Yahoo Groups archive

Homebrew_PCBs

Index last updated: 2026-03-31 01:30 UTC

Thread

PCBoard trace width

PCBoard trace width

2003-07-20 by Larry

Hi folks. I was just looking at some of the boards in the
photo/files area and i must say thats very good work. None of my
homebrewed boards came out as good as those.
I was just wondering , How narrow can a trace be etched in a
homebrewed board? I'd like to know if anyone has tried running a
trace between the pins of an IC. The reason i ask this is because
there are times when the only solution to running a trace(s) is to
route them between the pads for the IC pins, can this be done?



Net.

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] PCBoard trace width

2003-07-20 by Leon Heller

>From: "Larry" <nettron1000@...>
>Reply-To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
>To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] PCBoard trace width
>Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 12:18:59 -0000
>
> Hi folks. I was just looking at some of the boards in the
>photo/files area and i must say thats very good work. None of my
>homebrewed boards came out as good as those.
> I was just wondering , How narrow can a trace be etched in a
>homebrewed board? I'd like to know if anyone has tried running a
>trace between the pins of an IC. The reason i ask this is because
>there are times when the only solution to running a trace(s) is to
>route them between the pads for the IC pins, can this be done?

I can manage 10/10 design rules, using a LaserJet IIIp. No problems putting
a track between IC pins.

Leon
--
Leon Heller, G1HSM Tel: +44 1424 423947
Email:leon_heller@...
My web page: http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself with cool emoticons - download MSN Messenger today!
http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger

Re: PCBoard trace width

2003-07-20 by ghidera2000

I don't have any problem routing between IC pins. Usually use 8 mil
traces and I use rectangular pads 70 mil across the IC and 40 mil
along it - gives extra space between pads while still leaving lots of
meat to solder into. Works fine with 50 mill circular pads too but
its my soldering that worries me, not the etching :)

Having only recently started etching my own boards I can tell you the
three things that seemed to have the greatest impact on the boards I
made.

1) Overexpose! My kit says 6 minutes, I go 8-10. You'll have to
experiment to see how long you can get away with. Underexposure makes
development harder and you're much more likely to have an invisible
film of resist left over, screwing up your etching. I was worried
that overexposure would screw up my traces but, I've seen zero
degredation of the developed image and a great improvement in the
etched boards.

2) Brush the board while developing. At first I was scared to
actually touch the board with my brush. I just used it to swish the
solution around. Made for long etching times and a fair bit on trace
undercutting (eating the trace from the sides - under the resist).

3) When the board looks developed - its not! Keep brushing for
another minute or so - if you watch carefully you'll still see some
coloured mist coming off the "clean" copper. Thats the invisible scum
that can screw up your boards.

Of course you'll have to experiment a bit to get it right. Make a
small circuit and repeat it several times over a larger board, then
try things out. You'll likely lose a few but the gained experience is
invaluable - like when you etch that 48"x56" 25000pin monstrosity!

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Larry" <nettron1000@y...>
wrote:
> Hi folks. I was just looking at some of the boards in the
> photo/files area and i must say thats very good work. None of my
> homebrewed boards came out as good as those.
> I was just wondering , How narrow can a trace be etched in a
> homebrewed board? I'd like to know if anyone has tried running a
> trace between the pins of an IC. The reason i ask this is because
> there are times when the only solution to running a trace(s) is to
> route them between the pads for the IC pins, can this be done?
>
>
>
> Net.

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] PCBoard trace width

2003-07-20 by Stefan Trethan

track between ic pins (standard dil) is absolutely NO problem.
you can even do this with plotting resist on.

i think with photo process it would be well possible to make two traces
between the pads.
but i never tried because i didn't need.

i always make very long pads for dil ics. up to 4mm long.
but i make them only wide enough to allow some copper at the sides of the
drilled hole left.
so you get a good solder joint and can very easily run a thick track
between pads.
i don't use round pads for dil. i like to have bigger pads, especially with
"experimental" boards, this allows soldering parts in and out
some times if needed and also makes other modifications easier.
with my first boards years ago i sticked to the standard pads set in the
software.
these were designed for throughhole plated boards, thus having only a small
residual ring around the hole.
when i drilled sometimes this ring was broken on one side. you can imagine
the mechanical stability was very poor.
now i use pads of 3mm or so on the simple boards where size doesn't matter.


Also for transistors i often use oblong pads.

i think worst components are 2 row connectors, maybe d-sub connectors and
plcc sockets.
these components often can't have oblong pads because they have multiple
rows of pins.
then i use round pads which are just small enough to run a track between
two.

i hope this helped....

regards
stefan