Making a homebrew board using QFN packages
2006-01-25 by Anthony
Yahoo Groups archive
Index last updated: 2026-03-31 23:13 UTC
Thread
2006-01-25 by Anthony
2006-01-25 by Leon Heller
From: "Anthony" <toftat@...>
To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 3:24 PM
Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Making a homebrew board using QFN packages
> After great success with through hole boards, I have a new project
> starting, one of the components I want to use is the nRF905 from nordic
> semiconductor, the '905 is only available in a QFN package which
> doesn't seem to be the most hobbiest friendly of formats. As far as I
> can tell there are no legs on it...
>
> Is it possible to hand solder one of these, filling in the gap? do they
> make sockets for them (I have found prototype sockets on line but $400-
> $500 each they are a bit out of budget)
I have managed to solder the similar packaged ADXL202 onto a home-made PCB.
It was difficult, though. It helps if you make the pads longer than they are
on the standard QFN footprint, so that you can get the tip of a soldering
iron in there.
I tried with the Nordic nRF2401 on a double-sided PCB, but gave up and had
them mounted by a specialist SMT assembly company. They didn't charge me as
it was such a small job (it took them about 20 minutes), it was just before
Xmas, and I'd gone a long way on my motorbike to get to them. 8-) Their
minimum charge is 50 GBP.
Leon
2006-01-25 by Stefan Trethan
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 16:24:15 +0100, Anthony <toftat@...> wrote:
> After great success with through hole boards, I have a new project
>
> starting, one of the components I want to use is the nRF905 from nordic
>
> semiconductor, the '905 is only available in a QFN package which
>
> doesn't seem to be the most hobbiest friendly of formats. As far as I
>
> can tell there are no legs on it...
>
>
> Is it possible to hand solder one of these, filling in the gap? do they
>
> make sockets for them (I have found prototype sockets on line but $400-
>
> $500 each they are a bit out of budget)
>
>
> Any ideas folks?
>
>
> Anthony
>
2006-01-25 by derekhawkins
> Is it possible to hand solder one of theseGoogle >"soldering qfn"<.
--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Anthony" <toftat@c...> wrote:
>
> After great success with through hole boards, I have a new project
2006-01-25 by Mike Young
----- Original Message -----
From: "Anthony" <toftat@...>
To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 9:24 AM
Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Making a homebrew board using QFN packages
> After great success with through hole boards, I have a new project
> starting, one of the components I want to use is the nRF905 from nordic
> semiconductor, the '905 is only available in a QFN package which
> doesn't seem to be the most hobbiest friendly of formats. As far as I
> can tell there are no legs on it...
>
> Is it possible to hand solder one of these, filling in the gap? do they
> make sockets for them (I have found prototype sockets on line but $400-
> $500 each they are a bit out of budget)
>
> Any ideas folks?
>
> Anthony
>
>
>
>
>
> Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and
> Photos:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
>
> If Files or Photos are running short of space, post them here:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs_Archives/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
2006-01-25 by derekhawkins
> They already have to put some components inTapes are really intended for pick and place machines. But you knew
> SMD reel strips to keep them.
> Stupid people! why can't they use DIL?Then you'll be complaing that your cellphone was too be big...."Why
>pin i
> Not a problem, i have done two boards now with thin QFN (32 and 24
2006-01-25 by Anthony
>$16 at
> You could reflow it in a wok. Solder paste is (relatively) cheap:
> http://www.stencilsunlimited.com/solder_products.php. As toskillets being
> less than professional, I would have to agree to the extent thatISO
> certification is unlikely. Otherwise, it works just fine. It's noless
> controlled than hot air, and infinitely better than hand soldering.nordic
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Anthony" <toftat@c...>
> To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 9:24 AM
> Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Making a homebrew board using QFN packages
>
>
> > After great success with through hole boards, I have a new project
> > starting, one of the components I want to use is the nRF905 from
> > semiconductor, the '905 is only available in a QFN package whichas I
> > doesn't seem to be the most hobbiest friendly of formats. As far
> > can tell there are no legs on it...do they
> >
> > Is it possible to hand solder one of these, filling in the gap?
> > make sockets for them (I have found prototype sockets on line but$400-
> > $500 each they are a bit out of budget)and
> >
> > Any ideas folks?
> >
> > Anthony
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files,
> > Photos:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
> >
> > If Files or Photos are running short of space, post them here:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs_Archives/
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
2006-01-25 by derekhawkins
> You could reflow it in a wok.Toaster oven would be better. Saw a nice infrared convection toaster
> Solder paste is (relatively) cheap: $16That's $16.00 for 1.2 ounces BTW.
--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Young" <mikewhy@s...> wrote:
>
> You could reflow it in a wok. Solder paste is (relatively) cheap: $16
at
>
2006-01-25 by Mike Young
----- Original Message -----
From: "derekhawkins" <eldata@...>
To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 12:37 PM
Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Making a homebrew board using QFN packages
>> You could reflow it in a wok.
>
> Toaster oven would be better. Saw a nice infrared convection toaster
> oven with digital temperature display and controls, if only it was
> programmable.
Better in what way? If you're buying new, sure, get the toaster oven. I had
an old skillet on hand, and it stores very compactly. The "face" is open so
I can readily watch it cook, and even point an IR thermometer at it if I
want. But I haven't found a need. Medium flame, anywhere in the middle third
of the dial, gives a usable temp profile.
>> Solder paste is (relatively) cheap: $16
>
> That's $16.00 for 1.2 ounces BTW.
Yup, and it has a shelf life of about a year. 35 grams is more than a
non-production shop can use in that time. I'll likely throw out more than
half of it. In the meantime, I gain all the benefits. What can be simpler
than mashing the tiny parts approximately into place, and then stir frying
for 4 minutes? (Peanut butter and jelly sandwiches come to mind, but not by
much.)
2006-01-25 by derekhawkins
> If you're buying new, sure, get the toaster oven.What's wrong with an old toaster oven if one just happens to have one
--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Young" <mikewhy@s...> wrote:
>
> Better in what way? If you're buying new, sure, get the toaster oven.
I had
> an old skillet on hand, and it stores very compactly. The "face" is
2006-01-25 by Mike Young
----- Original Message -----
From: "derekhawkins" <eldata@...>
>> If you're buying new, sure, get the toaster oven.
>
> What's wrong with an old toaster oven if one just happens to have one
> on hand?
Nothing's wrong. Was just wondering what made it better.
2006-01-25 by Stefan Trethan
> Tapes are really intended for pick and place machines. But you knewYes, but they can't simply put them in a box with some antistatic foam
>
> that. A cut tape purchase simply means they cut a piece off with the
>
> quantity you ordered.
>I will never ever complain a phone is too big! If they would just rip out
>
>> Stupid people! why can't they use DIL?
>
>
> Then you'll be complaing that your cellphone was too be big...."Why
>
> can't they make <whatever> smaller?". More than likely, available
>
> package choices depends on the demand for those packages.
>
2006-01-26 by derekhawkins
> Yes, but they can't simply put them in a box with some antistaticYour argument makes sense if you're complaining about a lack of
> foam these days
>foam
>
> Yes, but they can't simply put them in a box with some antistatic
> these days - without the palstic packaging they would get lost.
>
2006-01-26 by bob_ledoux
--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Anthony" <toftat@c...> wrote:
>
> After more consideration, I am seriously considering getting the MiRF
> devices from sparkfun, that way I don't have to deal with the
> requirements for the RF circuit design either...
>
>
2006-01-26 by alan00463
>I take it you're referring to the nRF2401A transceiver pair pictured
> I just bought the Sparkfun MIRF units. They are nice. I've been
> experimenting with cheap RF units and the antenna requirements can
> make or break the whole system. The MIRF have them built in, making
> much simplier implementation--once you get past the configuration bits.
>
2006-01-26 by Leon Heller
----- Original Message -----
From: "alan00463" <alan00463@...>
To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 2:28 PM
Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Making a homebrew board using QFN packages
> --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "bob_ledoux" <bobledoux@p...> wrote:
>>
>> I just bought the Sparkfun MIRF units. They are nice. I've been
>> experimenting with cheap RF units and the antenna requirements can
>> make or break the whole system. The MIRF have them built in, making
>> much simplier implementation--once you get past the configuration bits.
>>
> I take it you're referring to the nRF2401A transceiver pair pictured
> here: http://www.sparkfun.com/shop/index.php?shop=1&itemid=396
> ?
> 1Mbps is indeed an impressive throughput for $19.95. What exactly
> are you using them for, if you don't mind my asking?
I'm using them as well, for a sports training aid, communicating between a
sensor unit (MSP430) and a processing/display unit (ARM). I'm only using
them for the prototypes, of course, I'll just use the chips for production.
Leon
2006-01-26 by Stefan Trethan
>Well, i'm all for SMD, but i can see that it will be very expensive to
> Your argument makes sense if you're complaining about a lack of
>
> package choices and this may have something to do with your
>
> distributor. If not, then it wasn't economically feasible for your
>
> preferred package to be manufactured anymore.
>
>
> Don't get me wrong....I still buy DIP ICs and thru hole components but
>
> only in quantities for prototype bread boarding. It's SMD all the way
>
> after that....Smaller and cheaper (in most cases). Heck, we're talking
>
> things like one hundred .1uf 16V caps for just over a dollar.
2006-01-26 by Jim Miller
2006-01-26 by Leon Heller
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Miller" <jtmiller2@...>
To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 7:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Making a homebrew board using QFN packages
> They're not made for humans at all anymore. They're made for pick and
> place
> robots. I just bought a little memory stick at Walmart and it has a clear
> plastic case. Inside I can see surface mount resistors which must only be
> 2mm or less long and 1mm wide.
>
Murata is producing 01005 capacitors, that's 0.4 mm x 0.2 mm x 0.2 mm!
Leon
2006-01-27 by Dave Hylands
> They're not made for humans at all anymore. They're made for pick and place0603's are 0.060" x 0.030" (1.5mm x 0.75mm) These aren't too bad to deal with.
> robots. I just bought a little memory stick at Walmart and it has a clear
> plastic case. Inside I can see surface mount resistors which must only be
> 2mm or less long and 1mm wide.
2006-01-27 by bob_ledoux
--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "alan00463" <alan00463@y...> wrote:
>
> --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "bob_ledoux" <bobledoux@p...>
wrote:
> >
> > I just bought the Sparkfun MIRF units. They are nice. I've been
> > experimenting with cheap RF units and the antenna requirements can
> > make or break the whole system. The MIRF have them built in, making
> > much simplier implementation--once you get past the configuration
bits.
> >
> I take it you're referring to the nRF2401A transceiver pair pictured
> here: http://www.sparkfun.com/shop/index.php?shop=1&itemid=396
> ?
> 1Mbps is indeed an impressive throughput for $19.95. What exactly
> are you using them for, if you don't mind my asking?
>
> Alan
>
2006-01-27 by derekhawkins
> Inside I can see surface mount resistors which must only be0805 - 2 X 1.25 mm
> 2mm or less long and 1mm wide.
>and place
> They're not made for humans at all anymore. They're made for pick
> robots. I just bought a little memory stick at Walmart and it has aclear
> plastic case. Inside I can see surface mount resistors which mustonly be
> 2mm or less long and 1mm wide.
>
> jim ab3cv
>
>
>
> After all, components should be
> made for humans to use, not ants.
>
> ST
>
2006-01-27 by Leon Heller
----- Original Message -----
From: "derekhawkins" <eldata@...>
To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 3:56 PM
Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] SMD popular component sizes
>> Inside I can see surface mount resistors which must only be
>> 2mm or less long and 1mm wide.
>
> 0805 - 2 X 1.25 mm
> 0603 - 1.6 X .8 mm
> 0402 - 1 X .5 mm
> 0201 - .6 X .3 mm
>
> Currently I buy and hand solder down to 0402s (small quantities).
> Down to 0603 is a piece of cake but problem with 0402 is visual
> confirmation of proper solder joint and for that I either use a
> camera (macro shot) or microscope. Just using a DIMM isn't good
> enough.
>
> This is coming from someone who needs glasses in order to read or see
> just about anything properly in a 3' radius. Those with younger eyes
> will be amazed at how something that appears daunting at first soon
> becomes a walk in the park. Many of us can probably recall when
> soldering even a 1206 (3.2 X 1.6 mm) seemed like an impossible task.
I routinely use 0805 and don't have problems with 0603, although I'm 63. I
do need to use plenty of magnification, sometimes a microscope is necessary.
Leon
2006-01-27 by derekhawkins
> I routinely use 0805 and don't have problems with 0603, although I'mThought I would need a microscope for placement and soldering of 0402s
> 63. I do need to use plenty of magnification, sometimes a microscope
> is necessary.
>63. I
>
> I routinely use 0805 and don't have problems with 0603, although I'm
> do need to use plenty of magnification, sometimes a microscope isnecessary.
>
> Leon
>
2006-01-27 by Dave Hylands
> Provided you're definitely hand soldering and not reflowing, a "trick"What would the changes be in the "modify them accordingly" step?
> to use for easy visual placement of these small components is not to
> use standard reflow pad layouts. Instead, import them into your library
> editor, modify them accordingly and save as new HS (or whatever)
> layouts.
2006-01-27 by Leon Heller
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Hylands" <dhylands@...>
To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: SMD popular component sizes
> Hi Derek,
>
>> Provided you're definitely hand soldering and not reflowing, a "trick"
>> to use for easy visual placement of these small components is not to
>> use standard reflow pad layouts. Instead, import them into your library
>> editor, modify them accordingly and save as new HS (or whatever)
>> layouts.
>
> What would the changes be in the "modify them accordingly" step?
Make them a bit longer. I often do this with the pads for SM chips.
Leon
---
[This E-mail has been scanned for viruses but it is your responsibility
to maintain up to date anti virus software on the device that you are
currently using to read this email. ]
2006-01-27 by derekhawkins
> What would the changes be in the "modify them accordingly" step?Using 0402 as an example. Here is a picture of a 0402 cap;
>
> Hi Derek,
> What would the changes be in the "modify them accordingly" step?
>
> --
> Dave Hylands
> Vancouver, BC, Canada
> http://www.DaveHylands.com/
>
2006-01-27 by Dave Hylands
> > What would the changes be in the "modify them accordingly" step?--
> 1. Lengthen the solder area as Leon indicated;
>
> 2. Shorten the width to just over .5 mm
>
> 3. Shorten the pad area beneath the chip so that the contact area on
> each side of the chip ends where the pad ends under the chip. In
> other words, for 0402, only about .5 X .2 mm (W X L1 or L2) of the
> pad is under each side of the chip.
2006-01-30 by idaho_huckleberry
>toaster
> > You could reflow it in a wok.
>
> Toaster oven would be better. Saw a nice infrared convection
> oven with digital temperature display and controls, if only it waswrote:
> programmable.
>
>
> > Solder paste is (relatively) cheap: $16
>
> That's $16.00 for 1.2 ounces BTW.
>
>
> --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Young" <mikewhy@s...>
> >$16
> > You could reflow it in a wok. Solder paste is (relatively) cheap:
> atYou may be interested in an article that appeared in the Circuit
> >
>
2006-01-30 by idaho_huckleberry
>was
> --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "derekhawkins" <eldata@m...>
> wrote:
> >
> > > You could reflow it in a wok.
> >
> > Toaster oven would be better. Saw a nice infrared convection
> toaster
> > oven with digital temperature display and controls, if only it
> > programmable.cheap:
> >
> >
> > > Solder paste is (relatively) cheap: $16
> >
> > That's $16.00 for 1.2 ounces BTW.
> >
> >
> > --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Young" <mikewhy@s...>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > You could reflow it in a wok. Solder paste is (relatively)
> $16Sorry, I was getting caught up after being out of town for a few days
> > at
> > >
> >
>
> You may be interested in an article that appeared in the Circuit
> Cellar magazine, July, 2004, Issue 168. The author described the
> circuits required to convert a toaster oven to a reflow oven,
> complete with profiles, and down loadable software.
>
> Dave Miller
>
2006-01-30 by Mike Young
>> > > You could reflow it in a wok.No worries, Dave. The "problem" with ovens is the presumption that careful
>> >
>> > > You could reflow it in a wok. Solder paste is (relatively)
> cheap:
>> $16
>> > at
>> > >
>> >
>>
>> You may be interested in an article that appeared in the Circuit
>> Cellar magazine, July, 2004, Issue 168. The author described the
>> circuits required to convert a toaster oven to a reflow oven,
>> complete with profiles, and down loadable software.
>>
>> Dave Miller
>>
>
> Sorry, I was getting caught up after being out of town for a few days
> and did not see that this had already been discussed.
2006-01-30 by cristian
>But the Evaluation Board used there is no more in production.
>You may be interested in an article that appeared in the Circuit
>Cellar magazine, July, 2004, Issue 168. The author described the
>circuits required to convert a toaster oven to a reflow oven,
>complete with profiles, and down loadable software.
>
>Dave Miller