Homebrew PCBs

No, of course not, I respect every hacker there is, but I value the 
time a lot more these days and I wish I knew about that 'golden' mix 
of HC200 laminator and 'Gootee paper' a year ago (I don't say other 
papers don't work, I just tried it and it stuck to PCB like I've 
never seen before and I tried quite a bit of them). In fact, it was 
when Gootee mentioned the Staples paper, I made a mental connection 
between info from www.pulsar.gs about the laminator HC 200 and the 
Staples paper itself. What I saw was infinitely better than all kinds 
of irons, iron presses and screenprinter's heat presses that I tried. 
I am now very entusiastic about TT and the HC laminator and I want to 
make sure that everybody hears about it so they have a choice between 
having a TT PCB in one afternoon or possibly never. There are quite a 
few research guys lurking around this board and I can see then just 
running to the nearest Staples store.  Mike

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Stefan Trethan 
<stefan_trethan@g...> wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:50:19 -0000, mikezcnc <eemikez@c...> wrote:
> 
> > Why is it a wrong statement that HC200 and Gootee paper is not all
> > there is to TT? You don't have to make any changes to it if doing
> > 0.040 PCBs. And small chenges for 0.060 IAW provided link
> > www.pulsar.gs
> >
> >
> > I agree with the rest of your post but it is unrelated to what I
> > wrote.  Mike
> >
> >
> 
> Possibly a misunderstanding.
> I interpreted it as "by the thing there is nothing else worth 
thinking 
> about".
> 
> ST