Agreed, Stefan. I never said that people should not convert xerox conductors. I enjoy that subject and reading about it that people do dare things and come out successfel, like yourself. That impresses me, but I would not do that myself anymore. I might have hinted that if people value their time a lot then the economical way is HC200. Enough beating that already dead horse. Mike --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Stefan Trethan <stefan_trethan@g...> wrote: > > When I used ironing, I tried all > > kinds of combinations, high temp, preheating in hte oven and > > pressure. I should have said in my posts that while it worked on > > small boards, I could not a make a pCB, say, 4"x6" that way. That's > > why I kept looking. If one wants to make 1"x1" or 2"x2" or maybe even > > 3"x3" they might be able to use a regular hot iron. It's the > > unpredictability of the standard process that lead me to HC200 > > laminator. > > I agree with you (for once ;-) ). > Using the iron is very hard to reproduce, 'specially with bigger boards. > This is much easier with a laminator as speed, pressure (though it is lower > on a big board) is constant. > > I'd say it is a good idea to provide the HC 200 laminator as a "no hassle" > solution. But there are some people who actually have time and no money > and like to convert a fuser. > I hope entered the HC 200 in the groups database section soon because > this is the place where one should go to learn about working combinations. > > ST
Message
Re: Beginner questions on building a homebrew TT laminator
2004-07-30 by mikezcnc
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.