--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "mikeromp2002" <MikeRomp@m...> wrote: > Personally, with soldering a scrap piece of wire, or using one of the > other discussed via methods being so easy (and repairable) I will not > be spending the money on the paint. Remember, when paint dries it > tends to become brittle and possibly even crack with heat. I guess if > it really worked that good/reliably, the "big boys" would be using > something like that on the professional boards. Just a thought. > > Keep us posted if you decide to try it. > Mike R. It looks like I'm going to be the one to save up £6 and nip down to Maplins some time (Farnell, RS etc are the same price). Quite a few people seem to have success using it for bridging clock divider pins on AMD processors, so I imagine thermal cycling (and fairly high temperature) isn't a problem for the modern stuff. In fact, according to the data sheets it seems that curing it at 85deg C or so gives a lower resistance. I intend to use several thinned applications of paint, followed by a coating of something to stop the oxygen attacking it. The idea is to be able to connect up layers on a laminated board (initially 3 layer, 1 double sided bonded to 1 single sided). Using the wire method would take 2 vias, the first to connect the 2 sides of the double sided (and thoroughly smoothed off), then another to connect the 2 outer layers. A blind via from inner to the outer of the single sided board wouldn't be possible with wire. The hope is that maybe I can get connection density high enough to support BGA packages, where there just isn't room for wired jumper vias. My motivation is that I have a device that I really would like to use but is only available in BGA, and increasingly the interesting stuff has no alternative (ARM processors, memory, high speed ADCs etc). All I need now is a free source of 0.4mm copperclad to experiment with! Mike
Message
making vias (was: Re: Plating thruholes.)
2004-08-17 by Mike
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.