Homebrew_PCBs

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Robert Hedan <robert.hedan@v...>
wrote:

> "BTW, I can tell you are scanning at way past your scanners optical
> resolution, my guess is about 3 or 4 times the optical resolution.

It is a

> waste of time and filespace to scan at anything above the optical
> resolution, above that your scanner software is just resampling."
>
> I am? I'm using a microscope with an optical camera. The

microscope is on

> the lowest setting, It can go up to something like 1,600 or so.

there's no

> resampling there, it's all optical, no digital.

It looks pixellated. That's what I'm going on. What do you mean by
"optical camera"? Digital camera? What is it's native resolution?

> Yup, roger on the shorter file names and brackets, I hate it when

they screw

> up.

It's a pain. I've just been doing it a long time so I know some of the
ins and outs of Yahoogroups.

Steve Greenfield