On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:28:39 -0500, Thomas P. Gootee <tomg@...> wrote: > > Hmmm... Well... OK. But I routinely use 6.67/1000ths-inch > (2/300ths-inch) tracks and spacing, with toner > transfer, with very close to a 100% success rate. I have also routinely > used 6.67/1000ths-inch tracks (2/300ths- > inch) with 3.33/1000ths-inch (1/300th-inch) spacing, with no problems > (with an HP LJ 4 @ 600DPI, in both cases). > And, in very-limited tests, I have even had almost 100% success with > 1.67/1000ths-inch tracks (i.e. 1 dot wide > printed with an HP LaserJet 4 at 600 dots per inch (i.e. 1/600th-inch > wide, on screen), with HP toner on > Staples' "Picture Paper", as before) (but unfortunately didn't test the > same size-range for the spacing limit). > Tom Gootee Good to hear there is still some room in it. My HPIIID just isn't up to it. Don't you have problems with toner spreading? if i make a 10mil track and 10mil space they turn out not exactly the same width. ST
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Home PCB kit
2005-02-04 by Stefan Trethan
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.