Yahoo Groups archive

Homebrew_PCBs

Index last updated: 2026-03-31 23:13 UTC

Thread

How I make my PCBs

How I make my PCBs

2003-05-18 by Leon Heller

I've been making my own PCBs at home for about 40 years, starting by
painting the pattern onto single-sided PCB material using a fine
paintbrush and cellulose paint, with ferric chloride or ammonium
persulphate etchant. I used 0.1" graph paper for designing the layout
then marked the holes with a centre punch through the paper onto the
copper surface. I even made a couple of double-sided PCBs using this
technique, by masking off one side, etching the other side, drilling it,
and using the drill holes as a guide when painting on the resist on the
second side. I then masked off the first side with tape to etch the
second side.

When low-cost CAD software became available (I used Easy-PC from Number
One Systems for years) I progressed to printing 2:1 artwork on a dot
matrix printer. I then got a local litho platemaking company to produce
a 1:1 positive transparency that I used with a home-made UV exposure
unit and resist-coated PCB material. When I got an ink jet printer I
found that I could get reasonable results by printing 1:1 artwork onto
tracing paper.

I now use an old LaserJet IIIp I picked up very cheaply to print 1:1
onto LaserStar film and expose the PCBs in a home-made UV exposure unit.
I sometimes use tracing paper (nice and cheap), but find that I get
better results from the LaserStar film. The CAD software I use is
Pulsonix, a professional package out of the same stable as Easy-PC. I
regularly use 12/12 design rules, occasionally going down to 10 mils if
I need to route tracks between IC pads. Rather than conventional
positive-resist FR4 PCB material, I usually use something called FPC-16
which consists of a sandwich of compressed paper between thin layers of
fibreglass. It's cheaper than FR4 and much easier to cut and drill. It's
available from Mega Electronics, as is the LaserStar film.

Etching is in ferric chloride. I place the etchant in a small plastic
food container inside a larger container half-filled with hot water and
continuously agitate the etchant manually by rocking the container.
Etching typically takes 5-10 minutes.

I'm quite pleased with the results. I intend to experiment with
double-sided boards by making a UV exposure unit that can expose both
sides of the PCB simultaneously. With a better printer and vacuum on the
UV exposure unit I think I could get 8 mil tracks quite reliably. I've
heard of other people managing it at home.

Here is an example of one of my PCBs:

http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller/pcb.html

I often use the Pulsonix copper pour facility for this type of board, as
it makes the routing easier. Cross-hatching is better with a laser
printer, as they don't tend to print large black areas very well.

Links:

Mega Electronics: http://www.megaelect.demon.co.uk/
Number One Systems: http://www.numberone.com/
Pulsonix: http://www.pulsonix.com/

Leon
--
Leon Heller, G1HSM
leon_heller@...
http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs

2003-05-18 by Stefan Trethan

nice description.
i have never seen this pcb material here but also have no need for it (have plenty of fr4 for.. well
lets say many years.)
the problem with drilling of fr4 i solve by buying good drill bits at ebay. a guy there (actually a
woman i think) sells lots of them which have been exchanged in precautionary tool exchange.
they are in very good shape, no resharpening required. (they normally break before they get dull - i
hope this improoves with the new drill press).

the cutting i do with a padsaw and a blade which is sold for cutting flagstones.

how do you cut the pcb material?
i know it is possible by this paper-cutter like machine which has a blade that chops it of.
this cutters are also used for sheet metal in a similar construction.

but they are expensive and i also don't like the edges (i have seen a original bungard one and the edges
are broken not cut)

i thought of using a angle grinder with 1mm thick cutting wheel or diamond wheel and fix it somehow
under a small desk but never tried.

any new and nice ideas are very welcome.


have all of you professional pcb drill presses or how do you drill your boards?
(maybe homebuilt ones and a picture of them???)

regrinding drill bits (for pcb) should be possible with a small diamond wheel?
is this true / is this possible & good for one who can regrind a normal drill bit so that it works
again? i have no idea where to get a diamond grinding wheel, has anyone ideas?

regards
stefan

(@ Leon especially:
why have you so small rings around the drill holes?
has this a certain reason or simply do you like it this way?
i make them much bigger because they provide much more mechanical stability then.
i actually like oblong pads at in-line parts (like dil).
they are good to solder and also withstand the one or other soldering out and in again.
)



18.05.2003 13:42:22, "Leon Heller" <leon_heller@...> wrote:

Show quoted textHide quoted text
>I've been making my own PCBs at home for about 40 years, starting by
>painting the pattern onto single-sided PCB material using a fine
>paintbrush and cellulose paint, with ferric chloride or ammonium
>persulphate etchant. I used 0.1" graph paper for designing the layout
>then marked the holes with a centre punch through the paper onto the
>copper surface. I even made a couple of double-sided PCBs using this
>technique, by masking off one side, etching the other side, drilling it,
>and using the drill holes as a guide when painting on the resist on the
>second side. I then masked off the first side with tape to etch the
>second side.
>
>When low-cost CAD software became available (I used Easy-PC from Number
>One Systems for years) I progressed to printing 2:1 artwork on a dot
>matrix printer. I then got a local litho platemaking company to produce
>a 1:1 positive transparency that I used with a home-made UV exposure
>unit and resist-coated PCB material. When I got an ink jet printer I
>found that I could get reasonable results by printing 1:1 artwork onto
>tracing paper.
>
>I now use an old LaserJet IIIp I picked up very cheaply to print 1:1
>onto LaserStar film and expose the PCBs in a home-made UV exposure unit.
>I sometimes use tracing paper (nice and cheap), but find that I get
>better results from the LaserStar film. The CAD software I use is
>Pulsonix, a professional package out of the same stable as Easy-PC. I
>regularly use 12/12 design rules, occasionally going down to 10 mils if
>I need to route tracks between IC pads. Rather than conventional
>positive-resist FR4 PCB material, I usually use something called FPC-16
>which consists of a sandwich of compressed paper between thin layers of
>fibreglass. It's cheaper than FR4 and much easier to cut and drill. It's
>available from Mega Electronics, as is the LaserStar film.
>
>Etching is in ferric chloride. I place the etchant in a small plastic
>food container inside a larger container half-filled with hot water and
>continuously agitate the etchant manually by rocking the container.
>Etching typically takes 5-10 minutes.
>
>I'm quite pleased with the results. I intend to experiment with
>double-sided boards by making a UV exposure unit that can expose both
>sides of the PCB simultaneously. With a better printer and vacuum on the
>UV exposure unit I think I could get 8 mil tracks quite reliably. I've
>heard of other people managing it at home.
>
>Here is an example of one of my PCBs:
>
> http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller/pcb.html
>
>I often use the Pulsonix copper pour facility for this type of board, as
>it makes the routing easier. Cross-hatching is better with a laser
>printer, as they don't tend to print large black areas very well.
>
>Links:
>
>Mega Electronics: http://www.megaelect.demon.co.uk/
>Number One Systems: http://www.numberone.com/
>Pulsonix: http://www.pulsonix.com/
>
>Leon
>--
>Leon Heller, G1HSM
>leon_heller@...
>http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller
>
>
>Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and files:
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs

2003-05-18 by Hans Wedemeyer

Leon,
good advice except for Easy-PC....
I spent full price on that program and found I wasted my money.
Here's what I think of Easy-PC
http://hans-w.com/ezpcbugs.html

I moved on to EAGLE and have been happy with it. It's STABLE does not
blow up cause me to lose work=time=money.

A limited version of EAGLE is available for Free, it is limited to two
sided board and size check it out at
http://www.cadsoftusa.com
EAGLE has a VAST library of part and users add parts all the time.
Compared EAGLE parts Library to to Easy-PC several 1000 to 1

I put Easy-PC up for sale on eBay but none wanted it. In fact I put my
entire collection of Numberone product in the same auction
Filter program, Easy-PC for DOS and for Windows and the digital
simulator Pulsar. INo one reached my minimum Price of $200 ! It's still
here in a box onthe floor, I think I'll use the disks and CD's for
target practice sometime...

Here's one thing that is not (was not)( they may have fixed it by now)
possible to do with Easy-PC for Wndows, in a situation where top and
bottom layers have parallel tracks sections that overlap, and a whole
bunch of closely spaced via's or other pads, it is not possible to put
the cursor on the trace/pad that I want for move/edit. It just snaps to
the nearest and of course that is not handy at all ! I can turn snap off
but that is not what it's all about.
EAGLE allows ANY pad/trace on any layer to be individually selected even
if they are overlapping.

Pulsonix used to look like Easy-PC, I think they are the same bunch...
Although Pulsonix used to give the schematic editor away for free, the
PCB layout part is high $$$$ ! That's much like saying "this car is
free, but the special wheel cost $20,000 each "

I'll get off my soap boix now...

I make double side board all the time. I used to do it the way you
mentioned, and even wrote a program for my CNC mill to compensate for
alignment problems.
I found a better way by printing on transparencies and then aligning
them visually, then stapling them together. Then slide the board in
between the transparencies and sandwich the whole lot between two plates
of glass, and place the sandwich between two lamps
http://hans-w.com/setupforexposure.jpg
and
http://hans-w.com/twolampexposure.jpg
Credit for this sandwich idea goes to
http://www.electricstuff.co.uk/pcbs.html

Alignment between top and bottom is good. Perhaps the greatest problem
I've run into is the HP LaserJet making different print sizes when I
mirror the one side.
I used to worry about getting the printed side of the transparency close
to the PCB, after testing with 5 mil lines I decided there is NO need to
mirror. Using the exposure as I how in my photo it allows me to do 5 mil
lines all day everyday.

Thanks for all the tips.
Best Regards
Hans Wedemeyer


Leon Heller wrote:

> I've been making my own PCBs at home for about 40 years, starting by
> painting the pattern onto single-sided PCB material using a fine
> paintbrush and cellulose paint, with ferric chloride or ammonium
> persulphate etchant. I used 0.1" graph paper for designing the layout
> then marked the holes with a centre punch through the paper onto the
> copper surface. I even made a couple of double-sided PCBs using this
> technique, by masking off one side, etching the other side, drilling
> it,
> and using the drill holes as a guide when painting on the resist on
> the
> second side. I then masked off the first side with tape to etch the
> second side.
>
> When low-cost CAD software became available (I used Easy-PC from
> Number
> One Systems for years) I progressed to printing 2:1 artwork on a dot
> matrix printer. I then got a local litho platemaking company to
> produce
> a 1:1 positive transparency that I used with a home-made UV exposure
> unit and resist-coated PCB material. When I got an ink jet printer I
> found that I could get reasonable results by printing 1:1 artwork onto
>
> tracing paper.
>
> I now use an old LaserJet IIIp I picked up very cheaply to print 1:1
> onto LaserStar film and expose the PCBs in a home-made UV exposure
> unit.
> I sometimes use tracing paper (nice and cheap), but find that I get
> better results from the LaserStar film. The CAD software I use is
> Pulsonix, a professional package out of the same stable as Easy-PC. I
> regularly use 12/12 design rules, occasionally going down to 10 mils
> if
> I need to route tracks between IC pads. Rather than conventional
> positive-resist FR4 PCB material, I usually use something called
> FPC-16
> which consists of a sandwich of compressed paper between thin layers
> of
> fibreglass. It's cheaper than FR4 and much easier to cut and drill.
> It's
> available from Mega Electronics, as is the LaserStar film.
>
> Etching is in ferric chloride. I place the etchant in a small plastic
> food container inside a larger container half-filled with hot water
> and
> continuously agitate the etchant manually by rocking the container.
> Etching typically takes 5-10 minutes.
>
> I'm quite pleased with the results. I intend to experiment with
> double-sided boards by making a UV exposure unit that can expose both
> sides of the PCB simultaneously. With a better printer and vacuum on
> the
> UV exposure unit I think I could get 8 mil tracks quite reliably. I've
>
> heard of other people managing it at home.
>
> Here is an example of one of my PCBs:
>
> http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller/pcb.html
>
> I often use the Pulsonix copper pour facility for this type of board,
> as
> it makes the routing easier. Cross-hatching is better with a laser
> printer, as they don't tend to print large black areas very well.
>
> Links:
>
> Mega Electronics: http://www.megaelect.demon.co.uk/
> Number One Systems: http://www.numberone.com/
> Pulsonix: http://www.pulsonix.com/
>
> Leon
> --
> Leon Heller, G1HSM
> leon_heller@...
> http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
[Click Here!]

Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and files:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs

2003-05-18 by Chris Graham

Hans Wedemeyer wrote:

> I make double side board all the time. I used to do it the way you
> mentioned, and even wrote a program for my CNC mill to compensate for
> alignment problems.
> I found a better way by printing on transparencies and then aligning
> them visually, then stapling them together. Then slide the board in
> between the transparencies and sandwich the whole lot between two plates
> of glass, and place the sandwich between two lamps

I make boards almost exactly the same way, also using Eagle. I print with a
Brother 5040 laser printer at 1200 dpi on overhead transparency slides.
I've made double sided boards down to 10 mil traces.

I decided to go with Eagle (even though I don't really like its user
interface because of) its stability, the extensive parts libraries, and the
very active support and user forums. Even if I don't find the exact part I
want in an Eagle library I can usually find something close that I can start
with - much easier than starting from scratch on a new part. And if I have a
question or problem I've always been able to get a quick answer on one of
the forums.

Regarding printing transparencies, one minor irritation I'd like to overcome
is that dark areas on the slides aren't as opaque as I'd like, and I've
needed to double up the top and bottom transparencies, for a stack of four,
which is a little tricky to align and keep aligned.

What media do other people print slides on?

Also, I read somewhere of someone who printed "transparencies" on normal
paper and then made them more transparent by spraying them with some
solution (maybe spray silicone?). These resulted in very opaque dark areas.
They needed somewhat longer than normal exposures, but produced excellent
boards. I now can't find where I read this, and would love to know the
details of the process. Are any of you familiar with this?

- Chris Graham

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs

2003-05-18 by Hans Wedemeyer

Chris,
I've done a lot of tests and found the following transparencies to work
well
3M CG3300 is good down to 10 mil
Appolo CG7060 does 5 mil all the time.

I understand what people say about LaserJet not doing well on large
surface areas. I can see through the large areas and at first ( many
years ago) I used to worry about it.
The first thing to check is the printer settings. I found HP had a
setting for "Economy Printing" and it defaults to that every time.
I simply goto the setting box and uncheck that feature and print at
600dpi
The next step is exposure, as you can see in the photos I use two 500W
GE lamps at about 6 inches. Exposure time is 70 Seconds.
I develop using Lye (in U.S.A. Red Devil Lye) at a mixture that gives me
clear visible copper in about 60-90 seconds.
During Developing it is possible to remove the board from the Lye and
rinse it in clear water, inspect with magnifier and if there is still a
trace of resist simply put it back in the Lye and continue developing.
This works every time. I reuse the Lye and it lasts for months and
months in a TupperWare container. My Ferric Chloride is about 6-7 years
old and still going strong.
Example ( I posted before) http://hans-w.com/pcb_harwin_rivets.jpg which
also shows Harwin pins and how I rivet them, notice the large surafce
area is solid and not pitted.
I use CoolAmp silver plating powder to coat the boards, this is cheap on
a per board basis, but will cost about $50 to get started, 1/4lb jar of
it.
A 1/4lb jar lasts a long long time. There is a product called something
like Tin-It, I've tried it, and it's a mess. It does not last long after
mixing and therefore becomes expensive on a per board basis.

Best Regards
Hans Wedemeyer

Chris Graham wrote:

Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Hans Wedemeyer wrote:
>
> > I make double side board all the time. I used to do it the way you
> > mentioned, and even wrote a program for my CNC mill to compensate
> for
> > alignment problems.
> > I found a better way by printing on transparencies and then aligning
>
> > them visually, then stapling them together. Then slide the board in
> > between the transparencies and sandwich the whole lot between two
> plates
> > of glass, and place the sandwich between two lamps
>
> I make boards almost exactly the same way, also using Eagle. I print
> with a
> Brother 5040 laser printer at 1200 dpi on overhead transparency
> slides.
> I've made double sided boards down to 10 mil traces.
>
> I decided to go with Eagle (even though I don't really like its user
> interface because of) its stability, the extensive parts libraries,
> and the
> very active support and user forums. Even if I don't find the exact
> part I
> want in an Eagle library I can usually find something close that I can
> start
> with - much easier than starting from scratch on a new part. And if I
> have a
> question or problem I've always been able to get a quick answer on one
> of
> the forums.
>
> Regarding printing transparencies, one minor irritation I'd like to
> overcome
> is that dark areas on the slides aren't as opaque as I'd like, and
> I've
> needed to double up the top and bottom transparencies, for a stack of
> four,
> which is a little tricky to align and keep aligned.
>
> What media do other people print slides on?
>
> Also, I read somewhere of someone who printed "transparencies" on
> normal
> paper and then made them more transparent by spraying them with some
> solution (maybe spray silicone?). These resulted in very opaque dark
> areas.
> They needed somewhat longer than normal exposures, but produced
> excellent
> boards. I now can't find where I read this, and would love to know
> the
> details of the process. Are any of you familiar with this?
>
> - Chris Graham
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor


>
> Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and files:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs

2003-05-18 by Leon Heller

>From: Stefan Trethan <stefan_trethan@...>
>Reply-To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
>To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs
>Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 16:33:34 +0200
>
>nice description.
>i have never seen this pcb material here but also have no need for it (have
>plenty of fr4 for.. well
>lets say many years.)
>the problem with drilling of fr4 i solve by buying good drill bits at ebay.
>a guy there (actually a
>woman i think) sells lots of them which have been exchanged in
>precautionary tool exchange.
>they are in very good shape, no resharpening required. (they normally break
>before they get dull - i
>hope this improoves with the new drill press).
>
>the cutting i do with a padsaw and a blade which is sold for cutting
>flagstones.
>
>how do you cut the pcb material?

I scribe it on both sides as a guide, then score it with a Stanley knife. It
then snaps quite cleanly.


Leon
--
Leon Heller, G1HSM Tel: +44 1424 423947
Email:leon_heller@...
My web page: http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller

_________________________________________________________________
Use MSN Messenger to send music and pics to your friends
http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs

2003-05-18 by Leon Heller

>From: Chris Graham <Chrisgr@...>
>Reply-To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
>To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs
>Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 08:15:40 -0700
>
>Hans Wedemeyer wrote:
>
> > I make double side board all the time. I used to do it the way you
> > mentioned, and even wrote a program for my CNC mill to compensate for
> > alignment problems.
> > I found a better way by printing on transparencies and then aligning
> > them visually, then stapling them together. Then slide the board in
> > between the transparencies and sandwich the whole lot between two plates
> > of glass, and place the sandwich between two lamps
>
>I make boards almost exactly the same way, also using Eagle. I print with
>a
>Brother 5040 laser printer at 1200 dpi on overhead transparency slides.
>I've made double sided boards down to 10 mil traces.
>
>I decided to go with Eagle (even though I don't really like its user
>interface because of) its stability, the extensive parts libraries, and
>the
>very active support and user forums. Even if I don't find the exact part I
>want in an Eagle library I can usually find something close that I can
>start
>with - much easier than starting from scratch on a new part. And if I have
>a
>question or problem I've always been able to get a quick answer on one of
>the forums.
>
>Regarding printing transparencies, one minor irritation I'd like to
>overcome
>is that dark areas on the slides aren't as opaque as I'd like, and I've
>needed to double up the top and bottom transparencies, for a stack of four,
>which is a little tricky to align and keep aligned.
>
>What media do other people print slides on?
>
>Also, I read somewhere of someone who printed "transparencies" on normal
>paper and then made them more transparent by spraying them with some
>solution (maybe spray silicone?). These resulted in very opaque dark
>areas.
>They needed somewhat longer than normal exposures, but produced excellent
>boards. I now can't find where I read this, and would love to know the
>details of the process. Are any of you familiar with this?


ESR (http://www.esr.co.uk) sells a spray to make paper transparent. I
haven't tried it. I've heard of people using cooking oil, and tried it once;
it works, but is a bit messy.


Leon
--
Leon Heller, G1HSM Tel: +44 1424 423947
Email:leon_heller@...
My web page: http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller

_________________________________________________________________
It's fast, it's easy and it's free. Get MSN Messenger today!
http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs

2003-05-18 by Neil

On Sunday 18 May 2003 09:33, Stefan Trethan scribbled:
> how do you cut the pcb material?
> ....
> any new and nice ideas are very welcome.

Haven't tried the paper cutter method, but it seems to work for many people.
I use either a hacksaw (takes time), then clean up with a flat-file. Or a
pair of paramedic scissors (really fast, and can cut curves). I've also used
a roto-zip (with a rotary cutting bit) to cut complex curves. Works well,
but messy.


Show quoted textHide quoted text
> have all of you professional pcb drill presses or how do you drill your
> boards? (maybe homebuilt ones and a picture of them???)

Tried a dremel tool with the Dremel drill-press attachment. Was too wobbly
for any precise work, so I dumped it and got a real drill press. Harbor
freight has a 50% off sale, so I paid $40 for the drill press. Much cheaper,
and sturdier than the dremel solution. Yes, it is slower, but works
excellent still.

For drill bits, I use Harbor Freight's 20-pc grab bag of carbide bits. It's a
*random* assortment, but even if I get only 10 useable sizes, it's worth it
for US$5. Never had any go dull, but I've broken a couple due to my mistake
of moving the board during drilling.

I'm very happy with my setup now.

Cheers,
-Neil.

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs

2003-05-18 by Stefan Trethan

i have the spray "pausklar 21" here.
this is a light oil which smells like the oil in orange peelings.

it should make the paper transparent (to uv).

i used it quite a while, because my laser is poor on transparency.
but the results are not that good.

the problem is because it is a fluid it builds small "lakes" between the paper/ pcb and paper/glass.
because of reflection etc. this "lakes" have other light transmitting value then the areas where a small
gap of air is in between.
this shows up very strong when developing.
also if you expose with a hot lamp the pcb gets hot too and there appear bubbles of air between the
layers even if you have put that much spray on it to get the whole area filled with oil.

i can not recommend this method, i think it is not good for (semi-)prefessional use.
maybe it gets better if you let the paper dry some minutes to get excess oil evaporating.

the oil also dissolves toner.
if you expose it with a hot lamp (the pcb only gets warm so that you still can touch) and when the time
is elapsed you peel of the paper the traces stick partially to the pcb.


(if you let the oil completely dry up the paper looks like before without oil applicated)

as a conclusion i can say it is possible to get it working.
i don't wat to make any confirmations about the possible trace with. i remember doing 0,3 or even 0,2
millimeter with it. (space between wider but won't be the limit).
but you really have to know how your developer works and you have to cope with several disadvantages.


if one wants to use photopositive process i can only suggest not to make it that weak and messy and less
powerful with trying to use this oil.
good transparencys are a better idea.
(if no way: i read of process using transparent (photo)film and printing on paper. then exposing
transparent film with artwork on paper lying on it for only some seconds (without oil but i think
water). this short time is because of sensitivity of film.
disadvantages obvios: expensive and darkroom work.)

but there is one REALLY GOOD USE FOR THE OIL:

it is the finest stuff for removing the rests of the covering foil on the pcb.
i had some pretty old stuff where the black cover didn't come of good at the edges.
the oil was a wonderful solvent for this sticky stuff but leaves alone the photopositive layer.

maybe it is a good solvent for other sticker residues too... never tried...

regards
stefan









18.05.2003 18:47:18, "Leon Heller" <leon_heller@...> wrote:

Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
>
>>From: Chris Graham <Chrisgr@...>
>>Reply-To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
>>To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
>>Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs
>>Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 08:15:40 -0700
>>
>>Hans Wedemeyer wrote:
>>
>> > I make double side board all the time. I used to do it the way you
>> > mentioned, and even wrote a program for my CNC mill to compensate for
>> > alignment problems.
>> > I found a better way by printing on transparencies and then aligning
>> > them visually, then stapling them together. Then slide the board in
>> > between the transparencies and sandwich the whole lot between two plates
>> > of glass, and place the sandwich between two lamps
>>
>>I make boards almost exactly the same way, also using Eagle. I print with
>>a
>>Brother 5040 laser printer at 1200 dpi on overhead transparency slides.
>>I've made double sided boards down to 10 mil traces.
>>
>>I decided to go with Eagle (even though I don't really like its user
>>interface because of) its stability, the extensive parts libraries, and
>>the
>>very active support and user forums. Even if I don't find the exact part I
>>want in an Eagle library I can usually find something close that I can
>>start
>>with - much easier than starting from scratch on a new part. And if I have
>>a
>>question or problem I've always been able to get a quick answer on one of
>>the forums.
>>
>>Regarding printing transparencies, one minor irritation I'd like to
>>overcome
>>is that dark areas on the slides aren't as opaque as I'd like, and I've
>>needed to double up the top and bottom transparencies, for a stack of four,
>>which is a little tricky to align and keep aligned.
>>
>>What media do other people print slides on?
>>
>>Also, I read somewhere of someone who printed "transparencies" on normal
>>paper and then made them more transparent by spraying them with some
>>solution (maybe spray silicone?). These resulted in very opaque dark
>>areas.
>>They needed somewhat longer than normal exposures, but produced excellent
>>boards. I now can't find where I read this, and would love to know the
>>details of the process. Are any of you familiar with this?
>
>
>ESR (http://www.esr.co.uk) sells a spray to make paper transparent. I
>haven't tried it. I've heard of people using cooking oil, and tried it once;
>it works, but is a bit messy.
>
>
>Leon
>--
>Leon Heller, G1HSM Tel: +44 1424 423947
>Email:leon_heller@...
>My web page: http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>It's fast, it's easy and it's free. Get MSN Messenger today!
>http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger
>
>
>
>Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and files:
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs

2003-05-18 by Mike Putnam

Hans,
I looked at the picture of your UV exposure setup. I just wanted to comment
that I would never use the round bulb. Use the florescent tubes and your
results will be better. I have found that the round bulb tends to give more
exposure in the center than at the outer edges. Even more apparent with
larger boards. This is the reason all exposure units sold on the market use
the florescent tube. You can compensate somewhat by having the bulb not so
close, but this just increases your exposure time. The other bad thing about
the round bulb is the heat. This will actually get in the way of your
process, depending upon what type of photo etch you are using. I am trying
to recall if it was a problem caused to the developer or if it was a
consistency problem in the exposure. Nevertheless, I found it to be a
problem several years back. If you modify your design to use the florescent
bulbs, you will notice a marked difference in detail as well as less
exposure time needed.
-Mike

----- Original Message -----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "Hans Wedemeyer" <hans@...>
To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2003 7:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs


> Leon,
> good advice except for Easy-PC....
> I spent full price on that program and found I wasted my money.
> Here's what I think of Easy-PC
> http://hans-w.com/ezpcbugs.html
>
> I moved on to EAGLE and have been happy with it. It's STABLE does not
> blow up cause me to lose work=time=money.
>
> A limited version of EAGLE is available for Free, it is limited to two
> sided board and size check it out at
> http://www.cadsoftusa.com
> EAGLE has a VAST library of part and users add parts all the time.
> Compared EAGLE parts Library to to Easy-PC several 1000 to 1
>
> I put Easy-PC up for sale on eBay but none wanted it. In fact I put my
> entire collection of Numberone product in the same auction
> Filter program, Easy-PC for DOS and for Windows and the digital
> simulator Pulsar. INo one reached my minimum Price of $200 ! It's still
> here in a box onthe floor, I think I'll use the disks and CD's for
> target practice sometime...
>
> Here's one thing that is not (was not)( they may have fixed it by now)
> possible to do with Easy-PC for Wndows, in a situation where top and
> bottom layers have parallel tracks sections that overlap, and a whole
> bunch of closely spaced via's or other pads, it is not possible to put
> the cursor on the trace/pad that I want for move/edit. It just snaps to
> the nearest and of course that is not handy at all ! I can turn snap off
> but that is not what it's all about.
> EAGLE allows ANY pad/trace on any layer to be individually selected even
> if they are overlapping.
>
> Pulsonix used to look like Easy-PC, I think they are the same bunch...
> Although Pulsonix used to give the schematic editor away for free, the
> PCB layout part is high $$$$ ! That's much like saying "this car is
> free, but the special wheel cost $20,000 each "
>
> I'll get off my soap boix now...
>
> I make double side board all the time. I used to do it the way you
> mentioned, and even wrote a program for my CNC mill to compensate for
> alignment problems.
> I found a better way by printing on transparencies and then aligning
> them visually, then stapling them together. Then slide the board in
> between the transparencies and sandwich the whole lot between two plates
> of glass, and place the sandwich between two lamps
> http://hans-w.com/setupforexposure.jpg
> and
> http://hans-w.com/twolampexposure.jpg
> Credit for this sandwich idea goes to
> http://www.electricstuff.co.uk/pcbs.html
>
> Alignment between top and bottom is good. Perhaps the greatest problem
> I've run into is the HP LaserJet making different print sizes when I
> mirror the one side.
> I used to worry about getting the printed side of the transparency close
> to the PCB, after testing with 5 mil lines I decided there is NO need to
> mirror. Using the exposure as I how in my photo it allows me to do 5 mil
> lines all day everyday.
>
> Thanks for all the tips.
> Best Regards
> Hans Wedemeyer
>
>
> Leon Heller wrote:
>
> > I've been making my own PCBs at home for about 40 years, starting by
> > painting the pattern onto single-sided PCB material using a fine
> > paintbrush and cellulose paint, with ferric chloride or ammonium
> > persulphate etchant. I used 0.1" graph paper for designing the layout
> > then marked the holes with a centre punch through the paper onto the
> > copper surface. I even made a couple of double-sided PCBs using this
> > technique, by masking off one side, etching the other side, drilling
> > it,
> > and using the drill holes as a guide when painting on the resist on
> > the
> > second side. I then masked off the first side with tape to etch the
> > second side.
> >
> > When low-cost CAD software became available (I used Easy-PC from
> > Number
> > One Systems for years) I progressed to printing 2:1 artwork on a dot
> > matrix printer. I then got a local litho platemaking company to
> > produce
> > a 1:1 positive transparency that I used with a home-made UV exposure
> > unit and resist-coated PCB material. When I got an ink jet printer I
> > found that I could get reasonable results by printing 1:1 artwork onto
> >
> > tracing paper.
> >
> > I now use an old LaserJet IIIp I picked up very cheaply to print 1:1
> > onto LaserStar film and expose the PCBs in a home-made UV exposure
> > unit.
> > I sometimes use tracing paper (nice and cheap), but find that I get
> > better results from the LaserStar film. The CAD software I use is
> > Pulsonix, a professional package out of the same stable as Easy-PC. I
> > regularly use 12/12 design rules, occasionally going down to 10 mils
> > if
> > I need to route tracks between IC pads. Rather than conventional
> > positive-resist FR4 PCB material, I usually use something called
> > FPC-16
> > which consists of a sandwich of compressed paper between thin layers
> > of
> > fibreglass. It's cheaper than FR4 and much easier to cut and drill.
> > It's
> > available from Mega Electronics, as is the LaserStar film.
> >
> > Etching is in ferric chloride. I place the etchant in a small plastic
> > food container inside a larger container half-filled with hot water
> > and
> > continuously agitate the etchant manually by rocking the container.
> > Etching typically takes 5-10 minutes.
> >
> > I'm quite pleased with the results. I intend to experiment with
> > double-sided boards by making a UV exposure unit that can expose both
> > sides of the PCB simultaneously. With a better printer and vacuum on
> > the
> > UV exposure unit I think I could get 8 mil tracks quite reliably. I've
> >
> > heard of other people managing it at home.
> >
> > Here is an example of one of my PCBs:
> >
> > http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller/pcb.html
> >
> > I often use the Pulsonix copper pour facility for this type of board,
> > as
> > it makes the routing easier. Cross-hatching is better with a laser
> > printer, as they don't tend to print large black areas very well.
> >
> > Links:
> >
> > Mega Electronics: http://www.megaelect.demon.co.uk/
> > Number One Systems: http://www.numberone.com/
> > Pulsonix: http://www.pulsonix.com/
> >
> > Leon
> > --
> > Leon Heller, G1HSM
> > leon_heller@...
> > http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
> [Click Here!]
>
> >
> > Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and files:
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and files:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs

2003-05-18 by Hans Wedemeyer

Mike,
H'mm as I have pretty good looking boards and can do 5 mil all day long
!

Here's an example http://hans-w.com/pcb_harwin_rivets.jpg

I've only been using Round Bulbs of various types for about 27
years......
I like the short exposure time and never have noticed the effect you
menitoned, my largest board size
is about 6"X7" and it exposed uniformly.

Just what is it about my boards that you think would make them any
better ? Please explain !

Hans Wedemeyer


Mike Putnam wrote:

Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Hans,
> I looked at the picture of your UV exposure setup. I just wanted to
> comment
> that I would never use the round bulb. Use the florescent tubes and
> your
> results will be better. I have found that the round bulb tends to give
> more
> exposure in the center than at the outer edges. Even more apparent
> with
> larger boards. This is the reason all exposure units sold on the
> market use
> the florescent tube. You can compensate somewhat by having the bulb
> not so
> close, but this just increases your exposure time. The other bad thing
> about
> the round bulb is the heat. This will actually get in the way of your
> process, depending upon what type of photo etch you are using. I am
> trying
> to recall if it was a problem caused to the developer or if it was a
> consistency problem in the exposure. Nevertheless, I found it to be a
> problem several years back. If you modify your design to use the
> florescent
> bulbs, you will notice a marked difference in detail as well as less
> exposure time needed.
> -Mike
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Hans Wedemeyer" <hans@...>
> To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2003 7:41 AM
> Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs
>
>
> > Leon,
> > good advice except for Easy-PC....
> > I spent full price on that program and found I wasted my money.
> > Here's what I think of Easy-PC
> > http://hans-w.com/ezpcbugs.html
> >
> > I moved on to EAGLE and have been happy with it. It's STABLE does
> not
> > blow up cause me to lose work=time=money.
> >
> > A limited version of EAGLE is available for Free, it is limited to
> two
> > sided board and size check it out at
> > http://www.cadsoftusa.com
> > EAGLE has a VAST library of part and users add parts all the time.
> > Compared EAGLE parts Library to to Easy-PC several 1000 to 1
> >
> > I put Easy-PC up for sale on eBay but none wanted it. In fact I put
> my
> > entire collection of Numberone product in the same auction
> > Filter program, Easy-PC for DOS and for Windows and the digital
> > simulator Pulsar. INo one reached my minimum Price of $200 ! It's
> still
> > here in a box onthe floor, I think I'll use the disks and CD's for
> > target practice sometime...
> >
> > Here's one thing that is not (was not)( they may have fixed it by
> now)
> > possible to do with Easy-PC for Wndows, in a situation where top and
>
> > bottom layers have parallel tracks sections that overlap, and a
> whole
> > bunch of closely spaced via's or other pads, it is not possible to
> put
> > the cursor on the trace/pad that I want for move/edit. It just snaps
> to
> > the nearest and of course that is not handy at all ! I can turn snap
> off
> > but that is not what it's all about.
> > EAGLE allows ANY pad/trace on any layer to be individually selected
> even
> > if they are overlapping.
> >
> > Pulsonix used to look like Easy-PC, I think they are the same
> bunch...
> > Although Pulsonix used to give the schematic editor away for free,
> the
> > PCB layout part is high $$$$ ! That's much like saying "this car is
>
> > free, but the special wheel cost $20,000 each "
> >
> > I'll get off my soap boix now...
> >
> > I make double side board all the time. I used to do it the way you
> > mentioned, and even wrote a program for my CNC mill to compensate
> for
> > alignment problems.
> > I found a better way by printing on transparencies and then aligning
>
> > them visually, then stapling them together. Then slide the board in
> > between the transparencies and sandwich the whole lot between two
> plates
> > of glass, and place the sandwich between two lamps
> > http://hans-w.com/setupforexposure.jpg
> > and
> > http://hans-w.com/twolampexposure.jpg
> > Credit for this sandwich idea goes to
> > http://www.electricstuff.co.uk/pcbs.html
> >
> > Alignment between top and bottom is good. Perhaps the greatest
> problem
> > I've run into is the HP LaserJet making different print sizes when I
>
> > mirror the one side.
> > I used to worry about getting the printed side of the transparency
> close
> > to the PCB, after testing with 5 mil lines I decided there is NO
> need to
> > mirror. Using the exposure as I how in my photo it allows me to do 5
> mil
> > lines all day everyday.
> >
> > Thanks for all the tips.
> > Best Regards
> > Hans Wedemeyer
> >
> >
> > Leon Heller wrote:
> >
> > > I've been making my own PCBs at home for about 40 years, starting
> by
> > > painting the pattern onto single-sided PCB material using a fine
> > > paintbrush and cellulose paint, with ferric chloride or ammonium
> > > persulphate etchant. I used 0.1" graph paper for designing the
> layout
> > > then marked the holes with a centre punch through the paper onto
> the
> > > copper surface. I even made a couple of double-sided PCBs using
> this
> > > technique, by masking off one side, etching the other side,
> drilling
> > > it,
> > > and using the drill holes as a guide when painting on the resist
> on
> > > the
> > > second side. I then masked off the first side with tape to etch
> the
> > > second side.
> > >
> > > When low-cost CAD software became available (I used Easy-PC from
> > > Number
> > > One Systems for years) I progressed to printing 2:1 artwork on a
> dot
> > > matrix printer. I then got a local litho platemaking company to
> > > produce
> > > a 1:1 positive transparency that I used with a home-made UV
> exposure
> > > unit and resist-coated PCB material. When I got an ink jet printer
> I
> > > found that I could get reasonable results by printing 1:1 artwork
> onto
> > >
> > > tracing paper.
> > >
> > > I now use an old LaserJet IIIp I picked up very cheaply to print
> 1:1
> > > onto LaserStar film and expose the PCBs in a home-made UV exposure
>
> > > unit.
> > > I sometimes use tracing paper (nice and cheap), but find that I
> get
> > > better results from the LaserStar film. The CAD software I use is
> > > Pulsonix, a professional package out of the same stable as
> Easy-PC. I
> > > regularly use 12/12 design rules, occasionally going down to 10
> mils
> > > if
> > > I need to route tracks between IC pads. Rather than conventional
> > > positive-resist FR4 PCB material, I usually use something called
> > > FPC-16
> > > which consists of a sandwich of compressed paper between thin
> layers
> > > of
> > > fibreglass. It's cheaper than FR4 and much easier to cut and
> drill.
> > > It's
> > > available from Mega Electronics, as is the LaserStar film.
> > >
> > > Etching is in ferric chloride. I place the etchant in a small
> plastic
> > > food container inside a larger container half-filled with hot
> water
> > > and
> > > continuously agitate the etchant manually by rocking the
> container.
> > > Etching typically takes 5-10 minutes.
> > >
> > > I'm quite pleased with the results. I intend to experiment with
> > > double-sided boards by making a UV exposure unit that can expose
> both
> > > sides of the PCB simultaneously. With a better printer and vacuum
> on
> > > the
> > > UV exposure unit I think I could get 8 mil tracks quite reliably.
> I've
> > >
> > > heard of other people managing it at home.
> > >
> > > Here is an example of one of my PCBs:
> > >
> > > http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller/pcb.html
> > >
> > > I often use the Pulsonix copper pour facility for this type of
> board,
> > > as
> > > it makes the routing easier. Cross-hatching is better with a laser
>
> > > printer, as they don't tend to print large black areas very well.
> > >
> > > Links:
> > >
> > > Mega Electronics: http://www.megaelect.demon.co.uk/
> > > Number One Systems: http://www.numberone.com/
> > > Pulsonix: http://www.pulsonix.com/
> > >
> > > Leon
> > > --
> > > Leon Heller, G1HSM
> > > leon_heller@...
> > > http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > ADVERTISEMENT
> > [Click Here!]
> >
> > >
> > > Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and
> files:
> > >
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and
> files:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor



>
> Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and files:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs

2003-05-18 by Zoran A. Scepanovic

Hello Stefan,

18. May 2003, 21:20:47, you wrote:

ST> it is nice to see this here.
ST> i have also seen this effect of stronger exposure in the center.
ST> i have used a setup with distance about the same as pcb with.
ST> i used a nitraphot 200W photo exposure lamp.

ST> i think this gets only visible if you have the exposure time on the too short edge.
ST> i never again have seen this error (but i increased distance, made smaller pcb, and had to increase
ST> exposure time).

ST> the nitraphot is also no good lamp for exposure.

ST> but there is a reason for using a point light source:
ST> if you use some fluorescent tubes you have a wide area of light emitting surface.
ST> if you look at one point at the film/pcb you can see different lightbeams fall on it, from different
ST> angles. if your film does not perfectly lie down on the pcb it will make a "washed out" edge there. this
ST> would make the tracks smaller. each pcb has some sort of uneven surface. i think this also depends on
ST> your overall setup how strong this effect is (and on pcb quality).

ST> a friend of mine uses because of this effect a setup with a daylight halogene bulb.
ST> this bulb is relatively cheap (75eur) and works directly from mains.
ST> but you would need a fan with this, it gets very hot.

For EUR 75.00 you can make more than one exposure unit that I described
in reply on one other post in this thread.

2 (two) UV-A fluorescent lamps made by Philips: EUR 5.00
2 (two) pairs of lamp holders with integrated starter holder: EUR 1.50
2 (two) 20W fluo ballasts: EUR 5.00
Some wires for interconnecting, some MDF for box, mains cable,
homebrew countown timer with PIC microcontroller: EUR 30.00
=========
TOTAL: EUR 41.50

Don't hold me for all the prices that I've mentioned because I can not
dig through all my sent messages where (on this forum) I gave all the
prices for the stuff that I've bought.

--
Best Regards,
Zoran
mailto:zasto@...
www.zas-elmed.co.yu

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: How I make my PCBs

2003-05-18 by Zoran A. Scepanovic

Hello bjeff65,

18. May 2003, 21:01:39, you wrote:
(my comments mixed)


b> So I've decided to put it in the form of a question:

b> If you needed to put together a positive photoresist exposure setup
b> for small PCBs (no bigger than 4" x 6") and your only option are from
b> the typical home improvement store/department (think Home Depot,
b> Lowe's, Walmart, etc.)
b> what would you choose and why?

b> To assist in your answer I'll list some of the options that I've seen:

b> * Standard incandecents
I do not recommend.

b> * Standard/Daylight flourescents.
I do not recommend.

b> * Black light incandecents
b> * Black light flourescents
These may work.

b> * Plant grow light incandecents/flourescents
Never tried.

b> * Halogen
b> * Floods of all types.
b> * Compact flourescents
b> * Germicidal flourescents (not really an option, but interested in
b> comments)
Never use them if you are not wearing protective googles that absorb UV-C
spectrum

I can not remember at the moment for the good link discusing the spectral
sensitivity of the photo resists, but all the informations that I've read
are stating that the max. sensitivity is around 340 nm, or UV-A part of
spectrum (under which you can get some tan without the burns caused by
UV-B). UV-C, from germicidal lamps, can cause the irrecoverable damage to
your eyes, so stay as far as possible from them (unless you need to erase
some UV-EPROMS).

My typical setup is as follows:
* Two fluorescent UV lamps (Philips) that are declared to have the peak
radiation value around 340 nm, placed in the wooden box, cca 11 cm
apart, with homebrew reflectors.
* Exposure time (determined with the 21 step Stoufer wedge) from 20 cm
distance: 5 min.
* I'm always using presensitized (spelling?) boards that I'm obtaining
in the local electronic shop.
* Developer: 7-10 gm/l Lye in pelets.
* Developing time cca. 2 min.
* Etchant: Fe3Cl solution
* Developing tank: homebrew one (similar to the Techno-Isel) vertical
with heater and air bubbler (porous teflon tube, often used for fish
tanks - made in Taiwan)
* Etching time cca. 10-15 minutes

For typical design for exposing unit, best is to visit:
www.thinktink.com , but my exposing unit is without colimating grid, and
I'm able to produce the 8/8 boards if needed be. The Fluorescents can be
easily obtained from local Philips or Osram rep. All ypu have to ask are
the fluo's for the solarium's.

And for the transparencies, I'm using services from one graphic design
buro, where the owner is a friend of mine, and all my artworks are made
on thye graphical film, directly from the PostScript files.





--
Best Regards,
Zoran
mailto:zasto@...
www.zas-elmed.co.yu

Re: How I make my PCBs

2003-05-18 by bjeff65

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Putnam" wrote:

> Hans,
> I looked at the picture of your UV exposure setup. I just wanted to
comment
> that I would never use the round bulb. Use the florescent tubes and your
> results will be better. I have found that the round bulb tends to
give more
> exposure in the center than at the outer edges. Even more apparent with
> larger boards. This is the reason all exposure units sold on the
market use
> the florescent tube. You can compensate somewhat by having the bulb
not so
> close, but this just increases your exposure time. The other bad
thing about
> the round bulb is the heat. This will actually get in the way of your
> process, depending upon what type of photo etch you are using. I am
trying
> to recall if it was a problem caused to the developer or if it was a
> consistency problem in the exposure. Nevertheless, I found it to be a
> problem several years back. If you modify your design to use the
florescent
> bulbs, you will notice a marked difference in detail as well as less
> exposure time needed.
> -Mike

Mike,

This seems like a great place to jump in. I'm very carefully trying to
get into the
homebrew photofab business and exposure is what I'm currently
researching. The problem with it is that there are so many options.
It's become clear to me that almost any strong light will do the job.
But I'm having a problem determining what is the best options in terms
of cost, efficiency, and availability. And oddly enough after
reading/skimming most of the nearly 2000 posts in this group there
doesn't seem to be a clear cut definitive answer.

So I've decided to put it in the form of a question:

If you needed to put together a positive photoresist exposure setup
for small PCBs (no bigger than 4" x 6") and your only option are from
the typical home improvement store/department (think Home Depot,
Lowe's, Walmart, etc.)
what would you choose and why?

To assist in your answer I'll list some of the options that I've seen:

* Standard incandecents
* Standard/Daylight flourescents.
* Black light incandecents
* Black light flourescents
* Plant grow light incandecents/flourescents
* Halogen
* Floods of all types.
* Compact flourescents
* Germicidal flourescents (not really an option, but interested in
comments)

I know I'm probably overthinking the problem. But frankly no light
bulb manufacturer gives any real indication of what wavelength and
what power their bulbs emit. So there's an overwhelming number of choices.

Now that being said I'd like to offer up for comment my ideal setup,
which Mike has already given partial comment on above. In an ideal
world I'd like to have 5 50W black light incandecents organized in a X
pattern using standard incandecent sockets. It would be the winner in
the cost and availablity criteria because I can set it up for about
$10 in Home Depot/WalMart parts. However in all of my reading I
haven't yet gotten clarity of how well it'll actually expose. And
frankly I'm fearful of screwing up and buying the wrong setup.

BTW for starting out I purchased the MG Chemicals Photofab kit:

http://www.mgchemicals.com/products/416k.html

Which has everything to get started short of transparancies and you
guessed it
exposure lights. BTW their instructions here:

http://www.mgchemicals.com/techsupport/photo_inst.html

suggest using 18" flourescents. But I'd be interested in something
better and/or
cheaper if possible.

Comments?

BAJ

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs

2003-05-18 by Stefan Trethan

it is nice to see this here.
i have also seen this effect of stronger exposure in the center.
i have used a setup with distance about the same as pcb with.
i used a nitraphot 200W photo exposure lamp.

i think this gets only visible if you have the exposure time on the too short edge.
i never again have seen this error (but i increased distance, made smaller pcb, and had to increase
exposure time).

the nitraphot is also no good lamp for exposure.

but there is a reason for using a point light source:
if you use some fluorescent tubes you have a wide area of light emitting surface.
if you look at one point at the film/pcb you can see different lightbeams fall on it, from different
angles. if your film does not perfectly lie down on the pcb it will make a "washed out" edge there. this
would make the tracks smaller. each pcb has some sort of uneven surface. i think this also depends on
your overall setup how strong this effect is (and on pcb quality).

a friend of mine uses because of this effect a setup with a daylight halogene bulb.
this bulb is relatively cheap (75eur) and works directly from mains.
but you would need a fan with this, it gets very hot.

this i think is the only reason for using a point source is better.


i have seen some description for making the light of the fluorescent tubes more parallel at think and
tinker i believe (not sure).


it is fine this setup works fine for you, i only wanted to say that i have also seen the problem with
stronger exposed center (you also can calculate this) but i found it only happening in "borderline"
cases.


regards
stefan







18.05.2003 20:52:25, Hans Wedemeyer <hans@...> wrote:

Show quoted textHide quoted text
>Mike,
>H'mm as I have pretty good looking boards and can do 5 mil all day long
>!
>
>Here's an example http://hans-w.com/pcb_harwin_rivets.jpg
>
>I've only been using Round Bulbs of various types for about 27
>years......
>I like the short exposure time and never have noticed the effect you
>menitoned, my largest board size
>is about 6"X7" and it exposed uniformly.
>
>Just what is it about my boards that you think would make them any
>better ? Please explain !
>
>Hans Wedemeyer
>
>
>Mike Putnam wrote:
>
>> Hans,
>> I looked at the picture of your UV exposure setup. I just wanted to
>> comment
>> that I would never use the round bulb. Use the florescent tubes and
>> your
>> results will be better. I have found that the round bulb tends to give
>> more
>> exposure in the center than at the outer edges. Even more apparent
>> with
>> larger boards. This is the reason all exposure units sold on the
>> market use
>> the florescent tube. You can compensate somewhat by having the bulb
>> not so
>> close, but this just increases your exposure time. The other bad thing
>> about
>> the round bulb is the heat. This will actually get in the way of your
>> process, depending upon what type of photo etch you are using. I am
>> trying
>> to recall if it was a problem caused to the developer or if it was a
>> consistency problem in the exposure. Nevertheless, I found it to be a
>> problem several years back. If you modify your design to use the
>> florescent
>> bulbs, you will notice a marked difference in detail as well as less
>> exposure time needed.
>> -Mike
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Hans Wedemeyer" <hans@...>
>> To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com>
>> Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2003 7:41 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs
>>
>>
>> > Leon,
>> > good advice except for Easy-PC....
>> > I spent full price on that program and found I wasted my money.
>> > Here's what I think of Easy-PC
>> > http://hans-w.com/ezpcbugs.html
>> >
>> > I moved on to EAGLE and have been happy with it. It's STABLE does
>> not
>> > blow up cause me to lose work=time=money.
>> >
>> > A limited version of EAGLE is available for Free, it is limited to
>> two
>> > sided board and size check it out at
>> > http://www.cadsoftusa.com
>> > EAGLE has a VAST library of part and users add parts all the time.
>> > Compared EAGLE parts Library to to Easy-PC several 1000 to 1
>> >
>> > I put Easy-PC up for sale on eBay but none wanted it. In fact I put
>> my
>> > entire collection of Numberone product in the same auction
>> > Filter program, Easy-PC for DOS and for Windows and the digital
>> > simulator Pulsar. INo one reached my minimum Price of $200 ! It's
>> still
>> > here in a box onthe floor, I think I'll use the disks and CD's for
>> > target practice sometime...
>> >
>> > Here's one thing that is not (was not)( they may have fixed it by
>> now)
>> > possible to do with Easy-PC for Wndows, in a situation where top and
>>
>> > bottom layers have parallel tracks sections that overlap, and a
>> whole
>> > bunch of closely spaced via's or other pads, it is not possible to
>> put
>> > the cursor on the trace/pad that I want for move/edit. It just snaps
>> to
>> > the nearest and of course that is not handy at all ! I can turn snap
>> off
>> > but that is not what it's all about.
>> > EAGLE allows ANY pad/trace on any layer to be individually selected
>> even
>> > if they are overlapping.
>> >
>> > Pulsonix used to look like Easy-PC, I think they are the same
>> bunch...
>> > Although Pulsonix used to give the schematic editor away for free,
>> the
>> > PCB layout part is high $$$$ ! That's much like saying "this car is
>>
>> > free, but the special wheel cost $20,000 each "
>> >
>> > I'll get off my soap boix now...
>> >
>> > I make double side board all the time. I used to do it the way you
>> > mentioned, and even wrote a program for my CNC mill to compensate
>> for
>> > alignment problems.
>> > I found a better way by printing on transparencies and then aligning
>>
>> > them visually, then stapling them together. Then slide the board in
>> > between the transparencies and sandwich the whole lot between two
>> plates
>> > of glass, and place the sandwich between two lamps
>> > http://hans-w.com/setupforexposure.jpg
>> > and
>> > http://hans-w.com/twolampexposure.jpg
>> > Credit for this sandwich idea goes to
>> > http://www.electricstuff.co.uk/pcbs.html
>> >
>> > Alignment between top and bottom is good. Perhaps the greatest
>> problem
>> > I've run into is the HP LaserJet making different print sizes when I
>>
>> > mirror the one side.
>> > I used to worry about getting the printed side of the transparency
>> close
>> > to the PCB, after testing with 5 mil lines I decided there is NO
>> need to
>> > mirror. Using the exposure as I how in my photo it allows me to do 5
>> mil
>> > lines all day everyday.
>> >
>> > Thanks for all the tips.
>> > Best Regards
>> > Hans Wedemeyer
>> >
>> >
>> > Leon Heller wrote:
>> >
>> > > I've been making my own PCBs at home for about 40 years, starting
>> by
>> > > painting the pattern onto single-sided PCB material using a fine
>> > > paintbrush and cellulose paint, with ferric chloride or ammonium
>> > > persulphate etchant. I used 0.1" graph paper for designing the
>> layout
>> > > then marked the holes with a centre punch through the paper onto
>> the
>> > > copper surface. I even made a couple of double-sided PCBs using
>> this
>> > > technique, by masking off one side, etching the other side,
>> drilling
>> > > it,
>> > > and using the drill holes as a guide when painting on the resist
>> on
>> > > the
>> > > second side. I then masked off the first side with tape to etch
>> the
>> > > second side.
>> > >
>> > > When low-cost CAD software became available (I used Easy-PC from
>> > > Number
>> > > One Systems for years) I progressed to printing 2:1 artwork on a
>> dot
>> > > matrix printer. I then got a local litho platemaking company to
>> > > produce
>> > > a 1:1 positive transparency that I used with a home-made UV
>> exposure
>> > > unit and resist-coated PCB material. When I got an ink jet printer
>> I
>> > > found that I could get reasonable results by printing 1:1 artwork
>> onto
>> > >
>> > > tracing paper.
>> > >
>> > > I now use an old LaserJet IIIp I picked up very cheaply to print
>> 1:1
>> > > onto LaserStar film and expose the PCBs in a home-made UV exposure
>>
>> > > unit.
>> > > I sometimes use tracing paper (nice and cheap), but find that I
>> get
>> > > better results from the LaserStar film. The CAD software I use is
>> > > Pulsonix, a professional package out of the same stable as
>> Easy-PC. I
>> > > regularly use 12/12 design rules, occasionally going down to 10
>> mils
>> > > if
>> > > I need to route tracks between IC pads. Rather than conventional
>> > > positive-resist FR4 PCB material, I usually use something called
>> > > FPC-16
>> > > which consists of a sandwich of compressed paper between thin
>> layers
>> > > of
>> > > fibreglass. It's cheaper than FR4 and much easier to cut and
>> drill.
>> > > It's
>> > > available from Mega Electronics, as is the LaserStar film.
>> > >
>> > > Etching is in ferric chloride. I place the etchant in a small
>> plastic
>> > > food container inside a larger container half-filled with hot
>> water
>> > > and
>> > > continuously agitate the etchant manually by rocking the
>> container.
>> > > Etching typically takes 5-10 minutes.
>> > >
>> > > I'm quite pleased with the results. I intend to experiment with
>> > > double-sided boards by making a UV exposure unit that can expose
>> both
>> > > sides of the PCB simultaneously. With a better printer and vacuum
>> on
>> > > the
>> > > UV exposure unit I think I could get 8 mil tracks quite reliably.
>> I've
>> > >
>> > > heard of other people managing it at home.
>> > >
>> > > Here is an example of one of my PCBs:
>> > >
>> > > http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller/pcb.html
>> > >
>> > > I often use the Pulsonix copper pour facility for this type of
>> board,
>> > > as
>> > > it makes the routing easier. Cross-hatching is better with a laser
>>
>> > > printer, as they don't tend to print large black areas very well.
>> > >
>> > > Links:
>> > >
>> > > Mega Electronics: http://www.megaelect.demon.co.uk/
>> > > Number One Systems: http://www.numberone.com/
>> > > Pulsonix: http://www.pulsonix.com/
>> > >
>> > > Leon
>> > > --
>> > > Leon Heller, G1HSM
>> > > leon_heller@...
>> > > http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller
>> > >
>> > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>> > ADVERTISEMENT
>> > [Click Here!]
>> >
>> > >
>> > > Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and
>> files:
>> > >
>> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
>> > >
>> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>> > > Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
>> Service.
>> >
>> >
>> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and
>> files:
>> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
>> >
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>> > Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
>
>
>>
>> Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and files:
>>
>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>> Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>>
>>
>>
>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and files:
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs

2003-05-18 by JanRwl@AOL.COM

In a message dated 5/18/2003 9:32:17 AM Central Standard Time,
stefan_trethan@... writes:

> any new and nice ideas are very welcome.
>
>
> have all of you professional pcb drill presses or how do you drill your
> boards? (maybe homebuilt ones and a picture of them???)
>
> regrinding drill bits (for pcb) should be possible with a small diamond
> wheel? is this true / is this possible &good for one who can regrind a
> normal drill bit so that it works again?

Stephan:

To your first question: WOW, you would be talking close to $100,000 (U.S.!)
for a "professional PCB drill press", I think! At least the one CNC 4-quill
job I saw in operation at a local PCB shop. Now, if you mean just a manual
drill-press one could use to MANUALLY drill a prototype board, I have never
seen one with an adequate-quality quill. The quill-bearings would have to be
at least ABEC-7 for that! I bought ONE such bearing to rebuild a tiny 400
Hz/3-Ø motor I used to MAKE a PCB-drill, and WOW, talk about PRICEY! The
precision and concentricity of a quill must be MIND-BOGGLINGLY close to give
ANY life at all to PCB-drills! And the "attack" and feed-rate must be
properly set, as well.

Yes, PCB drills ARE re-sharpened with small diamond wheels, but again, you
are talking about some very fine drill-bit tipping equipment, NOT just the
diamond-wheel! The results you can get from manually touching a tip to a
diamond-wheel on a small "grinder motor" will vary so wildly you will wonder
if any "sharpening" is taking place, at all!

Now, the frustration of the first ¶ above inspired ME to brew my OWN "PCB
Drill", and control that with a now-LONG-discontinued CBM "PET" computer (see
photo). But I did that in '84! Were I to do another (or rebuild that one,
when it finally fails, which may be soon! Argh!), I would design the
"electronics" to work with a "PC", as those can be had now for less than the
postage necessary to GET them delivered to the door!

So look at the photo: <A HREF="http://photos.groups.yahoo.com/group/cad_cam_edm_dro/vwp?.dir=/Home-brew+CNC+lathe&.src=gr&.dnm=PET-Controlled+X-Y+PCB-Drill.jpg&.view=t&.done=http%3a//photos.groups.yahoo.com/group/cad_cam_edm_dro/lst%3f%26.dir=/Home-brew%2bCNC%2blathe%26.src=gr%26.view=t">PET-Controlled X-Y PCB-Drill</A>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: How I make my PCBs

2003-05-18 by John Myszkowski

I can shed some light on the bulb wavelength...

All regular incadescent bulbs have very little UV generating ability.
They come in coated versions where mostly deep purple (black light)
is seen. That bulb will basically generate a lot of heat (infra red)
and very little UV. You can take the regular house bulb and paint it
deep purple to give the same result. The only way to get the bulb to
give out sufficient amount of UV is to get a high power bulb (ie.
500Watts), but that also generates an enormous amount of unwanted
heat.

Incadescent, Halogen bulbs do produce a high level of UV light. The
power is dependent on the size of the fillament and voltage applied.
These bulbs generates the full spectrum of colours, but with a heavy
emphasis on the UV. That is why lights utilizing the Halogen bulb are
required (by law) to have a UV filter in front of the bulb. Regular
window glass blocks most UV, but passes visible and most IR.
Halogen lights come in all powers from 5Watts all the way up to
1000's of Watts. The material that makes up the "glass" of the bulb
is quartz, that is why they are often called "quartz hallogen".

Fuorescent bulbs. These bulbs, when totally uncoated generate only
(Mostly) UV. Extremely little visible light is generated by the
fluorescent tube (when uncoated). The visible portion of light coming
from the fluorescent tube is generated by the fluorescence of the
various powders that coat the inner surface of the tube.
The wavelength generated by the tube (other than UV) is determined by
the composition of that powder.
ALL fluorescent bulbs generate UV, but the everyday bulbs sold for
home use have a powder coating that both blocks the UV as well as
generates only visible "white" light.
The power of these tubes is determined by the length and diameter of
the tube (plasma guide). Therefore, if the tube is the same length
and diameter as a normal 40Watt tube, then it is a 40Watt tube.

In order to reduce the IR effects, or the heat from the high power
lights you can simply use a fan to dissipate the heat. You can also
be more high tech and use a IR blocking filter that passes UV only,
but that is usually cost prohibitive for most people.


John M...
=================

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs

2003-05-18 by Mike Putnam

Hans,
Don't take it wrong. I have been in the business for many years and only
wanted to give you some tips. Feel free to ignore them.
-Mike

----- Original Message -----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "Hans Wedemeyer" <hans@...>
To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2003 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs


> Mike,
> H'mm as I have pretty good looking boards and can do 5 mil all day long
> !
>
> Here's an example http://hans-w.com/pcb_harwin_rivets.jpg
>
> I've only been using Round Bulbs of various types for about 27
> years......
> I like the short exposure time and never have noticed the effect you
> menitoned, my largest board size
> is about 6"X7" and it exposed uniformly.
>
> Just what is it about my boards that you think would make them any
> better ? Please explain !
>
> Hans Wedemeyer
>
>
> Mike Putnam wrote:
>
> > Hans,
> > I looked at the picture of your UV exposure setup. I just wanted to
> > comment
> > that I would never use the round bulb. Use the florescent tubes and
> > your
> > results will be better. I have found that the round bulb tends to give
> > more
> > exposure in the center than at the outer edges. Even more apparent
> > with
> > larger boards. This is the reason all exposure units sold on the
> > market use
> > the florescent tube. You can compensate somewhat by having the bulb
> > not so
> > close, but this just increases your exposure time. The other bad thing
> > about
> > the round bulb is the heat. This will actually get in the way of your
> > process, depending upon what type of photo etch you are using. I am
> > trying
> > to recall if it was a problem caused to the developer or if it was a
> > consistency problem in the exposure. Nevertheless, I found it to be a
> > problem several years back. If you modify your design to use the
> > florescent
> > bulbs, you will notice a marked difference in detail as well as less
> > exposure time needed.
> > -Mike
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Hans Wedemeyer" <hans@...>
> > To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2003 7:41 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs
> >
> >
> > > Leon,
> > > good advice except for Easy-PC....
> > > I spent full price on that program and found I wasted my money.
> > > Here's what I think of Easy-PC
> > > http://hans-w.com/ezpcbugs.html
> > >
> > > I moved on to EAGLE and have been happy with it. It's STABLE does
> > not
> > > blow up cause me to lose work=time=money.
> > >
> > > A limited version of EAGLE is available for Free, it is limited to
> > two
> > > sided board and size check it out at
> > > http://www.cadsoftusa.com
> > > EAGLE has a VAST library of part and users add parts all the time.
> > > Compared EAGLE parts Library to to Easy-PC several 1000 to 1
> > >
> > > I put Easy-PC up for sale on eBay but none wanted it. In fact I put
> > my
> > > entire collection of Numberone product in the same auction
> > > Filter program, Easy-PC for DOS and for Windows and the digital
> > > simulator Pulsar. INo one reached my minimum Price of $200 ! It's
> > still
> > > here in a box onthe floor, I think I'll use the disks and CD's for
> > > target practice sometime...
> > >
> > > Here's one thing that is not (was not)( they may have fixed it by
> > now)
> > > possible to do with Easy-PC for Wndows, in a situation where top and
> >
> > > bottom layers have parallel tracks sections that overlap, and a
> > whole
> > > bunch of closely spaced via's or other pads, it is not possible to
> > put
> > > the cursor on the trace/pad that I want for move/edit. It just snaps
> > to
> > > the nearest and of course that is not handy at all ! I can turn snap
> > off
> > > but that is not what it's all about.
> > > EAGLE allows ANY pad/trace on any layer to be individually selected
> > even
> > > if they are overlapping.
> > >
> > > Pulsonix used to look like Easy-PC, I think they are the same
> > bunch...
> > > Although Pulsonix used to give the schematic editor away for free,
> > the
> > > PCB layout part is high $$$$ ! That's much like saying "this car is
> >
> > > free, but the special wheel cost $20,000 each "
> > >
> > > I'll get off my soap boix now...
> > >
> > > I make double side board all the time. I used to do it the way you
> > > mentioned, and even wrote a program for my CNC mill to compensate
> > for
> > > alignment problems.
> > > I found a better way by printing on transparencies and then aligning
> >
> > > them visually, then stapling them together. Then slide the board in
> > > between the transparencies and sandwich the whole lot between two
> > plates
> > > of glass, and place the sandwich between two lamps
> > > http://hans-w.com/setupforexposure.jpg
> > > and
> > > http://hans-w.com/twolampexposure.jpg
> > > Credit for this sandwich idea goes to
> > > http://www.electricstuff.co.uk/pcbs.html
> > >
> > > Alignment between top and bottom is good. Perhaps the greatest
> > problem
> > > I've run into is the HP LaserJet making different print sizes when I
> >
> > > mirror the one side.
> > > I used to worry about getting the printed side of the transparency
> > close
> > > to the PCB, after testing with 5 mil lines I decided there is NO
> > need to
> > > mirror. Using the exposure as I how in my photo it allows me to do 5
> > mil
> > > lines all day everyday.
> > >
> > > Thanks for all the tips.
> > > Best Regards
> > > Hans Wedemeyer
> > >
> > >
> > > Leon Heller wrote:
> > >
> > > > I've been making my own PCBs at home for about 40 years, starting
> > by
> > > > painting the pattern onto single-sided PCB material using a fine
> > > > paintbrush and cellulose paint, with ferric chloride or ammonium
> > > > persulphate etchant. I used 0.1" graph paper for designing the
> > layout
> > > > then marked the holes with a centre punch through the paper onto
> > the
> > > > copper surface. I even made a couple of double-sided PCBs using
> > this
> > > > technique, by masking off one side, etching the other side,
> > drilling
> > > > it,
> > > > and using the drill holes as a guide when painting on the resist
> > on
> > > > the
> > > > second side. I then masked off the first side with tape to etch
> > the
> > > > second side.
> > > >
> > > > When low-cost CAD software became available (I used Easy-PC from
> > > > Number
> > > > One Systems for years) I progressed to printing 2:1 artwork on a
> > dot
> > > > matrix printer. I then got a local litho platemaking company to
> > > > produce
> > > > a 1:1 positive transparency that I used with a home-made UV
> > exposure
> > > > unit and resist-coated PCB material. When I got an ink jet printer
> > I
> > > > found that I could get reasonable results by printing 1:1 artwork
> > onto
> > > >
> > > > tracing paper.
> > > >
> > > > I now use an old LaserJet IIIp I picked up very cheaply to print
> > 1:1
> > > > onto LaserStar film and expose the PCBs in a home-made UV exposure
> >
> > > > unit.
> > > > I sometimes use tracing paper (nice and cheap), but find that I
> > get
> > > > better results from the LaserStar film. The CAD software I use is
> > > > Pulsonix, a professional package out of the same stable as
> > Easy-PC. I
> > > > regularly use 12/12 design rules, occasionally going down to 10
> > mils
> > > > if
> > > > I need to route tracks between IC pads. Rather than conventional
> > > > positive-resist FR4 PCB material, I usually use something called
> > > > FPC-16
> > > > which consists of a sandwich of compressed paper between thin
> > layers
> > > > of
> > > > fibreglass. It's cheaper than FR4 and much easier to cut and
> > drill.
> > > > It's
> > > > available from Mega Electronics, as is the LaserStar film.
> > > >
> > > > Etching is in ferric chloride. I place the etchant in a small
> > plastic
> > > > food container inside a larger container half-filled with hot
> > water
> > > > and
> > > > continuously agitate the etchant manually by rocking the
> > container.
> > > > Etching typically takes 5-10 minutes.
> > > >
> > > > I'm quite pleased with the results. I intend to experiment with
> > > > double-sided boards by making a UV exposure unit that can expose
> > both
> > > > sides of the PCB simultaneously. With a better printer and vacuum
> > on
> > > > the
> > > > UV exposure unit I think I could get 8 mil tracks quite reliably.
> > I've
> > > >
> > > > heard of other people managing it at home.
> > > >
> > > > Here is an example of one of my PCBs:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller/pcb.html
> > > >
> > > > I often use the Pulsonix copper pour facility for this type of
> > board,
> > > > as
> > > > it makes the routing easier. Cross-hatching is better with a laser
> >
> > > > printer, as they don't tend to print large black areas very well.
> > > >
> > > > Links:
> > > >
> > > > Mega Electronics: http://www.megaelect.demon.co.uk/
> > > > Number One Systems: http://www.numberone.com/
> > > > Pulsonix: http://www.pulsonix.com/
> > > >
> > > > Leon
> > > > --
> > > > Leon Heller, G1HSM
> > > > leon_heller@...
> > > > http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller
> > > >
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > > ADVERTISEMENT
> > > [Click Here!]
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and
> > files:
> > > >
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > > Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> > Service.
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and
> > files:
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
>
>
> >
> > Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and files:
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and files:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

Re: How I make my PCBs

2003-05-19 by bjeff65

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "John Myszkowski"
<myszka_us2000@y...> wrote:
> I can shed some light on the bulb wavelength...
>
> All regular incadescent bulbs have very little UV generating ability.
> [edited for brevity]
>
> Incadescent, Halogen bulbs do produce a high level of UV light.
> [again edited for brevity]
>
> Fuorescent bulbs. These bulbs, when totally uncoated generate only
> (Mostly) UV. Extremely little visible light is generated by the
> fluorescent tube (when uncoated). The visible portion of light coming
> from the fluorescent tube is generated by the fluorescence of the
> various powders that coat the inner surface of the tube.
> The wavelength generated by the tube (other than UV) is determined by
> the composition of that powder.
> ALL fluorescent bulbs generate UV, but the everyday bulbs sold for
> home use have a powder coating that both blocks the UV as well as
> generates only visible "white" light.
> The power of these tubes is determined by the length and diameter of
> the tube (plasma guide). Therefore, if the tube is the same length
> and diameter as a normal 40Watt tube, then it is a 40Watt tube.
>
>
> John M...

John,

Thanks for enlightening me! I find it almost amazing with such a clear
disparity
between the possible sources that I really haven't seen such a clear
explanation until now.

So my original question has a definitive answer: Get a fluorescent
black light bulb. Period. End of discussion. It's easy to extrapolate
from your discussion
above that a BL or BLB fluorescent bulb is coated to filter the
visible light and allow the UV-A through.

I've found an interesting site in my continuing search for info. Of
all places it's a Halloween haunted house type site. It talks about
Black Light sources and has a pointer to what I would now consider the
Holy Grail: compact fluorescent black lights. You can find it here:

http://wolfstone.halloweenhost.com/TechBase/bltgen_BlacklightGeneration.html

So unless someone has compelling evidence to the contrary, I plan to
build my light box using a pair of 12 in BLB fluorescents which are
easily found at the Home Depot or WalMart.

Thanks for the help,

BAJ
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> ================

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs

2003-05-19 by Pancary

see my pcb ploter at www.geocities.com\pancary


----- Original Message -----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Hans Wedemeyer <hans@...>
To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2003 3:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs


> Mike,
> H'mm as I have pretty good looking boards and can do 5 mil all day long
> !
>
> Here's an example http://hans-w.com/pcb_harwin_rivets.jpg
>
> I've only been using Round Bulbs of various types for about 27
> years......
> I like the short exposure time and never have noticed the effect you
> menitoned, my largest board size
> is about 6"X7" and it exposed uniformly.
>
> Just what is it about my boards that you think would make them any
> better ? Please explain !
>
> Hans Wedemeyer
>
>
> Mike Putnam wrote:
>
> > Hans,
> > I looked at the picture of your UV exposure setup. I just wanted to
> > comment
> > that I would never use the round bulb. Use the florescent tubes and
> > your
> > results will be better. I have found that the round bulb tends to give
> > more
> > exposure in the center than at the outer edges. Even more apparent
> > with
> > larger boards. This is the reason all exposure units sold on the
> > market use
> > the florescent tube. You can compensate somewhat by having the bulb
> > not so
> > close, but this just increases your exposure time. The other bad thing
> > about
> > the round bulb is the heat. This will actually get in the way of your
> > process, depending upon what type of photo etch you are using. I am
> > trying
> > to recall if it was a problem caused to the developer or if it was a
> > consistency problem in the exposure. Nevertheless, I found it to be a
> > problem several years back. If you modify your design to use the
> > florescent
> > bulbs, you will notice a marked difference in detail as well as less
> > exposure time needed.
> > -Mike
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Hans Wedemeyer" <hans@...>
> > To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2003 7:41 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs
> >
> >
> > > Leon,
> > > good advice except for Easy-PC....
> > > I spent full price on that program and found I wasted my money.
> > > Here's what I think of Easy-PC
> > > http://hans-w.com/ezpcbugs.html
> > >
> > > I moved on to EAGLE and have been happy with it. It's STABLE does
> > not
> > > blow up cause me to lose work=time=money.
> > >
> > > A limited version of EAGLE is available for Free, it is limited to
> > two
> > > sided board and size check it out at
> > > http://www.cadsoftusa.com
> > > EAGLE has a VAST library of part and users add parts all the time.
> > > Compared EAGLE parts Library to to Easy-PC several 1000 to 1
> > >
> > > I put Easy-PC up for sale on eBay but none wanted it. In fact I put
> > my
> > > entire collection of Numberone product in the same auction
> > > Filter program, Easy-PC for DOS and for Windows and the digital
> > > simulator Pulsar. INo one reached my minimum Price of $200 ! It's
> > still
> > > here in a box onthe floor, I think I'll use the disks and CD's for
> > > target practice sometime...
> > >
> > > Here's one thing that is not (was not)( they may have fixed it by
> > now)
> > > possible to do with Easy-PC for Wndows, in a situation where top and
> >
> > > bottom layers have parallel tracks sections that overlap, and a
> > whole
> > > bunch of closely spaced via's or other pads, it is not possible to
> > put
> > > the cursor on the trace/pad that I want for move/edit. It just snaps
> > to
> > > the nearest and of course that is not handy at all ! I can turn snap
> > off
> > > but that is not what it's all about.
> > > EAGLE allows ANY pad/trace on any layer to be individually selected
> > even
> > > if they are overlapping.
> > >
> > > Pulsonix used to look like Easy-PC, I think they are the same
> > bunch...
> > > Although Pulsonix used to give the schematic editor away for free,
> > the
> > > PCB layout part is high $$$$ ! That's much like saying "this car is
> >
> > > free, but the special wheel cost $20,000 each "
> > >
> > > I'll get off my soap boix now...
> > >
> > > I make double side board all the time. I used to do it the way you
> > > mentioned, and even wrote a program for my CNC mill to compensate
> > for
> > > alignment problems.
> > > I found a better way by printing on transparencies and then aligning
> >
> > > them visually, then stapling them together. Then slide the board in
> > > between the transparencies and sandwich the whole lot between two
> > plates
> > > of glass, and place the sandwich between two lamps
> > > http://hans-w.com/setupforexposure.jpg
> > > and
> > > http://hans-w.com/twolampexposure.jpg
> > > Credit for this sandwich idea goes to
> > > http://www.electricstuff.co.uk/pcbs.html
> > >
> > > Alignment between top and bottom is good. Perhaps the greatest
> > problem
> > > I've run into is the HP LaserJet making different print sizes when I
> >
> > > mirror the one side.
> > > I used to worry about getting the printed side of the transparency
> > close
> > > to the PCB, after testing with 5 mil lines I decided there is NO
> > need to
> > > mirror. Using the exposure as I how in my photo it allows me to do 5
> > mil
> > > lines all day everyday.
> > >
> > > Thanks for all the tips.
> > > Best Regards
> > > Hans Wedemeyer
> > >
> > >
> > > Leon Heller wrote:
> > >
> > > > I've been making my own PCBs at home for about 40 years, starting
> > by
> > > > painting the pattern onto single-sided PCB material using a fine
> > > > paintbrush and cellulose paint, with ferric chloride or ammonium
> > > > persulphate etchant. I used 0.1" graph paper for designing the
> > layout
> > > > then marked the holes with a centre punch through the paper onto
> > the
> > > > copper surface. I even made a couple of double-sided PCBs using
> > this
> > > > technique, by masking off one side, etching the other side,
> > drilling
> > > > it,
> > > > and using the drill holes as a guide when painting on the resist
> > on
> > > > the
> > > > second side. I then masked off the first side with tape to etch
> > the
> > > > second side.
> > > >
> > > > When low-cost CAD software became available (I used Easy-PC from
> > > > Number
> > > > One Systems for years) I progressed to printing 2:1 artwork on a
> > dot
> > > > matrix printer. I then got a local litho platemaking company to
> > > > produce
> > > > a 1:1 positive transparency that I used with a home-made UV
> > exposure
> > > > unit and resist-coated PCB material. When I got an ink jet printer
> > I
> > > > found that I could get reasonable results by printing 1:1 artwork
> > onto
> > > >
> > > > tracing paper.
> > > >
> > > > I now use an old LaserJet IIIp I picked up very cheaply to print
> > 1:1
> > > > onto LaserStar film and expose the PCBs in a home-made UV exposure
> >
> > > > unit.
> > > > I sometimes use tracing paper (nice and cheap), but find that I
> > get
> > > > better results from the LaserStar film. The CAD software I use is
> > > > Pulsonix, a professional package out of the same stable as
> > Easy-PC. I
> > > > regularly use 12/12 design rules, occasionally going down to 10
> > mils
> > > > if
> > > > I need to route tracks between IC pads. Rather than conventional
> > > > positive-resist FR4 PCB material, I usually use something called
> > > > FPC-16
> > > > which consists of a sandwich of compressed paper between thin
> > layers
> > > > of
> > > > fibreglass. It's cheaper than FR4 and much easier to cut and
> > drill.
> > > > It's
> > > > available from Mega Electronics, as is the LaserStar film.
> > > >
> > > > Etching is in ferric chloride. I place the etchant in a small
> > plastic
> > > > food container inside a larger container half-filled with hot
> > water
> > > > and
> > > > continuously agitate the etchant manually by rocking the
> > container.
> > > > Etching typically takes 5-10 minutes.
> > > >
> > > > I'm quite pleased with the results. I intend to experiment with
> > > > double-sided boards by making a UV exposure unit that can expose
> > both
> > > > sides of the PCB simultaneously. With a better printer and vacuum
> > on
> > > > the
> > > > UV exposure unit I think I could get 8 mil tracks quite reliably.
> > I've
> > > >
> > > > heard of other people managing it at home.
> > > >
> > > > Here is an example of one of my PCBs:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller/pcb.html
> > > >
> > > > I often use the Pulsonix copper pour facility for this type of
> > board,
> > > > as
> > > > it makes the routing easier. Cross-hatching is better with a laser
> >
> > > > printer, as they don't tend to print large black areas very well.
> > > >
> > > > Links:
> > > >
> > > > Mega Electronics: http://www.megaelect.demon.co.uk/
> > > > Number One Systems: http://www.numberone.com/
> > > > Pulsonix: http://www.pulsonix.com/
> > > >
> > > > Leon
> > > > --
> > > > Leon Heller, G1HSM
> > > > leon_heller@...
> > > > http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller
> > > >
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > > ADVERTISEMENT
> > > [Click Here!]
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and
> > files:
> > > >
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > > Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> > Service.
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and
> > files:
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
>
>
> >
> > Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and files:
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and files:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs

2003-05-19 by Hans Wedemeyer

Mike,
No problem, I have also been making boards for many years.
Just assume when someone tells me it can be better "I would like to know
what can be better than the really good results I'm getting now "
Why would I need to improve on really nice boards... ?
or do you see something really bad with
http://hans-w.com/pcb_harwin_rivets.jpg
Hans W


Mike Putnam wrote:

> Hans,
> Don't take it wrong. I have been in the business for many years and
> only
> wanted to give you some tips. Feel free to ignore them.
> -Mike
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Hans Wedemeyer" <hans@...>
> To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2003 11:52 AM
> Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs
>
>
> > Mike,
> > H'mm as I have pretty good looking boards and can do 5 mil all day
> long
> > !
> >
> > Here's an example http://hans-w.com/pcb_harwin_rivets.jpg
> >
> > I've only been using Round Bulbs of various types for about 27
> > years......
> > I like the short exposure time and never have noticed the effect you
>
> > menitoned, my largest board size
> > is about 6"X7" and it exposed uniformly.
> >
> > Just what is it about my boards that you think would make them any
> > better ? Please explain !
> >
> > Hans Wedemeyer
> >
> >
> > Mike Putnam wrote:
> >
> > > Hans,
> > > I looked at the picture of your UV exposure setup. I just wanted
> to
> > > comment
> > > that I would never use the round bulb. Use the florescent tubes
> and
> > > your
> > > results will be better. I have found that the round bulb tends to
> give
> > > more
> > > exposure in the center than at the outer edges. Even more apparent
>
> > > with
> > > larger boards. This is the reason all exposure units sold on the
> > > market use
> > > the florescent tube. You can compensate somewhat by having the
> bulb
> > > not so
> > > close, but this just increases your exposure time. The other bad
> thing
> > > about
> > > the round bulb is the heat. This will actually get in the way of
> your
> > > process, depending upon what type of photo etch you are using. I
> am
> > > trying
> > > to recall if it was a problem caused to the developer or if it was
> a
> > > consistency problem in the exposure. Nevertheless, I found it to
> be a
> > > problem several years back. If you modify your design to use the
> > > florescent
> > > bulbs, you will notice a marked difference in detail as well as
> less
> > > exposure time needed.
> > > -Mike
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Hans Wedemeyer" <hans@...>
> > > To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com>
> > > Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2003 7:41 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs
> > >
> > >
> > > > Leon,
> > > > good advice except for Easy-PC....
> > > > I spent full price on that program and found I wasted my money.
> > > > Here's what I think of Easy-PC
> > > > http://hans-w.com/ezpcbugs.html
> > > >
> > > > I moved on to EAGLE and have been happy with it. It's STABLE
> does
> > > not
> > > > blow up cause me to lose work=time=money.
> > > >
> > > > A limited version of EAGLE is available for Free, it is limited
> to
> > > two
> > > > sided board and size check it out at
> > > > http://www.cadsoftusa.com
> > > > EAGLE has a VAST library of part and users add parts all the
> time.
> > > > Compared EAGLE parts Library to to Easy-PC several 1000 to 1
> > > >
> > > > I put Easy-PC up for sale on eBay but none wanted it. In fact I
> put
> > > my
> > > > entire collection of Numberone product in the same auction
> > > > Filter program, Easy-PC for DOS and for Windows and the digital
> > > > simulator Pulsar. INo one reached my minimum Price of $200 !
> It's
> > > still
> > > > here in a box onthe floor, I think I'll use the disks and CD's
> for
> > > > target practice sometime...
> > > >
> > > > Here's one thing that is not (was not)( they may have fixed it
> by
> > > now)
> > > > possible to do with Easy-PC for Wndows, in a situation where top
> and
> > >
> > > > bottom layers have parallel tracks sections that overlap, and a
>
> > > whole
> > > > bunch of closely spaced via's or other pads, it is not possible
> to
> > > put
> > > > the cursor on the trace/pad that I want for move/edit. It just
> snaps
> > > to
> > > > the nearest and of course that is not handy at all ! I can turn
> snap
> > > off
> > > > but that is not what it's all about.
> > > > EAGLE allows ANY pad/trace on any layer to be individually
> selected
> > > even
> > > > if they are overlapping.
> > > >
> > > > Pulsonix used to look like Easy-PC, I think they are the same
> > > bunch...
> > > > Although Pulsonix used to give the schematic editor away for
> free,
> > > the
> > > > PCB layout part is high $$$$ ! That's much like saying "this
> car is
> > >
> > > > free, but the special wheel cost $20,000 each "
> > > >
> > > > I'll get off my soap boix now...
> > > >
> > > > I make double side board all the time. I used to do it the way
> you
> > > > mentioned, and even wrote a program for my CNC mill to
> compensate
> > > for
> > > > alignment problems.
> > > > I found a better way by printing on transparencies and then
> aligning
> > >
> > > > them visually, then stapling them together. Then slide the board
> in
> > > > between the transparencies and sandwich the whole lot between
> two
> > > plates
> > > > of glass, and place the sandwich between two lamps
> > > > http://hans-w.com/setupforexposure.jpg
> > > > and
> > > > http://hans-w.com/twolampexposure.jpg
> > > > Credit for this sandwich idea goes to
> > > > http://www.electricstuff.co.uk/pcbs.html
> > > >
> > > > Alignment between top and bottom is good. Perhaps the greatest
> > > problem
> > > > I've run into is the HP LaserJet making different print sizes
> when I
> > >
> > > > mirror the one side.
> > > > I used to worry about getting the printed side of the
> transparency
> > > close
> > > > to the PCB, after testing with 5 mil lines I decided there is NO
>
> > > need to
> > > > mirror. Using the exposure as I how in my photo it allows me to
> do 5
> > > mil
> > > > lines all day everyday.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for all the tips.
> > > > Best Regards
> > > > Hans Wedemeyer
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Leon Heller wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I've been making my own PCBs at home for about 40 years,
> starting
> > > by
> > > > > painting the pattern onto single-sided PCB material using a
> fine
> > > > > paintbrush and cellulose paint, with ferric chloride or
> ammonium
> > > > > persulphate etchant. I used 0.1" graph paper for designing the
>
> > > layout
> > > > > then marked the holes with a centre punch through the paper
> onto
> > > the
> > > > > copper surface. I even made a couple of double-sided PCBs
> using
> > > this
> > > > > technique, by masking off one side, etching the other side,
> > > drilling
> > > > > it,
> > > > > and using the drill holes as a guide when painting on the
> resist
> > > on
> > > > > the
> > > > > second side. I then masked off the first side with tape to
> etch
> > > the
> > > > > second side.
> > > > >
> > > > > When low-cost CAD software became available (I used Easy-PC
> from
> > > > > Number
> > > > > One Systems for years) I progressed to printing 2:1 artwork on
> a
> > > dot
> > > > > matrix printer. I then got a local litho platemaking company
> to
> > > > > produce
> > > > > a 1:1 positive transparency that I used with a home-made UV
> > > exposure
> > > > > unit and resist-coated PCB material. When I got an ink jet
> printer
> > > I
> > > > > found that I could get reasonable results by printing 1:1
> artwork
> > > onto
> > > > >
> > > > > tracing paper.
> > > > >
> > > > > I now use an old LaserJet IIIp I picked up very cheaply to
> print
> > > 1:1
> > > > > onto LaserStar film and expose the PCBs in a home-made UV
> exposure
> > >
> > > > > unit.
> > > > > I sometimes use tracing paper (nice and cheap), but find that
> I
> > > get
> > > > > better results from the LaserStar film. The CAD software I use
> is
> > > > > Pulsonix, a professional package out of the same stable as
> > > Easy-PC. I
> > > > > regularly use 12/12 design rules, occasionally going down to
> 10
> > > mils
> > > > > if
> > > > > I need to route tracks between IC pads. Rather than
> conventional
> > > > > positive-resist FR4 PCB material, I usually use something
> called
> > > > > FPC-16
> > > > > which consists of a sandwich of compressed paper between thin
> > > layers
> > > > > of
> > > > > fibreglass. It's cheaper than FR4 and much easier to cut and
> > > drill.
> > > > > It's
> > > > > available from Mega Electronics, as is the LaserStar film.
> > > > >
> > > > > Etching is in ferric chloride. I place the etchant in a small
> > > plastic
> > > > > food container inside a larger container half-filled with hot
> > > water
> > > > > and
> > > > > continuously agitate the etchant manually by rocking the
> > > container.
> > > > > Etching typically takes 5-10 minutes.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm quite pleased with the results. I intend to experiment
> with
> > > > > double-sided boards by making a UV exposure unit that can
> expose
> > > both
> > > > > sides of the PCB simultaneously. With a better printer and
> vacuum
> > > on
> > > > > the
> > > > > UV exposure unit I think I could get 8 mil tracks quite
> reliably.
> > > I've
> > > > >
> > > > > heard of other people managing it at home.
> > > > >
> > > > > Here is an example of one of my PCBs:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller/pcb.html
> > > > >
> > > > > I often use the Pulsonix copper pour facility for this type of
>
> > > board,
> > > > > as
> > > > > it makes the routing easier. Cross-hatching is better with a
> laser
> > >
> > > > > printer, as they don't tend to print large black areas very
> well.
> > > > >
> > > > > Links:
> > > > >
> > > > > Mega Electronics: http://www.megaelect.demon.co.uk/
> > > > > Number One Systems: http://www.numberone.com/
> > > > > Pulsonix: http://www.pulsonix.com/
> > > > >
> > > > > Leon
> > > > > --
> > > > > Leon Heller, G1HSM
> > > > > leon_heller@...
> > > > > http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller
> > > > >
> > > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > > > ADVERTISEMENT
> > > > [Click Here!]
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks
> and
> > > files:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
> > > > >
> > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > > > Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> > > Service.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and
> > > files:
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > > Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and
> files:
> > >
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and
> files:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
[Click Here!]

Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and files:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: How I make my PCBs

2003-05-19 by Hans Wedemeyer

John,
Is you want to cut down on the heat I have used 120Watt Plant Light
reflector lamps.
GE part number 120BR40/PL at the home depot for a few $$
When I use this lamp, instead of 70 Seconds Exposure (as I do with GE
EBW No.2 500W Blue lamps ) I give it about 110-120 Seconds

Hans W

bjeff65 wrote:

Show quoted textHide quoted text
> --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "John Myszkowski"
> <myszka_us2000@y...> wrote:
> > I can shed some light on the bulb wavelength...
> >
> > All regular incadescent bulbs have very little UV generating
> ability.
> > [edited for brevity]
> >
> > Incadescent, Halogen bulbs do produce a high level of UV light.
> > [again edited for brevity]
> >
> > Fuorescent bulbs. These bulbs, when totally uncoated generate only
> > (Mostly) UV. Extremely little visible light is generated by the
> > fluorescent tube (when uncoated). The visible portion of light
> coming
> > from the fluorescent tube is generated by the fluorescence of the
> > various powders that coat the inner surface of the tube.
> > The wavelength generated by the tube (other than UV) is determined
> by
> > the composition of that powder.
> > ALL fluorescent bulbs generate UV, but the everyday bulbs sold for
> > home use have a powder coating that both blocks the UV as well as
> > generates only visible "white" light.
> > The power of these tubes is determined by the length and diameter of
>
> > the tube (plasma guide). Therefore, if the tube is the same length
> > and diameter as a normal 40Watt tube, then it is a 40Watt tube.
> >
> >
> > John M...
>
> John,
>
> Thanks for enlightening me! I find it almost amazing with such a clear
>
> disparity
> between the possible sources that I really haven't seen such a clear
> explanation until now.
>
> So my original question has a definitive answer: Get a fluorescent
> black light bulb. Period. End of discussion. It's easy to extrapolate
> from your discussion
> above that a BL or BLB fluorescent bulb is coated to filter the
> visible light and allow the UV-A through.
>
> I've found an interesting site in my continuing search for info. Of
> all places it's a Halloween haunted house type site. It talks about
> Black Light sources and has a pointer to what I would now consider the
>
> Holy Grail: compact fluorescent black lights. You can find it here:
>
>
> ttp://wolfstone.halloweenhost.com/TechBase/bltgen_BlacklightGeneration.html
>
> So unless someone has compelling evidence to the contrary, I plan to
> build my light box using a pair of 12 in BLB fluorescents which are
> easily found at the Home Depot or WalMart.
>
> Thanks for the help,
>
> BAJ
> > ================
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor



>
> Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and files:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs

2003-05-19 by Adam Seychell

Fluro tubes have disadvantage producing of wide angled light. In
my experience this light source produces problems with light
under cutting the photomask and giving inconsistent track widths.
A bulb lamp at distance far enough so the uniformity is
relatively good across the panel, produces much sharper
photoresist patterns. That's why all PCB manufactures use a bulb
type. The lamp to panel distance doesn't need to be that great,
and Hans's setup looks perfectly adequate. With less light
undercutt the exposure time becomes more relaxed. So with such
wide time window, you can afford to overexpose in order to
compensate for non-uniformities.
In general bulbs will be slower than fluro tubes, unless you
start getting into high power, like the 2kW+ short arc HID lamps
used by professionals and manage a 15 second exposure time.

I use a 400W phosphorized mercury HID street lamp, at about 40cm
distance and get 3 minute exposures, but if I were to build
another light box I'd use 250W or 125W at go for closer distance.


Mike Putnam wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Hans,
> I looked at the picture of your UV exposure setup. I just wanted to comment
> that I would never use the round bulb. Use the florescent tubes and your
> results will be better. I have found that the round bulb tends to give more
> exposure in the center than at the outer edges. Even more apparent with
> larger boards. This is the reason all exposure units sold on the market use
> the florescent tube. You can compensate somewhat by having the bulb not so
> close, but this just increases your exposure time. The other bad thing about
> the round bulb is the heat. This will actually get in the way of your
> process, depending upon what type of photo etch you are using. I am trying
> to recall if it was a problem caused to the developer or if it was a
> consistency problem in the exposure. Nevertheless, I found it to be a
> problem several years back. If you modify your design to use the florescent
> bulbs, you will notice a marked difference in detail as well as less
> exposure time needed.
> -Mike
>

Re: How I make my PCBs

2003-05-19 by Jonathan W

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Stefan Trethan
<stefan_trethan@g...> wrote:

> have all of you professional pcb drill presses or how do you drill
your boards?
> (maybe homebuilt ones and a picture of them???)
>
> regrinding drill bits (for pcb) should be possible with a small
diamond wheel?
> is this true / is this possible & good for one who can regrind a
normal drill bit so that it works
> again? i have no idea where to get a diamond grinding wheel, has
anyone ideas?
>
> regards
> stefan

I use a dremel tool on a dremel drill press stand with used carbide
drill bits (available at most hamfests, as well as All Electronics:

http://www.allelectronics.com/cgi-bin/category.cgi?
category=search&item=DRB-9&type=store

This works extremely well for me.

Jonathan

Re: How I make my PCBs

2003-05-19 by Jonathan W

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Neil <cobra_neil@a...> wrote:
> On Sunday 18 May 2003 09:33, Stefan Trethan scribbled:
> > how do you cut the pcb material?
> > ....
> > any new and nice ideas are very welcome.
>
> Haven't tried the paper cutter method, but it seems to work for
many people.
> I use either a hacksaw (takes time), then clean up with a flat-
file. Or a
> pair of paramedic scissors (really fast, and can cut curves).
I've also used
> a roto-zip (with a rotary cutting bit) to cut complex curves.
Works well,
> but messy.
>
>
> > have all of you professional pcb drill presses or how do you
drill your
> > boards? (maybe homebuilt ones and a picture of them???)
>
> Tried a dremel tool with the Dremel drill-press attachment. Was
too wobbly
> for any precise work, so I dumped it and got a real drill press.
Harbor
> freight has a 50% off sale, so I paid $40 for the drill press.
Much cheaper,
> and sturdier than the dremel solution. Yes, it is slower, but
works
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> excellent still.

I guess I haven't had any problems with the dremel-press setup, but
once a little more cash can be devoted, perhaps I'll try your
solution.

Jonathan

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: How I make my PCBs

2003-05-19 by JanRwl@AOL.COM

Home-Brew CNC drilling of PCB's:

Now that Steve has been so kind as to fix my picture and put it under FILES,
it is ready for all to see at will.

Click on FILES, then Homebrew PCB Equipment, then the file-name DSCN 0329.JPG

Jan Rowland


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs

2003-05-19 by Stefan Trethan

i thought of manual drill press, moving the pcb with your hand.

i know there are such devices sold especially for this task and they are qite expensive.
but i'm sure it is possible to get a drill press working properly without these special bearings.
if you limit the minimum diameter to 0,8 or 0,6 millimeter.


i was wondering how the guys here do the drilling which don't hava a x/y drill cnc machine.

regards
stefan

19.05.2003 00:56:25, JanRwl@... wrote:

>In a message dated 5/18/2003 9:32:17 AM Central Standard Time,
>stefan_trethan@... writes:
>
>> any new and nice ideas are very welcome.
>>
>>
>> have all of you professional pcb drill presses or how do you drill your
>> boards? (maybe homebuilt ones and a picture of them???)
>>
>> regrinding drill bits (for pcb) should be possible with a small diamond
>> wheel? is this true / is this possible &good for one who can regrind a
>> normal drill bit so that it works again?
>
>Stephan:
>
>To your first question: WOW, you would be talking close to $100,000 (U.S.!)
>for a "professional PCB drill press", I think! At least the one CNC 4-quill
>job I saw in operation at a local PCB shop. Now, if you mean just a manual
>drill-press one could use to MANUALLY drill a prototype board, I have never
>seen one with an adequate-quality quill. The quill-bearings would have to be
>at least ABEC-7 for that! I bought ONE such bearing to rebuild a tiny 400
>Hz/3-Ø motor I used to MAKE a PCB-drill, and WOW, talk about PRICEY! The
>precision and concentricity of a quill must be MIND-BOGGLINGLY close to give
>ANY life at all to PCB-drills! And the "attack" and feed-rate must be
>properly set, as well.
>
>Yes, PCB drills ARE re-sharpened with small diamond wheels, but again, you
>are talking about some very fine drill-bit tipping equipment, NOT just the
>diamond-wheel! The results you can get from manually touching a tip to a
>diamond-wheel on a small "grinder motor" will vary so wildly you will wonder
>if any "sharpening" is taking place, at all!
>
>Now, the frustration of the first ¶ above inspired ME to brew my OWN "PCB
>Drill", and control that with a now-LONG-discontinued CBM "PET" computer (see
>photo). But I did that in '84! Were I to do another (or rebuild that one,
>when it finally fails, which may be soon! Argh!), I would design the
>"electronics" to work with a "PC", as those can be had now for less than the
>postage necessary to GET them delivered to the door!
>
>So look at the photo: <A HREF="http://photos.groups.yahoo.com/group/cad_cam_edm_dro/vwp?.dir=/Home-
brew+CNC+lathe&.src=gr&.dnm=PET-Controlled+X-Y+PCB-Drill.jpg&.view=t&.done=http%
3a//photos.groups.yahoo.com/group/cad_cam_edm_dro/lst%3f%26.dir=/Home-brew%2bCNC%2blathe%26.src=gr%
26.view=t">PET-Controlled X-Y PCB-Drill</A>
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and files:
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: How I make my PCBs

2003-05-19 by Stefan Trethan

thanks jonathan.
this encourages me that my new drill press would work.
it is mainly built of old needle printer linear rails.
i use a small dc motor as drill, it came from a dremel like tool (smaller, less powerful, dc).

i was very worried about the quill problem Jan Rowland wrote..

please tell me what minimum diameter you drill with your dremel and how often they break off.

regards
stefan



19.05.2003 07:24:50, "Jonathan W" <n0ym@...> wrote:

Show quoted textHide quoted text
>--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Stefan Trethan
><stefan_trethan@g...> wrote:
>
>> have all of you professional pcb drill presses or how do you drill
>your boards?
>> (maybe homebuilt ones and a picture of them???)
>>
>> regrinding drill bits (for pcb) should be possible with a small
>diamond wheel?
>> is this true / is this possible & good for one who can regrind a
>normal drill bit so that it works
>> again? i have no idea where to get a diamond grinding wheel, has
>anyone ideas?
>>
>> regards
>> stefan
>
>I use a dremel tool on a dremel drill press stand with used carbide
>drill bits (available at most hamfests, as well as All Electronics:
>
>http://www.allelectronics.com/cgi-bin/category.cgi?
>category=search&item=DRB-9&type=store
>
>This works extremely well for me.
>
>Jonathan
>
>

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs

2003-05-19 by Leon Heller

>From: Stefan Trethan <stefan_trethan@...>
>Reply-To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
>To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs
>Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 09:05:55 +0200
>
>i thought of manual drill press, moving the pcb with your hand.
>
>i know there are such devices sold especially for this task and they are
>qite expensive.
>but i'm sure it is possible to get a drill press working properly without
>these special bearings.
>if you limit the minimum diameter to 0,8 or 0,6 millimeter.
>
>
>i was wondering how the guys here do the drilling which don't hava a x/y
>drill cnc machine.

I use a Minicraft drill and stand, similar to the Dremel units. It isn't
very good - it's quite easy to break carbide drills. A friend of mine has a
PCB dept. where he works and they have a rather old manual Excellon PCB
drill. It looks as if it was originally *very* expensive and is *very*
heavy. The drill comes up from underneath the PCB and a magnified image of
the pad is shown on a screen. Someone at Southampton University was giving
one of these away a few months ago, perhaps I should have taken it off his
hands. 8-)

Leon
--
Leon Heller, G1HSM Tel: +44 1424 423947
Email:leon_heller@...
My web page: http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller

_________________________________________________________________
It's fast, it's easy and it's free. Get MSN Messenger today!
http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs

2003-05-19 by Stefan Trethan

18.05.2003 21:00:55, "Zoran A. Scepanovic" <zasto@...> wrote:


you are right.
when i last thought of building a new exposure unit the uv fluorescent lamps were sold at 300eur each. i
don't know why, the same shop has it for 8 eur or so.

oh, now i see the problem.
the daylight halogene costs only eur 6, sorry....
this was a quite important mistake.. thats the problem with the eur if you only know the price in
schilling (old currency) and forget to convert it.

sorry for that.
but you are right, uv fluorescents are quite cheap now.

but please also consider the undercutting effect if you want to make very fine tracks and have not ideal
flat pcb and transparencys.

regards
stefan


Show quoted textHide quoted text
>Hello Stefan,
>
>18. May 2003, 21:20:47, you wrote:
>
>
> For EUR 75.00 you can make more than one exposure unit that I described
> in reply on one other post in this thread.
>
> 2 (two) UV-A fluorescent lamps made by Philips: EUR 5.00
> 2 (two) pairs of lamp holders with integrated starter holder: EUR 1.50
> 2 (two) 20W fluo ballasts: EUR 5.00
> Some wires for interconnecting, some MDF for box, mains cable,
> homebrew countown timer with PIC microcontroller: EUR 30.00
> =========
> TOTAL: EUR 41.50
>
> Don't hold me for all the prices that I've mentioned because I can not
> dig through all my sent messages where (on this forum) I gave all the
> prices for the stuff that I've bought.
>
>--
> Best Regards,
> Zoran
> mailto:zasto@...
> www.zas-elmed.co.yu
>
>
>

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs

2003-05-19 by Stefan Trethan

i have also seen a setup where the drill came from underneath.
i have no idea how you cold see it with this unit.
but it looked not very expensive.

wait.. now i remember also a very heavy press as you described standing in the pcb shop.
but it was VERY old.
it has had a round screen, it looked like some military target finding equipment.

(i remember it looked like one of the alien/robot monsters in the old films with this "viewing screen"
as head and the legs of the very solid stand.)

i have never seen anybody using this monster. they all prefered small white drill presses which more
looked like microscopes, without eyepieces.


19.05.2003 09:24:16, "Leon Heller" <leon_heller@...> wrote:

Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
>
>I use a Minicraft drill and stand, similar to the Dremel units. It isn't
>very good - it's quite easy to break carbide drills. A friend of mine has a
>PCB dept. where he works and they have a rather old manual Excellon PCB
>drill. It looks as if it was originally *very* expensive and is *very*
>heavy. The drill comes up from underneath the PCB and a magnified image of
>the pad is shown on a screen. Someone at Southampton University was giving
>one of these away a few months ago, perhaps I should have taken it off his
>hands. 8-)
>
>Leon
>--
>Leon Heller, G1HSM Tel: +44 1424 423947
>Email:leon_heller@...
>My web page: http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>It's fast, it's easy and it's free. Get MSN Messenger today!
>http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger
>
>
>
>Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and files:
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs

2003-05-19 by Leon Heller

----- Original Message -----
From: "Stefan Trethan" <stefan_trethan@...>
To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 8:39 AM
Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs


> i have also seen a setup where the drill came from underneath.
> i have no idea how you cold see it with this unit.
> but it looked not very expensive.
>
> wait.. now i remember also a very heavy press as you described standing in
the pcb shop.
> but it was VERY old.
> it has had a round screen, it looked like some military target finding
equipment.
>
> (i remember it looked like one of the alien/robot monsters in the old
films with this "viewing screen"
> as head and the legs of the very solid stand.)
>
> i have never seen anybody using this monster. they all prefered small
white drill presses which more
> looked like microscopes, without eyepieces.

That sounds like it was the same thing. It's foot-operated, so both hands
are free to position the PCB. A clamping lever comes down before the drill
comes up, so the PCB is held securely. The magnification of the pad on the
screen is quite high (it looks about 10 cm across), so it is quite easy to
use, even if one doesn't have good eyesight.

Leon
--
Leon Heller, G1HSM
leon_heller@...
http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs

2003-05-19 by Stefan Trethan

yes i think that's it.
i never operated it, i haven't seen anyone doing that.

i think this machine was no longer used beause the bearings of the drilling spindle were worn out.

but maybe i'm wrong and simply nobody wanted to get too close to this monster.

regards
stefan

19.05.2003 09:47:36, "Leon Heller" <leon_heller@...> wrote:

Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Stefan Trethan" <stefan_trethan@...>
>To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com>
>Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 8:39 AM
>Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs
>
>
>> i have also seen a setup where the drill came from underneath.
>> i have no idea how you cold see it with this unit.
>> but it looked not very expensive.
>>
>> wait.. now i remember also a very heavy press as you described standing in
>the pcb shop.
>> but it was VERY old.
>> it has had a round screen, it looked like some military target finding
>equipment.
>>
>> (i remember it looked like one of the alien/robot monsters in the old
>films with this "viewing screen"
>> as head and the legs of the very solid stand.)
>>
>> i have never seen anybody using this monster. they all prefered small
>white drill presses which more
>> looked like microscopes, without eyepieces.
>
>That sounds like it was the same thing. It's foot-operated, so both hands
>are free to position the PCB. A clamping lever comes down before the drill
>comes up, so the PCB is held securely. The magnification of the pad on the
>screen is quite high (it looks about 10 cm across), so it is quite easy to
>use, even if one doesn't have good eyesight.
>
>Leon
>--
>Leon Heller, G1HSM
>leon_heller@...
>http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller
>
>
>Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and files:
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs

2003-05-19 by Mike Putnam

One point to make here, when I mentioned fluorescent tubes, I was not
refering to the white, like what you see overhead in office buildings. You
will want to use the blacklight type of tubes. Also, if you are having a
problem with undercutting, are you using transparency with artwork on the
same side as the pcb or is it on the top side? If your artwork (emulsion) is
against the pc board and it is opaque, you should not experience
undercutting from a tube type bulb or a set of tubes. You should use a hard
surface below the board so that it will be even and the glass should be held
down with some pressure to insure that there are no gaps between the copper
and emulsion. If all the above are true, then it could be too much exposure
time. I have used a table with 4 such tubes for years and I can easily
produce 12"X12" panels with tight mil specs, no problem. I do not know of
any of the professional board shops that use round bulbs for exposure. Also,
if you get into larger boardwork, the round bulbs will cause shadowing on
the outer traces. This is not noticable on small boards but on larger
boards, your traces will be bigger than the actual artwork on the outer
areas of the board due to the angle of the light. And lastly, in my area, I
can buy these blacklight tubes for next to nothing as opposed to the price
of those UV round bulbs.
-Mike

----- Original Message -----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "Adam Seychell" <adam_seychell@...>
To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2003 7:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs


> Fluro tubes have disadvantage producing of wide angled light. In
> my experience this light source produces problems with light
> under cutting the photomask and giving inconsistent track widths.
> A bulb lamp at distance far enough so the uniformity is