Yahoo Groups archive

Homebrew PCBs

Index last updated: 2026-04-03 21:38 UTC

Thread

Anybody tried a large flatbed laminator for toner transfer?

Anybody tried a large flatbed laminator for toner transfer?

2004-07-16 by Thomas P. Gootee

I was looking for a better way to make larger lots of pcboards at a time when I remembered that several years ago I had "accidentally" purchased a fairly large laminating machine at a gov't surplus auction.  It's a "Commercial 210M" model, made by Seal.  The bed and heated lid/press's mating surfaces are flat and measure about 18 x 22 inches.

I am wondering if anyone has found a way to make these types of machines work well, for making pcbs with the toner transfer method (laser printed pattern on common glossy paper).  It sure SEEMS like it OUGHT to be able to work well.  And it SURE would be *NICE* to be able to fill an 18 x 22-inch area with boards and do them all at once!

This thing is heavy! It has an external frame composed of two 1/2-inch x 2-inch (cross-section) steel members on each side, holding up the bed and the lid's axle, with 3/4 x 1 1/2 steel  c.s. members on each side comprising the lid/press's support and the lever/cam/closing mechanism, that rotate on a 1/2-inch diameter steel axle in the rear. And there's a 3 5/8 x 2 inch U-beam going from one side to the other, between those, from which the lid is suspended, by adjustable "swinging" 1-inch-diameter hollow bolts (so the lid can self-level as it closes). The levers'/cams' large handle goes all the way across the front of the unit and is connected to the opening/closing mechanism by steel members that measure 3/8 x 1 inch c.s.. The handle swings about 180 degrees between the closed and fully open positions, which raises the front of the lid about 10 inches and the rear about 2 inches.

It has a temperature control knob and a temperature gauge (thermometer), which go from 150 deg F to 350 deg F.  It's rated at 1350 Watts, 11.3 Amps, 115 Volts.

The inside surface of the heated lid seems to be made of something like hard rubber.  In the base, where the lid touches when closed, there was a smooth "cushion" about 3/4-inch thick, which sat on what looks like a sheet of asbestos-type material (no lectures on asbestos, please).

My first experiment was just to place a pcb with a toner transfer pattern sheet in the press (see my pcb toner transfer web page at http://www.fullnet.com/u/tomg/gooteepc.htm , for specs of paper used, etc), which was set for just under 300 deg F, and close the lid for three minutes.  No good.  The toner rubbed off quite easily.  

So I decided to try to go for higher pressure and placed a sheet of 1/4-inch-thick wood on the press's pad and put a pcb and toner pattern on top of the wood.  That made closing the press significantly more difficult, and, I assume, applied more pressure to the pcb.  The results were a lot better, but were spotty.  Apparently the inner surface of the lid is either not evenly flat, or maybe not evenly resilient, or, it's being deformed irregularly by the pcb, or something.  

So, I tried placing a 1/16th-inch-thick sheet of aluminum on top of the pcb and toner pattern paper, just before I closed the lid, in an attempt to even-out the pressure from the heated surface. The results were better, but not consistently great.  

I then pulled out the cushion/pad from the base and replaced it with a couple/few of sheets of 1/4-inch-thick plywood, to which I later added a 1/8-inch sheet, all in an attempt to get more pressure applied, and in a more uniform manner.  The wood looked smooth and flat, but I put a 1/16" thick sheet of aluminum UNDER the pcbs, as well as on top of them, just in case.  Eventually, I had it all set up so that closing the lid required quite a bit of force on the handle; probably well in excess of 50 pounds for the last few inches, to get it to the fully-closed position.  I did make some excellent boards, with toner that could not be rubbed off with fingers or with a stiff toothbrush, no matter how hard or fast I rubbed on it.  But, whenever I tried to put more than one board in the press, the results were spotty again, with maybe one out of four boards being good. And, occasionally, even with only one board in the press, there would be small areas where the toner was not fused well-enough and it could be rubbed off by my thumb or by the toothbrush.

I assume that the solution involves either more pressure or a better way to get the pressure distributed.  I was sandwiching multiple boards between two 6x18 inch pieces of 1/16th" aluminum (two halves of a "kickplate" made for the doors of houses. And I did have the boards separated by a couple of inches.  But perhaps if I used separate pieces for each board (or maybe even NO aluminum sheet on top of the boards, since the pressure is now much higher), it might work better; or MAYBE even a *thicker* (i.e. stiffer) sheet of metal, covering the whole inner (heated) surface of the lid.  But, I had boards that had to be made and shipped (for the Curve Tracer kits that I sell; see http://www.fullnet.com/u/tomg/gooteect.htm ), and work to do. So I have gone back to using the clothes iron, for now...  Sigh...

Any suggestions?  I need something that works perfectly every time.  A handheld iron does that, for me.  But I'm on a continuing mission to automate or streamline as much of the process as possible (I've got a nice etching tank, with two 50 Watt heaters, digital thermometer, and a 250 gph submersible pump that pumps sodium persulphate across the boards at high speed, which works very well. And for drilling I'm converting a small x-y milling table to CNC and mounting a surplus z-axis over it, "real soon now"...)

If anyone can suggest something else I should try to get the laminating press to work well, I'll really appreciate it!

Thanks.

Regards,

Tom Gootee

tomg@...

http://www.fullnet.com/u/tomg

-----------------------------------

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

RE: [Homebrew_PCBs] Anybody tried a large flatbed laminator for toner transfer?

2004-07-16 by Alex Hay

Thomas,

If you can put your press back togther you can probably sell it on ebay for
enough to buy a few good hot roller laminators!  The 210M is a great press
for artwork -- I used one in college for mounting photos, but could never
afford one of my own.  The 210M sells for $250 - $800 on ebay.

I use a HeatSeal H200 for toner transfer -- you can get a brand new one
online for $85.  It won't do the same size as the SEAL, but if you're doing
*that* many boards, you may want to look at cheap offshore fabrication (e.g.
olimex.com) or something from barebonespcb.com.

Of course if you want to trade your 210M for my H200. . .

-Alex

[Alex Hay]  -----Original Message-----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Thomas P. Gootee [mailto:tomg@...]
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 9:13 PM
To: 'Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com'
Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Anybody tried a large flatbed laminator for toner
transfer?


  I was looking for a better way to make larger lots of pcboards at a time
when I remembered that several years ago I had "accidentally" purchased a
fairly large laminating machine at a gov't surplus auction.  It's a
"Commercial 210M" model, made by Seal.  The bed and heated lid/press's
mating surfaces are flat and measure about 18 x 22 inches.

  I am wondering if anyone has found a way to make these types of machines
work well, for making pcbs with the toner transfer method (laser printed
pattern on common glossy paper).  It sure SEEMS like it OUGHT to be able to
work well.  And it SURE would be *NICE* to be able to fill an 18 x 22-inch
area with boards and do them all at once!

  This thing is heavy! It has an external frame composed of two 1/2-inch x
2-inch (cross-section) steel members on each side, holding up the bed and
the lid's axle, with 3/4 x 1 1/2 steel  c.s. members on each side comprising
the lid/press's support and the lever/cam/closing mechanism, that rotate on
a 1/2-inch diameter steel axle in the rear. And there's a 3 5/8 x 2 inch
U-beam going from one side to the other, between those, from which the lid
is suspended, by adjustable "swinging" 1-inch-diameter hollow bolts (so the
lid can self-level as it closes). The levers'/cams' large handle goes all
the way across the front of the unit and is connected to the opening/closing
mechanism by steel members that measure 3/8 x 1 inch c.s.. The handle swings
about 180 degrees between the closed and fully open positions, which raises
the front of the lid about 10 inches and the rear about 2 inches.

  It has a temperature control knob and a temperature gauge (thermometer),
which go from 150 deg F to 350 deg F.  It's rated at 1350 Watts, 11.3 Amps,
115 Volts.

  The inside surface of the heated lid seems to be made of something like
hard rubber.  In the base, where the lid touches when closed, there was a
smooth "cushion" about 3/4-inch thick, which sat on what looks like a sheet
of asbestos-type material (no lectures on asbestos, please).

  My first experiment was just to place a pcb with a toner transfer pattern
sheet in the press (see my pcb toner transfer web page at
http://www.fullnet.com/u/tomg/gooteepc.htm , for specs of paper used, etc),
which was set for just under 300 deg F, and close the lid for three minutes.
No good.  The toner rubbed off quite easily.

  So I decided to try to go for higher pressure and placed a sheet of
1/4-inch-thick wood on the press's pad and put a pcb and toner pattern on
top of the wood.  That made closing the press significantly more difficult,
and, I assume, applied more pressure to the pcb.  The results were a lot
better, but were spotty.  Apparently the inner surface of the lid is either
not evenly flat, or maybe not evenly resilient, or, it's being deformed
irregularly by the pcb, or something.

  So, I tried placing a 1/16th-inch-thick sheet of aluminum on top of the
pcb and toner pattern paper, just before I closed the lid, in an attempt to
even-out the pressure from the heated surface. The results were better, but
not consistently great.

  I then pulled out the cushion/pad from the base and replaced it with a
couple/few of sheets of 1/4-inch-thick plywood, to which I later added a
1/8-inch sheet, all in an attempt to get more pressure applied, and in a
more uniform manner.  The wood looked smooth and flat, but I put a 1/16"
thick sheet of aluminum UNDER the pcbs, as well as on top of them, just in
case.  Eventually, I had it all set up so that closing the lid required
quite a bit of force on the handle; probably well in excess of 50 pounds for
the last few inches, to get it to the fully-closed position.  I did make
some excellent boards, with toner that could not be rubbed off with fingers
or with a stiff toothbrush, no matter how hard or fast I rubbed on it.  But,
whenever I tried to put more than one board in the press, the results were
spotty again, with maybe one out of four boards being good. And,
occasionally, even with only one board in the press, there would be small
areas where the toner was not fused well-enough and it could be rubbed off
by my thumb or by the toothbrush.

  I assume that the solution involves either more pressure or a better way
to get the pressure distributed.  I was sandwiching multiple boards between
two 6x18 inch pieces of 1/16th" aluminum (two halves of a "kickplate" made
for the doors of houses. And I did have the boards separated by a couple of
inches.  But perhaps if I used separate pieces for each board (or maybe even
NO aluminum sheet on top of the boards, since the pressure is now much
higher), it might work better; or MAYBE even a *thicker* (i.e. stiffer)
sheet of metal, covering the whole inner (heated) surface of the lid.  But,
I had boards that had to be made and shipped (for the Curve Tracer kits that
I sell; see http://www.fullnet.com/u/tomg/gooteect.htm ), and work to do. So
I have gone back to using the clothes iron, for now...  Sigh...

  Any suggestions?  I need something that works perfectly every time.  A
handheld iron does that, for me.  But I'm on a continuing mission to
automate or streamline as much of the process as possible (I've got a nice
etching tank, with two 50 Watt heaters, digital thermometer, and a 250 gph
submersible pump that pumps sodium persulphate across the boards at high
speed, which works very well. And for drilling I'm converting a small x-y
milling table to CNC and mounting a surplus z-axis over it, "real soon
now"...)

  If anyone can suggest something else I should try to get the laminating
press to work well, I'll really appreciate it!

  Thanks.

  Regards,

  Tom Gootee

  tomg@...

  http://www.fullnet.com/u/tomg

  -----------------------------------

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



  Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and files:
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs


        Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
              ADVERTISEMENT





----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
  Yahoo! Groups Links

    a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs/

    b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

    c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Anybody tried a large flatbed laminator for toner transfer?

2004-07-16 by Steve

I have a dumb question- is there any reason not to try bumping the
temp up a bit?

Alex is right, that press could sell for quite a bit on eBay. 350F is
a bit low for a Tshirt press, though, but that is big.

I've heard of people doing Toner Transfer using a heat press, but
never had anyone say they needed to go to such lengths. I have a
Tshirt press, smaller but goes up to over 400F, and just got a laser
printer again.

Steve

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Thomas P. Gootee" <tomg@f...>
wrote:
> I was looking for a better way to make larger lots of pcboards at a
time when I remembered that several years ago I had "accidentally"
purchased a fairly large laminating machine at a gov't surplus
auction.  It's a "Commercial 210M" model, made by Seal.  The bed and
heated lid/press's mating surfaces are flat and measure about 18 x 22
inches.
>

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Anybody tried a large flatbed laminator for toner transfer?

2004-07-16 by Alexandre Souza

>   I am wondering if anyone has found a way to make these types of machines
> work well, for making pcbs with the toner transfer method (laser printed
> pattern on common glossy paper).  It sure SEEMS like it OUGHT to be able
to
> work well.  And it SURE would be *NICE* to be able to fill an 18 x 22-inch
> area with boards and do them all at once!

    Tom, I'm still using an old laser printer fusing unit, as my laminator,
and I get very consistent and repetable results every time. Yesterday I did
a pinboard (SMD to DIP adaptor) for an Atmega 128 - 64 pin MQFP - with no
errors whatsoever.

    I'd suggest you taking this path, maybe it can help :)

    Greetings,
    Alexandre Souza


---
- Use antivirus e atualize-o diariamente!
- Preserve a banda disponivel - Apague o "rabo" das mensagens
- Seja consciente - A internet \ufffd um bem universal, nao gaste bytes a toa!
- NAO ACEITO MENSAGENS NAO SOLICITADAS. Reservo-me o direito de perseguir e
denunciar o remetente de SPAM para minhas caixas postais at\ufffd as ultimas
consequencias. Isso \ufffd um aviso.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.719 / Virus Database: 475 - Release Date: 12/07/04

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Anybody tried a large flatbed laminator for toner transfer?

2004-07-16 by Stefan Trethan

On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 13:54:17 -0300, Alexandre Souza 
<alexandre-listas@...> wrote:

>
>>   I am wondering if anyone has found a way to make these types of 
>> machines
>> work well, for making pcbs with the toner transfer method (laser printed
>> pattern on common glossy paper).  It sure SEEMS like it OUGHT to be able
> to
>> work well.  And it SURE would be *NICE* to be able to fill an 18 x 
>> 22-inch
>> area with boards and do them all at once!
>
>     Tom, I'm still using an old laser printer fusing unit, as my 
> laminator,
> and I get very consistent and repetable results every time. Yesterday I 
> did
> a pinboard (SMD to DIP adaptor) for an Atmega 128 - 64 pin MQFP - with no
> errors whatsoever.
>
>     I'd suggest you taking this path, maybe it can help :)
>
>     Greetings,
>     Alexandre Souza
>
>

Tom was asking for efficiently making a big number of boards, may i 
suggest a big
fuser out of a copier? they are at least double the size of a laser 
printer and work very
well. you can panelize the boards to speed things up.
On the other hand, IMO toner transfer is not well suited for high 
quantities.

ST

Re: Anybody - - Laser printer fuser method

2004-07-16 by Dave Mucha

>     Tom, I'm still using an old laser printer fusing unit, as my 
laminator,
> and I get very consistent and repetable results every time. 

I have an old laser printer that could be sacrificed for this, but I 
have not seen anybody do any type of write-up on how to do it.

Is there something I missed on how to convert an hold HP-II to a PCB 
fuser/toner transfer  ?

Dave

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] creating webpages (was: Re: Anybody - - Laser printer fuser method)

2004-07-16 by Stefan Trethan

On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 17:36:43 -0000, Dave Mucha <dave_mucha@...> 
wrote:

>
>>     Tom, I'm still using an old laser printer fusing unit, as my
> laminator,
>> and I get very consistent and repetable results every time.
>
> I have an old laser printer that could be sacrificed for this, but I
> have not seen anybody do any type of write-up on how to do it.
>
> Is there something I missed on how to convert an hold HP-II to a PCB
> fuser/toner transfer  ?
>
> Dave
>

ya rip out the fuser unit, force me to finally write up the simple 
thermostat guide,
and figure out the mechanical drive and perhaps roller adjustment yourself.

ready to go.

How do you guys make webpages?
I speak HTML but i'd like to cut corners.
I need and want no fancy stuff, plain, even frameless html is wanted.
saving as html out of a word procssor creats junk code, i do not like that.
Is there a simple editor that allows me to enter the text, and easily place
headlines and pictures, maybe inserting a simple table here and there?
It MUST produce clean code.
I know it is OT but some of you have pages and surely know how to do it 
efficiently.
In the end it benefits PCB_making.

thanks

ST

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Anybody - - Laser printer fuser method

2004-07-16 by Alexandre Souza

> Is there something I missed on how to convert an hold HP-II to a PCB
> fuser/toner transfer  ?

    Ask me privately this night, I'll do a small tutorial with photos of my
unit, I think it would help you.


---
- Use antivirus e atualize-o diariamente!
- Preserve a banda disponivel - Apague o "rabo" das mensagens
- Seja consciente - A internet \ufffd um bem universal, nao gaste bytes a toa!
- NAO ACEITO MENSAGENS NAO SOLICITADAS. Reservo-me o direito de perseguir e
denunciar o remetente de SPAM para minhas caixas postais at\ufffd as ultimas
consequencias. Isso \ufffd um aviso.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.719 / Virus Database: 475 - Release Date: 12/07/04

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] creating webpages (was: Re: Anybody - - Laser printer fuser method)

2004-07-16 by Alexandre Souza

> How do you guys make webpages?
> I speak HTML but i'd like to cut corners.
> I need and want no fancy stuff, plain, even frameless html is wanted.
> saving as html out of a word procssor creats junk code, i do not like
that.
> Is there a simple editor that allows me to enter the text, and easily
place
> headlines and pictures, maybe inserting a simple table here and there?
> It MUST produce clean code.
> I know it is OT but some of you have pages and surely know how to do it
> efficiently.
> In the end it benefits PCB_making.

    I just use frontpage, but there are lots of code cleaners around...


---
- Use antivirus e atualize-o diariamente!
- Preserve a banda disponivel - Apague o "rabo" das mensagens
- Seja consciente - A internet \ufffd um bem universal, nao gaste bytes a toa!
- NAO ACEITO MENSAGENS NAO SOLICITADAS. Reservo-me o direito de perseguir e
denunciar o remetente de SPAM para minhas caixas postais at\ufffd as ultimas
consequencias. Isso \ufffd um aviso.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.719 / Virus Database: 475 - Release Date: 12/07/04

RE: [Homebrew_PCBs] creating webpages (was: Re: Anybody - - Laser printer fuser method)

2004-07-16 by Dave Hylands

Hi Stefan,

> How do you guys make webpages?
> I speak HTML but i'd like to cut corners.
> I need and want no fancy stuff, plain, even frameless html is 
> wanted. saving as html out of a word procssor creats junk 
> code, i do not like that. Is there a simple editor that 
> allows me to enter the text, and easily place headlines and 
> pictures, maybe inserting a simple table here and there? It 
> MUST produce clean code. I know it is OT but some of you have 
> pages and surely know how to do it 
> efficiently.
> In the end it benefits PCB_making.

I use Microsoft FrontPage for some stuff
(http://www.vancouverroboticsclub.org/)

For my personal web site: Http://www.DaveHylands.com/ I wrote a perl
script which parses a text file containing stuff like this:

---- Start of snippet ----
Title: Stinger
   Stinger is my first attempt at building a low profile mini-sumo. I
would say that
   it was successful, as Stinger came in 2nd place at the 
   <a href="http://www.robotgames.com/">Western Canadian Robot Games</a>
in Calgary.

Image: 01-Base.jpg      Base
     The Base is machined out of PVC. I happened to have some on hand
and decided
    to try it out. The notch in the front was a goof where I didn't have
the material
    clamped tightly enough during machining. The big holes in the middle
are to allow 
    air cooling of the motor drivers and CPU board.
---- End of snippet ----

You can see the result of the above by looking here:
http://www.DaveHylands.com/Robotics/Stinger/

And you can see the entire text file that made the set of pages here:
http://www.DaveHylands.com/Robotics/Stinger/Pages.txt
You'll probably need to use wget or something similar to download it and
preserve the line endings.

It uses a package called ImageMagick http://www.imagemagick.org/ to
downsample my full sized photos and create 50% versions and thumbnails.
I use cygwin under Windows and there are references to a couple of
cygwin apps in the script as well (cp, cmp, cygpath, mkdir)

I've always meant to write up something that describes how it works and
make the script available on my web site, but I haven't done so yet. In
the meantime, I'd be happy to send you the script along with some
samples and stuff.

--
Dave Hylands
Vancouver, BC, Canada
http://www.DaveHylands.com/

OT: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] creating webpages (was: Re: Anybody - - Laser printer fuser method)

2004-07-16 by Roy J. Tellason

On Friday 16 July 2004 01:49 pm, Stefan Trethan wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 17:36:43 -0000, Dave Mucha <dave_mucha@...>
> wrote:
> >>     Tom, I'm still using an old laser printer fusing unit, as my
> >> laminator, and I get very consistent and repetable results every time.

> > I have an old laser printer that could be sacrificed for this, but I
> > have not seen anybody do any type of write-up on how to do it.

I have one here too,  AAMOF.

> > Is there something I missed on how to convert an hold HP-II to a PCB
> > fuser/toner transfer  ?
> >
> > Dave

> ya rip out the fuser unit, force me to finally write up the simple
> thermostat guide, and figure out the mechanical drive and perhaps roller
> adjustment yourself.
>
> ready to go.
>
> How do you guys make webpages?

With a text editor.

> I speak HTML but i'd like to cut corners.
> I need and want no fancy stuff, plain, even frameless html is wanted.

Works for me!

> saving as html out of a word procssor creats junk code, i do not like that.

A "word processor" is a tool for working with "documents".  What you want is a 
text editor.

> Is there a simple editor that allows me to enter the text, and easily place
> headlines and pictures, maybe inserting a simple table here and there?

Yes,  there is no doubt in my mind of this.

> It MUST produce clean code.

It won't produce ANY code,  that is up to you!

> I know it is OT but some of you have pages and surely know how to do it
> efficiently.
> In the end it benefits PCB_making.

You don't say what platform you're running.  I am pretty near all linux here,  
and currently in the KDE GUI,  but for stuff like that I go to a text-based 
console.  I use a utility called mc,  which stands for "Midnight 
Commander" (supposed to be a Norton Commander clone,  but I can't speak to 
that as I've never used NC).  In that is the ability to press F4 while on a 
filename somewhere in your stuff,  and it pops the file up in an editor.

I think this is likely available for a number of different platforms,  try a 
search for it.

Get yourself a couple of books on basic HTML stuff.

Try to remember that many people won't have the same screen resolution that 
you are running (whatever that is),  and create pages that allow for this -- 
that sort of flexibility is one of the best things about HTML,  which many m$ 
tools choose to ignore with such nonsense as absolute pixel-specified font 
sizes and item positioning and similar crap.

Look at some pages that are out there that you like the look of with the "view 
source" option of your browser,  or better yet save some of them and try 
different things,  see what the effect is.

If you want to include images png files seem to load faster than either gif or 
jpg here.  Keep the number of colors down and the size of the image,  giving 
a link to a bigger copy in case someone wants it,  otherwise pages take WAY 
too long to load.

Feel free to contact me off-list if you have any questions about any of this 
stuff.  I started trying to organize my textual information here by putting 
piles of stuff into different directories.  Then I started seeing a bunch of 
documentation that was coming with software and it was in HTML format. So I 
started a local "tree" that I'm using to organize this stuff.  As some of 
what's out there is here now,  gone later,  I tend to save it on HD and plug 
it in to the tree.  Right now there are several thousand files in that pile,  
and it continues to grow all the time.  I'm fairly well organized when I get 
stuff over there,  but my main problem right now is that I have more info to 
put in there and never enough time to do it.  :-)

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] creating webpages (was: Re: Anybody - - Laser printer fuser method)

2004-07-16 by Roy J. Tellason

On Friday 16 July 2004 02:25 pm, Dave Hylands wrote:

> I use Microsoft FrontPage for some stuff
> (http://www.vancouverroboticsclub.org/)

I use no m$ stuff here at all if I can possibly avoid it.  Easier on 
linux...  :-)

> For my personal web site: Http://www.DaveHylands.com/ I wrote a perl
> script which parses a text file containing stuff like this:
>
> ---- Start of snippet ----
> Title: Stinger
>    Stinger is my first attempt at building a low profile mini-sumo. I
> would say that
>    it was successful, as Stinger came in 2nd place at the
>    <a href="http://www.robotgames.com/">Western Canadian Robot Games</a>
> in Calgary.
>
> Image: 01-Base.jpg      Base
>      The Base is machined out of PVC. I happened to have some on hand
> and decided
>     to try it out. The notch in the front was a goof where I didn't have
> the material
>     clamped tightly enough during machining. The big holes in the middle
> are to allow
>     air cooling of the motor drivers and CPU board.
> ---- End of snippet ----

Perl is something I need to get going with,  sometime soon.

> You can see the result of the above by looking here:
> http://www.DaveHylands.com/Robotics/Stinger/
>
> And you can see the entire text file that made the set of pages here:
> http://www.DaveHylands.com/Robotics/Stinger/Pages.txt
> You'll probably need to use wget or something similar to download it and
> preserve the line endings.

Taking that as an invitation,  wget is fetching away as I type this.  :-)

> It uses a package called ImageMagick http://www.imagemagick.org/ to
> downsample my full sized photos and create 50% versions and thumbnails.

Good package,  from what I understand,  and I have it on hand here,  but for 
that sort of thing I use The Gimp.

> I use cygwin under Windows and there are references to a couple of
> cygwin apps in the script as well (cp, cmp, cygpath, mkdir)
>
> I've always meant to write up something that describes how it works and
> make the script available on my web site, but I haven't done so yet. In
> the meantime, I'd be happy to send you the script along with some
> samples and stuff.

I wouldn't mind seeing that,  if wget doesn't fetch it.  Feel free to pass it 
along to my email,  if you don't mind.

Re: OT: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] creating webpages (was: Re: Anybody - - Laser printer fuser method)

2004-07-16 by Stefan Trethan

>> It MUST produce clean code.
>
> It won't produce ANY code,  that is up to you!
>


I get the impression there is no free lunch.
I was hoping to get a software that writes the html tags for me at least.

well, thanks for the hints, i know MC and it is real cool.
(although it sounds and looks a lot like NC).
I run XP here, linux is too time consuming for me.
(I want to switch it on and it should work, my linux knoweledge is too low
to make that happen and i don't want to invest the time to get the needed 
experience)

thanks,

st

Re: OT: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] creating webpages (was: Re: Anybody - - Laser printer fuser method)

2004-07-16 by Kevin Lavigne

Hi Stefan,
    Try looking at 1st Page 2000 (http://www.evrsoft.com/) I used it a few
years ago when I was in my 'Starving Techie' phase to create and ASP based
reporting engine for my employer.
It's free and it's positioned somewhere between Notepad and FrontPage.
Although I haven't used it for quite a few years I think you can drag and
drop well formed tags onto the page and it has a WYSIWYG type of component
also.

Hope this helps,
    Kevin

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stefan Trethan" <stefan_trethan@...>
To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 2:56 PM
Subject: Re: OT: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] creating webpages (was: Re: Anybody - -
Laser printer fuser method)
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> >> It MUST produce clean code.
> >
> > It won't produce ANY code,  that is up to you!
> >
>
>
> I get the impression there is no free lunch.
> I was hoping to get a software that writes the html tags for me at least.
>
> well, thanks for the hints, i know MC and it is real cool.
> (although it sounds and looks a lot like NC).
> I run XP here, linux is too time consuming for me.
> (I want to switch it on and it should work, my linux knoweledge is too low
> to make that happen and i don't want to invest the time to get the needed
> experience)
>
> thanks,
>
> st
>
>
>
> Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and files:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>

Re: OT: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] creating webpages (was: Re: Anybody - - Laser printer fuser method)

2004-07-16 by Roy J. Tellason

On Friday 16 July 2004 02:56 pm, Stefan Trethan wrote:
> >> It MUST produce clean code.

> > It won't produce ANY code,  that is up to you!

> I get the impression there is no free lunch.

Yep!

> I was hoping to get a software that writes the html tags for me at least.

Well,  there might be stuff out there,  but it isn't that hard to do,  really.

> well, thanks for the hints, i know MC and it is real cool.
> (although it sounds and looks a lot like NC).

Sounds?  It has sounds?  Not in my setup...

> I run XP here, linux is too time consuming for me.
> (I want to switch it on and it should work, my linux knoweledge is too low
> to make that happen and i don't want to invest the time to get the needed
> experience)

My brother describes himself as "a GUI kind of guy" and as far as computers 
are concerned,  he "just wants to use it" and have it "be like an appliance", 
though he seems to have no problem doing all sorts of stuff with his many 
vehicles.  I'm the other way around,  I do lots of stuff with computers and 
with my vehicles I "just want to use them".  :-)  Anyhow,  he's running 
Mandrake,  and seems to be pretty happy with it.  You might take a look some 
time.  These things tend to move forward fairly fast,  these days.

Re: OT: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] creating webpages (was: Re: Anybody - - Laser printer fuser method)

2004-07-16 by Stefan Trethan

> My brother describes himself as "a GUI kind of guy" and as far as 
> computers
> are concerned,  he "just wants to use it" and have it "be like an 
> appliance",
> though he seems to have no problem doing all sorts of stuff with his many
> vehicles.  I'm the other way around,  I do lots of stuff with computers 
> and
> with my vehicles I "just want to use them".  :-)  Anyhow,  he's running
> Mandrake,  and seems to be pretty happy with it.  You might take a look 
> some
> time.  These things tend to move forward fairly fast,  these days.
>


I was much more into PCs and programming in the past, now it is a tool, 
like
a screwdriver. I want to use it and it MUST work and take all kinds of 
abuse.
(Although grinding a screwdriver really good is a interesting thing to 
do....)

I got fed up with linux after trying for a week to get my IIID printing on 
one
side only, with windows it is undoing a check-box, with linux it seems 
impossible.
I don't want to tinker with it any more right now...

For HTML:
I downloaded
<http://software.visicommedia.com/en/download/register.php?idre=&idProduct=70>
and it seems to do what i need.
Make sure to undo the "i love spam" checkboxes.

ST

Re: OT: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] creating webpages (was: Re: Anybody - - Laser printer fuser method)

2004-07-16 by Leon Heller

----- Original Message ----- 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "Kevin Lavigne" <klavigne@...>
To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 8:23 PM
Subject: Re: OT: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] creating webpages (was: Re: Anybody - -
Laser printer fuser method)


> Hi Stefan,
>     Try looking at 1st Page 2000 (http://www.evrsoft.com/) I used it a few
> years ago when I was in my 'Starving Techie' phase to create and ASP based
> reporting engine for my employer.
> It's free and it's positioned somewhere between Notepad and FrontPage.
> Although I haven't used it for quite a few years I think you can drag and
> drop well formed tags onto the page and it has a WYSIWYG type of component
> also.

I have access to DreamWeaver - it's very good, but expensive.

Leon

RE: Anybody tried a large flatbed laminator for toner transfer?

2004-07-16 by rmustakos@att.net

Tom
  It's good to have a lot of pressure, to some extent.  I think the 
problem you are hitting now is that you are applying so much pressure 
that you are distorting the top plate and lossing contact as the top
deforms.  So increasing force on the plate may be decreasing the 
pressure where you want it.
I would try (as others have talked about) 
1) Increase the temp, 300F is about 150 C, which is low end of good.
Crank it up, 350 is still less than 180 C.
2) Back off on the pressure, and put more, stiffer, heat conducting 
plate (Al for steel) on the top and bottom (I say both because I'm 
not sure where your heater is). 
As an experiment, you might try laying out a grid of dots on paper
and fuse it to one of the sheets of aluminun you are using, try it
with a lot of pressure, and also on the other side with less 
pressure.  Check to see if it holds better on the edges than in
middle.  If it does, you might want to look at some type of curved
surface, convex up, highest in the center, with which to support
your boards.  I bet laminate glue is much more forgiving of
pressure than the toner is.
Good luck,
RM

RE: Anybody tried a large flatbed laminator for toner transfer?

2004-07-17 by Thomas P. Gootee

Alex,

Thanks!  

I *can* put the press back together.  All I did was lift the pad out of the base.  The pad wasn't actually *attached* in any way.

I think that seeing the ebay prices of the 210M press was why I bought it, originally, even though I normally only bought test equipment (for resale; see my website).  But if I can get it working well for making PCBs, it should (I *hope*) be worth more to me, eventually, if I keep it and use it, than if I sold it now.  But I am definitely open to using whatever is best for my needs.

How well does your HeatSeal H200 work for making PCBs with toner transfer?  (Sorry. I am sure this has been discussed. But I am new to this group and haven't read much, if any, about them, yet.)

And, maybe this is asking too much, but how does your H200 seem to compare with other similar types, and with the adapted laser printer fuser/roller assemblies?  (I have an old LaserJet III and an old LaserJet II that don't seem to work anymore, that I might be able to use the assemblies from.  I think that they both have straight-through paper paths, too, which seems like it might make it easier to convert them. (Don't know. Just guessing.)  [Now if we could just set up an automatic feeder that would run through a stack of patterns and a stack of board blanks...]

I don't *think* that I make quite enough boards, yet, to farm out their production, although I did have Bill Jenkins make some for me (He's GREAT. Search http://groups.google.com to find him.).  His price was really excellent.  But I am still doing some design changes/enhancements, etc, which would probably mean too much in new setup fees, etc, for the time being.

Right now, I periodically have to make something like 30 boards at a whack, consisting of 10 each of 3 different board designs (two are 2.25x6 inches and one is 4x6 inches), for my Curve Tracer kits.  Using the trusty "clothes iron with the broken handle", I can do it perfectly every single time, with maybe 3 or 4 minutes spent on printing the pattern, cutting out the pattern, and ironing, for each board. So it's not really *that* big of a deal, YET, except that I have to stand there the whole time, etc.  Other parts of the process take more time that producing and applying the patterns (although I am simultaneously trying to automate or optimize most of those, too).  But, IF I could use the laminating press, I could probably save some time and effort, especially since the press is already just sitting here, anyway.  And it would then probably be more-or-less "idiotproof", so someone else COULD do it for me (like one of my teenage kids, hehe).  Also, I could probably panelize the boards, which the iron can't do because of its small size, which might also speed things up a little more.  [Disclaimer: "If you make it idiot-proof, someone will invent a better idiot."]

But I *hope* that I soon WILL be needing to make more boards than I can handle, alone.  The rate of incoming orders for my kits is increasing. (And I also have several new pcb-containing products that I'm getting ready to release, "real soon now".)  For now, I just want to make the pcb-fab process as quick and painless as possible, mainly because I have so much OTHER stuff that I also need to do.  I'm hoping that if I can pull it all off this way (i.e. labor instead of cash), for a while longer, I might be able to reach some sort of "critical mass" and then be able to hire-out what I need, or maybe even turn the whole product over to some third party, or, whatever works. (That's "the dream", anyway, hehe...)

Thanks for the olimex and barebonespcb links!

Regards,

Tom Gootee

http://www.fullnet.com/u/tomg

-----------------------------------




   Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 06:00:48 -0700
Show quoted textHide quoted text
   From: "Alex Hay" <alex@...>
Subject: RE: Anybody tried a large flatbed laminator for toner transfer?

Thomas,

If you can put your press back togther you can probably sell it on ebay for
enough to buy a few good hot roller laminators!  The 210M is a great press
for artwork -- I used one in college for mounting photos, but could never
afford one of my own.  The 210M sells for $250 - $800 on ebay.

I use a HeatSeal H200 for toner transfer -- you can get a brand new one
online for $85.  It won't do the same size as the SEAL, but if you're doing
*that* many boards, you may want to look at cheap offshore fabrication (e.g.
olimex.com) or something from barebonespcb.com.

Of course if you want to trade your 210M for my H200. . .

-Alex

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

RE: Anybody tried a large flatbed laminator for toner transfer?

2004-07-17 by Thomas P. Gootee

Steve,

Thanks for the reply!

Actually, I already tried using a higher temperature.  I'm not really sure WHAT the true temperature is of the press is, since the knob and the thermometer don't agree, although I tend to believe the thermometer. (I guess I should measure it with a second thermometer...)

It turned out that the temperature didn't seem to be the problem.  As someone else mentions farther below, apparently correctly, the problem seemed to be the uneven contact between the pattern/board and the inside of the heated lid of the press, or, rather, the sheet of metal that I put between them, which was too thin and deformed around the board edges, causing it to bend away from parts of the inner portions of the boards.  The parts of the boards that DID work perfectly seemed to indicate that the temperature was fine at around 300 degF.  So I'm getting ready to give it another try, with a thicker sheet of metal between the lid and the boards.

Thanks again!

Regards,

Tom Gootee

http://www.fullnet.com/u/tomg

-----------------------------------

Message: 3         
   Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 16:33:36 -0000
Show quoted textHide quoted text
   From: "Steve" <alienrelics@...>
Subject: Re: Anybody tried a large flatbed laminator for toner transfer?

I have a dumb question- is there any reason not to try bumping the
temp up a bit?

Alex is right, that press could sell for quite a bit on eBay. 350F is
a bit low for a Tshirt press, though, but that is big.

I've heard of people doing Toner Transfer using a heat press, but
never had anyone say they needed to go to such lengths. I have a
Tshirt press, smaller but goes up to over 400F, and just got a laser
printer again.

Steve

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Thomas P. Gootee" <tomg@f...>
wrote:
> I was looking for a better way to make larger lots of pcboards at a
time when I remembered that several years ago I had "accidentally"
purchased a fairly large laminating machine at a gov't surplus
auction.  It's a "Commercial 210M" model, made by Seal.  The bed and
heated lid/press's mating surfaces are flat and measure about 18 x 22
inches.
> 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

RE: Anybody tried a large flatbed laminator for toner transfer?

2004-07-17 by Thomas P. Gootee

Alexandre,

Thanks for the reply!

That sounds very good.  And I DO have a couiple of older HP LaserJets here that I could use (an LJ III and an LJ II).

I will search the group's archive for more information.

Thanks again!

Regards,

Tom Gootee

http://www.fullnet.com/u/tomg

-----------------------------------

Message: 4         
   Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 13:54:17 -0300
Show quoted textHide quoted text
   From: "Alexandre Souza" <alexandre-listas@...>
Subject: Re: Anybody tried a large flatbed laminator for toner transfer?


>   I am wondering if anyone has found a way to make these types of machines
> work well, for making pcbs with the toner transfer method (laser printed
> pattern on common glossy paper).  It sure SEEMS like it OUGHT to be able
to
> work well.  And it SURE would be *NICE* to be able to fill an 18 x 22-inch
> area with boards and do them all at once!

    Tom, I'm still using an old laser printer fusing unit, as my laminator,
and I get very consistent and repetable results every time. Yesterday I did
a pinboard (SMD to DIP adaptor) for an Atmega 128 - 64 pin MQFP - with no
errors whatsoever.

    I'd suggest you taking this path, maybe it can help :)

    Greetings,
    Alexandre Souza


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] RE: Anybody tried a large flatbed laminator for toner transfer?

2004-07-17 by Stefan Trethan

haven't read much, if any, about them, yet.)
>
> And, maybe this is asking too much, but how does your H200 seem to 
> compare with other similar types, and with the adapted laser printer 
> fuser/roller assemblies?  (I have an old LaserJet III and an old 
> LaserJet II that don't seem to work anymore, that I might be able to use 
> the assemblies from.  I think that they both have straight-through paper 
> paths, too, which seems like it might make it easier to convert them. 
> (Don't know. Just guessing.)  [Now if we could just set up an automatic 
> feeder that would run through a stack of patterns and a stack of board 
> blanks...]


I get the impression some people have the idea the "converted" laminators
are "a modified printer where you feed the stuff through".
As far as i know this is NOT used by anyone so far.
What is done is "rip the fuser unit out" and use it (alone) like a 
laminator.
Of course you might want to take out a geartrain and a motor for drive, 
and possibly
some electronics to make the temperature control.

I do not think using it "in the printer" would be practical, it seems damn 
hard
to feed the stack and the motor is WAY too fast.

I have a IIID and although i would hate knowing that magnificent machine 
beeing ripped
apart the fuser unit is suitable i think.
There are 4 screws holding the fuser assy to the baseplate.
I think the LJII is the same on this part.

I'm not familiar with the drivetrain (had no problems with it so far and 
it is hidden
away pretty good) and don't know if there is a suitable motor in there.
I can highly recommend getting a "chicken grill motor" they are heavily 
geared
and reasonably cheap, even new. they can direct drive it and you get 1 
pass.

ST

RE: Anybody tried a large flatbed laminator for toner transfer?

2004-07-17 by Thomas P. Gootee

ST,

Thanks for the response!

For now, the quantity of boards that I make still seems to be well-suited to the toner transfer method.  And, my current quest is, after all, directly aimed at increasing the number of boards or rate of production that IS still viable using toner transfer.

So the copier fuser idea interests me.

I don't know how much time would be required, to convert either a copier or laser printer mechanism. But, if it's not TOO much time, I do happen to know of an *excellent* SOURCE for both of them, "for almost nothing":  

There are almost always hundreds or thousands of both copiers and laser printers sold at auction, by the military, every month, through http://www.govliquidation.com .  They also seem to have just about anything ELSE you can possibly imagine.  I didn't ever focus on the copier/printer auction lots, since I was into the resale of mostly just "electronic test and measurement equipment".  But it *seemed* like the copiers and printers often went for about the minimum bid (usually $35 + 10% fee + tax), which was often for several or MANY of them in one auction lot.  I have even seen large semi trailer loads of used HP and other laser printers that looked perfectly fine that occasionally sold for less than $1000, although that was probably five or more years ago.  And they usually have the really *BIG* copiers, too (not to mention lots of other cool stuff, like big pen-plotters, forklifts, jet engines, generators, boats, ... you name it...!).  So, if a person is lucky-enough to be fairly near one of their larger warehouses, that could be a great source for lots of interesting "stuff".  Even just going there to LOOK at all the stuff, during the inspection period, is usually an *amazing* experience.

Before anyone gets TOO excited, please note that there are some significant inherent risks involved with buying surplus equipment from govliquidation.com . You basically have to go there in person, to pick up whatever you've won/bought (or pay through the nose to have it picked up and shipped to you; usually *HUGE* $), usually without any assistance in loading it. And there is NO guarantee that ANY of it will work, at all, or that it even has all of its parts, etc, AND even no guarantee that what is listed or pictured for an auction lot is actually what is in the lot!  Their listed "condition codes" are sometimes completely wrong, too, and are often ambiguous or misleading.  So, until you "know the ropes", or don't care too much about the risks, it is advisable to go to the warehouse, during the official inspection period before the auction, to personally inspect the lots you're interested in bidding on.  (Hint: If you're looking at many lots, then, if you can, take a digital camera, so you won't need to write down too many notes about items' conditions, etc.)  

Also, compared to back when I was buying from them much more regularly, they've gradually gotten smarter about selling, so that now they sometimes put the really good stuff in very small lots, or one at a time.  And they've changed from mostly sealed-bid auctions to mostly on-line "live" auctions, similar to ebay. Those are probably "a good thing" for end users, although it tends to make it worse for the resellers.  However, I always wondered how many of the end-user-type buyers, buying a single item, were disappointed because they didn't yet understand what the risks were, especially when I'd see, for example, a nice Tektronix oscilloscope model go for what a known-working one would sell for on ebay!  Even with experience and VERY careful pre-bid inspection, at least 10% or 15%, and sometimes up to 30% or more, of what I acquired was NOT in working condition. (Of course, the prices were still 10% to 30% of the average ebay selling prices for the same items, back then.)  So, bid accordingly.

Sorry to blather-on for so long, about all of that!

Thanks again, ST!

Regards,

Tom Gootee

http://www.fullnet.com/u/tomg

-----------------------------------

Message: 5         
   Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 19:28:09 +0200
Show quoted textHide quoted text
   From: Stefan Trethan <stefan_trethan@...>
Subject: Re: Anybody tried a large flatbed laminator for toner transfer?

On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 13:54:17 -0300, Alexandre Souza 
<alexandre-listas@...> wrote:

<snipped>

Tom was asking for efficiently making a big number of boards, may i 
suggest a big
fuser out of a copier? they are at least double the size of a laser 
printer and work very
well. you can panelize the boards to speed things up.
On the other hand, IMO toner transfer is not well suited for high 
quantities.

ST




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

RE: Anybody tried a large flatbed laminator for toner transfer?

2004-07-17 by Thomas P. Gootee

RM,

Thanks for the reply!

I think you NAILED it!

The boards that I made using the press that were NOT good always had areas that were bad that were not on the edges.  The bad areas were often even symmetrically located, on the board, usually 1/2 to 1 inch or so inboard from each of the shorter ends of the board, and basically centered wrt the other two sides.  So it DOES sound like the (too) thin aluminum sheet was probably being deformed by the pressure, around the edges of the boards, as you thought, causing it to tend to bend upward and away from the boards.

So I am going to look for a thicker, more rigid sheet of metal that I can either lay on top of the boards and patterns, or, maybe, somehow attach to the inside of the lid of the press (which is the heated part), but *probably* only if I can do that without modifying or damaging the press (in case I ever want to sell it, I guess).  I would LIKE to have the metal sheet attached to the lid, though, so that: a) it would stay hot all the time, and b) I wouldn't have to keep handling a large piece of very hot metal.  It might even help with maintaining initial pattern alignment, although, for my other tests, especially with multiple boards, I just used the clothes iron on a corner of each one, for 10 or 15 seconds, to "tack" the pattern to the board in the proper position.

Thanks again, RM!

Regards,

Tom Gootee

http://www.fullnet.com/u/tomg

-----------------------------------

Message: 5         
   Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 20:47:58 +0000
Show quoted textHide quoted text
   From: rmustakos@...
Subject: RE: Anybody tried a large flatbed laminator for toner transfer?

Tom
  It's good to have a lot of pressure, to some extent.  I think the 
problem you are hitting now is that you are applying so much pressure 
that you are distorting the top plate and lossing contact as the top
deforms.  So increasing force on the plate may be decreasing the 
pressure where you want it.
I would try (as others have talked about) 
1) Increase the temp, 300F is about 150 C, which is low end of good.
Crank it up, 350 is still less than 180 C.
2) Back off on the pressure, and put more, stiffer, heat conducting 
plate (Al for steel) on the top and bottom (I say both because I'm 
not sure where your heater is). 
As an experiment, you might try laying out a grid of dots on paper
and fuse it to one of the sheets of aluminun you are using, try it
with a lot of pressure, and also on the other side with less 
pressure.  Check to see if it holds better on the edges than in
middle.  If it does, you might want to look at some type of curved
surface, convex up, highest in the center, with which to support
your boards.  I bet laminate glue is much more forgiving of
pressure than the toner is.
Good luck,
RM




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] RE: Anybody tried a large flatbed laminator for toner transfer?

2004-07-17 by Stefan Trethan

yea, whatever, my gouvernment isn't selling stuff as far as i know..

There isn't much work involved with converting a copier, really only 
ripping out
the fuser unit, adding a simple thermostat circuit and
a drive motor. ready to go.  I assume mine didn't take more than 2 hours 
and i tried
a few things.
You might want to reduce the spring tension pressing the rollers together 
a bit, because
the boards are thicker than paper.
I used a ricoh fuser but i assume almost all brands are good for it.

ST

(P.S.: Tom, knowing your webpage you might be interested in
<http://www.albany.net/~gwoods/esr_meter/esr_meter_index.html>
I built it and it is performing great.)

On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 16:12:04 -0500, Thomas P. Gootee <tomg@...> 
wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> ST,
>
> Thanks for the response!
>
> For now, the quantity of boards that I make still seems to be 
> well-suited to the toner transfer method.  And, my current quest is, 
> after all, directly aimed at increasing the number of boards or rate of 
> production that IS still viable using toner transfer.
>
> So the copier fuser idea interests me.

Homebrew 4 +layer PCB's?

2004-07-18 by tony@elroynet.com

Hi all,

I was wondering if anyone here has or does homebrew 4 layer or more
boards, and how it might be done?

I can do 2 layer boards no problem, but 4 layer and more I have to send
out for prototypes and it gets expensive =(

-Tony

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Homebrew 4 +layer PCB's?

2004-07-18 by Adam Seychell

tony@... wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I was wondering if anyone here has or does homebrew 4 layer or more
> boards, and how it might be done?
> 

Unfortunatly 4 layer requires plated through holes. The process for 
fabricating plated through hole PCBs is huge jump in complexity compared 
to non-plated hole PCBs. Going from double sided plated through hole to 
4 layer requires the ability to laminate layers. A multilayer PCB 
follows all the same steps as a double sided plated through PCB, with 
addition of innerlayer etching and lamination.

I havn't made a 4 layer board. I'm still working on my PCB equipment for 
making plated through hole 2 layers.

Adam

Re: Homebrew 4 +layer PCB's?

2004-07-19 by rmustakos

Adam
  Someone has written about this before, I think on here, but it may have been Electronics_101, but I think it was here.  My understanding is that if you can handle PTH, and have access to an industrial sized heated press (a la the one Tom G was talking about earlier last week) it is not much harder than double sided.  I think someone said they did it using epoxy to hold the boards together.  Maybe ST, but you'd have to check the archives.
Richard

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Homebrew 4 +layer PCB's?

2004-07-20 by Jeremy Taylor

Markus Zingg is the guy who has done it, The topic ws discussed here. I was about ready to try it, but I found away to do the project on 2 layer. 

JT
Show quoted textHide quoted text
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: rmustakos 
  To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 7:21 PM
  Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Homebrew 4 +layer PCB's?


  Adam
    Someone has written about this before, I think on here, but it may have been Electronics_101, but I think it was here.  My understanding is that if you can handle PTH, and have access to an industrial sized heated press (a la the one Tom G was talking about earlier last week) it is not much harder than double sided.  I think someone said they did it using epoxy to hold the boards together.  Maybe ST, but you'd have to check the archives.
  Richard



  Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and files:
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs 


        Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
              ADVERTISEMENT
             
       
       


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Yahoo! Groups Links

    a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs/
      
    b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
      
    c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Homebrew 4 +layer PCB's?

2004-07-20 by Stefan Trethan

On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 23:21:48 -0000, rmustakos <rmustakos@...> wrote:

> Adam
>   Someone has written about this before, I think on here, but it may 
> have been Electronics_101, but I think it was here.  My understanding is 
> that if you can handle PTH, and have access to an industrial sized 
> heated press (a la the one Tom G was talking about earlier last week) it 
> is not much harder than double sided.  I think someone said they did it 
> using epoxy to hold the boards together.  Maybe ST, but you'd have to 
> check the archives.
> Richard
>
>
Markus, in Switzerland, was it

ST

[Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Homebrew 4 +layer PCB's?

2004-07-20 by Michael Johnston

This question was posted on June 19, 2004 titled "4 Layer" and was discussed
on June 20th.  The message below seems to be the most relevant.  The
archives will contain the complete discussion.  If you can't find it, let me
know and I can forward the complete discussion to you.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: Markus Zingg [mailto:m.zingg@...]
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 5:07 AM
To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] 4 Layer


On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 06:42:10 -0400, you wrote:

>Thanks for the reply. I have PTH, Tin/lead electro, and cnc. I was hoping
it could be done,

It can be done, and to be honest I not even find it especially
difficult.

>What particular brand of epoxy did you use,

I tried different 5 min epoxys. All I tried worked well, I don't think
it's critical.

>and did you need a layer of insulating material between boards, or did you
use single sided outer boards, with an inner double?

The latter. That's by far the easiest way. Simply expose, develop and
etch the inner layer first but don't drill any holes (except for two
diagonal center holes I first drill thrugh the whole stack). Then,
apply the glue to the inner double sided board. I use plastic sticks
from ice creams (I do have 3 kids, hence lot's of sticks available
here) and apply a very thin layer of glue. However, I take special
care to asure that glue is also in those parts where the copper was
etched away. I apply glue to both sides at the same time. I then put
the stack together and put it into the vice press.

>Did you put your vise~glue~boards sandwich in the oven, or did it air dry.

Air dry is sufficient. Since I use 5 min epoxy the whole thing is
ready after 5 minutes! I then drill all holes and pass the stack
through the through hole plating. Exposing, developping and etching of
the outer layers then goes as usual. I use dry laminate but figure you
do it the same way.

>How does it hold up??

Although it's clear that such a PCB can't hold up the same as one made
with predips and a hot press, they hold very well. In practize (and
that's honestly all that's important to me) they are usable the very
same way as any other board. I.e. no troubles whatsover with drilling,
applying thin, soldering or whatever.

I like to point out though that the complete process of making PCB's
on my own serve the sole purpose of creating prototypes. I never would
sell such a board due to obvious reasons. However, being able to have
a four layer PCB in my hands ~4 hours after decideing to do so is a
very cool thing.

Markus


Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and files:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs


      Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
            ADVERTISEMENT





----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Yahoo! Groups Links

  a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs/

  b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
  Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

  c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

RE: Anybody tried a large flatbed laminator for toner transfer?

2004-07-20 by Thomas P. Gootee

RM (and everyone),

It looks like all of the problems are solved and the big Seal " Commercial 
210M " laminating press can now make perfect toner transfers!

I went to a local machine shop and purchased a rectangular steel plate, 
1/4-inch thick, to place between the press's heated lid's underside and the 
pcb pattern and board (which sit on a smooth piece of "chipboard" with some 
plywood under it, to get the correct height for creating the amount of 
pressure needed when the lid is clamped down with the handle).

I also discovered that the temperature-control knob DOES go up past the 350 
degF setting, to about 400 degF (although the knob's scale-markings don't 
go that high).  I cranked it all the way up and, assuming that the 
thermometer's scale remains linear past the scale-markings that are printed 
on it, the press's temp went to about 400 degF.

And I found out that the two large bolts and nuts that the lid is suspended 
from needed a slight adjustment, to make the lid level, which looks like it 
probably also makes the distribution of the pressure more uniform, when the 
lid is closed.

I also removed two sheets of 5/32"-thick plywood that I had earlier placed 
underneath the chipboard, to make room for the 1/4"-thick steel plate and 
to lower the pressure, somewhat, when the lid was latched down.

I lowered the lid onto the steel plate, without latching it down but with 
good contact, and let the press heat up to between 375 degF and 400 degF.

Then I opened the lid and carefully moved the steel plate, using kitchen 
potholders, and placed the pcb and pattern on the wood, and laid the hot 
steel plate on top of it.  Then I latched the press down and waited for two 
minutes before removing the pcb, which I then dropped into a dish of hot 
tap water.

Later, when I removed the "Staples Picture Paper", the pattern was 
essentially perfect, and was adhering VERY well, everywhere (which had been 
the main problem, before).  Using a stiff toothbrush, vigorously, to remove 
the paper remnants from the 0.02" square drill-hole marks, there was 
absolutely zero damage. No trace edges, nor anything else, were affected at 
all.

The only adjustment that I think I need to make is to further-reduce the 
pressure that's applied to the pcb, since, on the test boards, some of the 
tiny 4-point text was deformed a little bit, e.g. with the center openings 
of 4's and 0's basically closed up.

I didn't get a steel plate that is as large as the press is (22" x 18"), 
yet.  I paid $3 for one that's roughly 8" x 12" x 1/4" and weighs 6 pounds, 
just to test it.  But I definitely want to have a much larger steel plate, 
and want it to be attached to the lid, somehow, so I don't have to handle 
it by hand.  However, I also don't want to modify or damage the press 
itself, in any way.  So I'm thinking I will probably get a steel plate that 
is a little larger than the lid and support it from the outside.  I'll 
probably drill a couple of holes in each edge of the plate, fairly near the 
corners, and then run steel wires or cables across the top of the lid from 
one hole to another (probably in two "X" patterns so they can't slip off 
the lid), to suspend the plate under the lid.  It doesn't need to be a very 
tight fit, since it will always be tight when the press is closed.  Any 
other ideas that anyone might have are welcome.

Regards,

Tom Gootee

http://www.fullnet.com/u/tomg

-----------------------------------

Message: 5
   Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 20:47:58 +0000
Show quoted textHide quoted text
   From: rmustakos@...
Subject: RE: Anybody tried a large flatbed laminator for toner transfer?

Tom
  It's good to have a lot of pressure, to some extent.  I think the
problem you are hitting now is that you are applying so much pressure
that you are distorting the top plate and lossing contact as the top
deforms.  So increasing force on the plate may be decreasing the
pressure where you want it.
I would try (as others have talked about)
1) Increase the temp, 300F is about 150 C, which is low end of good.
Crank it up, 350 is still less than 180 C.
2) Back off on the pressure, and put more, stiffer, heat conducting
plate (Al for steel) on the top and bottom (I say both because I'm
not sure where your heater is).
As an experiment, you might try laying out a grid of dots on paper
and fuse it to one of the sheets of aluminun you are using, try it
with a lot of pressure, and also on the other side with less
pressure.  Check to see if it holds better on the edges than in
middle.  If it does, you might want to look at some type of curved
surface, convex up, highest in the center, with which to support
your boards.  I bet laminate glue is much more forgiving of
pressure than the toner is.
Good luck,
RM


begin 600 WINMAIL.DAT
M>)\^(AD1`0:0" `$```````!``$``0>0!@`(````Y 0```````#H``$-@ 0`
M`@````(``@`!!) &`*@"```"````# ````,``# $````"P`/#@`````"`?\/
M`0```%D`````````@2L?I+ZC$!F=;@#=`0]4`@````!(;VUE8G)E=U]00T)S
M0'EA:&]O9W)O=7!S+F-O;0!33510`$AO;65B<F5W7U!#0G- >6%H;V]G<F]U
M<',N8V]M`````!X``C !````!0```%--5% `````'@`#, $````>````2&]M
M96)R97=?4$-"<T!Y86AO;V=R;W5P<RYC;VT````#`!4,`0````,`_@\&````
M'@`!, $````@````)TAO;65B<F5W7U!#0G- >6%H;V]G<F]U<',N8V]M)P`"
M`0LP`0```",```!33510.DA/345"4D577U!#0E- 64%(3T]'4D]54%,N0T]-
M```#```Y``````L`0#H!`````@'V#P$````$````````! T````#```P!0``
M``L`#PX!`````@'_#P$```!!`````````($K'Z2^HQ 9G6X`W0$/5 (```$`
M<FUU<W1A:V]S0&%T="YN970`4TU44 !R;75S=&%K;W- 871T+FYE= `````>
M``(P`0````4```!33510`````!X``S !````$@```')M=7-T86MO<T!A='0N
M;F5T`````P`5# (````#`/X/!@```!X``3 !````% ```"=R;75S=&%K;W- 
M871T+FYE="<``@$+, $````7````4TU44#I235535$%+3U- 0514+DY%5 ``
M`P``.0`````+`$ Z``````(!]@\!````! ````````4"`?D/`0```$$`````
M````@2L?I+ZC$!F=;@#=`0]4`@```0!R;75S=&%K;W- 871T+FYE= !33510
M`')M=7-T86MO<T!A='0N;F5T``````2,`0B !P`8````25!-+DUI8W)O<V]F
M="!-86EL+DYO=&4`,0@!!( !`$ ```!213H@06YY8F]D>2!T<FEE9"!A(&QA
M<F=E(&9L871B960@;&%M:6YA=&]R(&9O<B!T;VYE<B!T<F%N<V9E<C\`]Q8!
M!8 #``X```#4!P<`% `+`"D`,P`"`%\!`2" `P`.````U <'`!0`"@`I``<`
M`@`R`0$)@ $`(0```$4X.31#.#,Y,SA$040X,3$X1C4Y,# P-#5!-C8Q0T0W
M`" '`0.0!@!X#0``$@````L`(P```````P`F```````+`"D```````,`-@``
M````0 `Y`" *:'5X;L0!'@!P``$```! ````4D4Z($%N>6)O9'D@=')I960@
M82!L87)G92!F;&%T8F5D(&QA;6EN871O<B!F;W(@=&]N97(@=')A;G-F97(_
M``(!<0`!````%@````'$;GAU:#G(E.G:.!'8CUD`!%IF'-<``!X`'@P!````
M!0```%--5% `````'@`?# $````1````=&]M9T!F=6QL;F5T+F-O;0`````#
M``80YC^M:0,`!Q"@#@``'@`($ $```!E````4DTH04Y$159%4EE/3D4I+$E4
M3$]/2U-,24M%04Q,3T942$504D]"3$5-4T%215-/3%9%1$%.1%1(14))1U-%
M04PB0T]-34520TE!3#(Q,$TB3$%-24Y!5$E.1U!215-30T%.3@`````"`0D0
M`0```-@+``#4"P``/Q4``$Q:1G7X:0N+_P`*`0\"%0*D`^0%ZP*#`% 3`U0"
M`&-H"L!S973N,@8`!L,"@S(#Q@<3`H/&,P/%`@!P<G$2(!.(,C03#V8U%#P&
ML'-T=&5M`H!]"H (SPG9._$9+S(U-0* "H$-L0M@X&YG,3 S%" +"A0BC0P!
M8P! !_!-("@`<%!D(&5V!)!Y`B!E;"DL"H4*A4D%0!C ;X)K!"!L:6ME( = 
MP0,@;V8@=&@@T!3 OF\"8!@0!" *P"#0<P;PCQZ@'G >4B%B8FEG!E%1!T @
M(B (4&T'@'+R8P<Q(#(<4!X@(_ +8/)M"X!A= N (X 4P >0Y00@8P.1;F\'
MX # (,':< 209@60!4!T'N$%P%QT<@!Q)T 1X"$?/2#^=PGP)W(@X" Q)D #
M( #!1F@+@")1:&]P(M-P[PAP$;$1\"+!(!DP)V <(>YU"V %P!?Q90,@"U$8
M`, L(#$O-"T+@!&P<2%1:6-K+= IX0M18[\C01(`*9 )\"%5)@$G!""O(7 M
MH1YP(*!D,)%U'F"/*%$Q0"#1(O5P8V(AD'\E@!@`!*$>4@;@"Q$>,'>_+I$N
M8 "0!4 "("H!<P1@OF\A8"&0") O42$Q(BJQ_G SLR/P`_ U42)P!X M<=QY
M=R!0'G QDR TD"[3?F<2`"%3!:$L8C"Q(W!H_P5 `A %P 4`,-$EHB%B)4#_
M"& IL2$Q)>,(<"#0'O )@/\BL30@+]4Q,3A )B$E,2<0_1YP9":0`Z VTR%B
M$< >8/DAX"DN"H<+9!6R`= ?EO\<[QWP*7 '0")P/E $``6@_QZA(K$A8"6 
M(5,8`2<1)8"]/#$M!: ", -@`R!K)H!1,M!$3T4%\&<I\'7/*T *L!?P(5,S
M-4$`#;#\9T8B8!(`)9(NTP&@"	!4 T,$=E'D!L(6 (8/\Y\"%31;(PD03P
M!T!%$ # G')K):$$(#Y@;B<%0-]&44/C*L Y\#^@("EA!0`_`' @P#V1!4 @
M\B%B=V'^>49R'E$MT"OP/" E43KB^T0&(7!R!& '@#,A2J8L4?\`P N (((>
M\ K!1K=*W4/C_R(R%, +@##R-,$X4S 91'+O*8A(JS^V"H5!'F$I< (0OS&1
M(2!(P4/H-Z E(7(XP.\SH4F@(A$>86Y(P%/E/3G]/"!S)Q QH1YP`U(\9C3Q
MHR"@.?)A9&I=$'0'@+\","[3)L,]-B'@'J!L+=#_-"0@2321(:(!H#> 0M0F
MPD]3XB#00S$G\&EB2,!I_S3!(3<\!01@(D$QD :0!;#V;6$"/0YO+ %7_4+%
M49%_0W$C`5J!*Q )X%M!(3$UX"\S,B(M+H,W9T/C_REP$< ><0K (* GP2\C
M-]7_4C$^U38G7Y@#8%W!.C(A8O\M\6KV+2DBU%J1)I GPF3Y_RW0-R(T("6 
M9GU.<""!)8#_$; ^-6?_<F-#LSU4`B%,,O\B42TZ-M)(LG53):(TD3YC_V1!
M-L1&4#?!13(`T#AA'E)_(> XY"7D,,)&<BGA+X8SO#<U1W0>4E=_"I149J)_
M*7 K, GP=WD>4B9 &3!F_RS08L%I=7B.71 EHDM@=7+]`Z!P-4$&\#&R?&1M
M)3)V_RMC,P4TP4XS-[%\90MP(P3_*R %0'$ZB%(K,2$Q-)!,\?^!%756?0@^
M8QY23G TD%UR_W 26H$E44C !Y$O@#HQ47-_0W ZQC*Q808I<"%A`Z!D_0-@
M<#XB5+$I\D,Q+F A,:^)\@&05G$MH7)7_4R3TL]F=2EP:5<A<2)3DX$AX'T$
M(% NH$3BER"3D 20(O]593,%=1(F`2FA!S%BP2<5'WQD=1)>\%!A):)615+^
M62F!(0`MT!Z39I$B0305_VQB+X OU5&R(98MT(]T3.)^5833-/$ED W0)X$U
M06+Z<ET0:"W0D"!&4 -@71#_-X NTVE4F"4G$5&")7 ",,<$(%VC(6(P+C!J
MX")@G'%U(C*1T ,0;"V%T;^>$DM0AC%04DY2(A%B(G&[CR%BP7H$D$,1)4!A
M.,#]3/!.3#$H`"]1"8 XP(8Q]R: !< `<'DN@26Q+5 1\/MA`9RR80W0)U$B
MLDW3@"__BM)BPE\':^:I\FM0*7 \<K]?ISVQ*>&"\ `@4&$M&3'^=2]19.M#
MXC"1DY +4 B0_W(3D'>$T2]0+="(58\Q!4#_,[.&,3<C(34ED4Z0+A"%H/M4
ML41A>'LQ=2$-L69!+!._(* "0%%A(V X8:A09TSP?SZW+U!4P07 @8)+<R$Q
M-/NR0AYA,#"18I `D"I18L'O9Y1&<78?0S!D2^,XT: 2_W%80^,]L74C6M)U
M(7T(/;&4*#*DH7@MX#@B'Q \('D2`$SS"K ]@20S_SHC'N&Q]J&1.?!BP<(@
MP>+?P<1PD8VT.=($(#:%D3&1WX8Q7Q*RX[2BBY-"2,&]X?\-P N CB%BP4YP
M*;01P**!_2H0;;#P86%:PBT-C<0IL?\TD7XCJX%\(8R3>%0Q,7.$_2L@=W."
MO=)+T\GCR;,_8MU-LF).D#]"3/%(<G$>H?\MT$+&2]/)9@1A!I!.D 6Q[Z@$
MP,I;0"U09BW0GE&IP>M.8DSQ4\[Q)Z02KK$EHO\I<:5A8EB^?[^(N";*I4/A
M_ST8'E(\()(`&-%-LJ/G2+'[,>),\B?7>J5#*@$%H$: _U%ADQ.6\IY1([ N
M4:D2(2?]+91F"W!LP$Z04C,Y!2>Q_X8UD8.@\ .@+20#\"7QTY+_)D AT2(1
M!0!GL&.$BR4]-O]=H\.RI:,IXB: 4%(>,&)G\YY16G(B6"/P,O5*L7A3_[Q!
M`'!+\5Z!BT+FE\)!*>'_707A&#?E/35,\GJB!Y!+XO^O%LS2H4 >L;81.?,X
M4K.S_TVRUU,'0$YQCU+PQ6:7P1?_9Y5-`%C@TX'H<S'QP*-4(O^IT,.R)5 Y
M\LGDII(M4 6@>P> 5_U21Y"U`ZP-7<%'#S4Q"> ?/#H`=' Z+_0O=_QP+H+R
M'O"+H/?Q2"]U+R>0;6<?/"W/_K__SPJ+(* S-@WP0$O?_? 10!@`)V$*A4TF
M`:@QOCIJH$T`!(4*A02!1"VAW0101MZP+='&D$HLT"2P!4D`- ;!.C0W.C7X
M." K20!)``48!A 14%\$4%" 7R$FT&>P0#,!+L/\\4$E4W5B:@,Q!%#<4D4$
M4/416Q!D\+'>L/^WY%K#' $8\#$")42ID7 #_2>K/_FO!1<@$#"1>Z/)N/\8
MP#N;[)2U<K<!*:%,\ZZ4_R%B024AI<)@H: B(RK 1_/?)G.OXD/R%;:R<GDE
MHF,2_\IB.^=!)1<K8^+<(3K&BR+_<9B\<833>_7 EHLA026WA/YSU@0N,3J!
MA-,Z,36R+^7_<:,JD+90S-'(L!^G%(L\!?^<E!6RS"4_MBEQH:"%\"?A_[90
M28!J85!2,*'/HU%038+52),I!08Q)]!)'Y1@%'M60BW0,TD`1["_XDBC,?U'
M44-A!CVQ<F&<,%ERM<#[>Z(_MD--4DVR1H IH4=1_US2.K#=X9;Q4^,TT,(0
M*L'U/[8R)]!"J-!K4.O2();_<Q>&8TC!9;)S@:!"E3)]HY]%,;#A.K,4QG&C
M*$'>X/\Z,LL3)]"T)HLQNT);$(?P_5W!*-<P!! A@:"Q?D'E(/]=$#L@UF)!
M)>A17/$CFOOA^VWQ]8)S3.%8=EM2$V&9\?YI7U05LO;4)=*&L!@S2++]WP!G
MWK L`W70:E*%@9?"_T$ENT+\L"CQS'3#LK6U:AC_45!/8N0!%;:$PZ'Q\*%B
M,/] !7M3$<]\9-(#B%7H9-U2[[DT+K,BS4SQ0U+@:T'LLO]J,"2@BW+?LK4@
M?D*Z`[0TWZD3VL358$ %#5!DT$'"HG]*T^\R/.K)9F&"JX(3(W3V>9GPM:)C
ML%"6(4 %L;'_X="SXGOQG%#!\"VBJ@#$D/_'P[0TN=1Y9&$5[+/<`T %OSIC
MM.3"HWY1#28<0&>G0,^OP\I39;/#<6=ID".UL/\BSMK7#A1C\+SV^L$<@;#P
MLFOYEE)-`.<")#,"E*AC9C$"[GU ``!@X ,`$! ``````P`1$ ````! ``<P
JH#]+^6]NQ % ``@PH#]+^6]NQ $>`#T``0````4```!213H@`````.0M
`
end

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.