Yahoo Groups archive

Homebrew_PCBs

Index last updated: 2026-03-31 23:13 UTC

Thread

CuCl analysis questions

CuCl analysis questions

2003-05-15 by grantfair2001

Hi Adam - (and interested list members).

All (I hope)of my equipment and most of my chemicals are now on hand.
The specific gravity of my etchant is 1.245.

I did a trial titration. First I tried titrating until I reached
"turbidity" (whatever that is, I didn't see anything which I thought
might be it.) So I started over.

I put 1 ml of etchant in 20 mL distilled water, and added 4 drops of
Methyl orange. I then dripped 0.1 N NaOH solution into the beaker
until the color changed from orange to yellow. About 17.5 mL of
titrant were used to get to the end point.

Assuming .31% HCl corresponds to 1 mL of titrant, the acid
concentration is about 5.4%, which is a bit high I guess, but some
etching will bring it down.

I had fun playing mad chemist. When a couple more chemicals arrive I
will try to determine the copper content and see how (if?) it matches
up with the specific gravity. (Luckily I found a photographer with a
100 pound bag of sodium thiosulfate who was happy to send me 100 grams
for the price of stamps. While it is a consituent of some current
photographic "fixers" (to fix the silver structure of the photgraph so
it doesn't change), there are lots of other chemicals included in all
the fixers I found, so I had to go looking for someone who had the
pure stuff.

I do have one question: is this the appropriate way to titrate with
methyl orange indicator? Are these calculations right?

The only other problem I see is all the grunge bits floating on my
etchant - I think this is the dissolved bits of the "airstone" I tried
until it mushed out. I'll try coffee filters to get rid of it.

I will be etching some boards eventually <g>. All this chemistry is
more than what is needed to use this approach, but I find it a fun bit
of learning.

For anyone interested in trying this approach, don't let it scare you
off. The "quick, cheap and dirty" analysis mentioned on the website
(in the links) on Etching with Copper Chloride Etching Systems is
likely all you need.

www.pacificsun.ca/~robert/pcb/pcb.htm

My next focus (I hope) will be trying to get a fairly even etch.

Grant

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] CuCl analysis questions

2003-05-15 by Adam Seychell

Grant,

Its been interesting listening to your progress on copper
chloride makeup over the past few weeks. I agree with you about
it all this chemistry being fun while learning new things.

I'm not sure what you know about molar mass and working in
concentrations represented in moles per liter (or "Molar" or just
"M" for short).

http://www.cards.anoka.k12.mn.us/projects/HTML_98/sievert/Sievert.html

Working with percent by mass of HCl is not very popular because
its a lot more difficult to calculate accurately, when doing
analysis. Concentrations are almost always given in the mass of
the active species per volume of liquid. If you know the molar
mass of the compound then you can easily convert in to number of
moles per liter. Where molar mass of NaOH and HCl compounds are;

NaOH = 40.00 grams per mole.
HCl = 36.45 grams per mole.


You prepare 0.1 moles/liter of NaOH solution by placing 4.000
grams of NaOH into a flask and add water until its exactly 1 liter.

You added 17.5 cm^3 of 0.100 M NaOH and it reacted with 1 cm^3 of
etchant of unknown concentration. The equation to calculate
concentration of the unknown is

[HCl] = 17.5cm^3 * 0.100M / 1.00cm^3 = 1.75 moles/liter

This is a bit higher than necessary, but definitely not too high
to worry about. You should aim for 0.5 to 1 moles/liter of HCl.

Note the symbol N ("normality) is sometimes used for
concentrations. The normality is equal to the molarity when the
compound has one atom available for the reaction (this is not a
good definition). Sulfuric acid has 2 hydrogen atoms and each one
reacts with a NaOH molecule. So you need two moles of NaOH to
react with one mole of H2SO4. The normality of a 1 mole per liter
concentration of sulfuric acid is 2 N. The normality of a 1 mole
per liter concentration of hydrochloric acid is 1 N.

What type of hydrometer did you end up getting ?

I think 1.245 is ok. My solution measures around 1.29
I don't know the copper concentration, but going by the mass of
copper dissolved during makeup and its final volume, its should
be around 150 g/l.


Adam

grantfair2001 wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Hi Adam - (and interested list members).
>
> All (I hope)of my equipment and most of my chemicals are now on hand.
> The specific gravity of my etchant is 1.245.
>
> I did a trial titration. First I tried titrating until I reached
> "turbidity" (whatever that is, I didn't see anything which I thought
> might be it.) So I started over.
>
> I put 1 ml of etchant in 20 mL distilled water, and added 4 drops of
> Methyl orange. I then dripped 0.1 N NaOH solution into the beaker
> until the color changed from orange to yellow. About 17.5 mL of
> titrant were used to get to the end point.
>
> Assuming .31% HCl corresponds to 1 mL of titrant, the acid
> concentration is about 5.4%, which is a bit high I guess, but some
> etching will bring it down.
>
> I had fun playing mad chemist. When a couple more chemicals arrive I
> will try to determine the copper content and see how (if?) it matches
> up with the specific gravity. (Luckily I found a photographer with a
> 100 pound bag of sodium thiosulfate who was happy to send me 100 grams
> for the price of stamps. While it is a consituent of some current
> photographic "fixers" (to fix the silver structure of the photgraph so
> it doesn't change), there are lots of other chemicals included in all
> the fixers I found, so I had to go looking for someone who had the
> pure stuff.
>
> I do have one question: is this the appropriate way to titrate with
> methyl orange indicator? Are these calculations right?
>
> The only other problem I see is all the grunge bits floating on my
> etchant - I think this is the dissolved bits of the "airstone" I tried
> until it mushed out. I'll try coffee filters to get rid of it.
>
> I will be etching some boards eventually <g>. All this chemistry is
> more than what is needed to use this approach, but I find it a fun bit
> of learning.
>
> For anyone interested in trying this approach, don't let it scare you
> off. The "quick, cheap and dirty" analysis mentioned on the website
> (in the links) on Etching with Copper Chloride Etching Systems is
> likely all you need.
>
> www.pacificsun.ca/~robert/pcb/pcb.htm
>
> My next focus (I hope) will be trying to get a fairly even etch.
>
> Grant
>
>
>
> Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and files:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

Re: CuCl analysis questions

2003-05-16 by grantfair2001

Adam-

It has been a learning experience, and now that it has succeeded I
would say worthwhile.

I do like to operate from recipes, I guess. Understanding may follow
later if the motive and ability go in that direction. But without a
recipe for something new, I tend to suffer from what someone called
"analysis paralysis". I think my worrying and asking questions may
have put a few people off the idea of CuCl. If so, that's too bad,
since I now have an easy, effective recipe which works very well and,
cheaply too. Many thanks to you and other list members for all your
assistance on this.

Thanks for the molarity info. I had grabbed a couple of chemistry
texts from the library this week but the link you gave gives the right
size of info chunk in the right way for my tired brain. I assume I
studied this stuff long ago (I did take some highschool chemistry)but
after the exams it went west.

The hydrometer I got was an inexpensive (US $11.00) Bellweather brand.
It ranges from 1.20 to 1.42, which seems to be the clsest thing I have
seen to the range you recommended which is readily available in N Am.
The divisions are .02, i.e. between 1.20 and 1.220 are 10 divisions.

My next project is to make a horizonatal holding adjustable PCB
holder; I plan to do that this weekend.

Then, I have a shitload of decades old silk screen PCB patterns,
mostly from old Elektor mags. If I can figure out what they are
(anyone with a collection of old Elektors want to take part; I'll
trade etched but undrilled PCB's for info). I will try to print a few
up and etch them, and let the grouip know how fast this quantity of
etchant does the job.

Grant



Grant
--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Adam Seychell
<adam_seychell@y...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Grant,
>
> Its been interesting listening to your progress on copper
> chloride makeup over the past few weeks. I agree with you about
> it all this chemistry being fun while learning new things.
>
> I'm not sure what you know about molar mass and working in
> concentrations represented in moles per liter (or "Molar" or just
> "M" for short).
>
> http://www.cards.anoka.k12.mn.us/projects/HTML_98/sievert/Sievert.html
>
> Working with percent by mass of HCl is not very popular because
> its a lot more difficult to calculate accurately, when doing
> analysis. Concentrations are almost always given in the mass of
> the active species per volume of liquid. If you know the molar
> mass of the compound then you can easily convert in to number of
> moles per liter. Where molar mass of NaOH and HCl compounds are;
>
> NaOH = 40.00 grams per mole.
> HCl = 36.45 grams per mole.
>
>
> You prepare 0.1 moles/liter of NaOH solution by placing 4.000
> grams of NaOH into a flask and add water until its exactly 1 liter.
>
> You added 17.5 cm^3 of 0.100 M NaOH and it reacted with 1 cm^3 of
> etchant of unknown concentration. The equation to calculate
> concentration of the unknown is
>
> [HCl] = 17.5cm^3 * 0.100M / 1.00cm^3 = 1.75 moles/liter
>
> This is a bit higher than necessary, but definitely not too high
> to worry about. You should aim for 0.5 to 1 moles/liter of HCl.
>
> Note the symbol N ("normality) is sometimes used for
> concentrations. The normality is equal to the molarity when the
> compound has one atom available for the reaction (this is not a
> good definition). Sulfuric acid has 2 hydrogen atoms and each one
> reacts with a NaOH molecule. So you need two moles of NaOH to
> react with one mole of H2SO4. The normality of a 1 mole per liter
> concentration of sulfuric acid is 2 N. The normality of a 1 mole
> per liter concentration of hydrochloric acid is 1 N.
>
> What type of hydrometer did you end up getting ?
>
> I think 1.245 is ok. My solution measures around 1.29
> I don't know the copper concentration, but going by the mass of
> copper dissolved during makeup and its final volume, its should
> be around 150 g/l.
>
>
> Adam