I'm not sure how you got "hung up" out of my comments. Maybe you got confused - I'm not the OP. However, I wouldn't focus on using fat traces for avoiding copper removal. I think that would be the hard way to do it. I much prefer to create a ground polygon that encompasses the entire board and then let the layout software figure out the actual shape. In eagle, I put a ground poly on both the top and bottom with isolate set to 24 mil. Then I route the board. The only places eagle will take copper is for isolation and "orphaned" copper areas (not connected to ground). Look at http://www.geocities.com/pcbs4less/boardtop.gif for an example of this. Red and green are copper areas/traces. As you can see, this design keeps much more copper than one using just fat traces. It seems much cleaner and makes for a quieter board, noise-wise, because of the extensive ground areas. Besides, thin traces just look more professional to me :) Phil --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Mycroft2152 <mycroft2152@y...> wrote: > Hi Phil, > > Don't be hung up on very thin traces. Having wide > traces means less copper to etch away. Only use the > thinnest to get the circuit laid out. > > You my want to post a photo of the pcb or else the > layout for comments. > > Myc
Message
Re: Another rookie starts a high volume pcb project.
2005-07-14 by Phil
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.