MG Chemicals negative dry film resist report
2009-05-25 by DJ Delorie
Finally got around to testing the MG Chemicals negative dry film resist. I got a 5'x12" roll for $28 with shipping (shipping cost almost as much as the film!) Lamination: The MG instructions say to dry laminate it, which I did, at 230F. There were a few tiny bubbles, but no worse than I usually get. I might try a larger board to see if holding the film away from the board reduces bubbles. Exposure: 4 minutes in my exposure box (99x 395nm UV LEDs @20mA) holds at 6 on an ST21 gauge. This is less than the Riston film, so will require more exposure time. My LEDs are a bit outside the sweet spot from the spec, but who knows. The MG site doesn't spec exposure other than "12 minutes with our unit", so I'm just guessing at the ideal exposure time - I'll try a longer exposure with a photofilm pattern under it to see what works best in practice. Development: Despite MG claiming it won't work, sodium carbonate works just fine, with development times about the same as the Riston film. Quality: The film quality seems OK (not that I'm an expert). There are a couple of microscopic pinholes in the exposed parts, but that might be my process. Stripping: NaOH stripper works, but not the same way as Riston. With Riston, the film would swell and separate from the pcb so you could see when it was time to take the board out and scrape off the waste film. With MG, the film turns into pudding but *looks* the same. It still scrapes off after the same amount of time, but it's harder to tell when that time is just by looking at it. Overall: The MG site is sorely lacking in specs and details on how to use their film with anything other than their equipment, which is a big negative. However, it seems to work mostly the same as other films, and is available in smaller units than Riston, although the cost/ft is about twice as much.