Hello everyone, This is my first post to this great group. I meant to reply to this sooner, but just didn't get a round tuit. :) Before anyone asks you to believe chemical exposures (other than chronic occupational overexposures) cause cancers, please first consider the latest clinical findings by scientistss invloved in cancer research, not toxicologists or environmentalists. The findings of the latter two academicians must be understood within the context of the metrics they use to rate carcinogenicity, metrics which leading cancer researchers have recently denounced as false and worthless. The metrics, such as the Ames Assay, were once believed accurate, but now it seems clear were based on false assumptions about thresholds of exposures and confounded further by the lack of proper exposure control groups when these metrics were originally postulated. There is always a lapse of time, usually measured in years, between laboratory research and implementation in the legal/regulatory world. This is further confounded by the current popular thought on this subject, shaped as it is by 30 odd years of drumming into our collective conciousness the mantra: "Kemicalzs Kauzes Kancer". But when the very scientists who once warned us thusly now say "It just isn't so", and when the leading advocate of this new thinking on cancer and chemicals is no less than the world's most published scientist and currently one of the world's leading cancer researchers, THEN you can believe it! http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/ppps/ma_reding_annex2.pdf Just use common sense and practice standard industrial hygene: limit exposure with appropriate clothing and practices, and wash of accidental exposures without delay, and then QUIT WORRYING! Jimbo P.S. If the IPA/cancer link were really plausible would'nt millions of people be at serious risk since IPA is used by the drum as a medicinal/theraputic topical? Wouldn't those areas of the body so chronically exposed then become predominant tumor sites? NO such link has ever been documented. Many people have suffered acute toxicity (poisoning)from overexposure to IPA in theraputic contexts, but no suspect cancers were reported. From OSHA: Epidemiological studies suggested an association between isopropyl alcohol and paranasal sinus cancer; however, subsequent analysis suggests that the "strong-acid" process used to manufacture isopropyl alcohol may be responsible for these cancers [ACGIH 1991]. The International Agency for Research on Cancer has concluded that the evidence for the carcinogenicity of this process is adequate but that the evidence for isopropyl alcohol itself is inadequate [IARC 1987]. --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "mikezcnc" <eemikez@c...> wrote: > Stefan, > > I would like three issues answered by a chemist and or pharmacist > (although here I suspect that argument would be made that since it is > used for rubbing then it must be ok: > > 1. The web search reveals that IPA causes cancer. We might get into > semantics on that one, but we should not use an argument of rubbing > alcohol being healthy, therfeore and the reason being that that > discussion might turn in to medical subject which I won't get into. I > know it is carcinogennic and if someone believes otherwise, I can > respect that.
Message
Re: Plating thruholes. Is ther an easy way ?
2004-08-03 by jimbo_1490
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.