Yahoo Groups archive

Homebrew_PCBs

Archive for Homebrew_PCBs.

Index last updated: 2026-03-30 01:05 UTC

Thread

Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

2016-10-26 by Jean-Paul Louis

The sad part is that the toner cartridge cost more than a new printer.

Jean-Paul
N1JPL

> On Oct 25, 2016, at 5:27 PM, Steve Greenfield alienrelics@... [Homebrew_PCBs] <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
>
> Anyone else see this Hackaday post about hacking a Pantum 2500 to direct print toner on PCBs?
> http://hackaday.com/2016/10/25/want-to-make-a-pcb-the-pantum-knows/
>
> The Pantum 2502W is under $40 with free shipping on Amazon and claims 1200x1200dpi resolution.
> https://www.amazon.com/Pantum-P2502W-Wireless-Monochrome-Printer/dp/B00N517VDK
>
>
>
>
> Steve Greenfield AE7HD http://www.linkedin.com/in/stevenjgreenfield
>
>

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

2016-10-26 by Mark Lerman


It's my Instructable they're quoting. I paid $25 each for a couple of these little printers, including shipping from Newegg. They conversion is relatively straightforward, and works very well. Anytime I want to do a board, I just pull it off the shelf and print. Works every time, no fuss or mess. I use acetone vapor to fuse the toner to the copper, so no laminator necessary.

Mark

At 05:27 PM 10/25/2016, you wrote:


Anyone else see this Hackaday post about hacking a Pantum 2500 to direct print toner on PCBs?
http://hackaday.com/2016/10/25/want-to-make-a-pcb-the-pantum-knows/

The Pantum 2502W is under $40 with free shipping on Amazon and claims 1200x1200dpi resolution.
https://www.amazon.com/Pantum-P2502W-Wireless-Monochrome-Printer/dp/B00N517VDK



 
Steve Greenfield AE7HD http://www.linkedin.com/in/stevenjgreenfield


Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

2016-10-26 by Rob

what does that mean....  "acetone vapor to fuse"

On 10/26/2016 03:14 PM, Mark Lerman mlerman@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:
 


It's my Instructable they're quoting. I paid $25 each for a couple of these little printers, including shipping from Newegg. They conversion is relatively straightforward, and works very well. Anytime I want to do a board, I just pull it off the shelf and print. Works every time, no fuss or mess. I use acetone vapor to fuse the toner to the copper, so no laminator necessary.

Mark

At 05:27 PM 10/25/2016, you wrote:


Anyone else see this Hackaday post about hacking a Pantum 2500 to direct print toner on PCBs?
http://hackaday.com/2016/10/25/want-to-make-a-pcb-the-pantum-knows/

The Pantum 2502W is under $40 with free shipping on Amazon and claims 1200x1200dpi resolution.
https://www.amazon.com/Pantum-P2502W-Wireless-Monochrome-Printer/dp/B00N517VDK



 
Steve Greenfield AE7HD http://www.linkedin.com/in/stevenjgreenfield



Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

2016-10-27 by Mark Lerman


The fuser is not used in the hack, so when the pcb comes out of the printer the toner is held in place by static electricity. You can easily wipe if off with a paper towel, but it  is held very tightly, and you can tap it quite vigorously without dislodging the toner.

What I do is put a small amount of acetone in a closed container and suspend the pcb over the vapor. It will fuse to the copper in 2-3 minutes, but you leave in there for 15-20 minutes, the toner softens then flows a tiny bit to cover any pinholes, then fuses very tightly to the copper.

Mark


At 03:45 PM 10/26/2016, you wrote:


what does that mean....  "acetone vapor to fuse"

On 10/26/2016 03:14 PM, Mark Lerman mlerman@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:
 


It's my Instructable they're quoting. I paid $25 each for a couple of these little printers, including shipping from Newegg. They conversion is relatively straightforward, and works very well. Anytime I want to do a board, I just pull it off the shelf and print. Works every time, no fuss or mess. I use acetone vapor to fuse the toner to the copper, so no laminator necessary.

Mark

At 05:27 PM 10/25/2016, you wrote:


Anyone else see this Hackaday post about hacking a Pantum 2500 to direct print toner on PCBs?
http://hackaday.com/2016/10/25/want-to-make-a-pcb-the-pantum-knows/

The Pantum 2502W is under $40 with free shipping on Amazon and claims 1200x1200dpi resolution.
https://www.amazon.com/Pantum-P2502W-Wireless-Monochrome-Printer/dp/B00N517VDK



 
Steve Greenfield AE7HD http://www.linkedin.com/in/stevenjgreenfield




Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

2016-10-28 by alienrelics@...

The replacement toner cartridges hold a lot more toner than the one that comes in the printer. This is very common, and has been for over a decade for both inkjet and Laser printers, at least for some brands.

Steve Greenfield AE7HD


---In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, <louijp@...> wrote :

The sad part is that the toner cartridge cost more than a new printer.

Jean-Paul
N1JPL

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

2016-10-28 by Rob

IS there a toner cartridge chip hack to defeat the page counter?


On 10/27/2016 10:59 PM, alienrelics@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:
 

The replacement toner cartridges hold a lot more toner than the one that comes in the printer. This is very common, and has been for over a decade for both inkjet and Laser printers, at least for some brands.


Steve Greenfield AE7HD


---In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, <louijp@...> wrote :

The sad part is that the toner cartridge cost more than a new printer.

Jean-Paul
N1JPL


Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

2016-10-28 by Mark Lerman



If you're using it only to print pcbs, the starter toner will last a very long time.

At 10:59 PM 10/27/2016, you wrote:


The replacement toner cartridges hold a lot more toner than the one that comes in the printer. This is very common, and has been for over a decade for both inkjet and Laser printers, at least for some brands.

Steve Greenfield AE7HD


---In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, <louijp@...> wrote :

The sad part is that the toner cartridge cost more than a new printer.

Jean-Paul
N1JPL



Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

2016-10-29 by lbattraw@...

Unfortunately the cartridges are "branded" with the date when you put it into the printer, and after a year it will self-destruct no matter how much toner is in the cartridge.  A really horrible, rotten thing to do, and a very real risk for a printer that's only used occasionally to make PCBs.  --And no, there are no hacks to disable or reset the chip in the cartridge which might otherwise make this an amazing printer instead of a scam to force you to buy cartridges every year, more like renting a printer than owning one.  It's very annoying since laser printers are not victim to having ink dry out and toner could conceivably remain viable for years, depending on the environment/humidity.  I keep hoping someone will figure something out but as of yet nobody seems to have found a way to reset the page counter and prevent the carts from expiring.  I've noticed that the prices for the printer are a bit higher than the $25 many people have reported, they go for close to $40 these days on Amazon and $35 on Newegg.  I figure it might be to persuade people not to buy another printer every time it runs out of toner since you can get a 1,000 page cart for $29.99 (Newegg).

There is only one seller on eBay that is selling toner (70g) and reset chip combos (Which seems suspicious, however they are in the US and have a high rating).  The combo is far more expensive ($65) than the 1600 page cart ($47.49 at Newegg) or 1000 page cart ($29.99 at Newegg).  It is labeled as being "MICR" (Toner used to print checks), and repeat that several times like it was really important.  In the description it says "Make sure You are buying " MICR (Megnetic) Check Toner."  Strange.  The same vendor also sells refurbished PB-210S ("economy" size, 1000 pages) for $94 with the reset chip installed/programmed, refurbished PB-211 (1600 pages) carts with the reset chip for $125, and a new printer+a starter toner cart with MICR toner for $108 (I guess they replaced the standard toner in a cart with MICR toner).  Odd how the printer/starter combo costs less than the 1600 page cart...
I've asked the seller several questions so I'll report back if I hear anything.  There is zero info in the auction about how many pages 70g will print, what the page limit for the chip is, how to install the chip (Not even a picture of it), and whether the chip will expire after a year like the OEM cartridges.
...
I just got a message from the seller, telling me this for the toner+chip combo:

"are you going to print MICR ?

this chip is for 1,000 pages for MICR"

Nothing else, I will update the thread when I hear more.

-Larry

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

2016-10-29 by Harvey White

On 29 Oct 2016 06:00:22 -0700, you wrote:

Nasty little trick in terms of the date stamp, it's a cheat and needs
to be illegal. At any rate, the MCR cart is likely to have iron
particles in the ink because of the use, it's not absolutely
guaranteed to be just plain plastic toner. (IMHO).

Magnetic ink is used in the check digit scanners for banking.

Harvey



>Unfortunately the cartridges are "branded" with the date when you put it into the printer, and after a year it will self-destruct no matter how much toner is in the cartridge. A really horrible, rotten thing to do, and a very real risk for a printer that's only used occasionally to make PCBs. --And no, there are no hacks to disable or reset the chip in the cartridge which might otherwise make this an amazing printer instead of a scam to force you to buy cartridges every year, more like renting a printer than owning one. It's very annoying since laser printers are not victim to having ink dry out and toner could conceivably remain viable for years, depending on the environment/humidity. I keep hoping someone will figure something out but as of yet nobody seems to have found a way to reset the page counter and prevent the carts from expiring. I've noticed that the prices for the printer are a bit higher than the $25 many people have reported, they go for close to $40 these days
on
>Amazon and $35 on Newegg. I figure it might be to persuade people not to buy another printer every time it runs out of toner since you can get a 1,000 page cart for $29.99 (Newegg).
> There is only one seller on eBay that is selling toner (70g) and reset chip combos (Which seems suspicious, however they are in the US and have a high rating). The combo is far more expensive ($65) than the 1600 page cart ($47.49 at Newegg) or 1000 page cart ($29.99 at Newegg). It is labeled as being "MICR" (Toner used to print checks), and repeat that several times like it was really important. In the description it says "Make sure You are buying " MICR (Megnetic) Check Toner." Strange. The same vendor also sells refurbished PB-210S ("economy" size, 1000 pages) for $94 with the reset chip installed/programmed, refurbished PB-211 (1600 pages) carts with the reset chip for $125, and a new printer+a starter toner cart with MICR toner for $108 (I guess they replaced the standard toner in a cart with MICR toner). Odd how the printer/starter combo costs less than the 1600 page cart...
> I've asked the seller several questions so I'll report back if I hear anything. There is zero info in the auction about how many pages 70g will print, what the page limit for the chip is, how to install the chip (Not even a picture of it), and whether the chip will expire after a year like the OEM cartridges.
> ...
> I just got a message from the seller, telling me this for the toner+chip combo:
>
>
> "are you going to print MICR ?
>
>
> this chip is for 1,000 pages for MICR"
>
>
> Nothing else, I will update the thread when I hear more.
>
>
> -Larry
>
>
>

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

2016-10-29 by Rob

It sounds nefarious.
Anyone selling refurbished $30 cartidges refilled with MICR Check toner has a niche market for check counterfeiting and is just looking to be busted.
Nobody who prints magnetic ink checks shops on EBAY for their toner source.


On 10/29/2016 09:00 AM, lbattraw@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:
 

Unfortunately the cartridges are "branded" with the date when you put it into the printer, and after a year it will self-destruct no matter how much toner is in the cartridge.  A really horrible, rotten thing to do, and a very real risk for a printer that's only used occasionally to make PCBs.  --And no, there are no hacks to disable or reset the chip in the cartridge which might otherwise make this an amazing printer instead of a scam to force you to buy cartridges every year, more like renting a printer than owning one.  It's very annoying since laser printers are not victim to having ink dry out and toner could conceivably remain viable for years, depending on the environment/humidity.  I keep hoping someone will figure something out but as of yet nobody seems to have found a way to reset the page counter and prevent the carts from expiring.  I've noticed that the prices for the printer are a bit higher than the $25 many peop le have reported, they go for close to $40 these days on Amazon and $35 on Newegg.  I figure it might be to persuade people not to buy another printer every time it runs out of toner since you can get a 1,000 page cart for $29.99 (Newegg).


There is only one seller on eBay that is selling toner (70g) and reset chip combos (Which seems suspicious, however they are in the US and have a high rating).  The combo is far more expensive ($65) than the 1600 page cart ($47.49 at Newegg) or 1000 page cart ($29.99 at Newegg).  It is labeled as being "MICR" (Toner used to print checks), and repeat that several times like it was really important.  In the description it says "Make sure You are buying " MICR (Megnetic) Check Toner."  Strange.  The same vendor also sells refurbished PB-210S ("economy" size, 1000 pages) for $94 with the reset chip installed/programmed, refurbished PB-211 (1600 pages) carts with the reset ch ip for $125, and a new printer+a starter toner cart with MICR toner for $108 (I guess they replaced the standard toner in a cart with MICR toner).  Odd how the printer/starter combo costs less than the 1600 page cart...
I've asked the seller several questions so I'll report back if I hear anything.  There is zero info in the auction about how many pages 70g will print, what the page limit for the chip is, how to install the chip (Not even a picture of it), and whether the chip will expire after a year like the OEM cartridges.
...
I just got a message from the seller, telling me this for the toner+chip combo:

"are you going to print MICR ?

this chip is for 1,000 pages for MICR"

Nothing else, I will update the thread when I hear more.

-Larry


Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

2016-10-29 by Harvey Altstadter

Just a thought. Printing 1000 pages of checks using MICR ink, doesn't amount to a lot of toner. I print my own checks on standard check forms, three checks to a page. I don't bother with the MICR ink because the bank doesn't complain (yet) about processing the checks without it. There is far less printed on a page of checks than a page of text, so that a very small amount of toner would be required to print 1000 pages of checks, as compared to regular pages of text.

(The other) Harvey


On 10/29/2016 10:13 AM, Rob roomberg@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:
 

It sounds nefarious.
Anyone selling refurbished $30 cartidges refilled with MICR Check toner has a niche market for check counterfeiting and is just looking to be busted.
Nobody who prints magnetic ink checks shops on EBAY for their toner source.


On 10/29/2016 09:00 AM, lbattraw@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:
 

Unfortunately the cartridges are "branded" with the date when you put it into the printer, and after a year it will self-destruct no matter how much toner is in the cartridge.  A really horrible, rotten thing to do, and a very real risk for a printer that's only used occasionally to make PCBs.  --And no, there are no hacks to disable or reset the chip in the cartridge which might otherwise make this an amazing printer instead of a scam to force you to buy cartridges every year, more like renting a printer than owning one.  It's very annoying since laser printers are not victim to having ink dry out and toner could conceivably remain viable for years, depending on the environment/humidity.  I keep hoping someone will figure something out but as of yet nobody seems to have found a way to reset the page counter and prevent the carts from expiring.  I've noticed that the prices for the printer are a bit higher than the $25 many peop le have reported, they go for close to $40 these days on Amazon and $35 on Newegg.  I figure it might be to persuade people not to buy another printer every time it runs out of toner since you can get a 1,000 page cart for $29.99 (Newegg).


There is only one seller on eBay that is selling toner (70g) and reset chip combos (Which seems suspicious, however they are in the US and have a high rating).  The combo is far more expensive ($65) than the 1600 page cart ($47.49 at Newegg) or 1000 page cart ($29.99 at Newegg).  It is labeled as being "MICR" (Toner used to print checks), and repeat that several times like it was really important.  In the description it says "Make sure You are buying " MICR (Megnetic) Check Toner."  Strange.  The same vendor also sells refurbished PB-210S ("economy" size, 1000 pages) for $94 with the reset chip installed/programmed, refurbished PB-211 (1600 pages) carts with the reset ch ip for $125, and a new printer+a starter toner cart with MICR toner for $108 (I guess they replaced the standard toner in a cart with MICR toner).  Odd how the printer/starter combo costs less than the 1600 page cart...
I've asked the seller several questions so I'll report back if I hear anything.  There is zero info in the auction about how many pages 70g will print, what the page limit for the chip is, how to install the chip (Not even a picture of it), and whether the chip will expire after a year like the OEM cartridges.
...
I just got a message from the seller, telling me this for the toner+chip combo:

"are you going to print MICR ?

this chip is for 1,000 pages for MICR"

Nothing else, I will update the thread when I hear more.

-Larry



Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

2016-10-30 by Jean-Paul Louis

Harvey,

The problem is not the number of pages, but the timing. After a year, your cartridge becomes obsolete according to the previous emails, even if you have not used all the toner.

Just my $0.02,

Jean-Paul
N1JPL



> On Oct 29, 2016, at 5:49 PM, Harvey Altstadter hrconsult@... [Homebrew_PCBs] <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
>
> Just a thought. Printing 1000 pages of checks using MICR ink, doesn't amount to a lot of toner. I print my own checks on standard check forms, three checks to a page. I don't bother with the MICR ink because the bank doesn't complain (yet) about processing the checks without it. There is far less printed on a page of checks than a page of text, so that a very small amount of toner would be required to print 1000 pages of checks, as compared to regular pages of text.
>
> (The other) Harvey
>
>
> On 10/29/2016 10:13 AM, Rob roomberg@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:
>>
>> It sounds nefarious.
>> Anyone selling refurbished $30 cartidges refilled with MICR Check toner has a niche market for check counterfeiting and is just looking to be busted.
>> Nobody who prints magnetic ink checks shops on EBAY for their toner source.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/29/2016 09:00 AM, lbattraw@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:
>>>
>>> Unfortunately the cartridges are "branded" with the date when you put it into the printer, and after a year it will self-destruct no matter how much toner is in the cartridge. A really horrible, rotten thing to do, and a very real risk for a printer that's only used occasionally to make PCBs. --And no, there are no hacks to disable or reset the chip in the cartridge which might otherwise make this an amazing printer instead of a scam to force you to buy cartridges every year, more like renting a printer than owning one. It's very annoying since laser printers are not victim to having ink dry out and toner could conceivably remain viable for years, depending on the environment/humidity. I keep hoping someone will figure something out but as of yet nobody seems to have found a way to reset the page counter and prevent the carts from expiring. I've noticed that the prices for the printer are a bit higher than the $25 many peop le have reported, they go for close to $40 these days on Amazon and $35 on Newegg. I figure it might be to persuade people not to buy another printer every time it runs out of toner since you can get a 1,000 page cart for $29.99 (Newegg).
>>>
>>>
>>> There is only one seller on eBay that is selling toner (70g) and reset chip combos (Which seems suspicious, however they are in the US and have a high rating). The combo is far more expensive ($65) than the 1600 page cart ($47.49 at Newegg) or 1000 page cart ($29.99 at Newegg). It is labeled as being "MICR" (Toner used to print checks), and repeat that several times like it was really important. In the description it says "Make sure You are buying " MICR (Megnetic) Check Toner." Strange. The same vendor also sells refurbished PB-210S ("economy" size, 1000 pages) for $94 with the reset chip installed/programmed, refurbished PB-211 (1600 pages) carts with the reset ch ip for $125, and a new printer+a starter toner cart with MICR toner for $108 (I guess they replaced the standard toner in a cart with MICR toner). Odd how the printer/starter combo costs less than the 1600 page cart...
>>> I've asked the seller several questions so I'll report back if I hear anything. There is zero info in the auction about how many pages 70g will print, what the page limit for the chip is, how to install the chip (Not even a picture of it), and whether the chip will expire after a year like the OEM cartridges.
>>> ...
>>> I just got a message from the seller, telling me this for the toner+chip combo:
>>>
>>> "are you going to print MICR ?
>>>
>>> this chip is for 1,000 pages for MICR"
>>>
>>> Nothing else, I will update the thread when I hear more.
>>>
>>> -Larry
>>>
>>
>
>
>

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

2016-10-30 by Harvey Altstadter

My point is that if one wanted to print whole pages with these cartridges, they would get many, as the claim for 1000 pages of MICR ink implies very little toner per page. I also question the suitability of that toner for transfer use, as it has iron in it, which would probably screw up our etching processes.


On 10/29/2016 7:47 PM, Jean-Paul Louis louijp@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:
 

Harvey,

The problem is not the number of pages, but the timing. After a year, your cartridge becomes obsolete according to the previous emails, even if you have not used all the toner.

Just my $0.02,

Jean-Paul
N1JPL

> On Oct 29, 2016, at 5:49 PM, Harvey Altstadter hrconsult@... [Homebrew_PCBs] <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
>
> Just a thought. Printing 1000 pages of checks using MICR ink, doesn't amount to a lot of toner. I print my own checks on standard check forms, three checks to a page. I don't bother with the MICR ink because the bank doesn't complain (yet) about processing the checks without it. There is far less printed on a page of checks than a page of text, so that a very small amount of toner would be required to print 1000 pages of checks, as compared to regular pages of text.
>
> (The other) Harvey
>
>
> On 10/29/2016 10:13 AM, Rob roomberg@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:
>>
>> It sounds nefarious.
>> Anyone selling refurbished $30 cartidges refilled with MICR Check toner has a niche market for check counterfeiting and is just looking to be busted.
>> Nobody who prints magnetic ink checks shops on EBAY for their toner source.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/29/2016 09:00 AM, lbattraw@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:
>>>
>>> Unfortunately the cartridges are "branded" with the date when you put it into the printer, and after a year it will self-destruct no matter how much toner is in the cartridge. A really horrible, rotten thing to do, and a very real risk for a printer that's only used occasionally to make PCBs. --And no, there are no hacks to disable or reset the chip in the cartridge which might otherwise make this an amazing printer instead of a scam to force you to buy cartridges every year, more like renting a printer than owning one. It's very annoying since laser printers are not victim to having ink dry out and toner could conceivably remain viable for years, depending on the environment/humidity. I keep hoping someone will figure something out but as of yet nobody seems to have found a way to reset the page counter and prevent the carts from expiring. I've noticed that the prices for the printer are a bit higher than the $25 many peop le have reported, they go for close to $40 these days on Amazon and $35 on Newegg. I figure it might be to persuade people not to buy another printer every time it runs out of toner since you can get a 1,000 page cart for $29.99 (Newegg).
>>>
>>>
>>> There is only one seller on eBay that is selling toner (70g) and reset chip combos (Which seems suspicious, however they are in the US and have a high rating). The combo is far more expensive ($65) than the 1600 page cart ($47.49 at Newegg) or 1000 page cart ($29.99 at Newegg). It is labeled as being "MICR" (Toner used to print checks), and repeat that several times like it was really important. In the description it says "Make sure You are buying " MICR (Megnetic) Check Toner." Strange. The same vendor also sells refurbished PB-210S ("economy" size, 1000 pages) for $94 with the reset chip installed/programmed, refurbished PB-211 (1600 pages) carts with the reset ch ip for $125, and a new printer+a starter toner cart with MICR toner for $108 (I guess they replaced the standard toner in a cart with MICR toner). Odd how the printer/starter combo costs less than the 1600 page cart...
>>> I've asked the seller several questions so I'll report back if I hear anything. There is zero info in the auction about how many pages 70g will print, what the page limit for the chip is, how to install the chip (Not even a picture of it), and whether the chip will expire after a year like the OEM cartridges.
>>> ...
>>> I just got a message from the seller, telling me this for the toner+chip combo:
>>>
>>> "are you going to print MICR ?
>>>
>>> this chip is for 1,000 pages for MICR"
>>>
>>> Nothing else, I will update the thread when I hear more.
>>>
>>> -Larry
>>>
>>
>
>
>


Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

2016-10-30 by lbattraw@...

In reference to the idea of the toner having iron in it, I believe it's fairly common to find toner with iron.  I saw an instructable (Or maybe it was a video on YT) that explained how to make your own "ferrorfluid" using toner and some sort of light oil.  --Seemed to work perfectly.  I bought some generic toner (In a bottle) for this very purpose, and it does appear to be magnetic.  Looks like it's quite common for HP toner to have iron in it, check out this rather long list of toner carts that have iron:

iron oxide in current laser toner cartridges?

 


The person who asked about it was also told to just check the MSDS, which sounds like a perfect idea to determine whether other toner contains iron.  Since it's so common to have iron in toner it doesn't seem like it would be a problem for toner-transfer/direct printing.  If we could get someone who has modded a printer for direct PCB printing (And it works well) to see if their toner is magnetic that would be really helpful.  I'm guessing you'd need a NdFeB magnetic to see the effect, as weaker magnets are unlikely to show as much attraction since the iron (As iron oxide or ferrite) isn't likely to be over around 40-50%.  I tried looking up any MSDS sheets for Pantum toner and haven't found a single one.  HP, Brother, Canon...  They all have easy links to MSDS for their toner, here's one for Canon that specifically details it containing 40-50% ferrite, and I found several others (Canon) that contained that or iron oxide at the same concentration:


-Larry

Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

2016-10-30 by kbyrne10@...

Where can I go to learn about printing my own checks due to high costs of bank checks? I have a HP Laser Jet P2015dn, works good for toner transfer and positive and negative development with a freeware program for the purpose of 1200 times 1200 dpi. Interesting thought hacking a cheep lasar jet
for toner transfer thou.

Re: Iron In Toner?

2016-10-30 by Roland Harriston

Pardon Me:

But isn't "xerography" or laser printing essentially an electrostatic process.
It's been a long time since I read about it, so correct me if I am in error.

So,  a ferrous (iron) content would be in the toner?.

Regards,

Roland F. Harriston P.D.
********************



Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Iron In Toner?

2016-10-30 by Dave Daniel

Xerography is an electrostatic process, yes. I have not kept up with the processes used since the 90s, but it used to be that the toner was essentially very small plastic balls embedded with carbon. The toner was manipulated through the print process by charging the toner one way and the photoreceptor (print drum or organic belt) the other way and bringing them together so that the toner formed an image on the photoreceptor. Then the paper was put in contact with the toner-laden photoreceptor and the toner was transferred from the photoreceptor to the paper by yet another electrostatic operation. Once the toner was released to the paper, the toner image on the paper was fed through some sort of fusing process to permanently (more or less) attach the toner to the paper.

However, we experimented with a completely different process where the toner contained iron as well as carbon and the toner was manipulated partially with electrostatic mechanisms and partly by magnetic mechanisms. I don't remember much about the overall print process. We got it working well enough to demonstrate but not well enough to productize it. IIRC, The original work was done by Kodak in the 80s.

DaveD


On 10/30/2016 9:10 AM, Roland Harriston rolohar@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:
 

Pardon Me:

But isn't "xerography" or laser printing essentially an electrostatic process.
It's been a long time since I read about it, so correct me if I am in error.

So,  a ferrous (iron) content would be in the toner?.

Regards,

Roland F. Harriston P.D.
********************







This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com


Re: Iron In Toner?

2016-10-30 by alienrelics@...

Using electrostatics, you actually don't want conductivity through the material or it will all just equalize.

Think of the last time you've opened a box full of styrofoam packing peanuts.

Steve Greenfield AE7HD

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Iron In Toner?

2016-10-30 by Dave Daniel

One could construct toner particles with iron to result in at least two different particle types: one, where the iron was completely coated with some sort of insulator (e.g., plastic) and so unable to form electrical connections, and two, where the iron was not completely covered and able to form electrical connections. There are obviously a bunch of variations on the latter which would result in various partially conductive configurations.

I have no idea if any of these formulations actually exist.

DaveD

On 10/30/2016 9:40 AM, alienrelics@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:
 

Using electrostatics, you actually don't want conductivity through the material or it will all just equalize.


Think of the last time you've opened a box full of styrofoam packing peanuts.

Steve Greenfield AE7HD



This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com


Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Iron In Toner?

2016-10-30 by Harvey Altstadter

Someone mentioned that he thought that the iron was a ferrite. Ferrites are ceramics, and as I understand it are insulators. My earlier comments about iron possibly upsetting the etching process was referring to metallic iron, which would not get along well with the etchant. I believe the ferrite would not present such an issue, but I am not sure.


On 10/30/2016 8:47 AM, Dave Daniel kc0wjn@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:
 

One could construct toner particles with iron to result in at least two different particle types: one, where the iron was completely coated with some sort of insulator (e.g., plastic) and so unable to form electrical connections, and two, where the iron was not completely covered and able to form electrical connections. There are obviously a bunch of variations on the latter which would result in various partially conductive configurations.

I have no idea if any of these formulations actually exist.

DaveD

On 10/30/2016 9:40 AM, alienrelics@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:
 

Using electrostatics, you actually don't want conductivity through the material or it will all just equalize.


Think of the last time you've opened a box full of styrofoam packing peanuts.

Steve Greenfield AE7HD



This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com



Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Iron In Toner?

2016-10-30 by Roland Harriston

DaveD:

Thanks for the "refresher" information.
Like you, it has been "many, many moons" since I was remotely associated with that kind of stuff,
and that was when "Xerox" machines were new and very, very expensive.

Regards,

Roland F. Harriston P.D
*******************

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Iron In Toner?

2016-10-30 by Roland Harriston

Hmmmmm..............

I think the "Xerography" concept was a lot more intricate than the static charge on a plastic bag.

Regards,

RFH











Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Iron In Toner?

2016-10-30 by LEON HELLER

I worked for Rank Xerox (UK) many years ago. The original Xerox 1385 flat-bed machine was manually operated, and I remember seeing an app. note that described how it could be used for making PCBs. IIRC, the toner image on the Xerox plate was transferred onto the PCB, fused, and the PCB etched. It was OK for prototypes.

73, Leon
G1HSM


On Sunday, 30 October 2016, 15:38, "Dave Daniel kc0wjn@... [Homebrew_PCBs]" <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
Xerography is an electrostatic process, yes. I have not kept up with the processes used since the 90s, but it used to be that the toner was essentially very small plastic balls embedded with carbon. The toner was manipulated through the print process by charging the toner one way and the photoreceptor (print drum or organic belt) the other way and bringing them together so that the toner formed an image on the photoreceptor. Then the paper was put in contact with the toner-laden photoreceptor and the toner was transferred from the photoreceptor to the paper by yet another electrostatic operation. Once the toner was released to the paper, the toner image on the paper was fed through some sort of fusing process to permanently (more or less) attach the toner to the paper.

However, we experimented with a completely different process where the toner contained iron as well as carbon and the toner was manipulated partially with electrostatic mechanisms and partly by magnetic mechanisms. I don't remember much about the overall print process. We got it working well enough to demonstrate but not well enough to productize it. IIRC, The original work was done by Kodak in the 80s.

DaveD


On 10/30/2016 9:10 AM, Roland Harriston rolohar@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:
 
Pardon Me:

But isn't "xerography" or laser printing essentially an electrostatic process.
It's been a long time since I read about it, so correct me if I am in error.

So,  a ferrous (iron) content would be in the toner?.

Regards,

Roland F. Harriston P.D.
********************






This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com



Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Iron In Toner?

2016-10-30 by Dennis Shelgren

From what I understand of the process, magnetic particles are standard. It's just the ratios are changed for different processes. Take apart a toner cartridge and there's usually a long magnet either in the drum or "doctor" assembly. Depending on the printer it either helps establish the coating, or helps weed any toner sticking to the drum in non-image areas. This is one of the reasons for brand specific toner. Some printers are entirely electrostatic, and can't take magnetic particles, some must have their magic ratio. I used to work on lightning printers that were used before memory got cheap. They used paper rolls instead of sheets and ran so fast, that if there was a jam the paper instantly ignited.


On Oct 30, 2016 10:42 AM, "Roland Harriston rolohar@... [Homebrew_PCBs]" <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 

Hmmmmm..............

I think the "Xerography" concept was a lot more intricate than the static charge on a plastic bag.

Regards,

RFH











RE: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

2016-10-30 by keith printy

Some toners have iron because the process uses a magnetic brush to deposit it on the drum . some others don’t because the iron filings are in the unit and you just coat them with toner. I tried different toner in an empty Epson cartridge and none was picked up.i believe HP uses the brush. I have a gestetner copier and it has non magnetic toner. The toner is deposited into a tray of iron filings which then puts it on the drum. I believe the Xerox process also works this way with the iron filings,at least in the machine I have,

 

From: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2016 2:42 AM
To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

 

 

In reference to the idea of the toner having iron in it, I believe it's fairly common to find toner with iron.  I saw an instructable (Or maybe it was a video on YT) that explained how to make your own "ferrorfluid" using toner and some sort of light oil.  --Seemed to work perfectly.  I bought some generic toner (In a bottle) for this very purpose, and it does appear to be magnetic.  Looks like it's quite common for HP toner to have iron in it, check out this rather long list of toner carts that have iron:

 

iron oxide in current laser toner cartridges?

iron oxide in current laser toner cartridges?

I have an HP laser jet P1102W laser jet. I would like to be able to print decals onto ceramic decal paper for firing onto enamel.  To do this, I need a toner cartri...

Preview by Yahoo

 

 

The person who asked about it was also told to just check the MSDS, which sounds like a perfect idea to determine whether other toner contains iron.  Since it's so common to have iron in toner it doesn't seem like it would be a problem for toner-transfer/direct printing.  If we could get someone who has modded a printer for direct PCB printing (And it works well) to see if their toner is magnetic that would be really helpful.  I'm guessing you'd need a NdFeB magnetic to see the effect, as weaker magnets are unlikely to show as much attraction since the iron (As iron oxide or ferrite) isn't likely to be over around 40-50%.  I tried looking up any MSDS sheets for Pantum toner and haven't found a single one.  HP, Brother, Cano! n...  They all have easy links to MSDS for their toner, here's one for Canon that specifically details it containing 40-50% ferrite, and I found several others (Canon) that contained that or iron oxide at the same concentration:

 

 

-Larry

 

RE: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

2016-10-31 by Boman33

If I remember correctly there is also a magnetic toner to be able to print a magnetic barcode/ banking numbers on financial documents.

Bertho

 

From: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2016 18:35
To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

 

 

Some toners have iron because the process uses a magnetic brush to deposit it on the drum . some others don’t because the iron filings are in the unit and you just coat them with toner. I tried different toner in an empty Epson cartridge and none was picked up.i believe HP uses the brush. I have a gestetner copier and it has non magnetic toner. The toner is deposited into a tray of iron filings which then puts it on the drum. I believe the Xerox process also works this way with the iron filings,at least in the machine I have,

 

From: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2016 2:42 AM
To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

 

 

In reference to the idea of the toner having iron in it, I believe it's fairly common to find toner with iron.  I saw an instructable (Or maybe it was a video on YT) that explained how to make your own "ferrorfluid" using toner and some sort of light oil.  --Seemed to work perfectly.  I bought some generic toner (In a bottle) for this very purpose, and it does appear to be magnetic.  Looks like it's quite common for HP toner to have iron in it, check out this rather long list of toner carts that have iron:

 

iron oxide in current laser toner cartridges?

iron oxide in current laser toner cartridges?

I have an HP laser jet P1102W laser jet. I would like to be able to print decals onto ceramic decal paper for firing onto enamel.  To do this, I need a toner cartri...

Preview by Yahoo

 

 

The person who asked about it was also told to just check the MSDS, which sounds like a perfect idea to determine whether other toner contains iron.  Since it's so common to have iron in toner it doesn't seem like it would be a problem for toner-transfer/direct printing.  If we could get someone who has modded a printer for direct PCB printing (And it works well) to see if their toner is magnetic that would be really helpful.  I'm guessing you'd need a NdFeB magnetic to see the effect, as weaker magnets are unlikely to show as much attraction since the iron (As iron oxide or ferrite) isn't likely to be over around 40-50%.  I tried looking up any MSDS sheets for Pantum toner and haven't found a single one.  HP, Brother, Cano! n...  They all have easy links to MSDS for their toner, here's one for Canon that specifically details it containing 40-50% ferrite, and I found several others (Canon) that contained that or iron oxide at the same concentration:

 

 

-Larry

 

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

2016-11-03 by g8kps@...

If there is a self destruct after one year then there must be a real time clock of some sort, if it's a clock chip then it should be possible to intercept the clock reference by either changing the clock oscillator Cristal for one that has a frequency of 1/2 or 1/4 of the original. If the clock reference is taken from another reference the inserting a device by 2 or 4  IC would do the same. Another option could be to remove the clock backup power source is battery then the clock would always start with its default date/time it just depends on wether the full data time are used or just the day.

My preference would be to use a slower clock reference signal. When I get my printer (just ordered printer) I will look and see if I can find the if there's clock, it could be in the printer or in the cartridge.

Anyone got a view to this approach to extending the usable life of a cartridge.

RE: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

2016-11-04 by Tony Smith

It’s simpler than that.

 

No idea of the exact scheme, but it’ll be something like when you put in a new cartridge the printer writes the current date & time (obtained from your PC) to the chips.  When a year has passed it writes ‘Dead’ to the chip.

 

You used to be able to reset chips, now you need to get new ones along with your toner refill after the manufacturers closed that ‘loophole’.

 

Could be worse, HP at one point were writing the manufacture date to the chips so if you inserted a brand new cartridge you’d had sitting in on your shelf for a while, it would report is as ‘too old’ and kill it.  Nasty.

 

Tony

 

 

 

From: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Friday, 4 November 2016 8:29 AM
To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

 



If there is a self destruct after one year then there must be a real time clock of some sort, if it's a clock chip then it should be possible to intercept the clock reference by either changing the clock oscillator Cristal for one that has a frequency of 1/2 or 1/4 of the original. If the clock reference is taken from another reference the inserting a device by 2 or 4  IC would do the same. Another option could be to remove the clock backup power source is battery then the clock would always start with its default date/time it just depends on wether the full data time are used or just the day.

 

My preference would be to use a slower clock reference signal. When I get my printer (just ordered printer) I will look and see if I can find the if there's clock, it could be in the printer or in the cartridge.

 

Anyone got a view to this approach to extending the usable life of a cartridge.

 




Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

2016-11-04 by Rob

So..... WHERE does the printer get the CURRENT DATE from?
and
WHAT IF YOUR PC DATE WAS SET TO THE SAME DATE EVERY TIME YOU TURN IT ON?
WHEN WOULD THE PRINTER DECIDE THE DATE HAS CHANGED?

So the real question here is IF you attach this printer to a PC thats sole purpose is to
print PCBs forever on this hacked printer then why would you care if you kept the the date
the same and then every time you were ready to print an image you could also reset that image creation date so nothing about that image attributes would carry into the print driver interogating dates.
 

On 11/03/2016 08:05 PM, 'Tony Smith' ajsmith1968@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:
 

It’s simpler than that.

 

No idea of the exact scheme, but it’ll be something like when you put in a new cartridge the printer writes the current date & time (obtained from your PC) to the chips.  When a year has passed it writes ‘Dead’ to the chip.

 

You used to be able to reset chips, now you need to get new ones along with your toner refill after the manufacturers closed that ‘loophole’.

 

Could be worse, HP at one point were writing the manufacture date to the chips so if you inserted a brand new cartridge you’d had sitting in on your shelf for a while, it would report is as ‘too old’ and kill it.  Nasty.

 

Tony

 

 

 

From: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Friday, 4 November 2016 8:29 AM
To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

 



If there is a self destruct after one year then there must be a real time clock of some sort, if it's a clock chip then it should be possible to intercept the clock reference by either changing the clock oscillator Cristal for one that has a frequency of 1/2 or 1/4 of the original. If the clock reference is taken from another reference the inserting a device by 2 or 4  IC would do the same. Another option could be to remove the clock backup power source is battery then the clock would always start with its default date/time it just depends on wether the full data time are used or just the day.

 

My preference would be to use a slower clock reference signal. When I get my printer (just ordered printer) I will look and see if I can find the if there's clock, it could be in the printer or in the cartridge.

 

Anyone got a view to this approach to extending the usable life of a cartridge.

 





RE: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

2016-11-04 by Tony Smith

Like I said, the printer gets the current date from your PC.

 

If you roll the date back before using the printer then it may not disable the cartridge.  That one time that you forget…

 

These printers might use a different scheme.  Recording page counts is common so the cartridge will be disabled eventually.

 

Tony

 

 

From: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Friday, 4 November 2016 1:15 PM
To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

 



So..... WHERE does the printer get the CURRENT DATE from?
and
WHAT IF YOUR PC DATE WAS SET TO THE SAME DATE EVERY TIME YOU TURN IT ON?
WHEN WOULD THE PRINTER DECIDE THE DATE HAS CHANGED?

So the real question here is IF you attach this printer to a PC thats sole purpose is to
print PCBs forever on this hacked printer then why would you care if you kept the the date
the same and then every time you were ready to print an image you could also reset that image creation date so nothing about that image attributes would carry into the print driver interogating dates.
 

On 11/03/2016 08:05 PM, 'Tony Smith' ajsmith1968@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:

 

It’s simpler than that.

 

No idea of the exact scheme, but it’ll be something like when you put in a new cartridge the printer writes the current date & time (obtained from your PC) to the chips.  When a year has passed it writes ‘Dead’ to the chip.

 

You used to be able to reset chips, now you need to get new ones along with your toner refill after the manufacturers closed that ‘loophole’.

 

Could be worse, HP at one point were writing the manufacture date to the chips so if you inserted a brand new cartridge you’d had sitting in on your shelf for a while, it would report is as ‘too old’ and kill it.  Nasty.

 

Tony

 

 

 

From: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Friday, 4 November 2016 8:29 AM
To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

 



If there is a self destruct after one year then there must be a real time clock of some sort, if it's a clock chip then it should be possible to intercept the clock reference by either changing the clock oscillator Cristal for one that has a frequency of 1/2 or 1/4 of the original. If the clock reference is taken from another reference the inserting a device by 2 or 4  IC would do the same. Another option could be to remove the clock backup power source is battery then the clock would always start with its default date/time it just depends on wether the full data time are used or just the day.

 

My preference would be to use a slower clock reference signal. When I get my printer (just ordered printer) I will look and see if I can find the if there's clock, it could be in the printer or in the cartridge.

 

Anyone got a view to this approach to extending the usable life of a cartridge.

 









RE: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

2016-11-04 by Tony Smith

Oh, some printers have a built-in clock complete with backup battery.  Unlikely to be the case with this printer, that sort of thing add a few cents to production costs.

 

That clock may never be updated after being set at the factory so changing the computer date won’t help.

 

Tony

 

 

 

From: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Friday, 4 November 2016 1:15 PM
To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

 



So..... WHERE does the printer get the CURRENT DATE from?
and
WHAT IF YOUR PC DATE WAS SET TO THE SAME DATE EVERY TIME YOU TURN IT ON?
WHEN WOULD THE PRINTER DECIDE THE DATE HAS CHANGED?

So the real question here is IF you attach this printer to a PC thats sole purpose is to
print PCBs forever on this hacked printer then why would you care if you kept the the date
the same and then every time you were ready to print an image you could also reset that image creation date so nothing about that image attributes would carry into the print driver interogating dates.
 

On 11/03/2016 08:05 PM, 'Tony Smith' ajsmith1968@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:

 

It’s simpler than that.

 

No idea of the exact scheme, but it’ll be something like when you put in a new cartridge the printer writes the current date & time (obtained from your PC) to the chips.  When a year has passed it writes ‘Dead’ to the chip.

 

You used to be able to reset chips, now you need to get new ones along with your toner refill after the manufacturers closed that ‘loophole’.

 

Could be worse, HP at one point were writing the manufacture date to the chips so if you inserted a brand new cartridge you’d had sitting in on your shelf for a while, it would report is as ‘too old’ and kill it.  Nasty.

 

Tony

 

 

 

From: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Friday, 4 November 2016 8:29 AM
To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

 



If there is a self destruct after one year then there must be a real time clock of some sort, if it's a clock chip then it should be possible to intercept the clock reference by either changing the clock oscillator Cristal for one that has a frequency of 1/2 or 1/4 of the original. If the clock reference is taken from another reference the inserting a device by 2 or 4  IC would do the same. Another option could be to remove the clock backup power source is battery then the clock would always start with its default date/time it just depends on wether the full data time are used or just the day.

 

My preference would be to use a slower clock reference signal. When I get my printer (just ordered printer) I will look and see if I can find the if there's clock, it could be in the printer or in the cartridge.

 

Anyone got a view to this approach to extending the usable life of a cartridge.

 









Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

2016-11-04 by Harvey Altstadter

No need for anything fancy, like a real time clock. The onboard processor in the printer only has to count seconds and store that info. When the appropriate number of seconds has elapsed, the processor tells the cartridge to shut off. No extra cost, the processor can easily handle this task while controlling the printer.

Harvey

On 11/3/2016 8:29 PM, 'Tony Smith' ajsmith1968@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:
 

Oh, some printers have a built-in clock complete with backup battery.  Unlikely to be the case with this printer, that sort of thing add a few cents to production costs.

 

That clock may never be updated after being set at the factory so changing the computer date won’t help.

 

Tony

 

 

 

From: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Friday, 4 November 2016 1:15 PM
To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

 



So..... WHERE does the printer get the CURRENT DATE from?
and
WHAT IF YOUR PC DATE WAS SET TO THE SAME DATE EVERY TIME YOU TURN IT ON?
WHEN WOULD THE PRINTER DECIDE THE DATE HAS CHANGED?

So the real question here is IF you attach this printer to a PC thats sole purpose is to
print PCBs forever on this hacked printer then why would you care if you kept the the date
the same and then every time you were ready to print an image you could also reset that image creation date so nothing about that image attributes would carry into the print driver interogating dates.
 

On 11/03/2016 08:05 PM, 'Tony Smith' ajsmith1968@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:

 

It’s simpler than that.

 

No idea of the exact scheme, but it’ll be something like when you put in a new cartridge the printer writes the current date & time (obtained from your PC) to the chips.  When a year has passed it writes ‘Dead’ to the chip.

 

You used to be able to reset chips, now you need to get new ones along with your toner refill after the manufacturers closed that ‘loophole’.

 

Could be worse, HP at one point were writing the manufacture date to the chips so if you inserted a brand new cartridge you’d had sitting in on your shelf for a while, it would report is as ‘too old’ and kill it.  Nasty.

 

Tony

 

 

 

From: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Friday, 4 November 2016 8:29 AM
To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

 



If there is a self destruct after one year then there must be a real time clock of some sort, if it's a clock chip then it should be possible to intercept the clock reference by either changing the clock oscillator Cristal for one that has a frequency of 1/2 or 1/4 of the original. If the clock reference is taken from another reference the inserting a device by 2 or 4  IC would do the same. Another option could be to remove the clock backup power source is battery then the clock would always start with its default date/time it just depends on wether the full data time are used or just the day.

 

My preference would be to use a slower clock reference signal. When I get my printer (just ordered printer) I will look and see if I can find the if there's clock, it could be in the printer or in the cartridge.

 

Anyone got a view to this approach to extending the usable life of a cartridge.

 










RE: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

2016-11-04 by Tony Smith

You can do it in the processor easily enough, but things tend to stop when the power is turned off.  RTC chips are cheap (but still not free).

 

A quick google turns up new chips for this printer, so I dare say it uses the computer clock and flips the kill switch after a while.

 

I wonder what would happen if you rolled your computer date forward a few years before installing the cartridge.

 

Are there any low cost printers than don’t do this crap these days?

 

Tony

 

 

 

From: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Friday, 4 November 2016 2:58 PM
To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

 

 

No need for anything fancy, like a real time clock. The onboard processor in the printer only has to count seconds and store that info. When the appropriate number of seconds has elapsed, the processor tells the cartridge to shut off. No extra cost, the processor can easily handle this task while controlling the printer.

Harvey

On 11/3/2016 8:29 PM, 'Tony Smith' ajsmith1968@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:

 

Oh, some printers have a built-in clock complete with backup battery.  Unlikely to be the case with this printer, that sort of thing add a few cents to production costs.

 

That clock may never be updated after being set at the factory so changing the computer date won’t help.

 

Tony

 

 

 

From: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Friday, 4 November 2016 1:15 PM
To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

 



So..... WHERE does the printer get the CURRENT DATE from?
and
WHAT IF YOUR PC DATE WAS SET TO THE SAME DATE EVERY TIME YOU TURN IT ON?
WHEN WOULD THE PRINTER DECIDE THE DATE HAS CHANGED?

So the real question here is IF you attach this printer to a PC thats sole purpose is to
print PCBs forever on this hacked printer then why would you care if you kept the the date
the same and then every time you were ready to print an image you could also reset that image creation date so nothing about that image attributes would carry into the print driver interogating dates.
 

On 11/03/2016 08:05 PM, 'Tony Smith' ajsmith1968@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:

 

It’s simpler than that.

 

No idea of the exact scheme, but it’ll be something like when you put in a new cartridge the printer writes the current date & time (obtained from your PC) to the chips.  When a year has passed it writes ‘Dead’ to the chip.

 

You used to be able to reset chips, now you need to get new ones along with your toner refill after the manufacturers closed that ‘loophole’.

 

Could be worse, HP at one point were writing the manufacture date to the chips so if you inserted a brand new cartridge you’d had sitting in on your shelf for a while, it would report is as ‘too old’ and kill it.  Nasty.

 

Tony

 

 

 

From: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Friday, 4 November 2016 8:29 AM
To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

 



If there is a self destruct after one year then there must be a real time clock of some sort, if it's a clock chip then it should be possible to intercept the clock reference by either changing the clock oscillator Cristal for one that has a frequency of 1/2 or 1/4 of the original. If the clock reference is taken from another reference the inserting a device by 2 or 4  IC would do the same. Another option could be to remove the clock backup power source is battery then the clock would always start with its default date/time it just depends on wether the full data time are used or just the day.

 

My preference would be to use a slower clock reference signal. When I get my printer (just ordered printer) I will look and see if I can find the if there's clock, it could be in the printer or in the cartridge.

 

Anyone got a view to this approach to extending the usable life of a cartridge.

 















Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

2016-11-04 by Harvey Altstadter

They are doing worse. HP was downloading an update to their firmware that would prevent the printer from using third party ink carts. After some bad publicity, they have promised to roll back this change. How low can you go?

Harvey


On 11/3/2016 9:19 PM, 'Tony Smith' ajsmith1968@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:
 

You can do it in the processor easily enough, but things tend to stop when the power is turned off.  RTC chips are cheap (but still not free).

 

A quick google turns up new chips for this printer, so I dare say it uses the computer clock and flips the kill switch after a while.

 

I wonder what would happen if you rolled your computer date forward a few years before installing the cartridge.

 

Are there any low cost printers than don’t do this crap these days?

 

Tony

 

 

 

From: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Friday, 4 November 2016 2:58 PM
To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

 

 

No need for anything fancy, like a real time clock. The onboard processor in the printer only has to count seconds and store that info. When the appropriate number of seconds has elapsed, the processor tells the cartridge to shut off. No extra cost, the processor can easily handle this task while controlling the printer.

Harvey

On 11/3/2016 8:29 PM, 'Tony Smith' ajsmith1968@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:

 

Oh, some printers have a built-in clock complete with backup battery.  Unlikely to be the case with this printer, that sort of thing add a few cents to production costs.

 

That clock may never be updated after being set at the factory so changing the computer date won’t help.

 

Tony

 

 

 

From: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Friday, 4 November 2016 1:15 PM
To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

 



So..... WHERE does the printer get the CURRENT DATE from?
and
WHAT IF YOUR PC DATE WAS SET TO THE SAME DATE EVERY TIME YOU TURN IT ON?
WHEN WOULD THE PRINTER DECIDE THE DATE HAS CHANGED?

So the real question here is IF you attach this printer to a PC thats sole purpose is to
print PCBs forever on this hacked printer then why would you care if you kept the the date
the same and then every time you were ready to print an image you could also reset that image creation date so nothing about that image attributes would carry into the print driver interogating dates.
 

On 11/03/2016 08:05 PM, 'Tony Smith' ajsmith1968@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:

 

It’s simpler than that.

 

No idea of the exact scheme, but it’ll be something like when you put in a new cartridge the printer writes the current date & time (obtained from your PC) to the chips.  When a year has passed it writes ‘Dead’ to the chip.

 

You used to be able to reset chips, now you need to get new ones along with your toner refill after the manufacturers closed that ‘loophole’.

 

Could be worse, HP at one point were writing the manufacture date to the chips so if you inserted a brand new cartridge you’d had sitting in on your shelf for a while, it would report is as ‘too old’ and kill it.  Nasty.

 

Tony

 

 

 

From: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Friday, 4 November 2016 8:29 AM
To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

 



If there is a self destruct after one year then there must be a real time clock of some sort, if it's a clock chip then it should be possible to intercept the clock reference by either changing the clock oscillator Cristal for one that has a frequency of 1/2 or 1/4 of the original. If the clock reference is taken from another reference the inserting a device by 2 or 4  IC would do the same. Another option could be to remove the clock backup power source is battery then the clock would always start with its default date/time it just depends on wether the full data time are used or just the day.

 

My preference would be to use a slower clock reference signal. When I get my printer (just ordered printer) I will look and see if I can find the if there's clock, it could be in the printer or in the cartridge.

 

Anyone got a view to this approach to extending the usable life of a cartridge.

 
















Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

2016-11-04 by Rob

Whats up with all this speculation?
clock..no clock.... battery... no battery......
saying ..:but it’ll be something like when you put in a new cartridge the printer writes the current date & time (obtained from your PC) to the chips.  When a year has passed it writes ‘Dead’ to the chip.

Does anyone here actually know what the Pantum printer cartridge expiration scheme is?

My interest level here is both in PCB etching and regular printing because my wife wants wireless printing
so I bought two of these printers.
If the toner cartridge WILL expire one year after installing it then I would be inclined to invest in
one more toner cartridge just to have for WHEN the cartridge expires.
Seems like thats not a lot to pay for two years of printing.
BUT
still
it would be nice to know how to extend the cartridge lifetime when there is still toner in it.......
sounds a lot like an old movie called LOGAN'S RUN



On 11/03/2016 11:29 PM, 'Tony Smith' ajsmith1968@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:
 

Oh, some printers have a built-in clock complete with backup battery.  Unlikely to be the case with this printer, that sort of thing add a few cents to production costs.

 

That clock may never be updated after being set at the factory so changing the computer date won’t help.

 

Tony

 

 

 

From: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Friday, 4 November 2016 1:15 PM
To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

 



So..... WHERE does the printer get the CURRENT DATE from?
and
WHAT IF YOUR PC DATE WAS SET TO THE SAME DATE EVERY TIME YOU TURN IT ON?
WHEN WOULD THE PRINTER DECIDE THE DATE HAS CHANGED?

So the real question here is IF you attach this printer to a PC thats sole purpose is to
print PCBs forever on this hacked printer then why would you care if you kept the the date
the same and then every time you were ready to print an image you could also reset that image creation date so nothing about that image attributes would carry into the print driver interogating dates.
 

On 11/03/2016 08:05 PM, 'Tony Smith' ajsmith1968@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:

 

It’s simpler than that.

 

No idea of the exact scheme, but it’ll be something like when you put in a new cartridge the printer writes the current date & time (obtained from your PC) to the chips.  When a year has passed it writes ‘Dead’ to the chip.

 

You used to be able to reset chips, now you need to get new ones along with your toner refill after the manufacturers closed that ‘loophole’.

 

Could be worse, HP at one point were writing the manufacture date to the chips so if you inserted a brand new cartridge you’d had sitting in on your shelf for a while, it would report is as ‘too old’ and kill it.  Nasty.

 

Tony

 

 

 

From: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Friday, 4 November 2016 8:29 AM
To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

 



If there is a self destruct after one year then there must be a real time clock of some sort, if it's a clock chip then it should be possible to intercept the clock reference by either changing the clock oscillator Cristal for one that has a frequency of 1/2 or 1/4 of the original. If the clock reference is taken from another reference the inserting a device by 2 or 4  IC would do the same. Another option could be to remove the clock backup power source is battery then the clock would always start with its default date/time it just depends on wether the full data time are used or just the day.

 

My preference would be to use a slower clock reference signal. When I get my printer (just ordered printer) I will look and see if I can find the if there's clock, it could be in the printer or in the cartridge.

 

Anyone got a view to this approach to extending the usable life of a cartridge.

 










Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

2016-11-04 by Rob

So HOW does it know 365 days?
Where does it get the actual date to decide one year?
Does it last for 10 years if you only turn on the power once every ten days?






On 11/03/2016 11:57 PM, Harvey Altstadter hrconsult@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:
 

No need for anything fancy, like a real time clock. The onboard processor in the printer only has to count seconds and store that info. When the appropriate number of seconds has elapsed, the processor tells the cartridge to shut off. No extra cost, the processor can easily handle this task while controlling the printer.

Harvey

On 11/3/2016 8:29 PM, 'Tony Smith' ajsmith1968@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:
 

Oh, some printers have a built-in clock complete with backup battery.  Unlikely to be the case with this printer, that sort of thing add a few cents to production costs.

 

That clock may never be updated after being set at the factory so changing the computer date won’t help.

 

Tony

 

 

 

From: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Friday, 4 November 2016 1:15 PM
To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

 



So..... WHERE does the printer get the CURRENT DATE from?
and
WHAT IF YOUR PC DATE WAS SET TO THE SAME DATE EVERY TIME YOU TURN IT ON?
WHEN WOULD THE PRINTER DECIDE THE DATE HAS CHANGED?

So the real question here is IF you attach this printer to a PC thats sole purpose is to
print PCBs forever on this hacked printer then why would you care if you kept the the date
the same and then every time you were ready to print an image you could also reset that image creation date so nothing about that image attributes would carry into the print driver interogating dates.
 

On 11/03/2016 08:05 PM, 'Tony Smith' ajsmith1968@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:

 

It’s simpler than that.

 

No idea of the exact scheme, but it’ll be something like when you put in a new cartridge the printer writes the current date & time (obtained from your PC) to the chips.  When a year has passed it writes ‘Dead’ to the chip.

 

You used to be able to reset chips, now you need to get new ones along with your toner refill after the manufacturers closed that ‘loophole’.

 

Could be worse, HP at one point were writing the manufacture date to the chips so if you inserted a brand new cartridge you’d had sitting in on your shelf for a while, it would report is as ‘too old’ and kill it.  Nasty.

 

Tony

 

 

 

From: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Friday, 4 November 2016 8:29 AM
To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

 



If there is a self destruct after one year then there must be a real time clock of some sort, if it's a clock chip then it should be possible to intercept the clock reference by either changing the clock oscillator Cristal for one that has a frequency of 1/2 or 1/4 of the original. If the clock reference is taken from another reference the inserting a device by 2 or 4  IC would do the same. Another option could be to remove the clock backup power source is battery then the clock would always start with its default date/time it just depends on wether the full data time are used or just the day.

 

My preference would be to use a slower clock reference signal. When I get my printer (just ordered printer) I will look and see if I can find the if there's clock, it could be in the printer or in the cartridge.

 

Anyone got a view to this approach to extending the usable life of a cartridge.

 











Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner rolling date back and page counts

2016-11-04 by Rob

Perhaps page counts will pop it at 700 pages as documented with the included starter toner cartridge.
I'm good with that number.
Thats a long time for me to make PCBs for hobby radios.

But what reallllly interests me in this PC DATE question is that if I am going to bother tearing apart
this printer to make it be a PCB print workstation then the PC I attach it to is not going to be anything more than
a dedicated print driver PC...which will be set up to reset its date upon booting up.
And the extended range $40 cartride is good for 1,000 pages?
 So I'm thinkning that if we can beat the date problem then page count won't be an issue.




On 11/03/2016 10:56 PM, 'Tony Smith' ajsmith1968@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:
 

Like I said, the printer gets the current date from your PC.

 

If you roll the date back before using the printer then it may not disable the cartridge.  That one time that you forget…

 

These printers might use a different scheme.  Recording page counts is common so the cartridge will be disabled eventually.

 

Tony

 

 

From: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Friday, 4 November 2016 1:15 PM
To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

 



So..... WHERE does the printer get the CURRENT DATE from?
and
WHAT IF YOUR PC DATE WAS SET TO THE SAME DATE EVERY TIME YOU TURN IT ON?
WHEN WOULD THE PRINTER DECIDE THE DATE HAS CHANGED?

So the real question here is IF you attach this printer to a PC thats sole purpose is to
print PCBs forever on this hacked printer then why would you care if you kept the the date
the same and then every time you were ready to print an image you could also reset that image creation date so nothing about that image attributes would carry into the print driver interogating dates.
 

On 11/03/2016 08:05 PM, 'Tony Smith' ajsmith1968@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:

 

It’s simpler than that.

 

No idea of the exact scheme, but it’ll be something like when you put in a new cartridge the printer writes the current date & time (obtained from your PC) to the chips.  When a year has passed it writes ‘Dead’ to the chip.

 

You used to be able to reset chips, now you need to get new ones along with your toner refill after the manufacturers closed that ‘loophole’.

 

Could be worse, HP at one point were writing the manufacture date to the chips so if you inserted a brand new cartridge you’d had sitting in on your shelf for a while, it would report is as ‘too old’ and kill it.  Nasty.

 

Tony

 

 

 

From: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Friday, 4 November 2016 8:29 AM
To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

 



If there is a self destruct after one year then there must be a real time clock of some sort, if it's a clock chip then it should be possible to intercept the clock reference by either changing the clock oscillator Cristal for one that has a frequency of 1/2 or 1/4 of the original. If the clock reference is taken from another reference the inserting a device by 2 or 4  IC would do the same. Another option could be to remove the clock backup power source is battery then the clock would always start with its default date/time it just depends on wether the full data time are used or just the day.

 

My preference would be to use a slower clock reference signal. When I get my printer (just ordered printer) I will look and see if I can find the if there's clock, it could be in the printer or in the cartridge.

 

Anyone got a view to this approach to extending the usable life of a cartridge.

 










Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

2016-11-04 by Harvey Altstadter

The computer can be the source of the date. Unless you change the default on Windows type computers, the computer time comes from the Internet, so if it is turned off, the next time it turns on, it will be updated. There is also a real time clock in the computer, that is used when the machine is not connected to the Internet. It operated from the same battery as the CMOS chip.

As I said in an earlier post, the processor in the printer can be counting seconds to get elapsed time, no dates required. Someone mentioned that turning off the printer would stop that count. Not so. Some parts of the printer operate when the power is off. Since the power button on many printers is a soft button, the processor has to be operating all the times, if just to be waiting for the closure of the power switch.  Many processors have a low power mode that is used for basic system timekeeping and other occasional activities, like the power on button. It is well within the power of the processor to be counting seconds in power down mode.  I never turn my printers off, just let them hibernate until they get a signal from the computer. under those conditions, the processor is always working, waiting for the USB signal or the wireless signal to start printing. If the processor is counting seconds, the way to stop the count would be to unplug the printer. This assumes that there is no battery backup. I assume that there is no backup because this is such an inexpensive device.


On 11/3/2016 10:05 PM, Rob roomberg@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:
 

So HOW does it know 365 days?
Where does it get the actual date to decide one year?
Does it last for 10 years if you only turn on the power once every ten days?






On 11/03/2016 11:57 PM, Harvey Altstadter hrconsult@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:
 

No need for anything fancy, like a real time clock. The onboard processor in the printer only has to count seconds and store that info. When the appropriate number of seconds has elapsed, the processor tells the cartridge to shut off. No extra cost, the processor can easily handle this task while controlling the printer.

Harvey

On 11/3/2016 8:29 PM, 'Tony Smith' ajsmith1968@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:
 

Oh, some printers have a built-in clock complete with backup battery.  Unlikely to be the case with this printer, that sort of thing add a few cents to production costs.

 

That clock may never be updated after being set at the factory so changing the computer date won’t help.

 

Tony

 

 

 

From: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Friday, 4 November 2016 1:15 PM
To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

 



So..... WHERE does the printer get the CURRENT DATE from?
and
WHAT IF YOUR PC DATE WAS SET TO THE SAME DATE EVERY TIME YOU TURN IT ON?
WHEN WOULD THE PRINTER DECIDE THE DATE HAS CHANGED?

So the real question here is IF you attach this printer to a PC thats sole purpose is to
print PCBs forever on this hacked printer then why would you care if you kept the the date
the same and then every time you were ready to print an image you could also reset that image creation date so nothing about that image attributes would carry into the print driver interogating dates.
 

On 11/03/2016 08:05 PM, 'Tony Smith' ajsmith1968@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:

 

It’s simpler than that.

 

No idea of the exact scheme, but it’ll be something like when you put in a new cartridge the printer writes the current date & time (obtained from your PC) to the chips.  When a year has passed it writes ‘Dead’ to the chip.

 

You used to be able to reset chips, now you need to get new ones along with your toner refill after the manufacturers closed that ‘loophole’.

 

Could be worse, HP at one point were writing the manufacture date to the chips so if you inserted a brand new cartridge you’d had sitting in on your shelf for a while, it would report is as ‘too old’ and kill it.  Nasty.

 

Tony

 

 

 

From: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Friday, 4 November 2016 8:29 AM
To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

 



If there is a self destruct after one year then there must be a real time clock of some sort, if it's a clock chip then it should be possible to intercept the clock reference by either changing the clock oscillator Cristal for one that has a frequency of 1/2 or 1/4 of the original. If the clock reference is taken from another reference the inserting a device by 2 or 4  IC would do the same. Another option could be to remove the clock backup power source is battery then the clock would always start with its default date/time it just depends on wether the full data time are used or just the day.

 

My preference would be to use a slower clock reference signal. When I get my printer (just ordered printer) I will look and see if I can find the if there's clock, it could be in the printer or in the cartridge.

 

Anyone got a view to this approach to extending the usable life of a cartridge.

 












RE: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner rolling date back and page counts

2016-11-04 by Tony Smith

Appears to be that the cartridges die after 700 (?) pages, no date expiry.

 

Apparently the best option is to fill up the starter cartridge, eg http://www.aaatoner.com/2butoreforpa.html and then buy a new one once it’s dead, not that you’ll ever do that if you only print PCB’s with it.

 

Note the comment there about not being any reset chips for this printer.  AliExpress had a few sellers claiming to have them buy they were stupidly expensive (~$100).  Who knows.

 

Tony

 

 

 

From: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Friday, 4 November 2016 4:13 PM
To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner rolling date back and page counts

 



Perhaps page counts will pop it at 700 pages as documented with the included starter toner cartridge.
I'm good with that number.
Thats a long time for me to make PCBs for hobby radios.

But what reallllly interests me in this PC DATE question is that if I am going to bother tearing apart
this printer to make it be a PCB print workstation then the PC I attach it to is not going to be anything more than
a dedicated print driver PC...which will be set up to reset its date upon booting up.
And the extended range $40 cartride is good for 1,000 pages?
 So I'm thinkning that if we can beat the date problem then page count won't be an issue.



On 11/03/2016 10:56 PM, 'Tony Smith' ajsmith1968@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:

 

Like I said, the printer gets the current date from your PC.

 

If you roll the date back before using the printer then it may not disable the cartridge.  That one time that you forget…

 

These printers might use a different scheme.  Recording page counts is common so the cartridge will be disabled eventually.

 

Tony

 

 

From: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Friday, 4 November 2016 1:15 PM
To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

 



So..... WHERE does the printer get the CURRENT DATE from?
and
WHAT IF YOUR PC DATE WAS SET TO THE SAME DATE EVERY TIME YOU TURN IT ON?
WHEN WOULD THE PRINTER DECIDE THE DATE HAS CHANGED?

So the real question here is IF you attach this printer to a PC thats sole purpose is to
print PCBs forever on this hacked printer then why would you care if you kept the the date
the same and then every time you were ready to print an image you could also reset that image creation date so nothing about that image attributes would carry into the print driver interogating dates.
 

On 11/03/2016 08:05 PM, 'Tony Smith' ajsmith1968@... [Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:

 

It’s simpler than that.

 

No idea of the exact scheme, but it’ll be something like when you put in a new cartridge the printer writes the current date & time (obtained from your PC) to the chips.  When a year has passed it writes ‘Dead’ to the chip.

 

You used to be able to reset chips, now you need to get new ones along with your toner refill after the manufacturers closed that ‘loophole’.

 

Could be worse, HP at one point were writing the manufacture date to the chips so if you inserted a brand new cartridge you’d had sitting in on your shelf for a while, it would report is as ‘too old’ and kill it.  Nasty.

 

Tony

 

 

 

From: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Friday, 4 November 2016 8:29 AM
To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner

 



If there is a self destruct after one year then there must be a real time clock of some sort, if it's a clock chip then it should be possible to intercept the clock reference by either changing the clock oscillator Cristal for one that has a frequency of 1/2 or 1/4 of the original. If the clock reference is taken from another reference the inserting a device by 2 or 4  IC would do the same. Another option could be to remove the clock backup power source is battery then the clock would always start with its default date/time it just depends on wether the full data time are used or just the day.

 

My preference would be to use a slower clock reference signal. When I get my printer (just ordered printer) I will look and see if I can find the if there's clock, it could be in the printer or in the cartridge.

 

Anyone got a view to this approach to extending the usable life of a cartridge.

 















RE: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner rolling date back and page counts

2016-11-04 by yahoo@...

Hi All,

    I've taken apart a couple of these printers for this purpose.     There is no obvious battery (coin cell, etc) on the main logic board or the digital board.    There are lines from the digital board to the cart labeled sda sclk, along with what I would guess is a ground, and a connection that appears to not be connected.

                     Best,

                           -Ozz

RE: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner rolling date back and page counts

2016-11-04 by Tony Smith

All these cartridge chips are the same, they’re just a memory chip on a I2C bus.

 

4 connections – power, ground, SDA (data) and SCLK (clock).

 

If you put a logic analyser on there you’d see the printer read the chip to get the current number of pages, and write back an updated count after printing.  All the chip resetters do is restore the chip to the ‘factory’ setting, ie zero pages. 

 

In theory what you do is put in a new cartridge, and record what the printer writes to the chip.  When you refill the cartridge you write that data to the chip, thus resetting it.  Something like an Arduino can do I2C.

 

Easier said than done, the manufacturers have wised up and encrypt the data and so on.  Not like in the old days where you could just cut a track, or where HP used to store the page count in a text file on your PC.

 

Tony

 

 

 

From: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Saturday, 5 November 2016 12:19 AM
To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Pantum 2500 hack to direct print toner rolling date back and page counts

 

Hi All,

    I've taken apart a couple of these printers for this purpose.     There is no obvious battery (coin cell, etc) on the main logic board or the digital board.    There are lines from the digital board to the cart labeled sda sclk, along with what I would guess is a ground, and a connection that appears to not be connected.

                     Best,

                           -Ozz