be cleaned of the cured emulsion and reused.


Regards, Bob

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "lcdpublishing"
<lcdpublishing@y...> wrote:
> Is there a way to get the "Cured" emulsion off of the traces after
> etching?
>

Re: RE : [Homebrew_PCBs] Experimental method

2005-07-23 by Phil

I agree - post the pixs please! He didn't say how the board came out,
what kind of design rules (trace width, etc), cleaning ... It would
be also good to know the cost of the treatment - great if the PCB +
sensitizer + developer is less than presensitized boards.

Robert, have you mod'd the GBC for thicker material? The pulsar
directions are ok (just ok) for the 200. I would not force the
laminator too hard, the plastic gears on the 200 do not look like they
can handle much stress.

I believe that .032 PCB material goes through and unmod'd 200 just
fine. I've fed it myself and there was aposting about 6-9 months ago
on that topic as well. I may have some .032 -- need to check my stock.

Phil

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Robert Hedan <robert.hedan@v...>
wrote:
> Can you posts pics please? I'm really curious as to how it came
out. I'm
> trying out the Pulsar technique right now and I like it. I had some
> messing-up around the edge 'cause my PCB was VERY corroded; I
cleaned it for
> as long as my arms could handle. But I have another brand of PCB
and it is
> obvious that the first one was VERY old.
>
> I'm also switching to 1/32" thick PCB. The GBC H300 laminator does NOT
> digest 1/16" boards very well; it burped and farted the whole time,
having
> to force-feed it by hand with another blank board.
>
> Robert
> :)
>
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com] De
> la part de hjf2k2
> Envoyé : juillet 23 2005 13:19
> À : Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
> Objet : [Homebrew_PCBs] Experimental method
>
>
> Hi all, i've been testing a way to make photo etching cheap'n easy.
I went
> to a Screen-print shop and bought photosensitive emulsion, the cheapest
> type. I mixed the components and painted the emulsion on the copper.
Then I
> let it dry overnight in a (pitch) dark place. On a transparency I
printed
> the negative of my circuit and placed the transparency, toner side
to the
> emulsion and placed it under a fluorescent lamp for 7 minutes or so. I
> removed the board and nothing seemed to change, until I ran some
water over
> the board, and with a hair brush for babies (the softer-than-hair
type) i
> helped the water. The exposed areas dried up but the rest washed
with water.
> GREAT precision, SMD quality. Then I let the board again now in the
sun to
> totally burn the emulsion and it was ready for etching, warm (hot)
ferric
> chloride.
>
> Hope that helps.
> Some day I'll try the AZO-based emulsion, but that one needs UV curing.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and
Photos:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
>
> If Files or Photos are running short of space, post them here:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs_Archives/
> Yahoo! Groups Links

Re: Experimental method

2005-07-23 by Bob_xyz

Could you tell us the brand name of the emulsion you used, what sort
of quantities are available, and its shelf life?

Do you have any indication as to how well the emulsion would stand up
to other etchants, particularly CuCl?

Did you have to do anything special to get a smooth coating of the
emulsion onto the copper?


Regards, Bob

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "hjf2k2" <drgenio@h...> wrote:
> Hi all, i've been testing a way to make photo etching cheap'n easy.
I
> went to a Screen-print shop and bought photosensitive emulsion, the
> cheapest type. I mixed the components and painted the emulsion on
the
> copper. Then I let it dry overnight in a (pitch) dark place.
<snip>

RE : RE : [Homebrew_PCBs] Experimental method

2005-07-24 by Robert Hedan

Phil,

I can't speak for the H200, but from the point of view of the H300, the mods
are useless. I can't for the life of me figure out how it alters anything.
Had you tried passing a 1/16" PCB through the H200 before the mod? I would
have liked to know if you observed ANY before and after difference.

I know the H300 and 200 might not share the same construction and framework,
but I don't think that's the case. I think they only difference if width of
the rollers. I think they share the same mechanism, it wouldn't make
business sense to have so many different frames in a line of products (just
change the frame and roller lengths). The pics in the Pulsar directions
'appear' to be identical to my H300 except for size. I suppose you need
both laminators side by side to say for sure.

Before you start cutting plastic on your 200, take it apart for yourself.
Look at how the rolls are attached to the chassis; that shiny metallic
framework that takes up most of the space.

The only mod that might do 'some' difference is the cutting of the tab, it
might give the mechanism a bit more play when you push on the tab. That
might give you more movement of the rollers to get a stuck PCB out of the
mechanism, but that's about all I can figure out. All that tab does is
rotate a gear using a small tooth.

1/32" PCB went through the H300 beautifully. I made one mistake, I used a
piece of paper to act as a carrier; as suggested on the H300 casing. Big
mistake, I think the carrier prevented adequate heating of the transfer
material. It is most obvious along the edges of the PCB, the toner easily
flakes off a perfectly clean board. I believe the extra thickness of paper
relieved roller pressure along the sides. The center area of the artwork is
perfect, no flaws.

I'm making another test tonight after my online race (woohoo, I love it).
I'm cleaning the toner off with acetone and starting the process over. I'll
post a pic of my first good PCB, all my attempts so far are embarassing...

Robert
:)


-----Message d'origine-----
De : Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com] De
la part de Phil
Envoyé : juillet 23 2005 16:53
À : Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Objet : Re: RE : [Homebrew_PCBs] Experimental method


Robert, have you mod'd the GBC for thicker material? The pulsar directions
are ok (just ok) for the 200. I would not force the laminator too hard, the
plastic gears on the 200 do not look like they can handle much stress.

I believe that .032 PCB material goes through and unmod'd 200 just fine.
I've fed it myself and there was aposting about 6-9 months ago on that topic
as well. I may have some .032 -- need to check my stock.

Phil


Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and Photos:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs

If Files or Photos are running short of space, post them here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs_Archives/
Yahoo! Groups Links

Re: Experimental method

2005-07-24 by hjf2k2

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Bob_xyz" <bob_barr@h...> wrote:
> Could you tell us the brand name of the emulsion you used, what sort
> of quantities are available, and its shelf life?

Yes, it's called POLI-X-SOL, but you won't find it on the US because
it seems to be a local brand for my country (Argentina). It's the
cheapest one, the smallest package, 30 pesos (US$ 10) for 1Kg (2
pounds) !!, about 1 liter of product. The shelf life? Couldn't tell,
the one I bought was already expired (for a few days anyway) but
seemed to work fine.

>
> Do you have any indication as to how well the emulsion would stand up
> to other etchants, particularly CuCl?

No idea, the stuff is for professional use and doesn't have
instructions. The guy who sold it to me said there were 3 types of
emulsion: the one I bought which is only water-proof, for water-based
inks for T-shirts, the chemical-proof one, for general purposes (maybe
what you need?) and the AZO-based one (AZO rings a bell from the
CD-Rs? no idea what AZO means).

>
> Did you have to do anything special to get a smooth coating of the
> emulsion onto the copper?

Just applied it with a brush. It's a very viscous liquid, much like
good quality latex paint, light purple when wet and almost black when
dry. I left the board on horizontal and it spread evenly (actually it
was a little to one side and a lot deposited on that side. If I can
borrow a digital camera I'll post the pix tomorrow.

>
>
> Regards, Bob
>
> --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "hjf2k2" <drgenio@h...> wrote:
> > Hi all, i've been testing a way to make photo etching cheap'n easy.
> I
> > went to a Screen-print shop and bought photosensitive emulsion, the
> > cheapest type. I mixed the components and painted the emulsion on
> the
> > copper. Then I let it dry overnight in a (pitch) dark place.
> <snip>

Re: Experimental method

2005-07-24 by hjf2k2

Exactly. It's a clear, odorless liquid, they called it a "decapant",
the guy who sold it to me said it was "ecological", thus, safe to go
down the drain. Anyway I placed the board in the remover and it was
FAST. Curiously it didn't affect a little black marker I placed for a
touch up, which had to be removed with alcohol. The decapant had
something of a chlorine smell when I put the board. It seems to attack
the copper (it's called a decapant anyway) because it dulled it a
little, so I'd try to be quick about it.

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Bob_xyz" <bob_barr@h...> wrote:
> Screen cleaner should strip it off easily. When a silk screen is done
> with a job, it can be cleaned of the cured emulsion and reused.
>
>
> Regards, Bob
>
> --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "lcdpublishing"
> <lcdpublishing@y...> wrote:
> > Is there a way to get the "Cured" emulsion off of the traces after
> > etching?
> >

Re: RE : [Homebrew_PCBs] Experimental method

2005-07-24 by hjf2k2

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Phil" <phil1960us@y...> wrote:
> I agree - post the pixs please! He didn't say how the board came out,
> what kind of design rules (trace width, etc), cleaning ... It would
> be also good to know the cost of the treatment - great if the PCB +
> sensitizer + developer is less than presensitized boards.

Yes, i promise, I'll post pics. About the design rules, shame on me, I
have no idea, "I just press buttons" on the Eagle CAD software because
English measures drive me crazy :D traces were about 1mm thick with no
problems, no smearing like with press-n-peel.
The cost of the treatment? 10 dollars for 1Kg of stuff. I have
absolutely no idea how much I used -- it was a brush load (1 inch
brush?) for a 10x15Cm board. I'm sure I wasted more product on the
brush than what I actually used. The sensitizer is included in the
package. The developer is tap water :D.

Re: RE : RE : [Homebrew_PCBs] Experimental method

2005-07-24 by Phil

passing .064 material through the stock H200 was an exercise in nasty
noises. .032 did just fine though. post mods (see next paragraphs)
it mostly works ok.

the mods did 3 things, iirc, 1) slowed the speed down to improve the
heating with each pass, 2) increased inter roller spacing and 3)
attempted to increase the outfeed plates spacing. I still had
problems with .064 stock jamming in the outfeed so I created 2 little
spacers for the outfeed plates. I used .064 FR4 and cut them to fit
over the little dimples on each side of the outfeed plates. The
plates sandwich the spacers and keep them at least .064 (+ copper
thickness) apart. This did the trick - no more jams.

sorry, i didn't take any pics and I'm not taking that damnable machine
apart again - even if it dies (I'll have to find a chicken motor...).
The spacers are about 1 cm x .5 cm. I cut them to stay out of the
feed path.

On the carrier. I use children's construction paper as a carrier. I
have to feed the assembly through the H200 20 times to get good
heating for toner adhesion. This more than other have reported and
some day I'll figure out why (I suspect my temp is a little low).
without a carrier, the paper with the artwork sometimes slips.

Phil

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Robert Hedan <robert.hedan@v...>
wrote:
> Phil,
>
> I can't speak for the H200, but from the point of view of the H300,
the mods
> are useless. I can't for the life of me figure out how it alters
anything.
> Had you tried passing a 1/16" PCB through the H200 before the mod?
I would
> have liked to know if you observed ANY before and after difference.
>
> I know the H300 and 200 might not share the same construction and
framework,
> but I don't think that's the case. I think they only difference if
width of
> the rollers. I think they share the same mechanism, it wouldn't make
> business sense to have so many different frames in a line of
products (just
> change the frame and roller lengths). The pics in the Pulsar directions
> 'appear' to be identical to my H300 except for size. I suppose you need
> both laminators side by side to say for sure.
>
> Before you start cutting plastic on your 200, take it apart for
yourself.
> Look at how the rolls are attached to the chassis; that shiny metallic
> framework that takes up most of the space.
>
> The only mod that might do 'some' difference is the cutting of the
tab, it
> might give the mechanism a bit more play when you push on the tab. That
> might give you more movement of the rollers to get a stuck PCB out
of the
> mechanism, but that's about all I can figure out. All that tab does is
> rotate a gear using a small tooth.
>
> 1/32" PCB went through the H300 beautifully. I made one mistake, I
used a
> piece of paper to act as a carrier; as suggested on the H300 casing.
Big
> mistake, I think the carrier prevented adequate heating of the transfer
> material. It is most obvious along the edges of the PCB, the toner
easily
> flakes off a perfectly clean board. I believe the extra thickness
of paper
> relieved roller pressure along the sides. The center area of the
artwork is
> perfect, no flaws.
>
> I'm making another test tonight after my online race (woohoo, I love
it).
> I'm cleaning the toner off with acetone and starting the process
over. I'll
> post a pic of my first good PCB, all my attempts so far are
embarassing...
>
> Robert
> :)
>
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com] De
> la part de Phil
> Envoyé : juillet 23 2005 16:53
> À : Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
> Objet : Re: RE : [Homebrew_PCBs] Experimental method
>
>
> Robert, have you mod'd the GBC for thicker material? The pulsar
directions
> are ok (just ok) for the 200. I would not force the laminator too
hard, the
> plastic gears on the 200 do not look like they can handle much stress.
>
> I believe that .032 PCB material goes through and unmod'd 200 just fine.
> I've fed it myself and there was aposting about 6-9 months ago on
that topic
> as well. I may have some .032 -- need to check my stock.
>
> Phil
>
>
> Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and
Photos:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
>
> If Files or Photos are running short of space, post them here:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs_Archives/
> Yahoo! Groups Links

Re: RE : RE : [Homebrew_PCBs] Experimental method

2005-07-24 by Stefan Trethan

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:42:50 +0200, Phil <phil1960us@...> wrote:

> I use children's construction paper as a carrier. I
> have to feed the assembly through the H200 20 times to get good
> heating for toner adhesion. This more than other have reported and
> some day I'll figure out why (I suspect my temp is a little low).
> without a carrier, the paper with the artwork sometimes slips.
> Phil


Maybe the others don't use a carrier, and it isolates the board better.

ST

[Homebrew_PCBs] what if - drilling under water

2005-07-24 by Stefan Trethan

Hi,


whille looking around for a shop vac to catch drilling dust i had an idea.

If i set up the CNC for EDM anyway, why not simply drill the boards under
water?

Then the water could simply be discarded after drilling the hols and
milling the outline.


What do you think? Any problems?
Maybe the cooling from the water would even be good? Does carbide rust?

thanks

ST

Re: what if - drilling under water

2005-07-24 by lcdpublishing

Hi Stefan,

The process of drilling metal under water I have done in the past -
usually with very hard steels and at very slow spindle speeds.

FOr PCBs, there could be a big problem though. When drilling, the
material may create a chip that is a "long string" which could fling
the water all about your shop. I have not drilled enough PCB
material to know how the chips develope and break so I am unsure of
this.

But, drilling under water is certainly okay to do. It will keep
both the tool cool and the material. Carbide doesn't rust like
ordinary steels, but the tool holders and such probably will rust.
You could use a "Coolant" which is an additive you add to water to
make "Coolant" used for metalworking. This stuff contains rust
inhibiors - you will find it at industrial suppply houses. Be
warned though of two aspects:

1) it may be difficult to dispose of depending on chemical make up -
don't dump it in the yard or down the drain.

2) If left stagnent in a tank, bacteria may grow and it will smell
terrible. The synthetic coolants are less prone to this than the
oil based coolants that are mixed with water.

Chris








--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Stefan Trethan"
<stefan_trethan@g...> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> whille looking around for a shop vac to catch drilling dust i had
an idea.
>
> If i set up the CNC for EDM anyway, why not simply drill the
boards under
> water?
>
> Then the water could simply be discarded after drilling the hols
and
> milling the outline.
>
>
> What do you think? Any problems?
> Maybe the cooling from the water would even be good? Does carbide
rust?
>
> thanks
>
> ST

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] what if - drilling under water

2005-07-24 by Leon Heller

----- Original Message -----
From: "Stefan Trethan" <stefan_trethan@...>
To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2005 11:58 AM
Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] what if - drilling under water


> Hi,
>
>
> whille looking around for a shop vac to catch drilling dust i had an idea.
>
> If i set up the CNC for EDM anyway, why not simply drill the boards under
> water?
>
> Then the water could simply be discarded after drilling the hols and
> milling the outline.
>
>
> What do you think? Any problems?
> Maybe the cooling from the water would even be good? Does carbide rust?

The board might need to be dried in an oven before soldering. I've had
problems with DS PTH PCBs absorbing moisture which causes bubbles in the
solder joints. Probably not a problem with SS PCBs, though.

Carbide won't rust.

Leon
--
Leon Heller, G1HSM
leon.heller@...
http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller



--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.9.4/57 - Release Date: 22/07/2005

---
[This E-mail has been scanned for viruses but it is your responsibility
to maintain up to date anti virus software on the device that you are
currently using to read this email. ]

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] what if - drilling under water

2005-07-24 by Stefan Trethan

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:02:47 +0200, Leon Heller
<leon.heller@...> wrote:

>
> The board might need to be dried in an oven before soldering. I've had
> problems with DS PTH PCBs absorbing moisture which causes bubbles in the
> solder joints. Probably not a problem with SS PCBs, though.
> Carbide won't rust.
> Leon


Ok, thanks.

I've had bubbling before, never thought it might be not enough dryig time
but it might well be.

ST

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: what if - drilling under water

2005-07-24 by Stefan Trethan

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:58:24 +0200, lcdpublishing
<lcdpublishing@...> wrote:

> Hi Stefan,
> The process of drilling metal under water I have done in the past -
> usually with very hard steels and at very slow spindle speeds.
> FOr PCBs, there could be a big problem though. When drilling, the
> material may create a chip that is a "long string" which could fling
> the water all about your shop. I have not drilled enough PCB
> material to know how the chips develope and break so I am unsure of
> this.


Well, most seems to be fine dust when drilling in air.
But sometimes fibers seem to stick together and accumulate on the drill.
It isn't very strong fibers and i don't think it could stay at the drill
in water (drag), it comes off very easily when drilling in air.

Easy enough to try out with a small water container and the drill press.

thanks

ST

Re: what if - drilling under water

2005-07-24 by lcdpublishing

OH, and I forget to mention also!

As you know, water and electricity make for nasty enemies!
Depending on the helix angle of the drill (or other cutting tool) it
may make for a pump to pull water up the tool and, with enough
velocity, into the motor - that might cause some problems.

I would certainly do tests on a drill press first - water on the
spindle won't hurt it like water in a dremel motor.

Chris





--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Stefan Trethan"
<stefan_trethan@g...> wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:58:24 +0200, lcdpublishing
> <lcdpublishing@y...> wrote:
>
> > Hi Stefan,
> > The process of drilling metal under water I have done in the
past -
> > usually with very hard steels and at very slow spindle speeds.
> > FOr PCBs, there could be a big problem though. When drilling,
the
> > material may create a chip that is a "long string" which could
fling
> > the water all about your shop. I have not drilled enough PCB
> > material to know how the chips develope and break so I am unsure
of
> > this.
>
>
> Well, most seems to be fine dust when drilling in air.
> But sometimes fibers seem to stick together and accumulate on the
drill.
> It isn't very strong fibers and i don't think it could stay at the
drill
> in water (drag), it comes off very easily when drilling in air.
>
> Easy enough to try out with a small water container and the drill
press.
>
> thanks
>
> ST

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: what if - drilling under water

2005-07-24 by Stefan Trethan

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:17:01 +0200, lcdpublishing
<lcdpublishing@...> wrote:

> OH, and I forget to mention also!
> As you know, water and electricity make for nasty enemies!
> Depending on the helix angle of the drill (or other cutting tool) it
> may make for a pump to pull water up the tool and, with enough
> velocity, into the motor - that might cause some problems.
> I would certainly do tests on a drill press first - water on the
> spindle won't hurt it like water in a dremel motor.
> Chris

I think with open sides on the drill there is no way it lifts the water up.

I do think people overreact with water and electricity, why, i had a nice
waterfall all over my PC plugin cards several times with no damage ;-)


Nah, i understand what you mean. Maybe i make a washer on the drill to
deflect any water outward, and the "tank" should have high enough sides to
catch it.

I'll try now, it will be less work than thiking about it for hours!

ST

Re: what if - drilling under water

2005-07-24 by lcdpublishing

> Nah, i understand what you mean. Maybe i make a washer on the drill
to
> deflect any water outward

That device is commonly referred to as a "Slinger" and it works great
in a variety of similar applications.

Chris

RE : [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: what if - drilling under water

2005-07-24 by Robert Hedan

Simple, use the water along with a water-type shopvac (I think they all
are).

The water stops dirt particles from going airborn, and the shopvac stops the
water from going anywhere.

Robert
:)







Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and Photos:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs

If Files or Photos are running short of space, post them here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs_Archives/
Yahoo! Groups Links

RE : RE : [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: what if - drilling under water

2005-07-24 by Robert Hedan

Ooops, I see now you've already discussed this idea.

One note, if you have the shopvac higher relative to the drill, you can use
gravity to move the water, no pump required. Control the downflow of water
with a ball valve.

I would also make sure the DIY outlet on the side of the shopvac is below
the waterline, to keep floating dust in the shopvac.

I'm sure there's a way of using a shopvac without any fancy modifications.

Robert
:)


-----Message d'origine-----
De : Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com] De
la part de Robert Hedan
Envoyé : juillet 24 2005 15:13
À : Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Objet : RE : [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: what if - drilling under water


Simple, use the water along with a water-type shopvac (I think they all
are).

The water stops dirt particles from going airborn, and the shopvac stops the
water from going anywhere.

Robert
:)







Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and Photos:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs

If Files or Photos are running short of space, post them here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs_Archives/
Yahoo! Groups Links








Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and Photos:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs

If Files or Photos are running short of space, post them here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs_Archives/
Yahoo! Groups Links

[Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Experimental method

2005-07-25 by Robert Hedan

I'm taking pictures of every step of the Pulsar process and taking notes on
problems that pop up along the way. So far, I think the Pulsar technique is
the most accurate for the money. Yes, it is a bit tedious the 1st time
through. I printed the checklist and followed it step by step.

The 1st time, I made it all the way to the silk screen process regardless of
errors. I figured I better run through all steps to learn as much off one
bad board. My silkscreen was 'weak', the transfer was uneven, my etching
was just a tad off, problems with the laminator.

The 2nd time (in progress) looks extremely promising. I'm not quite as fast
as they are, I have wife, kids, guests, lawnmowing, tree-trimming, real life
things to deal with. :) So I do a step here and there during the day, but
I spend a lot of 'thinking' time on this run, trying to avoid any potential
problem. I trying to say I'm lazy and slow without actually saying it. :D

So far I've avoided every previous problem, but I've encountered a new one.
I'm documenting everything with pics and notes and I'll upload a HTML later.
The Pulsar is probably a tad expensive if you plan on making small
production runs, but for one-off prototyping and small runs, it's excellent.

The 3rd test will be trying to reproduce the kinds of results they
advertise; fine traces. Of course they are experts at their technique, it's
normal for them to have perfect results. They even have a comment that
their process is not 'perfect every time', but I think it can be made darn
quite close with some attention to detail.

One thing I had not considered was the toner, I'm using a Konica/Minolta
PagePro 1350W laser. The green foil is not adhering 'perfectly'. At first
I thought it was the heating process, but I just realized it might be the
toner quality. I have a HP LaserJet 2100 ready for test #3, I have yet
heard any negative results with HP toner.

Robert
:)


-----Message d'origine-----
De : Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com] De
la part de hjf2k2
Envoyé : juillet 24 2005 17:18
À : Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Objet : [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Experimental method


Hey everyone. I posted the pictures as promised. Here they are:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs/files/PhotoEtching/

It's a RAR file with the pictures. Sadly the board came out seriously bad,
as it seems that I "underdeveloped" it, that is, didn't clean it out
properly :(, but you can see that even in that case there are pretty good
results.




Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and Photos:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs

If Files or Photos are running short of space, post them here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs_Archives/
Yahoo! Groups Links

[Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Experimental method

2005-07-25 by Robert Hedan

Ok, finished downloading.

I love it! It's great seeing people from around the world use different
techniques and material to achieve the same goal. I nearly fell off my
chair with the pic of the PCB hanging under the neon lamp. :D

I love your lab, it makes me realize just how badly I have to clean up my
workspace. Ugh...

Have you considered using a spray bottle to apply the photo-purple-liquid?

I would guess that US and Canada might not have access to all those
materials. Laws on cancerigenic (sp), toxic, radioactive :D material are
a bit severe here. I wonder if equivalent materials could be acquired from
photodevelopment sources and such? I heard of a product from Kodak that
worked wonders, but I can never remember the name.

I'm intrigued by your problem with even distribution of that
photo-purple-liquid. At first I thought of a centrifuge like the folks in
the Yahoo Casting group use to spin casts, but that would be messy and
probably excessive force. You just want to make sure that your liquid flows
evenly across the PCB.

Have you thought of a small press? Sandwiching another layer over the PCB,
forcing the liquid flat. Place a thin spacer and you have a controlled
'area' to pour in your liquid. The same way as we make foundations for
houses over here, a vertical mold, except your would be less than 1mm wide.

If your liquid is sticky, maybe you can use wax paper in your mold, or cut
out a panel from a teflon frying pan. Wax paper will most likely make 'wave
patterns', a hard surface like teflow is better.

Very nice results considering how you went about to get them.

Robert
:)



-----Message d'origine-----
De : Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com] De
la part de hjf2k2
Envoyé : juillet 24 2005 17:18
À : Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Objet : [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Experimental method


Hey everyone. I posted the pictures as promised. Here they are:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs/files/PhotoEtching/

It's a RAR file with the pictures. Sadly the board came out seriously bad,
as it seems that I "underdeveloped" it, that is, didn't clean it out
properly :(, but you can see that even in that case there are pretty good
results.




Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and Photos:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs

If Files or Photos are running short of space, post them here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs_Archives/
Yahoo! Groups Links

Re: Experimental method

2005-07-25 by Bob_xyz

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Robert Hedan
<robert.hedan@v...>
wrote:
<snip>
>
> If your liquid is sticky, maybe you can use wax paper in your mold,
or cut
> out a panel from a teflon frying pan. Wax paper will most likely
make 'wave
> patterns', a hard surface like teflow is better.
>

Perhaps this might be a good use for the non-stick Reynolds aluminum
foil that someone mentioned in a recent post.


Regards, Bob

[Homebrew_PCBs] Pulsar toner tranfer technique

2005-07-25 by Robert Hedan

I've posted a pic in <FILES / PULSAR / Robert Hedan> to give a general idea
of the quality of the etch I was able to achieve. I'm hopeful that others
will also start uploading pics of their results for comparison.

Note this pic was taken after extensive brushing with a sponge in FeCL and
the traces are not damaged in any way. I was trying in vain to remove all
the copper around the PCB, but I gave up once I got the 4 corners cleared.

I have no idea yet why the unprotected copper along the border is so
difficult to remove. The inner circuits were totally etched and I continued
scrubbing the edges for a few minutes; FeCL still all over the inner traces.
This gives you an idea on the reliability of the green foil used to protect
the toner. That stuff is excellent for people like me that need more time
to get things done.

I'm deviating a bit from the official Pulsar directions and I am sanding the
silkscreen side with 600 grit sandpaper prior to toner transfer. The epoxy
is extremely glossy, I am sure a light 'roughing' would help the toner
adhere much better; give it something to hold on to.

This board is by far the best one I've done yet. I'm already looking
forward to the next test on small SMD traces.

Robert
:)







Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and Photos:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs

If Files or Photos are running short of space, post them here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs_Archives/
Yahoo! Groups Links

Re: Experimental method

2005-07-25 by hjf2k2

> I love it! It's great seeing people from around the world use different
> techniques and material to achieve the same goal. I nearly fell off my
> chair with the pic of the PCB hanging under the neon lamp. :D
>
It's just a 40W fluorescent lamp, just a cheap light for the storage
area (that's a wooden platform which divides the 4 meter ceiling into
two 2-meter spaces).
I'm going to make an insolation bed, A4 size (it's the maximum size my
printer can print anyway), with a thick glass, 6mm maybe, to press the
transparency to the sens. board to elliminate the air in the middle,
which makes pictures fuzzy.

> I love your lab, it makes me realize just how badly I have to clean
up my
> workspace. Ugh...
Actually my dad's lab, this is a TV repair shop actually. And I
cleaned up a little for the pictures ;)

>
> Have you considered using a spray bottle to apply the
photo-purple-liquid?
>

Yes but I doubt it would work, the liquid is very viscous. I forgot to
take a picture of it!.

> I would guess that US and Canada might not have access to all those
> materials. Laws on cancerigenic (sp), toxic, radioactive :D
material are
> a bit severe here. I wonder if equivalent materials could be
acquired from
> photodevelopment sources and such? I heard of a product from Kodak that
> worked wonders, but I can never remember the name.

I don't think so, I heard you can get this kind of products in Spain,
and they have more severe laws for that in Europe. Anyway you could
try with Diazo-based inks, which are environmental-friendly. You
should go to a print shop, some place where they make small quantities
of T-Shirts with screen printing, they will most likely use this kind
of products.
>
> I'm intrigued by your problem with even distribution of that
> photo-purple-liquid. At first I thought of a centrifuge like the
folks in
> the Yahoo Casting group use to spin casts, but that would be messy and
> probably excessive force. You just want to make sure that your
liquid flows
> evenly across the PCB.
>

Yes, I read something about that, and it sounds very interesting. The
problem is to get a perfectly centered wheel to spin it at high-rev
and some way to attach the board to it. CD's are manufactured that
way. Of course, CDs are round and have a hole in the center which
makes things a lot easier :D

> Have you thought of a small press? Sandwiching another layer over
the PCB,
> forcing the liquid flat. Place a thin spacer and you have a controlled
> 'area' to pour in your liquid. The same way as we make foundations for
> houses over here, a vertical mold, except your would be less than
1mm wide.
>
> If your liquid is sticky, maybe you can use wax paper in your mold,
or cut
> out a panel from a teflon frying pan. Wax paper will most likely
make 'wave
> patterns', a hard surface like teflow is better.

I think that would be something interesting to try. But the liquid is
W-A-Y sticky (it sticks to glass). The teflon pan would be interesting
but it would have to be some cast-aluminum pan, to make sure it's
flat and stays that way. Problem with cast aluminum and real teflon is
price :) But as I say the liquid is viscous and takes a few hours to
dry, so the paint brush method is the best I could find so far. I'll
ask the manufacturer about what can be done. Maybe I'll be able to
dissolve the thick liquid, in order to get a thinner layer.
>
> Very nice results considering how you went about to get them.
>
Actually no, I severely blew that board. I also found out that my
transparency was bent a little and that caused a small out-of-focus
area. But the other picture I uploaded show a properly made board.
> Robert
> :)
>
>
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com] De
> la part de hjf2k2
> Envoyé : juillet 24 2005 17:18
> À : Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
> Objet : [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Experimental method
>
>
> Hey everyone. I posted the pictures as promised. Here they are:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs/files/PhotoEtching/
>
> It's a RAR file with the pictures. Sadly the board came out
seriously bad,
> as it seems that I "underdeveloped" it, that is, didn't clean it out
> properly :(, but you can see that even in that case there are pretty
good
> results.
>
>
>
>
> Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and
Photos:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
>
> If Files or Photos are running short of space, post them here:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs_Archives/
> Yahoo! Groups Links

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Experimental method

2005-07-25 by Stefan Trethan

On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:38:42 +0200, hjf2k2 <drgenio@...> wrote:

> Maybe I'll be able to
> dissolve the thick liquid, in order to get a thinner layer.


I'm sure you can dilute it, and then maybe you can spray it?

Ask the manufacturer which solvent they use, or try yourself, acetone
surely works, maybe alcohol.


ST

Re: Experimental method

2005-07-25 by hjf2k2

> Ask the manufacturer which solvent they use, or try yourself, acetone
> surely works, maybe alcohol.

I just called the manufacturer, they told me to use distilled water,
20% will reduce the viscosity to 50%. Maybe enough for an airbrush.

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Experimental method-jamming

2005-07-25 by Roy J. Tellason

On Sunday 24 July 2005 08:22 pm, Radra wrote:
> I too encountered the jamming problem with 0.062 material. Refer to
> message 7700 for a different solution.
>
> Lyman

Realize that those of us who get this (and other yahoo lists) by direct email
instead of through the web interface don't see any message numbers...

Re: Experimental method

2005-07-25 by bob_ledoux

The Pulsar Green Foil is great to allow sponging on the etchant--no
tanks needed. If it doesn't stick properly the first time, run it
through the laminator again with an unused bit of foil over the bad
area. This works for me.


--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Robert Hedan <robert.hedan@v...>
wrote:

>
> One thing I had not considered was the toner, I'm using a
Konica/Minolta
> PagePro 1350W laser. The green foil is not adhering 'perfectly'.
At first
> I thought it was the heating process, but I just realized it might
be the
> toner quality. I have a HP LaserJet 2100 ready for test #3, I have
yet
> heard any negative results with HP toner.
>
> Robert
> :)
>
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com] De
> la part de hjf2k2
> Envoyé : juillet 24 2005 17:18
> À : Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
> Objet : [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Experimental method
>
>
> Hey everyone. I posted the pictures as promised. Here they are:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs/files/PhotoEtching/
>
> It's a RAR file with the pictures. Sadly the board came out
seriously bad,
> as it seems that I "underdeveloped" it, that is, didn't clean it out
> properly :(, but you can see that even in that case there are pretty
good
> results.
>
>
>
>
> Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and
Photos:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
>
> If Files or Photos are running short of space, post them here:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs_Archives/
> Yahoo! Groups Links

[Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Experimental method

2005-07-26 by Robert Hedan

I did run it through a second time with an unused bit of foil, and it still
did not stick 'perfectly'; same place, same pattern. That's why I am
suspecting that the toner is the culprit.

Of course the folks at Electronics_101 told me about the LM3914 chip AFTER I
finished my circuit. LOL I was doing the same thing with diodes. So now I
am changing my voltmeter design a 3rd time and going with the LM3914. I
have yet to figure out how I can use it for an ammeter, but that's another
story.

I examined the copper close up today and there is slight pitting. I can see
little dots where the sponge rubbed through the green foil, rubbed off the
toner and attacked the copper. It is insignificant, tiny dots here and
there in filled areas.

I have yet to figure out why the edge of the PCB was so difficult to etch.
I had brushed that area as much as the center, and even longer. Does copper
etch from the sides or from the top-down? I just can't figure out why
unprotected copper was able to resist etchant.

I also used a plastic bin, I can't see myself just dabbing at the PCB
without a vessel; hybrid technique, Pulsar sponge technique with just a bit
more etchant and a container. I had about an ounce of FeCL sloshing around
plus the FeCL stored in the sponge tip. The edges of the PCB were often
dipped in the etchant and yet it made no difference. It's like my PCB
etched from the center and worked outwards, in a circular pattern, kinda
like a portal to another dimension...

(...X Files theme...)

Robert
:)


-----Message d'origine-----
De : Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com] De
la part de bob_ledoux
Envoyé : juillet 25 2005 17:52
À : Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Objet : [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Experimental method


The Pulsar Green Foil is great to allow sponging on the etchant--no tanks
needed. If it doesn't stick properly the first time, run it through the
laminator again with an unused bit of foil over the bad area. This works
for me.



Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and Photos:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs

If Files or Photos are running short of space, post them here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs_Archives/
Yahoo! Groups Links

Re: Experimental method

2005-07-26 by bob_ledoux

I'm impressed with the sponge technique. I can etch a 4x5 inch board
in 10 minutes using about 2 ounces of FeCl. I learned to leave large
areas of toner between my traces to reduce the amount to etch. (The
green film covers these areas and eliminates pin holes commonly
reported by some users.)

The sponge wipes off the exhausted etchant/copper mix which can be
identified by its very dark color. This makes way for fresh chemical
and speeds up the process. Thin trace areas etch faster than broader
copper areas. But these can be attacked with selective sponging.

Undercutting has not been a problem.

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Robert Hedan <robert.hedan@v...>
wrote:


> I also used a plastic bin, I can't see myself just dabbing at the
PCB
> without a vessel; hybrid technique, Pulsar sponge technique with
just a bit
> more etchant and a container. I had about an ounce of FeCL sloshing
around
> plus the FeCL stored in the sponge tip. The edges of the PCB were
often
> dipped in the etchant and yet it made no difference. It's like my
PCB
> etched from the center and worked outwards, in a circular pattern,
kinda
> like a portal to another dimension...
>
> (...X Files theme...)
>
> Robert
> :)
>
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com] De
> la part de bob_ledoux
> Envoyé : juillet 25 2005 17:52
> À : Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
> Objet : [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Experimental method
>
>
> The Pulsar Green Foil is great to allow sponging on the etchant--no
tanks
> needed. If it doesn't stick properly the first time, run it
through the
> laminator again with an unused bit of foil over the bad area. This
works
> for me.
>
>
>
> Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and
Photos:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
>
> If Files or Photos are running short of space, post them here:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs_Archives/
> Yahoo! Groups Links

Re: Experimental method

2005-07-26 by hjf2k2

> am changing my voltmeter design a 3rd time and going with the LM3914. I
> have yet to figure out how I can use it for an ammeter, but that's
another
> story.

shunt. http://www.tpub.com/content/neets/14175/css/14175_33.htm

That's how those cheap digital testers work, if you crack one open
you'll find a big piece of wire (1,5mm diameter, about 1 inch long),
that's the shunt resistor.

BTW, you know about the ICL7107 right? It's a 40-pin IC with all you
need to drive a 3 1/2 digit 7-seg led display, exactly like cheap
testers. www.intersil.com, order free samples with free shipping!

[Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Experimental method

2005-07-26 by Robert Hedan

"BTW, you know about the ICL7107 right? It's a 40-pin IC with all you need
to drive a 3 1/2 digit 7-seg led display, exactly like cheap testers.
www.intersil.com, order free samples with free shipping!"

Yup, put in a request for samples from Maxim/Dallas.

They won't help me for the meters I had in mind. Quick visual indication by
LED bargraphs is the fastest, and blinking numerals are not much help. But
I have other plans for that IC, further upstream, at the power source, to
monitor for a stable supply. The meters I'm building right now will be to
monitor stepper motors, those signals will jump all over. I just want a
visual cue to know if they remain within specs, or remain too often at peak.

Robert
:)


Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and Photos:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs

If Files or Photos are running short of space, post them here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs_Archives/
Yahoo! Groups Links

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Experimental method

2005-07-26 by Thomas

Gents
just a thought, could this stuff be diluted enough for use in a inkjet printer then printing direct onto the copper board ....
my old canon 200spx is ready for such a job LOL


Thomas

----- Original Message -----
From: hjf2k2
To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 12:50 AM
Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Experimental method


> Ask the manufacturer which solvent they use, or try yourself, acetone
> surely works, maybe alcohol.

I just called the manufacturer, they told me to use distilled water,
20% will reduce the viscosity to 50%. Maybe enough for an airbrush.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Experimental method

2005-07-26 by Stefan Trethan

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:51:16 +0200, Thomas <teecee@...> wrote:

> Gents
> just a thought, could this stuff be diluted enough for use in a inkjet
> printer then printing direct onto the copper board
> ....
> my old canon 200spx is ready for such a job LOL
> Thomas


As i have said before, inkjet printig photosensitive ink is doing double
the work.
Why would you need photosensitive ink when it is already printed in the
right pattern?


ST

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Experimental method

2005-07-26 by Mycroft2152

Stephan,

As I said in a previous post, the photosensitivity of
the ink can be used to crosslink the compound to the
copper. This may alleviate the drying/solvent problems
at the inkjet head itself.

UV cure inks are routinely used in indusrty to acheive
high speed and low solvent emissions.

Myc


--- Stefan Trethan <stefan_trethan@...> wrote:

> On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:51:16 +0200, Thomas
> <teecee@...> wrote:
>
> > Gents
> > just a thought, could this stuff be diluted enough
> for use in a inkjet
> > printer then printing direct onto the copper board
> > ....
> > my old canon 200spx is ready for such a job LOL
> > Thomas
>
>
> As i have said before, inkjet printig photosensitive
> ink is doing double
> the work.
> Why would you need photosensitive ink when it is
> already printed in the
> right pattern?
>
>
> ST
>
>
> Be sure to visit the group home and check for new
> Links, Files, and Photos:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
>
> If Files or Photos are running short of space, post
> them here:
>
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs_Archives/
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
> Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>
>


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Experimental method

2005-07-26 by Thomas

... if it works, who cares !
UDC2 & UDC3 is good for a solder mask so it says http://www.ink4u.ca/emulsions.htm
then maybe its good enough to protect the copper etc from the etching solution.


----- Original Message -----
From: Stefan Trethan
To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 6:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Experimental method


On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:51:16 +0200, Thomas <teecee@...> wrote:

> Gents
> just a thought, could this stuff be diluted enough for use in a inkjet
> printer then printing direct onto the copper board
> ....
> my old canon 200spx is ready for such a job LOL
> Thomas


As i have said before, inkjet printig photosensitive ink is doing double
the work.
Why would you need photosensitive ink when it is already printed in the
right pattern?


ST



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Experimental method

2005-07-26 by Stefan Trethan

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:13:36 +0200, Thomas <teecee@...> wrote:

> ... if it works, who cares !
> UDC2 & UDC3 is good for a solder mask so it says
> http://www.ink4u.ca/emulsions.htm
> then maybe its good enough to protect the copper etc from the etching
> solution.


'course it would be fine if it works,
what i mean is it might be easier to print a non-photosensitive ink.
UV curing ink might well be the solution, i tought the discussed ink must
"dry" in air before it is UV treated however.

ST

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Experimental method

2005-07-26 by Roy J. Tellason

On Monday 25 July 2005 08:39 pm, hjf2k2 wrote:
> > am changing my voltmeter design a 3rd time and going with the LM3914. I
> > have yet to figure out how I can use it for an ammeter, but that's
>
> another
>
> > story.
>
> shunt. http://www.tpub.com/content/neets/14175/css/14175_33.htm
>
> That's how those cheap digital testers work, if you crack one open
> you'll find a big piece of wire (1,5mm diameter, about 1 inch long),
> that's the shunt resistor.
>
> BTW, you know about the ICL7107 right? It's a 40-pin IC with all you
> need to drive a 3 1/2 digit 7-seg led display, exactly like cheap
> testers. www.intersil.com, order free samples with free shipping!

Yeah, but the Maxim replacement allows fewer external components...

Re: Experimental method

2005-07-26 by hjf2k2

> Yeah, but the Maxim replacement allows fewer external components...

I asked Maxim for samples and printed literature and all they sent was
a CD-ROM with the datasheets...
Intersil sent my samples via fedex from hong kong, and they paid for
all the shipping and customs...

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Experimental method

2005-07-27 by Stefan Trethan

On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:20:32 +0200, hjf2k2 <drgenio@...> wrote:

>
> I asked Maxim for samples and printed literature and all they sent was
> a CD-ROM with the datasheets...
> Intersil sent my samples via fedex from hong kong, and they paid for
> all the shipping and customs...


you can order maxim samples online on their page, no hassle or anything.
Just click on order samples on a product page.

ST

Re: Experimental method

2005-07-27 by hjf2k2

> you can order maxim samples online on their page, no hassle or anything.
> Just click on order samples on a product page.
I did a while ago and all they sent was the CD-ROM, apparently they
don't ship outside the US. I'll try again anyway.

[Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Experimental method

2005-07-27 by Robert Hedan

Ah yeah, you're a little further than Canada. I've had no problems getting
samples over here.

Look, if you just can't get them to ship them to you, ask if someone here
can act as an intermediate. I'm pretty sure the US has no problems
exporting to South American countries. We have to be careful with that or
else we can get into mucho problemo. This is from Maxim's samples
confirmation email:


TERRORIST COUNTRIES:
U.S. Export laws prohibit Maxim from selling product into the following
countries: Cuba, Libya, Iran, Iraq, Sudan, Syria and North Korea. Our
customers are prohibited from re-exporting to these countries as well.


I'd volunteer, but I'm stretching the generosity of the 'samples' system
already.

Robert
:)


-----Message d'origine-----
De : Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com] De
la part de hjf2k2
Envoyé : juillet 26 2005 22:43
À : Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Objet : [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Experimental method


I did a while ago and all they sent was the CD-ROM, apparently they don't
ship outside the US. I'll try again anyway.




Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and Photos:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs

If Files or Photos are running short of space, post them here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs_Archives/
Yahoo! Groups Links

Re: Experimental method

2005-07-27 by hjf2k2

> Look, if you just can't get them to ship them to you, ask if someone
here
> can act as an intermediate.

Well yeah it depends, for cheap parts maybe it will be better to just
buy them here rather than paying a $50 - $80 fedex shipment, for some
reason regular mail doesn't arrive at my door anymore, now I have to
pick it up at the customs office which is about 30 minutes from here,
and I don't have a car :D (fedex deals with the customs themselves).
my part-time (remote sysamdmin) job only pays $100 a month (i work
like 1 day a month anyway :)... Now I'm saving to buy xilinx's $99
FPGA starter kit $99 plus $50 s&h... :(

> I'd volunteer, but I'm stretching the generosity of the 'samples' system
> already.
I don't think I could ask someone to do that kind of favor :D

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Experimental method

2005-07-27 by Stefan Trethan

On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 04:42:57 +0200, hjf2k2 <drgenio@...> wrote:

>> you can order maxim samples online on their page, no hassle or anything.
>> Just click on order samples on a product page.
> I did a while ago and all they sent was the CD-ROM, apparently they
> don't ship outside the US. I'll try again anyway.


They ship to Austria, which is well outside the US i'd hope ;-)

ST

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Experimental method

2005-07-27 by Leon Heller

----- Original Message -----
From: "hjf2k2" <drgenio@...>
To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 3:42 AM
Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Experimental method


>> you can order maxim samples online on their page, no hassle or anything.
>> Just click on order samples on a product page.
> I did a while ago and all they sent was the CD-ROM, apparently they
> don't ship outside the US. I'll try again anyway.

I don't have any problems getting samples from Maxim UK, I give them a phone
call and get them the next day.

Leon
--
Leon Heller, G1HSM
leon.heller@...
http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller

---
[This E-mail has been scanned for viruses but it is your responsibility
to maintain up to date anti virus software on the device that you are
currently using to read this email. ]

Re: Experimental method

2005-07-27 by hjf2k2

> I don't have any problems getting samples from Maxim UK, I give them
a phone
> call and get them the next day.

Lucky you. I contacted the distributor and I have to fill a form
stating the estimated annual production, estimated date for
prototypes, etc. And they will EVALUATE if they send the samples. I
imagine the answer: "dear sir/madam: we have evaluated your request
and found it doesn't meet our requirements, so we have decided to
reject it.". Or something like that :(. But I'll try anyway :D

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Experimental method

2005-07-27 by Stefan Trethan

On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:23:45 +0200, hjf2k2 <drgenio@...> wrote:

>
> Lucky you. I contacted the distributor and I have to fill a form
> stating the estimated annual production, estimated date for
> prototypes, etc. And they will EVALUATE if they send the samples. I
> imagine the answer: "dear sir/madam: we have evaluated your request
> and found it doesn't meet our requirements, so we have decided to
> reject it.". Or something like that :(. But I'll try anyway


Don't go over the distributor, go over maxim directly.
www.maxim-ic.com -> search for the chip you want -> bottom left "order
samples" -> get them.

I don't understand why this shouldn`t work for you.
As soon as you are starting to talk to people they can tell you to sod
off, if you use the web interface nobody thinks about you and it just goes
automatic.

I never got any literature request filled though ;-)

ST

Re: Experimental method

2005-07-27 by hjf2k2

> Don't go over the distributor, go over maxim directly.
> www.maxim-ic.com -> search for the chip you want -> bottom left "order
> samples" -> get them.
>
> I don't understand why this shouldn`t work for you.

THEY DON'T SHIP DIRECTLY TO ARGENTINA. Do you think I would go through
all this trouble if I could do it directly via maxim?

> As soon as you are starting to talk to people they can tell you to sod
> off, if you use the web interface nobody thinks about you and it
just goes
> automatic.

No shit. :D

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Experimental method

2005-07-27 by Stefan Trethan

On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:03:18 +0200, hjf2k2 <drgenio@...> wrote:

>
> THEY DON'T SHIP DIRECTLY TO ARGENTINA. Do you think I would go through
> all this trouble if I could do it directly via maxim?


Oh sorry i must have missed that.

ST

Re: Experimental method

2005-07-27 by hjf2k2

> > THEY DON'T SHIP DIRECTLY TO ARGENTINA. Do you think I would go through
> > all this trouble if I could do it directly via maxim?
>
>
> Oh sorry i must have missed that.

Sorry, I didn't mean to sound rude.

Re: Experimental method

2005-08-02 by Bob_xyz

Investigating photo emulsions, I may have found a good way to coat
blank PCBs with the emulsion.

There's a device used for silkscreen preparation called a 'scoop-
coater'. These hold a small quantity of the emulsion and are drawn
over the silkscreen frame to coat it evenly. You may need to do some
shimming to adjust the gap between the edge of the unit and the PCB
to get a thin coating. They're available in various lengths and are
reasonably low in price.


Regards, Bob


--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "hjf2k2" <drgenio@h...> wrote:
> Hi all, i've been testing a way to make photo etching cheap'n easy.
I
> went to a Screen-print shop and bought photosensitive emulsion, the
> cheapest type. I mixed the components and painted the emulsion on
the
> copper. Then I let it dry overnight in a (pitch) dark place.
> On a transparency I printed the negative of my circuit and placed
the
> transparency, toner side to the emulsion and placed it under a
> fluorescent lamp for 7 minutes or so. I removed the board and
nothing
> seemed to change, until I ran some water over the board, and with a
> hair brush for babies (the softer-than-hair type) i helped the
water.
> The exposed areas dried up but the rest washed with water. GREAT
> precision, SMD quality. Then I let the board again now in the sun
to
> totally burn the emulsion and it was ready for etching, warm (hot)
> ferric chloride.
>
> Hope that helps.
> Some day I'll try the AZO-based emulsion, but that one needs UV
curing.

Re: Experimental method

2005-09-02 by thespeakerguy

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "hjf2k2" <drgenio@h...> wrote:
>
> I asked Maxim for samples and printed literature and all they sent
was

If you are still looking for a sample let me know

the
speaker
guy
at
yahoo
dot
com