Yahoo Groups archive

Homebrew PCBs

Index last updated: 2026-04-05 19:38 UTC

Thread

First CNC milled board

First CNC milled board

2011-03-03 by designer_craig

I did my first CNC milled PWB today.  It came out great and far
exceeding my expectations.  The board is a little 3" x 2" solar panel
controller for solar battery charger.   The two layer board was designed
in DipTrace then converted to island milling G-Code by LineGrinder and
cut on my  Mach3 CNC converted Bridgeport mill.   The accuracy of the
milling was amazing.  I was able to drill .022" dia via holes and not
get any break-out  of the .040" dia via pads on the far side.

My bigest limitation is the spindle speed of the BP, at 6800 RPM and I
really need to get some sort of high speed spindle.

I postes some pictures on my Picasa web album:
Pictures of the board:
https://picasaweb.google.com/cschaffter/PCB_Stuff?feat=directlink
<https://picasaweb.google.com/cschaffter/PCB_Stuff?feat=directlink> 
Craig


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] First CNC milled board

2011-03-03 by Erik Knise

Craig,

That looks amazing.  How long did it take for the mill to do it's thing?

On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 8:42 PM, designer_craig <cs6061@...> wrote:

>
> I did my first CNC milled PWB today.  It came out great and far
> exceeding my expectations.  The board is a little 3" x 2" solar panel
> controller for solar battery charger.   The two layer board was designed
> in DipTrace then converted to island milling G-Code by LineGrinder and
> cut on my  Mach3 CNC converted Bridgeport mill.   The accuracy of the
> milling was amazing.  I was able to drill .022" dia via holes and not
> get any break-out  of the .040" dia via pads on the far side.
>
> My bigest limitation is the spindle speed of the BP, at 6800 RPM and I
> really need to get some sort of high speed spindle.
>
> I postes some pictures on my Picasa web album:
> Pictures of the board:
> https://picasaweb.google.com/cschaffter/PCB_Stuff?feat=directlink
> <https://picasaweb.google.com/cschaffter/PCB_Stuff?feat=directlink>
> Craig
>
> --
Erik L. Knise
Pacific Shipping Company
Seattle, WA


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: First CNC milled board

2011-03-03 by designer_craig

I have the cut rate fairly low so it took 16 minutes for the top side and 25 minutes for the bottom side.  For some reason there were a lot of small cuts on the bottom side related to the copper pour that slowed things down.

Craig

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Erik Knise <elknise@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Craig,
> 
> That looks amazing.  How long did it take for the mill to do it's thing?
> 
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 8:42 PM, designer_craig <cs6061@...> wrote:
> 
> >
> > I did my first CNC milled PWB today.  It came out great and far
> > exceeding my expectations.  The board is a little 3" x 2" solar panel
> > controller for solar battery charger.   The two layer board was designed
> > in DipTrace then converted to island milling G-Code by LineGrinder and
> > cut on my  Mach3 CNC converted Bridgeport mill.   The accuracy of the
> > milling was amazing.  I was able to drill .022" dia via holes and not
> > get any break-out  of the .040" dia via pads on the far side.
> >
> > My bigest limitation is the spindle speed of the BP, at 6800 RPM and I
> > really need to get some sort of high speed spindle.
> >
> > I postes some pictures on my Picasa web album:
> > Pictures of the board:
> > https://picasaweb.google.com/cschaffter/PCB_Stuff?feat=directlink
> > <https://picasaweb.google.com/cschaffter/PCB_Stuff?feat=directlink>
> > Craig
> >
> > --
> Erik L. Knise
> Pacific Shipping Company
> Seattle, WA
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Re: First CNC milled board

2011-03-03 by byron.woltman

Craig,
My first milled PCB seemed to take F-O-R-E-V-E-R to mill.  Turned-out
the Gcode was not at all optimized.  After running the Gcode through an
optimizer, my milling time was cut by 60-70%.  See my blog entry for
details
<http://woodworkerbcncrouterproject.blogspot.com/2010/06/gcode-optimizat\
ion.html>  .   If it works for your Gcode, it would be totally worth the
effort.
The results of your milling look outstanding.  I tend to get a lot of
"curling" of the copper
<http://woodworkerbcncrouterproject.blogspot.com/2010/06/pcb-milling-att\
empt-2.html>  at the edges - not sure if it the tool or some operator
issue.  I still need a lot more milling experience, to be sure.

WoodWorkerB

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "designer_craig" <cs6061@...>
wrote:
>
> I have the cut rate fairly low so it took 16 minutes for the top side
and 25 minutes for the bottom side.  For some reason there were a lot of
small cuts on the bottom side related to the copper pour that slowed
things down.
>
> Craig
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: First CNC milled board

2011-03-08 by buckeyes1997

I'm still fine tuning my milling process but its working really well so far.
http://www.allthingsrc.com/cnc/pcb_3.jpg  <--cut with 45deg bit
http://www.allthingsrc.com/cnc/pcb_3.jpg  <--cut with 90deg bit

Matt
 


--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "byron.woltman" <brian.volken@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Craig,
> My first milled PCB seemed to take F-O-R-E-V-E-R to mill.  Turned-out
> the Gcode was not at all optimized.  After running the Gcode through an
> optimizer, my milling time was cut by 60-70%.  See my blog entry for
> details
> <http://woodworkerbcncrouterproject.blogspot.com/2010/06/gcode-optimizat\
> ion.html>  .   If it works for your Gcode, it would be totally worth the
> effort.
> The results of your milling look outstanding.  I tend to get a lot of
> "curling" of the copper
> <http://woodworkerbcncrouterproject.blogspot.com/2010/06/pcb-milling-att\
> empt-2.html>  at the edges - not sure if it the tool or some operator
> issue.  I still need a lot more milling experience, to be sure.
> 
> WoodWorkerB
> 
> --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "designer_craig" <cs6061@>
> wrote:
> >
> > I have the cut rate fairly low so it took 16 minutes for the top side
> and 25 minutes for the bottom side.  For some reason there were a lot of
> small cuts on the bottom side related to the copper pour that slowed
> things down.
> >
> > Craig
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Re: First CNC milled board

2011-03-08 by buckeyes1997

oops wrong link
> http://www.allthingsrc.com/cnc/pcb_1.jpg  <--cut with 90deg bit
> http://www.allthingsrc.com/cnc/pcb_3.jpg  <--cut with 45deg bit


--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "buckeyes1997" <buckeyes1997@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> I'm still fine tuning my milling process but its working really well so far.
> http://www.allthingsrc.com/cnc/pcb_3.jpg  <--cut with 45deg bit
> http://www.allthingsrc.com/cnc/pcb_3.jpg  <--cut with 90deg bit
> 
> Matt
>  
> 
> 
> --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "byron.woltman" <brian.volken@> wrote:
> >
> > Craig,
> > My first milled PCB seemed to take F-O-R-E-V-E-R to mill.  Turned-out
> > the Gcode was not at all optimized.  After running the Gcode through an
> > optimizer, my milling time was cut by 60-70%.  See my blog entry for
> > details
> > <http://woodworkerbcncrouterproject.blogspot.com/2010/06/gcode-optimizat\
> > ion.html>  .   If it works for your Gcode, it would be totally worth the
> > effort.
> > The results of your milling look outstanding.  I tend to get a lot of
> > "curling" of the copper
> > <http://woodworkerbcncrouterproject.blogspot.com/2010/06/pcb-milling-att\
> > empt-2.html>  at the edges - not sure if it the tool or some operator
> > issue.  I still need a lot more milling experience, to be sure.
> > 
> > WoodWorkerB
> > 
> > --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "designer_craig" <cs6061@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I have the cut rate fairly low so it took 16 minutes for the top side
> > and 25 minutes for the bottom side.  For some reason there were a lot of
> > small cuts on the bottom side related to the copper pour that slowed
> > things down.
> > >
> > > Craig
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>

Re: First CNC milled board

2011-03-08 by designer_craig

Matt,
So which bit works best for you?  On my board I used a 60 and it seemed to work fine.  What RPM, DOC and feed rate are you using?
What kind of board stock are you using?

This was my first milled board and I was totally amazed at the quality. I think it was better then when I was doing boards with photo resist and films.

Craig

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "buckeyes1997" <buckeyes1997@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> I'm still fine tuning my milling process but its working really well so far.
> http://www.allthingsrc.com/cnc/pcb_3.jpg  <--cut with 45deg bit
> http://www.allthingsrc.com/cnc/pcb_3.jpg  <--cut with 90deg bit
> 
> Matt
>  
> 
> 
> --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "byron.woltman" <brian.volken@> wrote:
> >
> > Craig,
> > My first milled PCB seemed to take F-O-R-E-V-E-R to mill.  Turned-out
> > the Gcode was not at all optimized.  After running the Gcode through an
> > optimizer, my milling time was cut by 60-70%.  See my blog entry for
> > details
> > <http://woodworkerbcncrouterproject.blogspot.com/2010/06/gcode-optimizat\
> > ion.html>  .   If it works for your Gcode, it would be totally worth the
> > effort.
> > The results of your milling look outstanding.  I tend to get a lot of
> > "curling" of the copper
> > <http://woodworkerbcncrouterproject.blogspot.com/2010/06/pcb-milling-att\
> > empt-2.html>  at the edges - not sure if it the tool or some operator
> > issue.  I still need a lot more milling experience, to be sure.
> > 
> > WoodWorkerB
> > 
> > --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "designer_craig" <cs6061@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I have the cut rate fairly low so it took 16 minutes for the top side
> > and 25 minutes for the bottom side.  For some reason there were a lot of
> > small cuts on the bottom side related to the copper pour that slowed
> > things down.
> > >
> > > Craig
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.