Yahoo Groups archive

Homebrew PCBs

Index last updated: 2026-04-05 19:38 UTC

Thread

thinking about buying a CNC kit such as the Bluechick kit

thinking about buying a CNC kit such as the Bluechick kit

2011-08-10 by Chris Kleeschulte

I wanted to rekindle the discussion about using CNC for pcb fabrication. I
love the toner transfer method, but I hate the chemicals and the drilling. I
think a CNC would alleviate this.

What I have learned from this group and CNCzone forums is that CNC is a
whole other rabbit hole, but can be worth the time and effort. My questions
are:

1. Can I reasonably expect to get enough resolution to create designs that
use such things as SOIC and even TQFP IC packages from a CNC kit?
2. Is the fact that the FR4 is not flat (has peaks and valleys) going to
make it impossible to perform the CNC process of creating boards?


What do big board houses do? Do they etch chemically or use CNC techniques?
I would think they would load a 4 foot by 8 foot sheet of stock and etch it
all at once.

It would be really neat to just load in some double-side copper cladded FR4
and have the cad drawing etched and drilled. I remember someone saying that
small board houses were run out of business years ago because of
environmental concerns, but I am not sure this has anything to do with it.


Chris


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] thinking about buying a CNC kit such as the Bluechick kit

2011-08-10 by Mark Lerman

You should be able to do 7 mil or smaller traces with a reasonably 
good cnc. As has been discussed before, the good pcb machines "map" 
the contour of the fr4 to compensate for the waviness. I have a model 
that does not do this, and it really is a problem - sometimes the 
traces are too deep, other times too shallow. This problem is 
especially exacerbated if you use V shaped tools (much cheaper) 
rather than standard ones. As you implied, it is exchanging one set of problems
  for another, but when it works well, you have a finished, drilled, 
two sided board. You can't beat that!

Mark


At 09:59 AM 8/10/2011, you wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>I wanted to rekindle the discussion about using CNC for pcb fabrication. I
>love the toner transfer method, but I hate the chemicals and the drilling. I
>think a CNC would alleviate this.
>
>What I have learned from this group and CNCzone forums is that CNC is a
>whole other rabbit hole, but can be worth the time and effort. My questions
>are:
>
>1. Can I reasonably expect to get enough resolution to create designs that
>use such things as SOIC and even TQFP IC packages from a CNC kit?
>2. Is the fact that the FR4 is not flat (has peaks and valleys) going to
>make it impossible to perform the CNC process of creating boards?
>
>
>What do big board houses do? Do they etch chemically or use CNC techniques?
>I would think they would load a 4 foot by 8 foot sheet of stock and etch it
>all at once.
>
>It would be really neat to just load in some double-side copper cladded FR4
>and have the cad drawing etched and drilled. I remember someone saying that
>small board houses were run out of business years ago because of
>environmental concerns, but I am not sure this has anything to do with it.
>
>
>Chris
>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>------------------------------------
>
>Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and Photos:
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBsYahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] thinking about buying a CNC kit such as the Bluechick kit

2011-08-10 by Harvey White

On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 09:59:52 -0400, you wrote:

I'll weigh in on this....

>I wanted to rekindle the discussion about using CNC for pcb fabrication. I
>love the toner transfer method, but I hate the chemicals and the drilling. I
>think a CNC would alleviate this.

It can...... <note dots....>
>
>What I have learned from this group and CNCzone forums is that CNC is a
>whole other rabbit hole, but can be worth the time and effort. My questions
>are:
>

Cost of equipment, maintenance, accuracy, and some inherent
limitations.

>1. Can I reasonably expect to get enough resolution to create designs that
>use such things as SOIC and even TQFP IC packages from a CNC kit?

Yes, but as I understand it, within limits.  The main problems with
CNC go to the resolution and repeatability of the basic setup and the
wear and tear and resolution of the cutting bit.  

Cutting bits seem to be about 5 dollars each minimum, how much linear
cutting they will do seems to be (as I have once  heard, about 300 to
600 inches).  That may be a single complicated board, or many lesser
ones.  Commercially available bits are in the 35 dollar range.  

My recollection is that they will do (perhaps) pins with a 1.0 mm
spacing, but you do have to be careful with it.


>2. Is the fact that the FR4 is not flat (has peaks and valleys) going to
>make it impossible to perform the CNC process of creating boards?


Yes.  Methods are either a vacuum hold down or a foot on the milling
head.  It is possible to probe the board and compensate with that.
Currently, there is an experiment/development project on the PCB-Gcode
newsgroup for adding probe capability to PCB Gcode.  This is a program
which works with EAGLE, and produces milling files from it.



>
>
>What do big board houses do? Do they etch chemically or use CNC techniques?
>I would think they would load a 4 foot by 8 foot sheet of stock and etch it
>all at once.

Chemical etch, including plated through holes.  Drill each layer,
assemble, plate through, resist, etch, solder mask, silk screen.

>
>It would be really neat to just load in some double-side copper cladded FR4
>and have the cad drawing etched and drilled. I remember someone saying that
>small board houses were run out of business years ago because of
>environmental concerns, but I am not sure this has anything to do with it.

It doesn't.  Mechanical etch is not profitable for boards in general,
but because it involves no chemicals, and can be done at home (with
varying results), can be a decent technique when minimal runs are
needed and time (to make) is all automated.  

The EPA got most of the smaller board houses, and the Chinese low cost
market got most of the rest.  (IMHO).

I've used photoetch (quality absolutely dependent on negative density
and registration), and toner transfer (quality is more variable, but
essentially cheaper for materials).

Currently doing toner transfer.  Typical run can be 4 to 14 board
sides.

Harvey
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
>
>Chris
>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>------------------------------------
>
>Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and Photos:
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBsYahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

Re: thinking about buying a CNC kit such as the Bluechick kit

2011-08-20 by rf33333

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Chris Kleeschulte <laconia@...>
wrote:
>
> I wanted to rekindle the discussion about using CNC for pcb
fabrication. I
> love the toner transfer method, but I hate the chemicals and the
drilling. I
> think a CNC would alleviate this.
>
> What I have learned from this group and CNCzone forums is that CNC is
a
> whole other rabbit hole, but can be worth the time and effort. My
questions
> are:
>
> 1. Can I reasonably expect to get enough resolution to create designs
that
> use such things as SOIC and even TQFP IC packages from a CNC kit?
> 2. Is the fact that the FR4 is not flat (has peaks and valleys) going
to
> make it impossible to perform the CNC process of creating boards?
>
>
> What do big board houses do? Do they etch chemically or use CNC
techniques?
> I would think they would load a 4 foot by 8 foot sheet of stock and
etch it
> all at once.
>
> It would be really neat to just load in some double-side copper
cladded FR4
> and have the cad drawing etched and drilled. I remember someone saying
that
> small board houses were run out of business years ago because of
> environmental concerns, but I am not sure this has anything to do with
it.
>
>
> Chris
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>


You ca read this: http://www.accuratecnc.com/mithsandtruths.html
<http://www.accuratecnc.com/mithsandtruths.html>

Ivan



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.