Yahoo Groups archive

Homebrew_PCBs

Index last updated: 2026-03-31 23:13 UTC

Thread

Making a homebrew board using QFN packages

Making a homebrew board using QFN packages

2006-01-25 by Anthony

After great success with through hole boards, I have a new project
starting, one of the components I want to use is the nRF905 from nordic
semiconductor, the '905 is only available in a QFN package which
doesn't seem to be the most hobbiest friendly of formats. As far as I
can tell there are no legs on it...

Is it possible to hand solder one of these, filling in the gap? do they
make sockets for them (I have found prototype sockets on line but $400-
$500 each they are a bit out of budget)

Any ideas folks?

Anthony

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Making a homebrew board using QFN packages

2006-01-25 by Leon Heller

http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller
----- Original Message -----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "Anthony" <toftat@...>
To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 3:24 PM
Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Making a homebrew board using QFN packages


> After great success with through hole boards, I have a new project
> starting, one of the components I want to use is the nRF905 from nordic
> semiconductor, the '905 is only available in a QFN package which
> doesn't seem to be the most hobbiest friendly of formats. As far as I
> can tell there are no legs on it...
>
> Is it possible to hand solder one of these, filling in the gap? do they
> make sockets for them (I have found prototype sockets on line but $400-
> $500 each they are a bit out of budget)

I have managed to solder the similar packaged ADXL202 onto a home-made PCB.
It was difficult, though. It helps if you make the pads longer than they are
on the standard QFN footprint, so that you can get the tip of a soldering
iron in there.

I tried with the Nordic nRF2401 on a double-sided PCB, but gave up and had
them mounted by a specialist SMT assembly company. They didn't charge me as
it was such a small job (it took them about 20 minutes), it was just before
Xmas, and I'd gone a long way on my motorbike to get to them. 8-) Their
minimum charge is 50 GBP.

Leon

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Making a homebrew board using QFN packages

2006-01-25 by Stefan Trethan

Not a problem, i have done two boards now with thin QFN (32 and 24 pin i
think both 0.5mm spacing).
The thermal pad is a bit of a pain though, since one IC needed quite a bit
of heatsinking. Can't plate vias so i ended up making a large hole and
filling it with solder. Not ideal but works. Maxim suggests to make a
large via/hole if you don't need heatsinking, then you can take it off
with a soldering iron by heating through there.

I solder them by smearing some SMD paste on the board and using hot air
after careful placement. Works great, bridges can be cleared with solder
braid, excess solder is pressed out from under the case and beads up at
the sides. Make the pads longer so that they extend a bit straight outside.

You can even reflow them by putting a soldering iron with a large tip and
a good sized ball of solder against the top. It will heat through the case
and melt the solder underneath. Probably useful if there's a bad
connection.

But, what good is this all when you can't find the part because it got
lost in the bubbles of the antistatic foam? They already have to put some
components in SMD reel strips to keep them. Stupid people! why can't they
use DIL?


ST


Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 16:24:15 +0100, Anthony <toftat@...> wrote:

> After great success with through hole boards, I have a new project
>
> starting, one of the components I want to use is the nRF905 from nordic
>
> semiconductor, the '905 is only available in a QFN package which
>
> doesn't seem to be the most hobbiest friendly of formats. As far as I
>
> can tell there are no legs on it...
>
>
> Is it possible to hand solder one of these, filling in the gap? do they
>
> make sockets for them (I have found prototype sockets on line but $400-
>
> $500 each they are a bit out of budget)
>
>
> Any ideas folks?
>
>
> Anthony
>

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Making a homebrew board using QFN packages

2006-01-25 by Mike Young

You could reflow it in a wok. Solder paste is (relatively) cheap: $16 at
http://www.stencilsunlimited.com/solder_products.php. As to skillets being
less than professional, I would have to agree to the extent that ISO
certification is unlikely. Otherwise, it works just fine. It's no less
controlled than hot air, and infinitely better than hand soldering.

----- Original Message -----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "Anthony" <toftat@...>
To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 9:24 AM
Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Making a homebrew board using QFN packages


> After great success with through hole boards, I have a new project
> starting, one of the components I want to use is the nRF905 from nordic
> semiconductor, the '905 is only available in a QFN package which
> doesn't seem to be the most hobbiest friendly of formats. As far as I
> can tell there are no legs on it...
>
> Is it possible to hand solder one of these, filling in the gap? do they
> make sockets for them (I have found prototype sockets on line but $400-
> $500 each they are a bit out of budget)
>
> Any ideas folks?
>
> Anthony
>
>
>
>
>
> Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and
> Photos:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
>
> If Files or Photos are running short of space, post them here:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs_Archives/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>

Re: Making a homebrew board using QFN packages

2006-01-25 by derekhawkins

> They already have to put some components in
> SMD reel strips to keep them.

Tapes are really intended for pick and place machines. But you knew
that. A cut tape purchase simply means they cut a piece off with the
quantity you ordered.

> Stupid people! why can't they use DIL?

Then you'll be complaing that your cellphone was too be big...."Why
can't they make <whatever> smaller?". More than likely, available
package choices depends on the demand for those packages.

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Stefan Trethan"
<stefan_trethan@g...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Not a problem, i have done two boards now with thin QFN (32 and 24
pin i

Re: Making a homebrew board using QFN packages

2006-01-25 by Anthony

After more consideration, I am seriously considering getting the MiRF
devices from sparkfun, that way I don't have to deal with the
requirements for the RF circuit design either...

Thanks for the responses guys...

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Young" <mikewhy@s...>
wrote:
>
> You could reflow it in a wok. Solder paste is (relatively) cheap:
$16 at
> http://www.stencilsunlimited.com/solder_products.php. As to
skillets being
> less than professional, I would have to agree to the extent that
ISO
> certification is unlikely. Otherwise, it works just fine. It's no
less
> controlled than hot air, and infinitely better than hand soldering.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Anthony" <toftat@c...>
> To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 9:24 AM
> Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Making a homebrew board using QFN packages
>
>
> > After great success with through hole boards, I have a new project
> > starting, one of the components I want to use is the nRF905 from
nordic
> > semiconductor, the '905 is only available in a QFN package which
> > doesn't seem to be the most hobbiest friendly of formats. As far
as I
> > can tell there are no legs on it...
> >
> > Is it possible to hand solder one of these, filling in the gap?
do they
> > make sockets for them (I have found prototype sockets on line but
$400-
> > $500 each they are a bit out of budget)
> >
> > Any ideas folks?
> >
> > Anthony
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files,
and
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> > Photos:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
> >
> > If Files or Photos are running short of space, post them here:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs_Archives/
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Re: Making a homebrew board using QFN packages

2006-01-25 by derekhawkins

> You could reflow it in a wok.

Toaster oven would be better. Saw a nice infrared convection toaster
oven with digital temperature display and controls, if only it was
programmable.


> Solder paste is (relatively) cheap: $16

That's $16.00 for 1.2 ounces BTW.


Show quoted textHide quoted text
--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Young" <mikewhy@s...> wrote:
>
> You could reflow it in a wok. Solder paste is (relatively) cheap: $16
at
>

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Making a homebrew board using QFN packages

2006-01-25 by Mike Young

----- Original Message -----
From: "derekhawkins" <eldata@...>
To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 12:37 PM
Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Making a homebrew board using QFN packages


>> You could reflow it in a wok.
>
> Toaster oven would be better. Saw a nice infrared convection toaster
> oven with digital temperature display and controls, if only it was
> programmable.

Better in what way? If you're buying new, sure, get the toaster oven. I had
an old skillet on hand, and it stores very compactly. The "face" is open so
I can readily watch it cook, and even point an IR thermometer at it if I
want. But I haven't found a need. Medium flame, anywhere in the middle third
of the dial, gives a usable temp profile.

>> Solder paste is (relatively) cheap: $16
>
> That's $16.00 for 1.2 ounces BTW.

Yup, and it has a shelf life of about a year. 35 grams is more than a
non-production shop can use in that time. I'll likely throw out more than
half of it. In the meantime, I gain all the benefits. What can be simpler
than mashing the tiny parts approximately into place, and then stir frying
for 4 minutes? (Peanut butter and jelly sandwiches come to mind, but not by
much.)

Re: Making a homebrew board using QFN packages

2006-01-25 by derekhawkins

> If you're buying new, sure, get the toaster oven.

What's wrong with an old toaster oven if one just happens to have one
on hand?



Show quoted textHide quoted text
--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Young" <mikewhy@s...> wrote:
>
> Better in what way? If you're buying new, sure, get the toaster oven.
I had
> an old skillet on hand, and it stores very compactly. The "face" is

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Making a homebrew board using QFN packages

2006-01-25 by Stefan Trethan

On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:09:12 +0100, derekhawkins <eldata@...> wrote:

> Tapes are really intended for pick and place machines. But you knew
>
> that. A cut tape purchase simply means they cut a piece off with the
>
> quantity you ordered.

Yes, but they can't simply put them in a box with some antistatic foam
these days - without the palstic packaging they would get lost.

Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
>
>> Stupid people! why can't they use DIL?
>
>
> Then you'll be complaing that your cellphone was too be big...."Why
>
> can't they make <whatever> smaller?". More than likely, available
>
> package choices depends on the demand for those packages.
>

I will never ever complain a phone is too big! If they would just rip out
all the junk that i don't need and put in a simple circuit that actually
allows you to call someone there wouold be plenty of space to use "sane"
smd components. But wait, they did that, and i have such a phone....

ST

Re: Making a homebrew board using QFN packages

2006-01-26 by derekhawkins

> Yes, but they can't simply put them in a box with some antistatic
> foam these days

Your argument makes sense if you're complaining about a lack of
package choices and this may have something to do with your
distributor. If not, then it wasn't economically feasible for your
preferred package to be manufactured anymore.

Don't get me wrong....I still buy DIP ICs and thru hole components but
only in quantities for prototype bread boarding. It's SMD all the way
after that....Smaller and cheaper (in most cases). Heck, we're talking
things like one hundred .1uf 16V caps for just over a dollar.

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Stefan Trethan"
<stefan_trethan@g...> wrote:
>
>
> Yes, but they can't simply put them in a box with some antistatic
foam
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> these days - without the palstic packaging they would get lost.
>

Re: Making a homebrew board using QFN packages

2006-01-26 by bob_ledoux

I just bought the Sparkfun MIRF units. They are nice. I've been
experimenting with cheap RF units and the antenna requirements can
make or break the whole system. The MIRF have them built in, making
much simplier implementation--once you get past the configuration bits.


Show quoted textHide quoted text
--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Anthony" <toftat@c...> wrote:
>
> After more consideration, I am seriously considering getting the MiRF
> devices from sparkfun, that way I don't have to deal with the
> requirements for the RF circuit design either...
>
>

Re: Making a homebrew board using QFN packages

2006-01-26 by alan00463

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "bob_ledoux" <bobledoux@p...> wrote:
>
> I just bought the Sparkfun MIRF units. They are nice. I've been
> experimenting with cheap RF units and the antenna requirements can
> make or break the whole system. The MIRF have them built in, making
> much simplier implementation--once you get past the configuration bits.
>
I take it you're referring to the nRF2401A transceiver pair pictured
here: http://www.sparkfun.com/shop/index.php?shop=1&itemid=396
?
1Mbps is indeed an impressive throughput for $19.95. What exactly
are you using them for, if you don't mind my asking?

Alan

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Making a homebrew board using QFN packages

2006-01-26 by Leon Heller

----- Original Message -----
From: "alan00463" <alan00463@...>
To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 2:28 PM
Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Making a homebrew board using QFN packages


> --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "bob_ledoux" <bobledoux@p...> wrote:
>>
>> I just bought the Sparkfun MIRF units. They are nice. I've been
>> experimenting with cheap RF units and the antenna requirements can
>> make or break the whole system. The MIRF have them built in, making
>> much simplier implementation--once you get past the configuration bits.
>>
> I take it you're referring to the nRF2401A transceiver pair pictured
> here: http://www.sparkfun.com/shop/index.php?shop=1&itemid=396
> ?
> 1Mbps is indeed an impressive throughput for $19.95. What exactly
> are you using them for, if you don't mind my asking?

I'm using them as well, for a sports training aid, communicating between a
sensor unit (MSP430) and a processing/display unit (ARM). I'm only using
them for the prototypes, of course, I'll just use the chips for production.

Leon

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Making a homebrew board using QFN packages

2006-01-26 by Stefan Trethan

On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 02:48:27 +0100, derekhawkins <eldata@...> wrote:

Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Your argument makes sense if you're complaining about a lack of
>
> package choices and this may have something to do with your
>
> distributor. If not, then it wasn't economically feasible for your
>
> preferred package to be manufactured anymore.
>
>
> Don't get me wrong....I still buy DIP ICs and thru hole components but
>
> only in quantities for prototype bread boarding. It's SMD all the way
>
> after that....Smaller and cheaper (in most cases). Heck, we're talking
>
> things like one hundred .1uf 16V caps for just over a dollar.


Well, i'm all for SMD, but i can see that it will be very expensive to
make prototypes very soon.
Now you can still sort of find ways to make boards and populating yourself
for most parts, but i'm really too close to the limits of what i can do
for comfort here and they are not stopping making things smaller and
smaller. Power is becoming a real problem - they put 2W losses in a 5x5mm
thin qfp without blinking an eye - you have TO220 size for that normally.
If you don't have real good boards with vias and stuff that's turning into
a real problem. Packages where you could just flange a heatsink on are
long gone.
If they make the spacing much smaller i simple won't be able to make the
traces because of underetching, there isn't much headroom left.

What i'm saying is it will be getting too hard to use many parts soon,
that's all. I would not mind them stopping miniaturization on a package
level right now, it's plenty small for me. After all, components should be
made for humans to use, not ants.

ST

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Making a homebrew board using QFN packages

2006-01-26 by Jim Miller

They're not made for humans at all anymore. They're made for pick and place
robots. I just bought a little memory stick at Walmart and it has a clear
plastic case. Inside I can see surface mount resistors which must only be
2mm or less long and 1mm wide.

jim ab3cv



After all, components should be
made for humans to use, not ants.

ST

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Making a homebrew board using QFN packages

2006-01-26 by Leon Heller

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Miller" <jtmiller2@...>
To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 7:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Making a homebrew board using QFN packages


> They're not made for humans at all anymore. They're made for pick and
> place
> robots. I just bought a little memory stick at Walmart and it has a clear
> plastic case. Inside I can see surface mount resistors which must only be
> 2mm or less long and 1mm wide.
>

Murata is producing 01005 capacitors, that's 0.4 mm x 0.2 mm x 0.2 mm!

Leon

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Making a homebrew board using QFN packages

2006-01-27 by Dave Hylands

Hi Jim,

> They're not made for humans at all anymore. They're made for pick and place
> robots. I just bought a little memory stick at Walmart and it has a clear
> plastic case. Inside I can see surface mount resistors which must only be
> 2mm or less long and 1mm wide.

0603's are 0.060" x 0.030" (1.5mm x 0.75mm) These aren't too bad to deal with.
0402's are 0.040" x 0.020" (1mm x 0.5mm) These are strating to get
tiny, but are pretty standard on cell phone circuit boards. I solder
these very carefully, and try to ensure I have more than one left
because inevitably I'll breath too hard. These are very hard to find
on the floor.

0201's are becoming more popular Grrr. surface tension of the solder
on the tip of your soldering iron is now a pain.

And as Leon mentioned 01005 (half again as big). Thankfully I've never
had to deal with those.

--
Dave Hylands
Vancouver, BC, Canada
http://www.DaveHylands.com/

Re: Making a homebrew board using QFN packages

2006-01-27 by bob_ledoux

They are for a hot air balloon temperature reporting system. I use a
Dallas DS18S20 digital sensor to a PIC and then to the MIRF. The
temperature is transmitted to an LCD in the basket, about 50 feet away..

I've just received the MIRF's so I haven't finished the software.

I spent about 100 hours trying to get cheap 433mhz units working well.
Even with manchester coding and multiple samples I couldn't get
reliable RF transfer. I did get the units to work by sending a pulse
width modulated signal where the pwm width represented the
temperature. But because of receiver "switch on" delay I had to
calibrate the unit with an oil bath to translate sent pwm to received
value.

I understand the nRF2401 are becoming widely used for short distance
data transfers. Each transfer is very few bits, but the rapid update
rate makes it useful for systems like remote keyboards.

Its interesting that Norway, producers of the nRF2401, has a rapidly
growing high tech industry.


Show quoted textHide quoted text
--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "alan00463" <alan00463@y...> wrote:
>
> --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "bob_ledoux" <bobledoux@p...>
wrote:
> >
> > I just bought the Sparkfun MIRF units. They are nice. I've been
> > experimenting with cheap RF units and the antenna requirements can
> > make or break the whole system. The MIRF have them built in, making
> > much simplier implementation--once you get past the configuration
bits.
> >
> I take it you're referring to the nRF2401A transceiver pair pictured
> here: http://www.sparkfun.com/shop/index.php?shop=1&itemid=396
> ?
> 1Mbps is indeed an impressive throughput for $19.95. What exactly
> are you using them for, if you don't mind my asking?
>
> Alan
>

SMD popular component sizes

2006-01-27 by derekhawkins

> Inside I can see surface mount resistors which must only be
> 2mm or less long and 1mm wide.

0805 - 2 X 1.25 mm
0603 - 1.6 X .8 mm
0402 - 1 X .5 mm
0201 - .6 X .3 mm

Currently I buy and hand solder down to 0402s (small quantities).
Down to 0603 is a piece of cake but problem with 0402 is visual
confirmation of proper solder joint and for that I either use a
camera (macro shot) or microscope. Just using a DIMM isn't good
enough.

This is coming from someone who needs glasses in order to read or see
just about anything properly in a 3' radius. Those with younger eyes
will be amazed at how something that appears daunting at first soon
becomes a walk in the park. Many of us can probably recall when
soldering even a 1206 (3.2 X 1.6 mm) seemed like an impossible task.


--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Jim Miller" <jtmiller2@c...>
wrote:
>
> They're not made for humans at all anymore. They're made for pick
and place
> robots. I just bought a little memory stick at Walmart and it has a
clear
> plastic case. Inside I can see surface mount resistors which must
only be
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 2mm or less long and 1mm wide.
>
> jim ab3cv
>
>
>
> After all, components should be
> made for humans to use, not ants.
>
> ST
>

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] SMD popular component sizes

2006-01-27 by Leon Heller

----- Original Message -----
From: "derekhawkins" <eldata@...>
To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 3:56 PM
Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] SMD popular component sizes


>> Inside I can see surface mount resistors which must only be
>> 2mm or less long and 1mm wide.
>
> 0805 - 2 X 1.25 mm
> 0603 - 1.6 X .8 mm
> 0402 - 1 X .5 mm
> 0201 - .6 X .3 mm
>
> Currently I buy and hand solder down to 0402s (small quantities).
> Down to 0603 is a piece of cake but problem with 0402 is visual
> confirmation of proper solder joint and for that I either use a
> camera (macro shot) or microscope. Just using a DIMM isn't good
> enough.
>
> This is coming from someone who needs glasses in order to read or see
> just about anything properly in a 3' radius. Those with younger eyes
> will be amazed at how something that appears daunting at first soon
> becomes a walk in the park. Many of us can probably recall when
> soldering even a 1206 (3.2 X 1.6 mm) seemed like an impossible task.

I routinely use 0805 and don't have problems with 0603, although I'm 63. I
do need to use plenty of magnification, sometimes a microscope is necessary.

Leon

Re: SMD popular component sizes

2006-01-27 by derekhawkins

> I routinely use 0805 and don't have problems with 0603, although I'm
> 63. I do need to use plenty of magnification, sometimes a microscope
> is necessary.

Thought I would need a microscope for placement and soldering of 0402s
but my 5X magnification visor works just fine after a bit of practice.
Provided you're definitely hand soldering and not reflowing, a "trick"
to use for easy visual placement of these small components is not to
use standard reflow pad layouts. Instead, import them into your library
editor, modify them accordingly and save as new HS (or whatever)
layouts.


--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Leon Heller" <leon.heller@b...>
wrote:
>
>
> I routinely use 0805 and don't have problems with 0603, although I'm
63. I
> do need to use plenty of magnification, sometimes a microscope is
necessary.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Leon
>

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: SMD popular component sizes

2006-01-27 by Dave Hylands

Hi Derek,

> Provided you're definitely hand soldering and not reflowing, a "trick"
> to use for easy visual placement of these small components is not to
> use standard reflow pad layouts. Instead, import them into your library
> editor, modify them accordingly and save as new HS (or whatever)
> layouts.

What would the changes be in the "modify them accordingly" step?

--
Dave Hylands
Vancouver, BC, Canada
http://www.DaveHylands.com/

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: SMD popular component sizes

2006-01-27 by Leon Heller

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Hylands" <dhylands@...>
To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: SMD popular component sizes


> Hi Derek,
>
>> Provided you're definitely hand soldering and not reflowing, a "trick"
>> to use for easy visual placement of these small components is not to
>> use standard reflow pad layouts. Instead, import them into your library
>> editor, modify them accordingly and save as new HS (or whatever)
>> layouts.
>
> What would the changes be in the "modify them accordingly" step?

Make them a bit longer. I often do this with the pads for SM chips.

Leon
---
[This E-mail has been scanned for viruses but it is your responsibility
to maintain up to date anti virus software on the device that you are
currently using to read this email. ]

Re: SMD popular component sizes

2006-01-27 by derekhawkins

> What would the changes be in the "modify them accordingly" step?

Using 0402 as an example. Here is a picture of a 0402 cap;

http://rocky.digikey.com/WebLib/Panasonic/Web%20Photos/ECD-GOE%
20Series.jpg

Here is a data sheet;

http://www.panasonic.com/industrial/components/pdf/abj0000ce8.pdf

Editing with your imported standard reflow layout, you would;

1. Lengthen the solder area as Leon indicated;

2. Shorten the width to just over .5 mm

3. Shorten the pad area beneath the chip so that the contact area on
each side of the chip ends where the pad ends under the chip. In
other words, for 0402, only about .5 X .2 mm (W X L1 or L2) of the
pad is under each side of the chip.

1 above allows for easy soldering and aids heat dissipation. 2 and 3
above allow for quick alignment along X and Y axes. Remember, you'll
be hand soldering so a layout pattern that facilitates sutface
tension centering is no longer applicable. If heat dissipation
requirements, say in the case of a resistor, are near the limit of
the device then either stick with the reflow pattern or use a bigger
package size with standard pad layout.

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Dave Hylands <dhylands@g...>
wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Hi Derek,
> What would the changes be in the "modify them accordingly" step?
>
> --
> Dave Hylands
> Vancouver, BC, Canada
> http://www.DaveHylands.com/
>

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: SMD popular component sizes

2006-01-27 by Dave Hylands

Thanks (to both Derek & Leon) - makes alot of sense.

> > What would the changes be in the "modify them accordingly" step?

> 1. Lengthen the solder area as Leon indicated;
>
> 2. Shorten the width to just over .5 mm
>
> 3. Shorten the pad area beneath the chip so that the contact area on
> each side of the chip ends where the pad ends under the chip. In
> other words, for 0402, only about .5 X .2 mm (W X L1 or L2) of the
> pad is under each side of the chip.

--
Dave Hylands
Vancouver, BC, Canada
http://www.DaveHylands.com/

Re: Making a homebrew board using QFN packages

2006-01-30 by idaho_huckleberry

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "derekhawkins" <eldata@m...>
wrote:
>
> > You could reflow it in a wok.
>
> Toaster oven would be better. Saw a nice infrared convection
toaster
> oven with digital temperature display and controls, if only it was
> programmable.
>
>
> > Solder paste is (relatively) cheap: $16
>
> That's $16.00 for 1.2 ounces BTW.
>
>
> --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Young" <mikewhy@s...>
wrote:
> >
> > You could reflow it in a wok. Solder paste is (relatively) cheap:
$16
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> at
> >
>

You may be interested in an article that appeared in the Circuit
Cellar magazine, July, 2004, Issue 168. The author described the
circuits required to convert a toaster oven to a reflow oven,
complete with profiles, and down loadable software.

Dave Miller

Re: Making a homebrew board using QFN packages

2006-01-30 by idaho_huckleberry

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "idaho_huckleberry"
<dmiller45@j...> wrote:
>
> --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "derekhawkins" <eldata@m...>
> wrote:
> >
> > > You could reflow it in a wok.
> >
> > Toaster oven would be better. Saw a nice infrared convection
> toaster
> > oven with digital temperature display and controls, if only it
was
> > programmable.
> >
> >
> > > Solder paste is (relatively) cheap: $16
> >
> > That's $16.00 for 1.2 ounces BTW.
> >
> >
> > --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Young" <mikewhy@s...>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > You could reflow it in a wok. Solder paste is (relatively)
cheap:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> $16
> > at
> > >
> >
>
> You may be interested in an article that appeared in the Circuit
> Cellar magazine, July, 2004, Issue 168. The author described the
> circuits required to convert a toaster oven to a reflow oven,
> complete with profiles, and down loadable software.
>
> Dave Miller
>

Sorry, I was getting caught up after being out of town for a few days
and did not see that this had already been discussed.

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Making a homebrew board using QFN packages

2006-01-30 by Mike Young

----- Original Message -----
>> > > You could reflow it in a wok.
>> >
>> > > You could reflow it in a wok. Solder paste is (relatively)
> cheap:
>> $16
>> > at
>> > >
>> >
>>
>> You may be interested in an article that appeared in the Circuit
>> Cellar magazine, July, 2004, Issue 168. The author described the
>> circuits required to convert a toaster oven to a reflow oven,
>> complete with profiles, and down loadable software.
>>
>> Dave Miller
>>
>
> Sorry, I was getting caught up after being out of town for a few days
> and did not see that this had already been discussed.

No worries, Dave. The "problem" with ovens is the presumption that careful
and very fine control is needed, along with the associated cost and
complexity. I find this not to be so, and that simply watching for full
reflow on an open skillet is sufficient. After all, this is all we're doing
with hot air. In any case, there are so many advantages to reflowing
compared to hand soldering that it's worth experimenting. After removing the
need for the thermocouple, control circuitry, and power switching, the only
thing standing in the way is a $20 tube of paste. This puts it well within
reach for anyone wanting to experiment with surface mount components. I
wouldn't categorize it as a life-changing experience, but getting rid of
that particular bogeyman opens the way for other opportunities.

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Making a homebrew board using QFN packages

2006-01-30 by cristian

>
>You may be interested in an article that appeared in the Circuit
>Cellar magazine, July, 2004, Issue 168. The author described the
>circuits required to convert a toaster oven to a reflow oven,
>complete with profiles, and down loadable software.
>
>Dave Miller

But the Evaluation Board used there is no more in production.
Cristian