Yahoo Groups archive

Homebrew PCBs

Index last updated: 2026-04-05 19:38 UTC

Thread

[Homebrew_PCBs] Phaser solid ink printersparently must come from the lower tray

[Homebrew_PCBs] Phaser solid ink printersparently must come from the lower tray

2011-03-24 by Mark Lerman

A couple of people on the list have mentioned using Xerox solid ink 
printers to make pcbs, so I thought I'd take a look. These machines 
print by depositing melted wax on a large rotating aluminum drum then 
rolling heated paper over the drum to transfer the image. This would 
seem ideal because the wax is an excellent etch resist so that you 
should be able to just print and etch. I bought a used Xerox Phaser 
8400 for $100 on ebay. My preliminary thoughts/observations:

1 - These are big, heavy machines, 65# (30Kg). They take up a lot of space.
2 - They take 20 minute or so to warm up and use (waste) a lot of ink 
when they start up.
3 - There is an incredible amount of system and component checking 
during the warm up period.
4 - There are a LOT of sensors, making it hard to force this machine 
to do things it wasn't designed to do.

That said, one simple way to use them is to print on thin pcb board. 
I ran a piece of ss .009 mil board through and got an excellent print 
right off the bat. I could simply glue this to a thicker piece of FR4 
and I would have a very simple method of making pcbs. I haven't 
etched a board yet, but others have said this is no problem. Since I 
don't have a lot of this thin pcb material, I don't want to etch 
right now, but I'll let you know.

After taking the paper path apart, I *think* I can straighten the 
path enough to run .062 board through, but I'm not 100% sure. There 
would certainly have to be a microprocessor to simulate a number of 
the sensors because there are quite a few paper sensors. In fact, the 
paper trays even have sensors that tell the printer how wide and how 
long the paper is as well as when the tray is empty! Another problem 
is that when the printer is first powered up it prints this very full 
page that must come from tray 2. Since the paper stops for awhile in 
the paper preheater before moving onward, the preheater (which has 
both entrance and exit sensors) has to be emulated in software.

Other problems are that every 50 pages the transfer roller is oiled, 
and every time there is an error the printer prints 'Chase" pages to 
clean off the drum.

Finally, there is the problem of preheating the board. A .062  pcb 
can fit through the preheater, but I have no idea whether it can heat 
the copper fast enough for the wax ink to transfer properly.

Lots of engineering challenges. I have put a data logger on the 
relevant sensors and will now try to make the printer print with 
emulated sensors. If that works, I can then see if full thickness 
boards can pass. I'll let you know!

Mark

RE: [Homebrew_PCBs] Phaser solid ink printersparently must come from the lower tray

2011-03-24 by piers@u-h-p.com

I've read they're great for making fpc's ... my previous employer had one and I can certify only that they're 100 no good for traditional toner transfer because the wax soaks straight into the paper when heated - perfect absorbtion

PG

---- Sent on an old timey phone. 'Scuse the typos etc.

-original message-
Show quoted textHide quoted text
Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Phaser solid ink printersparently must come from the
 lower tray
From: "Mark Lerman" <mlerman@...>
Date: 25/03/2011 08:48

A couple of people on the list have mentioned using Xerox solid ink 
printers to make pcbs, so I thought I'd take a look. These machines 
print by depositing melted wax on a large rotating aluminum drum then 
rolling heated paper over the drum to transfer the image. This would 
seem ideal because the wax is an excellent etch resist so that you 
should be able to just print and etch. I bought a used Xerox Phaser 
8400 for $100 on ebay. My preliminary thoughts/observations:

1 - These are big, heavy machines, 65# (30Kg). They take up a lot of space.
2 - They take 20 minute or so to warm up and use (waste) a lot of ink 
when they start up.
3 - There is an incredible amount of system and component checking 
during the warm up period.
4 - There are a LOT of sensors, making it hard to force this machine 
to do things it wasn't designed to do.

That said, one simple way to use them is to print on thin pcb board. 
I ran a piece of ss .009 mil board through and got an excellent print 
right off the bat. I could simply glue this to a thicker piece of FR4 
and I would have a very simple method of making pcbs. I haven't 
etched a board yet, but others have said this is no problem. Since I 
don't have a lot of this thin pcb material, I don't want to etch 
right now, but I'll let you know.

After taking the paper path apart, I *think* I can straighten the 
path enough to run .062 board through, but I'm not 100% sure. There 
would certainly have to be a microprocessor to simulate a number of 
the sensors because there are quite a few paper sensors. In fact, the 
paper trays even have sensors that tell the printer how wide and how 
long the paper is as well as when the tray is empty! Another problem 
is that when the printer is first powered up it prints this very full 
page that must come from tray 2. Since the paper stops for awhile in 
the paper preheater before moving onward, the preheater (which has 
both entrance and exit sensors) has to be emulated in software.

Other problems are that every 50 pages the transfer roller is oiled, 
and every time there is an error the printer prints 'Chase" pages to 
clean off the drum.

Finally, there is the problem of preheating the board. A .062  pcb 
can fit through the preheater, but I have no idea whether it can heat 
the copper fast enough for the wax ink to transfer properly.

Lots of engineering challenges. I have put a data logger on the 
relevant sensors and will now try to make the printer print with 
emulated sensors. If that works, I can then see if full thickness 
boards can pass. I'll let you know!

Mark

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Phaser solid ink printers

2011-03-25 by Mark Lerman

Well, there is not enough space between the drum and the Transfix 
Roller to pass a thick pcb. I would have to replace the cams that 
raise and lower the Transfix Roller with smaller ones to make it 
work. Coupled with all the other problems, I am not sure it is worth 
the effort.

Mark



At 05:48 PM 3/24/2011, you wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>A couple of people on the list have mentioned using Xerox solid ink
>printers to make pcbs, so I thought I'd take a look. These machines
>print by depositing melted wax on a large rotating aluminum drum then
>rolling heated paper over the drum to transfer the image. This would
>seem ideal because the wax is an excellent etch resist so that you
>should be able to just print and etch. I bought a used Xerox Phaser
>8400 for $100 on ebay. My preliminary thoughts/observations:
>
>1 - These are big, heavy machines, 65# (30Kg). They take up a lot of space.
>2 - They take 20 minute or so to warm up and use (waste) a lot of ink
>when they start up.
>3 - There is an incredible amount of system and component checking
>during the warm up period.
>4 - There are a LOT of sensors, making it hard to force this machine
>to do things it wasn't designed to do.
>
>That said, one simple way to use them is to print on thin pcb board.
>I ran a piece of ss .009 mil board through and got an excellent print
>right off the bat. I could simply glue this to a thicker piece of FR4
>and I would have a very simple method of making pcbs. I haven't
>etched a board yet, but others have said this is no problem. Since I
>don't have a lot of this thin pcb material, I don't want to etch
>right now, but I'll let you know.
>
>After taking the paper path apart, I *think* I can straighten the
>path enough to run .062 board through, but I'm not 100% sure. There
>would certainly have to be a microprocessor to simulate a number of
>the sensors because there are quite a few paper sensors. In fact, the
>paper trays even have sensors that tell the printer how wide and how
>long the paper is as well as when the tray is empty! Another problem
>is that when the printer is first powered up it prints this very full
>page that must come from tray 2. Since the paper stops for awhile in
>the paper preheater before moving onward, the preheater (which has
>both entrance and exit sensors) has to be emulated in software.
>
>Other problems are that every 50 pages the transfer roller is oiled,
>and every time there is an error the printer prints 'Chase" pages to
>clean off the drum.
>
>Finally, there is the problem of preheating the board. A .062  pcb
>can fit through the preheater, but I have no idea whether it can heat
>the copper fast enough for the wax ink to transfer properly.
>
>Lots of engineering challenges. I have put a data logger on the
>relevant sensors and will now try to make the printer print with
>emulated sensors. If that works, I can then see if full thickness
>boards can pass. I'll let you know!
>
>Mark
>
>
>
>------------------------------------
>
>Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and Photos:
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBsYahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Phaser solid ink printers

2011-03-25 by joe lobocki

I can say he is right, it would take a lot of effort, I use one right now
for regular paper printing and it is picky enough for that, its got quite a
few different systems running inside it and if everything isn't right in the
place it wants it to be, it has a fit and refuses to work. I would much
rather rebuild the upper half of my engine again than try to disassemble a
phaser and modify it to pass boards. pair that with the price of the ink
blocks and the tendency for jets to permanently clog if you use cheap ink,
and you are just better off with laser. Just my personal opinion.


On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Mark Lerman <mlerman@...> wrote:

>
>
> Well, there is not enough space between the drum and the Transfix
> Roller to pass a thick pcb. I would have to replace the cams that
> raise and lower the Transfix Roller with smaller ones to make it
> work. Coupled with all the other problems, I am not sure it is worth
> the effort.
>
> Mark
>
> At 05:48 PM 3/24/2011, you wrote:
> >A couple of people on the list have mentioned using Xerox solid ink
> >printers to make pcbs, so I thought I'd take a look. These machines
> >print by depositing melted wax on a large rotating aluminum drum then
> >rolling heated paper over the drum to transfer the image. This would
> >seem ideal because the wax is an excellent etch resist so that you
> >should be able to just print and etch. I bought a used Xerox Phaser
> >8400 for $100 on ebay. My preliminary thoughts/observations:
> >
> >1 - These are big, heavy machines, 65# (30Kg). They take up a lot of
> space.
> >2 - They take 20 minute or so to warm up and use (waste) a lot of ink
> >when they start up.
> >3 - There is an incredible amount of system and component checking
> >during the warm up period.
> >4 - There are a LOT of sensors, making it hard to force this machine
> >to do things it wasn't designed to do.
> >
> >That said, one simple way to use them is to print on thin pcb board.
> >I ran a piece of ss .009 mil board through and got an excellent print
> >right off the bat. I could simply glue this to a thicker piece of FR4
> >and I would have a very simple method of making pcbs. I haven't
> >etched a board yet, but others have said this is no problem. Since I
> >don't have a lot of this thin pcb material, I don't want to etch
> >right now, but I'll let you know.
> >
> >After taking the paper path apart, I *think* I can straighten the
> >path enough to run .062 board through, but I'm not 100% sure. There
> >would certainly have to be a microprocessor to simulate a number of
> >the sensors because there are quite a few paper sensors. In fact, the
> >paper trays even have sensors that tell the printer how wide and how
> >long the paper is as well as when the tray is empty! Another problem
> >is that when the printer is first powered up it prints this very full
> >page that must come from tray 2. Since the paper stops for awhile in
> >the paper preheater before moving onward, the preheater (which has
> >both entrance and exit sensors) has to be emulated in software.
> >
> >Other problems are that every 50 pages the transfer roller is oiled,
> >and every time there is an error the printer prints 'Chase" pages to
> >clean off the drum.
> >
> >Finally, there is the problem of preheating the board. A .062 pcb
> >can fit through the preheater, but I have no idea whether it can heat
> >the copper fast enough for the wax ink to transfer properly.
> >
> >Lots of engineering challenges. I have put a data logger on the
> >relevant sensors and will now try to make the printer print with
> >emulated sensors. If that works, I can then see if full thickness
> >boards can pass. I'll let you know!
> >
> >Mark
> >
> >
> >
> >------------------------------------
> >
> >Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and
> Photos:
> >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBsYahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Phaser solid ink printers

2011-03-25 by tda7000

Given the right equipment and resources I reckon it would be better to produce a direct-to-PCB-printing ..printer..  from the ground up.

Toner might be best, or some kind of inkjet which prints with proper etch resist. From your description of the Solid Ink printer it sounds like a very complex device, with all the checking, preheating, and constant cleaning etc. Replicating something like that would be difficult...

Of course this all assumes someone has access to a good workshop, essentially a factory... could sell them to hobbyists\small businesses.. no doubt you'd need a fair bit of money to start up though..

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Mark Lerman <mlerman@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Well, there is not enough space between the drum and the Transfix 
> Roller to pass a thick pcb. I would have to replace the cams that 
> raise and lower the Transfix Roller with smaller ones to make it 
> work. Coupled with all the other problems, I am not sure it is worth 
> the effort.
> 
> Mark
> 
> 
> 
> At 05:48 PM 3/24/2011, you wrote:
> >A couple of people on the list have mentioned using Xerox solid ink
> >printers to make pcbs, so I thought I'd take a look. These machines
> >print by depositing melted wax on a large rotating aluminum drum then
> >rolling heated paper over the drum to transfer the image. This would
> >seem ideal because the wax is an excellent etch resist so that you
> >should be able to just print and etch. I bought a used Xerox Phaser
> >8400 for $100 on ebay. My preliminary thoughts/observations:
> >
> >1 - These are big, heavy machines, 65# (30Kg). They take up a lot of space.
> >2 - They take 20 minute or so to warm up and use (waste) a lot of ink
> >when they start up.
> >3 - There is an incredible amount of system and component checking
> >during the warm up period.
> >4 - There are a LOT of sensors, making it hard to force this machine
> >to do things it wasn't designed to do.
> >
> >That said, one simple way to use them is to print on thin pcb board.
> >I ran a piece of ss .009 mil board through and got an excellent print
> >right off the bat. I could simply glue this to a thicker piece of FR4
> >and I would have a very simple method of making pcbs. I haven't
> >etched a board yet, but others have said this is no problem. Since I
> >don't have a lot of this thin pcb material, I don't want to etch
> >right now, but I'll let you know.
> >
> >After taking the paper path apart, I *think* I can straighten the
> >path enough to run .062 board through, but I'm not 100% sure. There
> >would certainly have to be a microprocessor to simulate a number of
> >the sensors because there are quite a few paper sensors. In fact, the
> >paper trays even have sensors that tell the printer how wide and how
> >long the paper is as well as when the tray is empty! Another problem
> >is that when the printer is first powered up it prints this very full
> >page that must come from tray 2. Since the paper stops for awhile in
> >the paper preheater before moving onward, the preheater (which has
> >both entrance and exit sensors) has to be emulated in software.
> >
> >Other problems are that every 50 pages the transfer roller is oiled,
> >and every time there is an error the printer prints 'Chase" pages to
> >clean off the drum.
> >
> >Finally, there is the problem of preheating the board. A .062  pcb
> >can fit through the preheater, but I have no idea whether it can heat
> >the copper fast enough for the wax ink to transfer properly.
> >
> >Lots of engineering challenges. I have put a data logger on the
> >relevant sensors and will now try to make the printer print with
> >emulated sensors. If that works, I can then see if full thickness
> >boards can pass. I'll let you know!
> >
> >Mark
> >
> >
> >
> >------------------------------------
> >
> >Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and Photos:
> >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBsYahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Phaser solid ink printers

2011-03-25 by mlerman@ix.netcom.com

I'm still investigating this machine, and I think I can modify it, but it is going to take a lot of work and thought. The plan is to make it possible for the average hobbiest to modify one of these relatively easily and relatively quickly, following the directions I hope to provide. Since I do not have much of a machine shop, the mod will either be simple to do once I figure it out, or I can't do it at all. It certainly will need a microprocessor to emulate some of the sensors, but I would like to do the mod with essentially no machining.

A straight path is, indeed, possible. I am currently logging and evaluating all the sensors in the paper and media path, but there are a lot of them. For instance, Tray 2 must be loaded with 8.5x11 inch paper during the initialization sequence. There are sensors that determine the length and width of the paper you have loaded as well as whether there is paper loaded and whether the tray is present. So if you want to run the printer without this tray present, you have to emulate a lot of sensors!

Mark


-----Original Message-----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>From: tda7000 <Tda7000@...>
>Sent: Mar 25, 2011 5:14 PM
>To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Phaser solid ink printers
>
>Given the right equipment and resources I reckon it would be better to produce a direct-to-PCB-printing ..printer..  from the ground up.
>
>Toner might be best, or some kind of inkjet which prints with proper etch resist. From your description of the Solid Ink printer it sounds like a very complex device, with all the checking, preheating, and constant cleaning etc. Replicating something like that would be difficult...
>
>Of course this all assumes someone has access to a good workshop, essentially a factory... could sell them to hobbyists\small businesses.. no doubt you'd need a fair bit of money to start up though..
>
>--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Mark Lerman <mlerman@...> wrote:
>>
>> Well, there is not enough space between the drum and the Transfix 
>> Roller to pass a thick pcb. I would have to replace the cams that 
>> raise and lower the Transfix Roller with smaller ones to make it 
>> work. Coupled with all the other problems, I am not sure it is worth 
>> the effort.
>> 
>> Mark
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> At 05:48 PM 3/24/2011, you wrote:
>> >A couple of people on the list have mentioned using Xerox solid ink
>> >printers to make pcbs, so I thought I'd take a look. These machines
>> >print by depositing melted wax on a large rotating aluminum drum then
>> >rolling heated paper over the drum to transfer the image. This would
>> >seem ideal because the wax is an excellent etch resist so that you
>> >should be able to just print and etch. I bought a used Xerox Phaser
>> >8400 for $100 on ebay. My preliminary thoughts/observations:
>> >
>> >1 - These are big, heavy machines, 65# (30Kg). They take up a lot of space.
>> >2 - They take 20 minute or so to warm up and use (waste) a lot of ink
>> >when they start up.
>> >3 - There is an incredible amount of system and component checking
>> >during the warm up period.
>> >4 - There are a LOT of sensors, making it hard to force this machine
>> >to do things it wasn't designed to do.
>> >
>> >That said, one simple way to use them is to print on thin pcb board.
>> >I ran a piece of ss .009 mil board through and got an excellent print
>> >right off the bat. I could simply glue this to a thicker piece of FR4
>> >and I would have a very simple method of making pcbs. I haven't
>> >etched a board yet, but others have said this is no problem. Since I
>> >don't have a lot of this thin pcb material, I don't want to etch
>> >right now, but I'll let you know.
>> >
>> >After taking the paper path apart, I *think* I can straighten the
>> >path enough to run .062 board through, but I'm not 100% sure. There
>> >would certainly have to be a microprocessor to simulate a number of
>> >the sensors because there are quite a few paper sensors. In fact, the
>> >paper trays even have sensors that tell the printer how wide and how
>> >long the paper is as well as when the tray is empty! Another problem
>> >is that when the printer is first powered up it prints this very full
>> >page that must come from tray 2. Since the paper stops for awhile in
>> >the paper preheater before moving onward, the preheater (which has
>> >both entrance and exit sensors) has to be emulated in software.
>> >
>> >Other problems are that every 50 pages the transfer roller is oiled,
>> >and every time there is an error the printer prints 'Chase" pages to
>> >clean off the drum.
>> >
>> >Finally, there is the problem of preheating the board. A .062  pcb
>> >can fit through the preheater, but I have no idea whether it can heat
>> >the copper fast enough for the wax ink to transfer properly.
>> >
>> >Lots of engineering challenges. I have put a data logger on the
>> >relevant sensors and will now try to make the printer print with
>> >emulated sensors. If that works, I can then see if full thickness
>> >boards can pass. I'll let you know!
>> >
>> >Mark
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >------------------------------------
>> >
>> >Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and Photos:
>> >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBsYahoo! Groups Links
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------------
>
>Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and Photos:
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBsYahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Phaser solid ink printers

2011-04-01 by Mark Lerman

A final update:
It probably is possible to feed .062 pcbs through this printer, but 
even if you are able to do so, the machine would be cumbersome to use 
and not worth the effort. The machine has a mind of its own that 
requires cleaning pages any time there is a paper jam, has timing 
issues that are hard to emulate because the image is completely 
printed on a large diameter aluminum drum BEFORE the paper is 
engaged, and even if you do get everything working perfectly, you 
would still have a huge, heavy machine sitting somewhere in your 
workspace.  Not recommended!

Mark


At 06:30 PM 3/25/2011, you wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>I'm still investigating this machine, and I think I can modify it, 
>but it is going to take a lot of work and thought. The plan is to 
>make it possible for the average hobbiest to modify one of these 
>relatively easily and relatively quickly, following the directions I 
>hope to provide. Since I do not have much of a machine shop, the mod 
>will either be simple to do once I figure it out, or I can't do it 
>at all. It certainly will need a microprocessor to emulate some of 
>the sensors, but I would like to do the mod with essentially no machining.
>
>A straight path is, indeed, possible. I am currently logging and 
>evaluating all the sensors in the paper and media path, but there 
>are a lot of them. For instance, Tray 2 must be loaded with 8.5x11 
>inch paper during the initialization sequence. There are sensors 
>that determine the length and width of the paper you have loaded as 
>well as whether there is paper loaded and whether the tray is 
>present. So if you want to run the printer without this tray 
>present, you have to emulate a lot of sensors!
>
>Mark
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
> >From: tda7000 <Tda7000@...>
> >Sent: Mar 25, 2011 5:14 PM
> >To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
> >Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Phaser solid ink printers
> >
> >Given the right equipment and resources I reckon it would be 
> better to produce a direct-to-PCB-printing ..printer..  from the ground up.
> >
> >Toner might be best, or some kind of inkjet which prints with 
> proper etch resist. From your description of the Solid Ink printer 
> it sounds like a very complex device, with all the checking, 
> preheating, and constant cleaning etc. Replicating something like 
> that would be difficult...
> >
> >Of course this all assumes someone has access to a good workshop, 
> essentially a factory... could sell them to hobbyists\small 
> businesses.. no doubt you'd need a fair bit of money to start up though..
> >
> >--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Mark Lerman <mlerman@...> wrote:
> >>
> >> Well, there is not enough space between the drum and the Transfix
> >> Roller to pass a thick pcb. I would have to replace the cams that
> >> raise and lower the Transfix Roller with smaller ones to make it
> >> work. Coupled with all the other problems, I am not sure it is worth
> >> the effort.
> >>
> >> Mark
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> At 05:48 PM 3/24/2011, you wrote:
> >> >A couple of people on the list have mentioned using Xerox solid ink
> >> >printers to make pcbs, so I thought I'd take a look. These machines
> >> >print by depositing melted wax on a large rotating aluminum drum then
> >> >rolling heated paper over the drum to transfer the image. This would
> >> >seem ideal because the wax is an excellent etch resist so that you
> >> >should be able to just print and etch. I bought a used Xerox Phaser
> >> >8400 for $100 on ebay. My preliminary thoughts/observations:
> >> >
> >> >1 - These are big, heavy machines, 65# (30Kg). They take up a 
> lot of space.
> >> >2 - They take 20 minute or so to warm up and use (waste) a lot of ink
> >> >when they start up.
> >> >3 - There is an incredible amount of system and component checking
> >> >during the warm up period.
> >> >4 - There are a LOT of sensors, making it hard to force this machine
> >> >to do things it wasn't designed to do.
> >> >
> >> >That said, one simple way to use them is to print on thin pcb board.
> >> >I ran a piece of ss .009 mil board through and got an excellent print
> >> >right off the bat. I could simply glue this to a thicker piece of FR4
> >> >and I would have a very simple method of making pcbs. I haven't
> >> >etched a board yet, but others have said this is no problem. Since I
> >> >don't have a lot of this thin pcb material, I don't want to etch
> >> >right now, but I'll let you know.
> >> >
> >> >After taking the paper path apart, I *think* I can straighten the
> >> >path enough to run .062 board through, but I'm not 100% sure. There
> >> >would certainly have to be a microprocessor to simulate a number of
> >> >the sensors because there are quite a few paper sensors. In fact, the
> >> >paper trays even have sensors that tell the printer how wide and how
> >> >long the paper is as well as when the tray is empty! Another problem
> >> >is that when the printer is first powered up it prints this very full
> >> >page that must come from tray 2. Since the paper stops for awhile in
> >> >the paper preheater before moving onward, the preheater (which has
> >> >both entrance and exit sensors) has to be emulated in software.
> >> >
> >> >Other problems are that every 50 pages the transfer roller is oiled,
> >> >and every time there is an error the printer prints 'Chase" pages to
> >> >clean off the drum.
> >> >
> >> >Finally, there is the problem of preheating the board. A .062  pcb
> >> >can fit through the preheater, but I have no idea whether it can heat
> >> >the copper fast enough for the wax ink to transfer properly.
> >> >
> >> >Lots of engineering challenges. I have put a data logger on the
> >> >relevant sensors and will now try to make the printer print with
> >> >emulated sensors. If that works, I can then see if full thickness
> >> >boards can pass. I'll let you know!
> >> >
> >> >Mark
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >------------------------------------
> >> >
> >> >Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, 
> and Photos:
> >> >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBsYahoo! Groups Links
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >------------------------------------
> >
> >Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and Photos:
> >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBsYahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>------------------------------------
>
>Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and Photos:
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBsYahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

Re: Phaser solid ink printers

2012-03-22 by Jkirk3279

I just picked up one of these printers  off Craigslist for $40.

It needed Cyan ink but it's running well.

I wasn't planning to rebuild it, I just wanted to ask, who's tried straightforward toner transfer with it?

The way I figure it, run the print through twice to get a thicker layer of wax.

If I can print on silicone-treated label stock, the wax should just pop off.

But an alternative I've seen is printing on regular paper, and leaving it in place after ironing.   Either soak the paper in warm water to loosen the wood pulp, or put the whole thing in the etchant.

The etchant should soak  into the wood pulp and still do the job.   I can scrub the wood pulp off later.

Any thoughts?


--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Mark Lerman <mlerman@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> A final update:
> It probably is possible to feed .062 pcbs through this printer, but 
> even if you are able to do so, the machine would be cumbersome to use 
> and not worth the effort. The machine has a mind of its own that 
> requires cleaning pages any time there is a paper jam, has timing 
> issues that are hard to emulate because the image is completely 
> printed on a large diameter aluminum drum BEFORE the paper is 
> engaged, and even if you do get everything working perfectly, you 
> would still have a huge, heavy machine sitting somewhere in your 
> workspace.  Not recommended!
> 
> Mark
> 
> 
> At 06:30 PM 3/25/2011, you wrote:
> >I'm still investigating this machine, and I think I can modify it, 
> >but it is going to take a lot of work and thought. The plan is to 
> >make it possible for the average hobbiest to modify one of these 
> >relatively easily and relatively quickly, following the directions I 
> >hope to provide. Since I do not have much of a machine shop, the mod 
> >will either be simple to do once I figure it out, or I can't do it 
> >at all. It certainly will need a microprocessor to emulate some of 
> >the sensors, but I would like to do the mod with essentially no machining.
> >
> >A straight path is, indeed, possible. I am currently logging and 
> >evaluating all the sensors in the paper and media path, but there 
> >are a lot of them. For instance, Tray 2 must be loaded with 8.5x11 
> >inch paper during the initialization sequence. There are sensors 
> >that determine the length and width of the paper you have loaded as 
> >well as whether there is paper loaded and whether the tray is 
> >present. So if you want to run the printer without this tray 
> >present, you have to emulate a lot of sensors!
> >
> >Mark
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: tda7000 <Tda7000@...>
> > >Sent: Mar 25, 2011 5:14 PM
> > >To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
> > >Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Phaser solid ink printers
> > >
> > >Given the right equipment and resources I reckon it would be 
> > better to produce a direct-to-PCB-printing ..printer..  from the ground up.
> > >
> > >Toner might be best, or some kind of inkjet which prints with 
> > proper etch resist. From your description of the Solid Ink printer 
> > it sounds like a very complex device, with all the checking, 
> > preheating, and constant cleaning etc. Replicating something like 
> > that would be difficult...
> > >
> > >Of course this all assumes someone has access to a good workshop, 
> > essentially a factory... could sell them to hobbyists\small 
> > businesses.. no doubt you'd need a fair bit of money to start up though..
> > >
> > >--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Mark Lerman <mlerman@> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Well, there is not enough space between the drum and the Transfix
> > >> Roller to pass a thick pcb. I would have to replace the cams that
> > >> raise and lower the Transfix Roller with smaller ones to make it
> > >> work. Coupled with all the other problems, I am not sure it is worth
> > >> the effort.
> > >>
> > >> Mark
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> At 05:48 PM 3/24/2011, you wrote:
> > >> >A couple of people on the list have mentioned using Xerox solid ink
> > >> >printers to make pcbs, so I thought I'd take a look. These machines
> > >> >print by depositing melted wax on a large rotating aluminum drum then
> > >> >rolling heated paper over the drum to transfer the image. This would
> > >> >seem ideal because the wax is an excellent etch resist so that you
> > >> >should be able to just print and etch. I bought a used Xerox Phaser
> > >> >8400 for $100 on ebay. My preliminary thoughts/observations:
> > >> >
> > >> >1 - These are big, heavy machines, 65# (30Kg). They take up a 
> > lot of space.
> > >> >2 - They take 20 minute or so to warm up and use (waste) a lot of ink
> > >> >when they start up.
> > >> >3 - There is an incredible amount of system and component checking
> > >> >during the warm up period.
> > >> >4 - There are a LOT of sensors, making it hard to force this machine
> > >> >to do things it wasn't designed to do.
> > >> >
> > >> >That said, one simple way to use them is to print on thin pcb board.
> > >> >I ran a piece of ss .009 mil board through and got an excellent print
> > >> >right off the bat. I could simply glue this to a thicker piece of FR4
> > >> >and I would have a very simple method of making pcbs. I haven't
> > >> >etched a board yet, but others have said this is no problem. Since I
> > >> >don't have a lot of this thin pcb material, I don't want to etch
> > >> >right now, but I'll let you know.
> > >> >
> > >> >After taking the paper path apart, I *think* I can straighten the
> > >> >path enough to run .062 board through, but I'm not 100% sure. There
> > >> >would certainly have to be a microprocessor to simulate a number of
> > >> >the sensors because there are quite a few paper sensors. In fact, the
> > >> >paper trays even have sensors that tell the printer how wide and how
> > >> >long the paper is as well as when the tray is empty! Another problem
> > >> >is that when the printer is first powered up it prints this very full
> > >> >page that must come from tray 2. Since the paper stops for awhile in
> > >> >the paper preheater before moving onward, the preheater (which has
> > >> >both entrance and exit sensors) has to be emulated in software.
> > >> >
> > >> >Other problems are that every 50 pages the transfer roller is oiled,
> > >> >and every time there is an error the printer prints 'Chase" pages to
> > >> >clean off the drum.
> > >> >
> > >> >Finally, there is the problem of preheating the board. A .062  pcb
> > >> >can fit through the preheater, but I have no idea whether it can heat
> > >> >the copper fast enough for the wax ink to transfer properly.
> > >> >
> > >> >Lots of engineering challenges. I have put a data logger on the
> > >> >relevant sensors and will now try to make the printer print with
> > >> >emulated sensors. If that works, I can then see if full thickness
> > >> >boards can pass. I'll let you know!
> > >> >
> > >> >Mark
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >------------------------------------
> > >> >
> > >> >Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, 
> > and Photos:
> > >> >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBsYahoo! Groups Links
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >------------------------------------
> > >
> > >Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and Photos:
> > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBsYahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >------------------------------------
> >
> >Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and Photos:
> >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBsYahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Phaser solid ink printers

2012-03-22 by Mark Lerman

I spent a month or so playing with a couple of these for pcb use and 
concluded that it wasn't worth the effort. While the wax is an 
excellent  resist, modifying the machine to pass boards is not a 
trivial task. They are big machines that need a significant warm up 
time, waste a lot of wax doing all sorts of "cleaning" and 
maintenance. See my posts in this group for more info.


At 10:09 PM 3/21/2012, you wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>I just picked up one of these printers  off Craigslist for $40.
>
>It needed Cyan ink but it's running well.
>
>I wasn't planning to rebuild it, I just wanted to ask, who's tried 
>straightforward toner transfer with it?
>
>The way I figure it, run the print through twice to get a thicker 
>layer of wax.
>
>If I can print on silicone-treated label stock, the wax should just pop off.
>
>But an alternative I've seen is printing on regular paper, and 
>leaving it in place after ironing.   Either soak the paper in warm 
>water to loosen the wood pulp, or put the whole thing in the etchant.
>
>The etchant should soak  into the wood pulp and still do the 
>job.   I can scrub the wood pulp off later.
>
>Any thoughts?
>
>
>--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Mark Lerman <mlerman@...> wrote:
> >
> > A final update:
> > It probably is possible to feed .062 pcbs through this printer, but
> > even if you are able to do so, the machine would be cumbersome to use
> > and not worth the effort. The machine has a mind of its own that
> > requires cleaning pages any time there is a paper jam, has timing
> > issues that are hard to emulate because the image is completely
> > printed on a large diameter aluminum drum BEFORE the paper is
> > engaged, and even if you do get everything working perfectly, you
> > would still have a huge, heavy machine sitting somewhere in your
> > workspace.  Not recommended!
> >
> > Mark
> >
> >
> > At 06:30 PM 3/25/2011, you wrote:
> > >I'm still investigating this machine, and I think I can modify it,
> > >but it is going to take a lot of work and thought. The plan is to
> > >make it possible for the average hobbiest to modify one of these
> > >relatively easily and relatively quickly, following the directions I
> > >hope to provide. Since I do not have much of a machine shop, the mod
> > >will either be simple to do once I figure it out, or I can't do it
> > >at all. It certainly will need a microprocessor to emulate some of
> > >the sensors, but I would like to do the mod with essentially no machining.
> > >
> > >A straight path is, indeed, possible. I am currently logging and
> > >evaluating all the sensors in the paper and media path, but there
> > >are a lot of them. For instance, Tray 2 must be loaded with 8.5x11
> > >inch paper during the initialization sequence. There are sensors
> > >that determine the length and width of the paper you have loaded as
> > >well as whether there is paper loaded and whether the tray is
> > >present. So if you want to run the printer without this tray
> > >present, you have to emulate a lot of sensors!
> > >
> > >Mark
> > >
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >From: tda7000 <Tda7000@...>
> > > >Sent: Mar 25, 2011 5:14 PM
> > > >To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
> > > >Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Phaser solid ink printers
> > > >
> > > >Given the right equipment and resources I reckon it would be
> > > better to produce a direct-to-PCB-printing ..printer..  from 
> the ground up.
> > > >
> > > >Toner might be best, or some kind of inkjet which prints with
> > > proper etch resist. From your description of the Solid Ink printer
> > > it sounds like a very complex device, with all the checking,
> > > preheating, and constant cleaning etc. Replicating something like
> > > that would be difficult...
> > > >
> > > >Of course this all assumes someone has access to a good workshop,
> > > essentially a factory... could sell them to hobbyists\small
> > > businesses.. no doubt you'd need a fair bit of money to start up though..
> > > >
> > > >--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Mark Lerman <mlerman@> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Well, there is not enough space between the drum and the Transfix
> > > >> Roller to pass a thick pcb. I would have to replace the cams that
> > > >> raise and lower the Transfix Roller with smaller ones to make it
> > > >> work. Coupled with all the other problems, I am not sure it is worth
> > > >> the effort.
> > > >>
> > > >> Mark
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> At 05:48 PM 3/24/2011, you wrote:
> > > >> >A couple of people on the list have mentioned using Xerox solid ink
> > > >> >printers to make pcbs, so I thought I'd take a look. These machines
> > > >> >print by depositing melted wax on a large rotating aluminum drum then
> > > >> >rolling heated paper over the drum to transfer the image. This would
> > > >> >seem ideal because the wax is an excellent etch resist so that you
> > > >> >should be able to just print and etch. I bought a used Xerox Phaser
> > > >> >8400 for $100 on ebay. My preliminary thoughts/observations:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >1 - These are big, heavy machines, 65# (30Kg). They take up a
> > > lot of space.
> > > >> >2 - They take 20 minute or so to warm up and use (waste) a lot of ink
> > > >> >when they start up.
> > > >> >3 - There is an incredible amount of system and component checking
> > > >> >during the warm up period.
> > > >> >4 - There are a LOT of sensors, making it hard to force this machine
> > > >> >to do things it wasn't designed to do.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >That said, one simple way to use them is to print on thin pcb board.
> > > >> >I ran a piece of ss .009 mil board through and got an excellent print
> > > >> >right off the bat. I could simply glue this to a thicker piece of FR4
> > > >> >and I would have a very simple method of making pcbs. I haven't
> > > >> >etched a board yet, but others have said this is no problem. Since I
> > > >> >don't have a lot of this thin pcb material, I don't want to etch
> > > >> >right now, but I'll let you know.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >After taking the paper path apart, I *think* I can straighten the
> > > >> >path enough to run .062 board through, but I'm not 100% sure. There
> > > >> >would certainly have to be a microprocessor to simulate a number of
> > > >> >the sensors because there are quite a few paper sensors. In fact, the
> > > >> >paper trays even have sensors that tell the printer how wide and how
> > > >> >long the paper is as well as when the tray is empty! Another problem
> > > >> >is that when the printer is first powered up it prints this very full
> > > >> >page that must come from tray 2. Since the paper stops for awhile in
> > > >> >the paper preheater before moving onward, the preheater (which has
> > > >> >both entrance and exit sensors) has to be emulated in software.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >Other problems are that every 50 pages the transfer roller is oiled,
> > > >> >and every time there is an error the printer prints 'Chase" pages to
> > > >> >clean off the drum.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >Finally, there is the problem of preheating the board. A .062  pcb
> > > >> >can fit through the preheater, but I have no idea whether it can heat
> > > >> >the copper fast enough for the wax ink to transfer properly.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >Lots of engineering challenges. I have put a data logger on the
> > > >> >relevant sensors and will now try to make the printer print with
> > > >> >emulated sensors. If that works, I can then see if full thickness
> > > >> >boards can pass. I'll let you know!
> > > >> >
> > > >> >Mark
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >------------------------------------
> > > >> >
> > > >> >Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files,
> > > and Photos:
> > > >> >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBsYahoo! Groups Links
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > >Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, 
> Files, and Photos:
> > > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBsYahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >------------------------------------
> > >
> > >Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, 
> and Photos:
> > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBsYahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------------
>
>Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and Photos:
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBsYahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Phaser solid ink printers

2012-03-22 by Mark Lerman

In rereading your post, I see that you just wanted to use the printer 
to transfer the image. It should work, but these machines are very 
large and unless you use the printer for other things besides pcbs, 
there is no advantage over toner transfer that I can see. They are 
fascinating machines, though - I enjoyed dissecting mine!

Mark



At 10:09 PM 3/21/2012, you wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>I just picked up one of these printers  off Craigslist for $40.
>
>It needed Cyan ink but it's running well.
>
>I wasn't planning to rebuild it, I just wanted to ask, who's tried 
>straightforward toner transfer with it?
>
>The way I figure it, run the print through twice to get a thicker 
>layer of wax.
>
>If I can print on silicone-treated label stock, the wax should just pop off.
>
>But an alternative I've seen is printing on regular paper, and 
>leaving it in place after ironing.   Either soak the paper in warm 
>water to loosen the wood pulp, or put the whole thing in the etchant.
>
>The etchant should soak  into the wood pulp and still do the 
>job.   I can scrub the wood pulp off later.
>
>Any thoughts?
>
>
>--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Mark Lerman <mlerman@...> wrote:
> >
> > A final update:
> > It probably is possible to feed .062 pcbs through this printer, but
> > even if you are able to do so, the machine would be cumbersome to use
> > and not worth the effort. The machine has a mind of its own that
> > requires cleaning pages any time there is a paper jam, has timing
> > issues that are hard to emulate because the image is completely
> > printed on a large diameter aluminum drum BEFORE the paper is
> > engaged, and even if you do get everything working perfectly, you
> > would still have a huge, heavy machine sitting somewhere in your
> > workspace.  Not recommended!
> >
> > Mark
> >
> >
> > At 06:30 PM 3/25/2011, you wrote:
> > >I'm still investigating this machine, and I think I can modify it,
> > >but it is going to take a lot of work and thought. The plan is to
> > >make it possible for the average hobbiest to modify one of these
> > >relatively easily and relatively quickly, following the directions I
> > >hope to provide. Since I do not have much of a machine shop, the mod
> > >will either be simple to do once I figure it out, or I can't do it
> > >at all. It certainly will need a microprocessor to emulate some of
> > >the sensors, but I would like to do the mod with essentially no machining.
> > >
> > >A straight path is, indeed, possible. I am currently logging and
> > >evaluating all the sensors in the paper and media path, but there
> > >are a lot of them. For instance, Tray 2 must be loaded with 8.5x11
> > >inch paper during the initialization sequence. There are sensors
> > >that determine the length and width of the paper you have loaded as
> > >well as whether there is paper loaded and whether the tray is
> > >present. So if you want to run the printer without this tray
> > >present, you have to emulate a lot of sensors!
> > >
> > >Mark
> > >
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >From: tda7000 <Tda7000@...>
> > > >Sent: Mar 25, 2011 5:14 PM
> > > >To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
> > > >Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Phaser solid ink printers
> > > >
> > > >Given the right equipment and resources I reckon it would be
> > > better to produce a direct-to-PCB-printing ..printer..  from 
> the ground up.
> > > >
> > > >Toner might be best, or some kind of inkjet which prints with
> > > proper etch resist. From your description of the Solid Ink printer
> > > it sounds like a very complex device, with all the checking,
> > > preheating, and constant cleaning etc. Replicating something like
> > > that would be difficult...
> > > >
> > > >Of course this all assumes someone has access to a good workshop,
> > > essentially a factory... could sell them to hobbyists\small
> > > businesses.. no doubt you'd need a fair bit of money to start up though..
> > > >
> > > >--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Mark Lerman <mlerman@> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Well, there is not enough space between the drum and the Transfix
> > > >> Roller to pass a thick pcb. I would have to replace the cams that
> > > >> raise and lower the Transfix Roller with smaller ones to make it
> > > >> work. Coupled with all the other problems, I am not sure it is worth
> > > >> the effort.
> > > >>
> > > >> Mark
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> At 05:48 PM 3/24/2011, you wrote:
> > > >> >A couple of people on the list have mentioned using Xerox solid ink
> > > >> >printers to make pcbs, so I thought I'd take a look. These machines
> > > >> >print by depositing melted wax on a large rotating aluminum drum then
> > > >> >rolling heated paper over the drum to transfer the image. This would
> > > >> >seem ideal because the wax is an excellent etch resist so that you
> > > >> >should be able to just print and etch. I bought a used Xerox Phaser
> > > >> >8400 for $100 on ebay. My preliminary thoughts/observations:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >1 - These are big, heavy machines, 65# (30Kg). They take up a
> > > lot of space.
> > > >> >2 - They take 20 minute or so to warm up and use (waste) a lot of ink
> > > >> >when they start up.
> > > >> >3 - There is an incredible amount of system and component checking
> > > >> >during the warm up period.
> > > >> >4 - There are a LOT of sensors, making it hard to force this machine
> > > >> >to do things it wasn't designed to do.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >That said, one simple way to use them is to print on thin pcb board.
> > > >> >I ran a piece of ss .009 mil board through and got an excellent print
> > > >> >right off the bat. I could simply glue this to a thicker piece of FR4
> > > >> >and I would have a very simple method of making pcbs. I haven't
> > > >> >etched a board yet, but others have said this is no problem. Since I
> > > >> >don't have a lot of this thin pcb material, I don't want to etch
> > > >> >right now, but I'll let you know.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >After taking the paper path apart, I *think* I can straighten the
> > > >> >path enough to run .062 board through, but I'm not 100% sure. There
> > > >> >would certainly have to be a microprocessor to simulate a number of
> > > >> >the sensors because there are quite a few paper sensors. In fact, the
> > > >> >paper trays even have sensors that tell the printer how wide and how
> > > >> >long the paper is as well as when the tray is empty! Another problem
> > > >> >is that when the printer is first powered up it prints this very full
> > > >> >page that must come from tray 2. Since the paper stops for awhile in
> > > >> >the paper preheater before moving onward, the preheater (which has
> > > >> >both entrance and exit sensors) has to be emulated in software.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >Other problems are that every 50 pages the transfer roller is oiled,
> > > >> >and every time there is an error the printer prints 'Chase" pages to
> > > >> >clean off the drum.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >Finally, there is the problem of preheating the board. A .062  pcb
> > > >> >can fit through the preheater, but I have no idea whether it can heat
> > > >> >the copper fast enough for the wax ink to transfer properly.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >Lots of engineering challenges. I have put a data logger on the
> > > >> >relevant sensors and will now try to make the printer print with
> > > >> >emulated sensors. If that works, I can then see if full thickness
> > > >> >boards can pass. I'll let you know!
> > > >> >
> > > >> >Mark
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >------------------------------------
> > > >> >
> > > >> >Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files,
> > > and Photos:
> > > >> >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBsYahoo! Groups Links
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > >Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, 
> Files, and Photos:
> > > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBsYahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >------------------------------------
> > >
> > >Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, 
> and Photos:
> > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBsYahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------------
>
>Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and Photos:
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBsYahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

Re: Phaser solid ink printers

2012-03-25 by Jkirk3279

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Mark Lerman <mlerman@...> wrote:
>
> 
> In rereading your post, I see that you just wanted to use the printer 
> to transfer the image. It should work, but these machines are very 
> large and unless you use the printer for other things besides pcbs, 
> there is no advantage over toner transfer that I can see. They are 
> fascinating machines, though - I enjoyed dissecting mine!
> 
> Mark
> 

Yes, I just wanted to fast-forward into doing PCB etching and thought the wax would make a good protectant.

Has anybody posted a progress report on wax thermal PCB work?

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.