Yahoo Groups archive

Homebrew PCBs

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:05 UTC

Message

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: immersed etching

2005-04-16 by Stefan Trethan

On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 08:27:21 -0000, ballendo <ballendo@...> wrote:

>
> Hello,
> Can I ask a really dumb question?
> When I visit my board house (they're local and let me "tour" as I
> wish; a 900x certified facility) I see ALL their plating and etching
> baths using vertical board holders closely spaced in large tanks.
> No slanted walls, No bubbles. But here IS good recirculation of the
> etchant. (They do acid etching, AIRC)
> If it works for them; why doesn't it work for us?
> Ballendo


It does work for us, however if i have uneven etch that limits resolution  
and min. track width as the faster portions get etched more. True i do not  
really currently need more resolution than i can get, but i still like to  
solve problems.


> P.S. A buddy bought a commercial spray etcher from a closing low
> volume PCB fab house (They mostly stuffed boards, so were not really
> a PCB mfr. Had the spray etcher to be "complete" I guess.)
> Nothing special about it. Again boards/panels held vertically, with
> SS spray jets on each plexiglas side--might have been polycarb
> instead of acrylic? It WAS clear--and about 2' high by 3 feet wide
> and about 4-6 inches thick The spray nozzles were on about 8 inch
> centers The spray form was a flat cone, and they overlapped about 1/3
> cone. (So there was a spray line about every 2-2/3 inches)
> I'm pretty sure it had a back and forth motion to the board holder;
> kinda like Markus Zingg's THP line setup, only 90 degrees turned Like
> duck decoys at an amusement park shooting range.
> The etchant was clear (AP?)
> Worked like a charm; but took up too much space for him so he sold it.
> So the second question is, since we know spray etchers work, why are
> they so hard to duplicate?

Because those manufacturers spend a lot of money and time to develop these  
machines. I have no doubt it can be done (some have), but the simple and  
cheap solution i had aimed for didn't work out for me.

ST

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.