Quite true, but wouldn't you have a difficult time controlling the width of it's 'path'? If there were a really good way to 'set' the resulting width, I can see it being very useful to my process - if I could say I wanted a .003 line width out of the rotating scribe, and it were very uniform, it would certainly speed up my scratching process, even if I had to slow down the linear speed of the plotter head to let the scribe do it's work. *Brian -----Original Message----- From: Stefan Trethan [mailto:stefan_trethan@gmx.at] Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2005 10:19 AM To: Homebrew_PCBs@...m Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: "Twist" on an old method of PCB making. On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 10:01:58 -0600, Brian Schmalz <brian.s@...> wrote: > > Yah, I've never had any problem with getting a clean line when I do > scratching. My biggest problem is that the line is so incredibly thin > and precise > that I have a hard time 'covering' any sizable area in any reasonable > time. I use a carbide tipped scratcher, the thing that's meant to > scratch > through Dykem. > *Brian the rotary scribe would make a wider line. ST Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and files: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs Yahoo! Groups Links
Message
RE: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: "Twist" on an old method of PCB making.
2005-03-20 by Brian Schmalz
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.